View Full Version : Criterion sets Kurosawa's "Ran" for May 12, 2009...


ccfixx
02-13-09, 07:22 PM
Did everyone see this? Ran (http://www.criterion.com/films/754)

CC

RDarrylR
02-13-09, 07:23 PM
And another i'll have to buy. :)

spectator
02-13-09, 07:34 PM
Sold- to the man in the drool-soaked shirt!

cnikirk
02-13-09, 08:22 PM
Outstanding, good news indeed.

paku
02-13-09, 08:38 PM
Will be very interesting to see how this turns out. DVD Beaver just reviewed the Japanese release (http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film/DVDCompare2/ran.htm) from the Kurosawa box set and it looks like crap. As did the French HD DVD.

jvillain
02-13-09, 09:37 PM
* New, restored high-definition digital transfer

Looks promising.

giantchicken
02-13-09, 10:07 PM
Finally!!

I've been impatiently waiting for them to announce their first Kurosawa title on Blu-ray. Not really my first choice, but I'll take it!

ccfixx
02-13-09, 11:05 PM
* New, restored high-definition digital transfer

Looks promising.

Just remember that the "new, restored high-definition digital transfer" offered by Criterion should still be the last transfer they created in 2005 for the standard DVD release. We should, at least, get better color reproduction through the higher bit-rate of the blu-ray.

CC

rlsmith
02-14-09, 12:23 AM
This is a wonderful film but I am afraid I will have to see it before I purchase it.

I am very disappointed with Criterion's efforts on The Last Emperor so I feel the need to preview whatever they do before buying it.

I suggest that fans of this film proceed with great caution.

oink
02-14-09, 01:20 AM
This is a wonderful film but I am afraid I will have to see it before I purchase it.

I am very disappointed with Criterion's efforts on The Last Emperor so I feel the need to preview whatever they do before buying it.

I suggest that fans of this film proceed with great caution.

Sadly, I have to agree.
Ran is a classic, but I am not interested in purchasing another POS release from Criterion.

JBlacklow
02-14-09, 09:53 AM
Other than the AR, which was not a Criterion decision, what was wrong with it?

lordcloud
02-14-09, 10:00 AM
I can't wait for this one!

Rob Tomlin
02-14-09, 12:53 PM
Wow, looks like I will be buying this title for the third time!

Simply an outstanding movie. All of Kurosawa's prior experience culminated with this masterpiece.

Anyone want to buy my Criterion DVD version? :)

ZebraMajor
02-14-09, 01:40 PM
Other than the AR, which was not a Criterion decision, what was wrong with it?

Well it didn't both the theatrical and extended TV cut like the DVD release had. Just pointing that out.

oink
02-14-09, 02:31 PM
Other than the AR, which was not a Criterion decision, what was wrong with it?

NO lossless surround track.
Video is often extremely soft.
A grain pig (where is Lowry when you need them?;)).
Oh, and of course, no OAR.

If Criterion wishes to retain their rep as a great AV quality label, then it needs to put some serious thought into their BD releases going forward.

If this master was the best available for TLE, then the BD shouldn't have been released IMO.

spectator
02-14-09, 03:04 PM
Wow, looks like I will be buying this title for the third time!

This release will be #5, for me.

spectator
02-14-09, 03:05 PM
If Criterion wishes to retain their rep as a great AV quality label, then it needs to put some serious thought into their BD releases going forward.

Yeah! No more of this horrible crap like The Third Man and Chungking Express. :rolleyes:

Rob Tomlin
02-14-09, 04:25 PM
Yeah! No more of this horrible crap like The Third Man and Chungking Express. :rolleyes:

He's probably talking about not wanting more crap (pardon the pun!) like Salo:

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1107007&highlight=salo

BuckNaked
02-14-09, 04:36 PM
meeeh....I'll stick with the DVD on this one.

oink
02-14-09, 05:36 PM
Yeah! No more of this horrible crap like The Third Man and Chungking Express. :rolleyes:
Dude, ya didn't read my post closely!;)
I was answering JBlacklow's post, who was asking about my opinion regarding TLE.
No one said a word about TTM or CE.:p

spectator
02-14-09, 05:54 PM
Oh, I understood your post. I just thought it was a little much to make such a general statement about Criterion needing "to put some thought" into it. You can accuse them of many things, but probably not of not thinking about what they're doing.

IanRW
02-14-09, 08:32 PM
If this master was the best available for TLE, then the BD shouldn't have been released IMO.

I strongly disagree with this. I'm not going to complain about the quality of a below-average master provided it doesn't have easily avoidable flaws such as DNR and EE.

Also, having Lowry do clean-up on every single catalog release just isn't feasible. I don't place my expectations that high.

oink
02-15-09, 02:21 AM
You can accuse them of many things, but probably not of not thinking about what they're doing.There is a HUGE difference between putting out a 1920x1080/24p BD and a 480i DVD.
BTW, I don't recall many complaints about their LDs and DVDs over the years.


I strongly I'm not going to complain about the quality of a below-average masterI will...every time.:)
Failure to do so only invites more below-average masters.


Also, having Lowry do clean-up on every single catalog release just isn't feasible.
You're right, it isn't feasible.;)
BUT it is feasible for encodes to be derived from high quality masters.

mhafner
02-15-09, 04:18 AM
NO lossless surround track.
Video is often extremely soft.
A grain pig (where is Lowry when you need them?;)).
Oh, and of course, no OAR..

I want no Lowry interfering with my transfers unless restoration is required. The Criterion transfer is from the camera negative. So if there are soft shots it's the way it was shot. And the grain is on the negative. I don't want it removed.

paku
02-15-09, 07:13 AM
But the transfer of The Last Emperor wasn't done by Criterion though, was it?

sayitisntsony
02-15-09, 11:02 AM
Dude, ya didn't read my post closely!;)
I was answering JBlacklow's post, who was asking about my opinion regarding TLE.
No one said a word about TTM or CE.:p

You did say "I am not interested in purchasing another POS release from Criterion". The word 'another' implies buying a POS from Criterion happens with enough regularity to be wary of.

I have dozens of their DVDs and a few of the BDs, so far no POS. Your original post seems to slam Criterion with a wide brush, IMO.

oink
02-15-09, 06:43 PM
I want no Lowry interfering with my transfers unless restoration is required.
Like I said, I would like to see TLE given a "Lowry-type treatment."
If a restoration is what was needed for a great BD, then great, let's do it post-haste.:)


You did say "I am not interested in purchasing another POS release from Criterion". The word 'another' implies buying a POS from Criterion happens with enough regularity to be wary of.

I have dozens of their DVDs and a few of the BDs, so far no POS. Your original post seems to slam Criterion with a wide brush, IMO.

Again...I was referring to the BD of TLE.

BTW, I have approx. 1/3 of the Criterion Collection on DVD in my library.;)

ChrisWiggles
02-15-09, 06:56 PM
I am very excited. Their treatment of the DVD of this film was fantastic, so the BR should be equally excellent, but in HD finally!

giantchicken
04-03-09, 01:46 PM
Dang!! Cancelled.

The 2 disc set is now out of print and along with that apparently goes the rights to the Blu-ray release. This is disappointing...


"Criterion's two-disc special edition of RAN is now out of print, and the previously announced Blu-ray edition has been withdrawn from the schedule due to a rights issue."

Deviation
04-03-09, 04:05 PM
Yeah, apparently the US rights are currently held by Genius Productions, of which The Weinstein Company owns a majority share. They ran into some kind of trouble in negotiations if what I've been reading is correct.

Dan Average
04-04-09, 12:15 AM
That's what I thought too, but it turns out the Weinsteins sold their majority share back in February. The new majority owners are these guys (http://quadrantig.com/). I'm guessing they're the culprit.

ChrisWiggles
04-04-09, 12:17 AM
This is crap. They need to lock these people in a room with no food and water until they figure it out. Ran is the greatest film of all time. It needs to be out in HD. And it needs to be Criterion or somebody trusted to handle it properly and not muss it up. The Criterion DVD was exceptional, we need that but in 1080p done by hand.

bosque11
04-04-09, 04:58 AM
The DVD PQ was good but not exceptional, too much edge-enhancement which will probably reappear on the Blu-Ray disc, when it is eventually released.

Rob Tomlin
04-04-09, 01:08 PM
The DVD PQ was good but not exceptional, too much edge-enhancement which will probably reappear on the Blu-Ray disc, when it is eventually released.

Way to have a positive attitude!

bosque11
04-04-09, 03:12 PM
Way to have a positive attitude!

Do you find that it affects the picture quality ?

Rob Tomlin
04-04-09, 03:28 PM
Do you find that it affects the picture quality ?

Just as much as thinking the eventual Blu-ray release will have EE.

bosque11
04-04-09, 05:12 PM
Just as much as thinking the eventual Blu-ray release will have EE.

Have you actually seen any of the numerous DVD releases of Ran ? Nobody would be more delighted than me to see a Blu-ray release free of most of the faults that were seen on the Criterion DVD.

Rob Tomlin
04-04-09, 06:56 PM
Have you actually seen any of the numerous DVD releases of Ran ? Nobody would be more delighted than me to see a Blu-ray release free of most of the faults that were seen on the Criterion DVD.

Yes, I own two of them, including the Criterion release, and I agree with you completely.

I'm just hoping for the best for one of the greatest movies ever made.

BTW, all DVD versions of Lawrence of Arabia have issues, including EE as well, but I am being optimistic that the Blu-ray version will not have those issues. Am I being unrealistic and overly optimistic? Time will tell.