Bigredhunk
02-16-09, 03:26 AM
After having a few problems with my old set (Panny TH-42PX6U?...whichever model was popular back in 2006), I had to return it about 6 weeks ago. So, I've been searching for a new HDTV for the past few weeks. Not sure whether I'll go with an LCD or a Plasma. Most on here are Plasma backers. I loved mine before the problems started. Great picture! They're tougher to find now, especially at Scum's Club (I saw 2 or 3, the rest were LCD's).
I went to Costco today, looking for something to get me through until I find one I really want (then this "transition" set is being sold to a family member so I can recoup some of the $$). Costco had a much better selection than Scum's. Unfortunately, it's about 115 miles away (Scum's is 25) and I only have a car. Hauling a huge set is a pain (take it out of the box, break the box down, etc...), so I was looking for something at 46" or less (which would fit into my back seat, still in the box).
I settled on the Panny TH-C42HD18 because of the price. I don't want to spend a fortune on something I won't be keeping. I also was drawn to Panasonic because I liked my old set so much. The floor model was manufactured summer '08, so I figured one out of the box would be as new or newer (which I like). I noticed this set has fewer HDMI inputs than my old one did (two instead of four). I figured this was a way of keeping the cost low to make a more budget-friendly tv. Othewise, I assumed this would be about the same as my old tv.
It was manufactured 1/09, which is outstanding. However, the picture leaves much to be desired. I've been without an HDTV for about 6 weeks now, but my memory isn't that bad. My old tv looked much better than this one. So I'm thinking either there's some setting I don't have right, there's something I've not done -OR- this is just a cheapo set that doesn't have high PQ. Does this make sense to anyone? It didn't look that great in the store either, but I figured it was the bright lights.
I connected the tv to my Dish Network HD receiver....turned it on.....selected "English" for language, set the clock, etc.. I then started flipping through the channels to see what I could see. I'm not impressed. The picture isn't very sharp. Could I be doing something wrong?
I simply hooked it up to my Dish Network HD receiver via HDMI cable (whereas I had my old Panny hooked up via composite cables, or, more specifically, through the composite ports but used the cheesy red/white/yellow cables). I changed the picture setting to the most attractive setting. There does seem to be a difference between the HD channels and their SD counterparts, but it seems to be a slight difference. I'm just not seeing the same "pop" on the HD channels as I did with my old set (which came off the line 2/06, if memory serves). It reads that I'm receiving the signal in 1080i. Not sure why it doesn't look that great.
There haven't been many posts re: this model, so I'm assuming not a lot of people have it. I'm just wondering from those that do own it and/or know more than I do about this stuff (everyone)....what the H is up with this set? Has anyone else been less than impressed with it?
I went to Costco today, looking for something to get me through until I find one I really want (then this "transition" set is being sold to a family member so I can recoup some of the $$). Costco had a much better selection than Scum's. Unfortunately, it's about 115 miles away (Scum's is 25) and I only have a car. Hauling a huge set is a pain (take it out of the box, break the box down, etc...), so I was looking for something at 46" or less (which would fit into my back seat, still in the box).
I settled on the Panny TH-C42HD18 because of the price. I don't want to spend a fortune on something I won't be keeping. I also was drawn to Panasonic because I liked my old set so much. The floor model was manufactured summer '08, so I figured one out of the box would be as new or newer (which I like). I noticed this set has fewer HDMI inputs than my old one did (two instead of four). I figured this was a way of keeping the cost low to make a more budget-friendly tv. Othewise, I assumed this would be about the same as my old tv.
It was manufactured 1/09, which is outstanding. However, the picture leaves much to be desired. I've been without an HDTV for about 6 weeks now, but my memory isn't that bad. My old tv looked much better than this one. So I'm thinking either there's some setting I don't have right, there's something I've not done -OR- this is just a cheapo set that doesn't have high PQ. Does this make sense to anyone? It didn't look that great in the store either, but I figured it was the bright lights.
I connected the tv to my Dish Network HD receiver....turned it on.....selected "English" for language, set the clock, etc.. I then started flipping through the channels to see what I could see. I'm not impressed. The picture isn't very sharp. Could I be doing something wrong?
I simply hooked it up to my Dish Network HD receiver via HDMI cable (whereas I had my old Panny hooked up via composite cables, or, more specifically, through the composite ports but used the cheesy red/white/yellow cables). I changed the picture setting to the most attractive setting. There does seem to be a difference between the HD channels and their SD counterparts, but it seems to be a slight difference. I'm just not seeing the same "pop" on the HD channels as I did with my old set (which came off the line 2/06, if memory serves). It reads that I'm receiving the signal in 1080i. Not sure why it doesn't look that great.
There haven't been many posts re: this model, so I'm assuming not a lot of people have it. I'm just wondering from those that do own it and/or know more than I do about this stuff (everyone)....what the H is up with this set? Has anyone else been less than impressed with it?