Hrimnir
02-22-09, 03:38 PM
Ok guys, so i'm getting ready to piece together a new setup. This will be my first "quality" system (i'm runnin a Sony HTIB atm) so i wanna do it right the first time around. That being said i also don't want to overspend for marginal differences.
Right now my budget/wallet likes the idea of an RF-10 setup as it would run about $1400. I am trying to determine whether spending the extra on RF-52's L/R, RC-52 C, and rs-42's for surrounding, and possibly an RW-10d over the RW-10 would be a worthwhile investment.
Basically what i need to know from people with experience is whether the extra ~750 dollars is actually going to produce an appreciable sound quality difference. I know the 5.25" on the RF-52's are going to be able to produce a lower frequency sound than the RF-10s, but since i am going to have a dedicated sub is this truly neccesary?
Edit: Also wanted to mention this setup would be 90% of the time used for movie watching and rarely for music (basically when im cleaning the kitchen or something like that i'll toss on some MP3's or Pandora on my HTPC).
These would be paired with either a Marantz SR4003 or SR5003, i still havent nailed down the receiver yet, but i understand that pairing klipsch with marantz helps tame the highs the klipsch have a natural tendendancy towards.
I also had a question regarding the subs. Besides having an electronically adjustable crossover and an extra 60w RMS, is the RW-10d really worth the extra $170 over the RW-10?
Sorry if these all seem like newb questions.
Also, just wanted to mention i did check the local Klipsch dealer and unfortunately they didnt have any RF-10's setup for demo, only rf-62's and rf-82's. So i got to hear the 62's which i suspect are probably pretty similar to the 52's. Either way, thanks for all your time guys ;)
Right now my budget/wallet likes the idea of an RF-10 setup as it would run about $1400. I am trying to determine whether spending the extra on RF-52's L/R, RC-52 C, and rs-42's for surrounding, and possibly an RW-10d over the RW-10 would be a worthwhile investment.
Basically what i need to know from people with experience is whether the extra ~750 dollars is actually going to produce an appreciable sound quality difference. I know the 5.25" on the RF-52's are going to be able to produce a lower frequency sound than the RF-10s, but since i am going to have a dedicated sub is this truly neccesary?
Edit: Also wanted to mention this setup would be 90% of the time used for movie watching and rarely for music (basically when im cleaning the kitchen or something like that i'll toss on some MP3's or Pandora on my HTPC).
These would be paired with either a Marantz SR4003 or SR5003, i still havent nailed down the receiver yet, but i understand that pairing klipsch with marantz helps tame the highs the klipsch have a natural tendendancy towards.
I also had a question regarding the subs. Besides having an electronically adjustable crossover and an extra 60w RMS, is the RW-10d really worth the extra $170 over the RW-10?
Sorry if these all seem like newb questions.
Also, just wanted to mention i did check the local Klipsch dealer and unfortunately they didnt have any RF-10's setup for demo, only rf-62's and rf-82's. So i got to hear the 62's which i suspect are probably pretty similar to the 52's. Either way, thanks for all your time guys ;)