No technical info as yet but it's listed here in New Zealand for 16 December 2009 release. Sony Pictures, aspect ratio 1.78:1.

Looking forward to this one. F**king prawns!

http://www.mightyape.co.nz/product/District-9/3196958/

One of the top 5 movies of the year...without a doubt.

One of the top 5 movies of the year...without a doubt.

Agreed.

These prawns were not seasoned to taste - I got suckered in along with the family, and found this to be an unsatisfying mess of a movie. Wife almost made me walk out. Oddly, my mother liked it - she's not often into these things, and absolutely doesn't get the LOTR movies, but liked this. Huh.

Loved the technical aspects and what they attempted, but the story was just nonexistent as far as I was concerned. No characters I could care about. The friend I saw it with and I got into heated arguments with other friends over it. ;)

There are a few story issues but I would say that the movie is mostly a success. And it has the best CGI you can get without spending a quarter of a billion(I'm looking at you Spiderman 3, not that it was bad, it was just so damn expensive).

I'm looking forward to the audio on this one.:D

Personally I thought this was refreshing in the sense that when I see aliens that are stronger than humans and have better weapons I want to see limbs getting ripped off and heads exploding.:cool:

Most alien movies don't go the extra step and make the movie rated R. I think King Kong would have been improved if it showed him turning humans into pulp...I mean he's a freaking giant gorilla.

One of the top 5 movies of the year...without a doubt.

That is a poor assessment of Hollywood. I found it a tired, old reprise of a thousand cop flicks.

That is a poor assessment of Hollywood. I found it a tired, old reprise of a thousand cop flicks.A) This wasn't a Hollywood movie. It was an indie flick that got support from Peter Jackson.

B) If all you saw was basically a cop flick, you were missing out on every single point the movie was trying to make. That's pretty hard, considering only a few of those points were subtle.

B) If all you saw was basically a cop flick, you were missing out on every single point the movie was trying to make. That's pretty hard, considering only a few of those points were subtle.

+1

This blew most Hollywood movies made the last couple of years out of the waters.

B) If all you saw was basically a cop flick, you were missing out on every single point the movie was trying to make. That's pretty hard, considering only a few of those points were subtle.
+2. An excellent movie about intolerance in a sci-fi wrapper. Had me thinking for days, unlike the usual and eminently forgettable alien/giant robot drivel.

Bring on the BD.

Meh it was ok. Inglourious Basterds was 10x better.

I LOVED this movie!! A true Sci/Fi masterpiece. Is that date also for US?

This one of the only movies I am without question excited for to come out on Blu Ray so I can watch it over and over and share it with my friends.

Saw this in the theatre and I liked it very much, interesting approach in disguising a story about intolerance and inequity as an action/sci-fi flick. Could have never been made in Hollywood. I'm looking forward to the BD release.

A) This wasn't a Hollywood movie. It was an indie flick that got support from Peter Jackson.

Not true. Peter Jackson and Sony were involved in the project from the beginning. "Low budget" and "Indie" are not synonymous terms. And really, $30 million is hardly "low budget." A "modest budget," yes, especially for a film of this scale. But hardly low.

To be fair, it's not really a "Hollywood" film either, though with today's complex financing, production and distribution practices, hardly anything is. "Studio Film" would be the best label.

It's a decent flick, though I thought it had some pretty major character and tone issues.

You shouldn't spend the majority of your first act mocking your lead if you expect the audience to empathize with him in the second and third, and the switch in tone from black comedy to pure action is fairly jarring.

Should make for a nice disc though.

I am hoping this makes a great BD!!

I'm not affraid of blind buys, but this one, I dunno, I heard too many mixed views from friends I usually agree with, it wasn't like a slam dunk one way or the other anyway, some really liked it, some said "heh, not that good"...so for me then, this screams "rental first, then purchase if it rocks." Hope its good though, sure looked fresh/interesting from the previews.

I saw it in the theaters after much anticipation only to come away uninspired. I liked the premise, but didnt really get into the movie. I am not really sure what it was missing, I just felt it was missing something substantial (more backstory perhaps?).
Not going to be buying this one, may watch again though.

Heres to hoping that we are nearing the end of the "shaky cam"

IMO this is the best new movie I've seen all year. It was different, it was smart, and it effin rocked! Day one purchase for me.

Bring on District 10! Or whatever they decide to call the sequel.

Looking forward to this release as well. Film was kickass.

Saw this in the theatre and I liked it very much, interesting approach in disguising a story about intolerance and inequity as an action/sci-fi flick. Could have never been made in Hollywood. I'm looking forward to the BD release.

Gene Roddenberry, Rod Serling style. They both knew how to make statements about people and attitudes within an other world setting.

Can't wait to get this one. One of my favorite sci-fi movies of all time. Loved the whole premise. Loved how disgusting the aliens were. Loved that the main character was sort of a douche and took a while to convert over. And loved the the racism in the move was blatant but also very subtle (sort of what happens in this country nowadays).

I think it was certainly better than Peter Jackson's last effort in King Kong. Its not for everyone. Actually quite violent. Doesn't have characters you can really care for. But that's the point. Its not supposed to be perfect.

I got to say that I saw the harry potter movie the week before and thought that was a good movie...but this one just had my jaw dropped in shock at how good this was. And again, $30mn is not a lot of money. I believe The Hangover or one of those other comedies that came out this year cost about that much but obviously didn't have the same scope as this. That said, i'm sure anybody will throw a freebie Peter Jackson's way just to have their name attached to it.

Meh it was ok. Inglourious Basterds was 10x better.

perhaps..and not to hijack the thread, but a WWII movies based on fiction is a complete waste of time IMO.

Loved the hell out of this flick.

I thought this movie was a sci-fi geek's wet dream since there was
-lots of aliens
-fantastic cgi
-lots of cool alien technology/weapsons
-lots of violence

hasn't been a quality sci-fi movie in a long time imo

One of the best movies I've seen this past year. My friends and I were talking about it several days after seeing it. A day 1 purchase for me.

I'm not affraid of blind buys, but this one, I dunno, I heard too many mixed views from friends I usually agree with, it wasn't like a slam dunk one way or the other anyway, some really liked it, some said "heh, not that good"...so for me then, this screams "rental first, then purchase if it rocks." Hope its good though, sure looked fresh/interesting from the previews.

And what's more, one you've discovered how amazing it is, you'll know which half of your friends to stop hanging out with! ;)

perhaps..and not to hijack the thread, but a WWII movies based on fiction is a complete waste of time IMO.

Bad call. It's a revisionist-history Jewish revenge fantasy and is never less that mesmerizingly stupendous; I left the theater sporting a goofy, humiliating ear-to-ear grin, but I just couldn't stop. I pity anyone who chooses to not give it a chance...

Bad call. It's a revisionist-history Jewish revenge fantasy and is never less that mesmerizingly stupendous; I left the theater sporting a goofy, humiliating ear-to-ear grin, but I just couldn't stop. I pity anyone who chooses to not give it a chance...

As someone who would like to send Quintin to an island someone where he can live alone and never be heard from again...I would never waste my money on it.

As someone who would like to send Quintin to an island someone where he can live alone and never be heard from again...I would never waste my money on it.

Then I guess you're one of those people I pity, yes? ;)

part of a good sci fi book/movie, is to find the humanity in things that aren't human. wall-e pulled it off, and i think District 9 did as well. the main character did more than the standard metamorphosis throughout the course of the movie. and, that, was good story telling

Excellent music.

district 9 was phenonemal.

never since Alien,predator,terminator had i hoped to see a great sci fi movie again.

the story, the action, when they run that camera work is awesome. forget the garbage hollywood bourne supremacy, quatum of solace, new star trek camera work. district 9 show how you do it.

i am happy peter jackson understand the talent neil has. imagine neil doing a terminator, predator or alien movie. it would be gold. please dear god let this guy not get any freak accidents. basically put him in a vacuum chamber were he can work on movies.

thanks to Neil my fate in sci fi movies has been restored.

oh and will i buy this bluray? lol i would buy the usa version. the eu version , japnese version. whatever comes first.
need it and want to see it again.

movie looked marvelous for 40 million dollars.

so why didn't people actually like this movie?

I went into District 9 after hearing all the raves but after seeing the trailer thinking this would be a movie that I wouldn't like. I was glad to be proven wrong. One of my top 3 best movies so far of this year-

- District 9
- Ingloriuous Bastards
- Up

I was carefull to see almost no trailers or anything for this movie before I saw it. Loved every mintute of it and what it tries to say. Going to see it once more in the cinema before I buy the Blu-Ray later in the year.

Besides the film, the thing I couldnt stop thinking about after the film, that I would have loved to see the Halo film made by Blomkamp.

Awesome news. I thought this movie was awesome, and I am greatly looking forward to seeing it again on BD!

I went into District 9 after hearing all the raves but after seeing the trailer thinking this would be a movie that I wouldn't like. I was glad to be proven wrong. One of my top 3 best movies so far of this year-

- District 9
- Ingloriuous Bastards
- Up

I have to agree that these were the three best of the summer. I really liked District 9 a lot. Best science fiction movie to come out in a long, long time. Relevant, complex, and very violent. That being said, I think Up is one of the best movies in a decade. They have an animated movie where cartoon characters give a more nuanced performance than 99% of live action movies. This is not to knock the other two. I did wish IB had a more "historical" ending, but that was not the point, I suppose. I will be watching these three once a year for the rest of my life, so it was a damn good summer.

Great movie, day 1 purchase.

"Don't point your fookn tentacles at me mun"

I liked District 9, although I didn't exactly love it. The worst thing for me was the irritating news-cam style that went on way, way too long. This is one movie that I wouldn't expect to benefit much from BD, since the news-cam footage (i.e. half the movie) looked more like VHS quality. But aside from that, yes, a good original story that was well-executed.

Day one purchase for sure.

This movie was brilliant. I thought the last act (contrived though it was) completely wiped the floor with both of those terrible TRANSFORMERS pictures.

Bring on DISTRICT 10!!

This is one movie that I wouldn't expect to benefit much from BD, since the news-cam footage (i.e. half the movie) looked more like VHS quality.

So the other half that had amazing visual effects and a wild audio experience is moot?

+2. An excellent movie about intolerance in a sci-fi wrapper. Had me thinking for days, unlike the usual and eminently forgettable alien/giant robot drivel.

Bring on the BD.

+3. This movie is all about prejudice and intolerance with a sci-fi setting. And done very very well. Great flick.

Great nice sci-fi film with complcated story line that I never seen before,sure pick one.

UK release date announced - 28 December. ;)

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B002KCO1NS/ref=s9_sima_gw_s0_p74_t2?pf_rd_m=A3P5ROKL5A1OLE&pf_rd_s=center-2&pf_rd_r=0AVWTW2BMWEZAAE2KJAQ&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=467128533&pf_rd_i=468294

Should be a reference disc for Audio.

Blu-ray.com is reporting Dec. 29th for the US release:

Sony Pictures Home Entertainment has announced that they will bring the sci-fi blockbuster hit 'District 9' to Blu-ray on December 29th, day-and-date with the DVD release. This two-disc set will feature 1.85:1 1080p AVC video accompanied by a 5.1 DTS-HD Master Audio soundtrack.

Special features for this release include:

* movieIQ
* cinechat
* Joburg From Above: Satellite and Schematics of the World of District 9 - Interactive Map
* Director's Commentary
* Koobus Big Gun
* The Alien Agenda: A Filmmaker's Log Three-Part Documentary
* The Alien Agenda: A Filmmaker's Log - Chapter 3: Refining District 9
* Metamorphosis: The Transformation of Wikus
* Innovation: Acting and Improvisation
* Conception and Design: Creating the World of District 9
* Alien Generation: Visual Effects

http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=3523

The most cerebral & satisfying scifi entry since 'Contact'. With this announcement, I can't imagine a better way to end the year....better stock up on cat food (!) :rolleyes:

While I agree the tonal shifting was jarring all in all I thoroughly enjoyed this film.

I put this and Star Trek as my two favorite semi to major summer releases of 09.

while i agree the tonal shifting was jarring all in all i thoroughly enjoyed this film.

I put this and star trek as my two favorite semi to major summer releases of 09.

+1

very great news.I love this film so much even if the gun looked very much alike in the game,a grabbing gun.

The many prolonged hand cam scenes made me queasy, and my daugther lost her lunch!
I'll still buy it though.
Paul

The many prolonged hand cam scenes made me queasy, and my daugther lost her lunch!
I'll still buy it though.
Paul

Ha. Best quote ever. I should buy you one for making me laugh on a dull and uninspired evening.

The pre-order at Amazon (http://www.amazon.com/District-9-Blu-ray-Norman-Anstey/dp/B002SJIO5E) is live this morning.

Any rumors on a steelbook release for this one from futureshop or amazon.uk?

Should be a reference disc for Audio.I sure hope so. I'm looking forward to hearing some of those alien weapons on my rig at home.

The many prolonged hand cam scenes made me queasy, and my daugther lost her lunch!
I'll still buy it though.
Paul

The shakycam sequences are nowhere as nauseating and extensive as on 'Cloverfield' or 'Quarantine' (for the record, this method of shooting doesn't bother me, even tho I don't care for it). In any case, the effect should be less-pronounced on the smaller home screen. Sigh, I miss the good ol' days of wide, smooth & elegant tracking shots a la David Lean....I need 'LOA' on Blu -- stat! :(

The shakycam sequences are nowhere as nauseating and extensive as on 'Cloverfield' or 'Quarantine' (for the record, this method of shooting doesn't bother me, even tho I don't care for it). In any case, the effect should be less-pronounced on the smaller home screen. Sigh, I miss the good ol' days of wide, smooth & elegant tracking shots a la David Lean....I need 'LOA' on Blu -- stat! :(

Speaking of "genre" movies with great cinematography:

"Big Trouble in Little China" and "The Fog."

Both John Carpenter films, both DP'd by Dean Cundey.

Both film veterans "kick it" old school: let the action happen within the lingering frame. It even works when things get frantic on BTiLC. You can still tell what's going on and you are allowed to drink in the shot!

Even a relatively young buck like Wes Anderson understands this.

Unfortunately, some in the industry [cough]hacks![cough] like Michael Bay or Marc Forster have no concept of this style.

Pic of the artwork....

http://www.dvdactive.com/images/news/screenshot/2009/10/distrtict9blurayadpic1.jpg

District 9 is to be a hybrid disc and will include the E3 God of War demo for PS3 owners.

http://blog.us.playstation.com/2009/10/district-9-forged-together-with-god-of-war-iii/

District 9 is to be a hybrid disc and will include the E3 God of War demo for PS3 owners.

http://blog.us.playstation.com/2009/10/district-9-forged-together-with-god-of-war-iii/

That's pretty cool! I'm really looking forward to trying out the demo. Not like I needed another reason to own this movie though :)

EDIT: I just realized the God of War collection coming out in a few weeks also includes the demo, so its inclusion on the District 9 BD is not a big deal for me.

District 9 is to be a hybrid disc and will include the E3 God of War demo for PS3 owners.

http://blog.us.playstation.com/2009/10/district-9-forged-together-with-god-of-war-iii/

great, wonder what % of players won't play this without waiting a month for a firmware update. :rolleyes:

[and before you say it, yes, i'm sure the ps3 will play it just fine]

if they really want to cross promote this, just stick a ps3 demo disc in the package.

I bought the soundtrack off of iTunes last night. The opening track with the synths and the African chants sounded real good. But then it got repetitive. Musically, it has a number of elements that I enjoy but it lacks a signature theme and direction. Those 4 or 5 elements mixed around in different orders is basically the rest of the album. It just doesn't feel like it has an identity. Sonically it sounds authoritative. There is weight to the bass and it really supports the "action".
Clinton Shorter is the man responsible and I will be watching out for him.

Favorite movie of 2009 so far. Rarely is there an action/sci-fi that has a brain, let alone a message too. And the fact that it costs $30mil is just pure icing.

For die hard fans...
http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b212/iamjackspictures/cleva_fokken_prawn_tshirt-p23521575.jpg

This is a film I never got a chance to see in theatres this past summer. I am definitely looking forward to this release! I'll likely rent and not buy it, but either way I hope to enjoy it!

I got the God of War 3 demo and it's a 2671 MB download, so it will not be taking up a lot of space on the BD-50. However I dont see why they dont just include a download code for the demo.

For die hard fans...
http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b212/iamjackspictures/cleva_fokken_prawn_tshirt-p23521575.jpg
That's awesome. But I thought they were "Fookers"?

DATE CHANGE: December 22

Hi

What are the chances that this will be a region free release?
I am thinking of scoring one off Amazon UK or Australia, if I happen to drop by.
I have a Region A PS 3.

Thanks

What are the chances that this will be a region free release?

As a Sony release, I'd say high.

This is a film I never got a chance to see in theatres this past summer. I am definitely looking forward to this release! I'll likely rent and not buy it, but either way I hope to enjoy it!

This did not sink in with me right away. I was a bit turned off by the documentary-type feel to the movie. However, after a few days of discussing with friends, contemplating all the different parts, I have really grown in anticipation to purchase when it comes out.

It is a pretty solid story.

This did not sink in with me right away. I was a bit turned off by the documentary-type feel to the movie. However, after a few days of discussing with friends, contemplating all the different parts, I have really grown in anticipation to purchase when it comes out.

It is a pretty solid story.I'd say that's pretty much how I felt, too. Everything isn't spelled out for you, so it leaves plenty of discussion material.

I'd say that's pretty much how I felt, too. Everything isn't spelled out for you, so it leaves plenty of discussion material.

I cant wait to watch this at home.

I'd say that's pretty much how I felt, too. Everything isn't spelled out for you, so it leaves plenty of discussion material.

I thought it was pretty cut and dry.

I thought it was pretty cut and dry.
Where did they come from?

Who ran the ship?

How did the alien weapons (which should sound awesome on the BD) stay in circulation in D9?

What happened to the leaders of the alien race, since the prawns (other then Christopher) were all dumb as bricks? Christopher couldn't have been the only smart one to govern 2 million aliens.

Were Christopher's intentions honorable? Was he really going to come back and help Wickus, or was he just telling him what he wanted to hear so he'd help him break into the MNU headquarters to steal back the magic prawn juice?

Bad call. It's a revisionist-history Jewish revenge fantasy and is never less that mesmerizingly stupendous; I left the theater sporting a goofy, humiliating ear-to-ear grin, but I just couldn't stop. I pity anyone who chooses to not give it a chance...

i gave it a chance when bored in my hotel room last week. Like my original feeling it was a total waste of time.

Not sure why, but fictional movies around major well known parts of history tend to come off as a total waste. It would be like making a movie about US forces capturing bin laden within the first week of the war in Afghanistan which didn't happen, and would come off silly/stupid much like IB did if someone made a movie to that effect.

just my 2 cents.

It would be like making a movie about US forces capturing bin laden within the first week of the war in Afghanistan which didn't happen, and would come off silly/stupid much like IB did if someone made a movie to that effect.

If it was played with SCHINDLER'S LIST-level seriousness, sure, but if it was worked up with the impish joie de vivre found in INGLORIOUS BASTERDS, I say bring it on. IB wasn't trying to be an authentic history lesson on any level. It winked at the audience every bit as much as a Mirror Universe episode of STAR TREK or Bill and Ted's run-ins with historical figures. It seems to me you're not able/willing to get in the spirit of the thing, if you ask me...

If it was played with SCHINDLER'S LIST-level seriousness, sure, but if it was worked up with the impish joie de vivre found in INGLORIOUS BASTERDS, I say bring it on. IB wasn't trying to be an authentic history lesson on any level. It winked at the audience every bit as much as a Mirror Universe episode of STAR TREK or Bill and Ted's run-ins with historical figures. It seems to me you're not able/willing to get in the spirit of the thing, if you ask me...

meh...maybe I just stumbled on a genre/type of movie which doesnt do it for me.

Strange..cuz i did like Bill and Ted's!

Looks great but we already knew that. How's the sound?

Question: Where did they come from?
Answer: does it matter?

Question: Who ran the ship?
Answer: I would imagine it's automated with a handful of engineers, like Christopher

Question: How did the alien weapons (which should sound awesome on the BD) stay in circulation in D9?
Answer: the aforementioned engineers build them, they and the criminals hide them.

Question: What happened to the leaders of the alien race, since the prawns (other then Christopher) were all dumb as bricks? Christopher couldn't have been the only smart one to govern 2 million aliens.
Answer: again, likely just a worker transport, no leaders aboard. Since they are alien, they might not have the social problems we do, like violence against one another requiring such leadership.

Question: Were Christopher's intentions honorable? Was he really going to come back and help Wickus, or was he just telling him what he wanted to hear so he'd help him break into the MNU headquarters to steal back the magic prawn juice?
Answer: we are led to believe he was honest. I didn't see any reason to doubt it.

^ You're answers are merely speculation to my questions. A previous poster mentioned discussing and contemplating the movie with friends, which was met by another post that said it was cut and dry. You're answers simply prove the point of my questions, which was that there is plenty to wonder about.

I thought it was pretty cut and dry.
I'm reminded of Ringo in Yellow Submarine, when he says "But I don't have an imagination!"

Question: Where did they come from?
Answer: does it matter?
More Answer: While this question is left wide open, it doesn't make a bit of difference in terms of the story that was told. That was part of the magic of the story; it doesn't matter if you are from the next country over or from another part of the galaxy, mankind manages find ways to discriminate and impinge the rights of others when given the opportunity.

Question: Who ran the ship?
Answer: I would imagine it's automated with a handful of engineers, like Christopher
More Answer: Indeed, the ship could have been nothing more than a work-transport structure, for the most part automated with no need for user-controlled flight or course plotting. Those features could very well have been computer controlled, with the passenger workforce along for the ride when something went wrong. If YOU were a passenger going to your daily office job on an automated tram and the tram broke down, could YOU fix it?


Question: What happened to the leaders of the alien race, since the prawns (other then Christopher) were all dumb as bricks? Christopher couldn't have been the only smart one to govern 2 million aliens.
Answer: again, likely just a worker transport, no leaders aboard. Since they are alien, they might not have the social problems we do, like violence against one another requiring such leadership.
More Answer: My thought was that if there was any alien leadership, they might have A. abandoned the survivors at some point or B. this ship was part of a larger convoy and has gotten separated or lost due to some malfunction in the flight system

Looking forward to this. How would folks rate this movie that have seen ROTF, StarTrek, Salvation?

^ You're answers are merely speculation to my questions. A previous poster mentioned discussing and contemplating the movie with friends, which was met by another post that said it was cut and dry. You're answers simply prove the point of my questions, which was that there is plenty to wonder about.

I thought his answers were pretty cut and dry.

I thought his answers were pretty cut and dry.What are you doing here? I thought you'd be watching Transformers 2.

To the other poster who "answered" my questions - once again, like the one who answered before you, you're simply proving my point - the movie leaves plenty do speculate on without clear answers. Personally, that was one of the things I really liked about the movie.

What are you doing here? I thought you'd be watching Transformers 2.

To the other poster who "answered" my questions - once again, like the one who answered before you, you're simply proving my point - the movie leaves plenty do speculate on without clear answers. Personally, that was one of the things I really liked about the movie.

Yes, but it wasn't obtuse or hard to follow. Ad really, if they were never to make a sequel the slight open endedness of it all would benefit the picture.

Looking forward to this. How would folks rate this movie that have seen ROTF, StarTrek, Salvation?Not as fun as Star Trek. This movie is very serious in nature. It's not a "happy" movie by any means. I'd call it dirty, ugly, intense, and very un-Hollywood. To me, it was much better than Salvation, and in a completely different league that ROTF. But, as always, opinions vary.

Yes, but it wasn't obtuse or hard to follow.Exactly. I think the questions I posted are being misinterpreted as me wishing they were answered. Quite the opposite. I'm glad they weren't.

Exactly. I think the questions I posted are being misinterpreted as me wishing they were answered. Quite the opposite. I'm glad they weren't.

You complete me.

^ You're answers are merely speculation to my questions. A previous poster mentioned discussing and contemplating the movie with friends, which was met by another post that said it was cut and dry. You're answers simply prove the point of my questions, which was that there is plenty to wonder about.

It's a movie. You're never going to get answers to those questions beyond reasonable speculation.

Looking forward to this. How would folks rate this movie that have seen ROTF, StarTrek, Salvation?

If Hollywood could produce this kind of thing on 30 million all the time, they wouldn't be begging people to hit the theaters or trying to employ gimmicks like 3D. It's quite different than the others mentioned. Even darker than Salvation.

If Hollywood could produce this kind of thing on 30 million all the time, they wouldn't be begging people to hit the theaters or trying to employ gimmicks like 3D. It's quite different than the others mentioned. Even darker than Salvation.

I agree, but to be fair it did have some tonal issues resulting in the black comedy style it was made with. Some scenes were overly dark and very ethically challenging while others were satirically humorous and borderline comedic.

But in a way its what made it good...

It's a movie. You're never going to get answers to those questions beyond reasonable speculation.

That's the entire point I was making. I'd much rather have a movie like this, than one that spells everything out from A to Z. This movie doesn't spell things out, and that was the point of my questions. Until an information providing sequel (or prequel), all we can do is speculate and draw our own conclusions. Good movies make you think, and keep you thinking about them later. This one worked for me.

What is everyones opinion on doing a blind buy on this? Good replay value as far as the actual film is concerned?

Just that scene with the "robot" alone has great replay value. I liken it to the gas station scene in Salvation. When I saw it in the theatres, I was turned off a bit by the journalistic/documentary look. I was hoping for a straight shot action sequence style with great PQ. In the end, I didn't mind it because the documentary style was mostly in the beginning and didn't get in the way of the action. Rather, it augmented the story without having to go through an elaborate background story.

I think sb1's (and mine, for that matter) point is not to find out answers to those questions literally. But having those unknowns (rhetorical questions, if you will) help add intrigue and value to the movie experience. The underlying motivations and decisions open up post-movie dialogue. Those were the types of discussions I was speaking about.

So, for under $18, it's a day 1 purchase for me. Actually, I already bit on the BB pre-sell so I'm partly committed. :D

What is everyones opinion on doing a blind buy on this? Good replay value as far as the actual film is concerned?
Personally it's alien movie I always wanted to see, but no one had the balls or know-how to do it.

You get semi-handheld photography(that does go away at times), some of the most convincing CGI ever(POTC 2 good:eek:), an excellent mix, an okay story(it's a great film, but the story just doesn't have enough meat), and solid acting.

Better than that though - you get to see body parts explode after getting hit by alien weapons and aliens that are strong enough to rip off limbs and leave them bloody. Plus it has mecha(or should that be a mecha?).

So a PG-13 Halo movie(someone do it), won't work well.

Personally it's alien movie I always wanted to see, but no one had the balls or know-how to do it.Now THAT is a good way to describe D9.

You get semi-handheld photography(that does go away at times), some of the most convincing CGI ever(POTC 2 good:eek:), an excellent mix, an okay story(it's a great film, but the story just doesn't have enough meat), and solid acting.I kind of agree and disagree here. The story was solid to me, but it was clearly based on material that wasn't that original or hard to recognize.

Better than that though - you get to see body parts explode after getting hit by alien weapons and aliens that are strong enough to rip off limbs and leave them bloody. Plus it has mecha(or should that be a mecha?). Does it get any better than that?

Thanks guys. I am in:)

Thanks guys. I am in:)

Looking forward to it's release also:)

Does it get any better than that?

Pig gun!!

My wife is currently fixing an appetizer consisting of a bowl of white shrimp. I walked into the kitchen, grabbed it, and yelled out "CLEVA FOOKIN' PRAWNS!!!". Considering she (nor anyone else here) has seen the movie, I think I'm the only one who found it even slightly amusing.

My wife is currently fixing an appetizer consisting of a bowl of white shrimp. I walked into the kitchen, grabbed it, and yelled out "CLEVA FOOKIN' PRAWNS!!!". Considering she (nor anyone else here) has seen the movie, I think I'm the only one who found it even slightly amusing.

You should also refer to all the males as "Cap" and the ladies as "Betty".

My wife is currently fixing an appetizer consisting of a bowl of white shrimp. I walked into the kitchen, grabbed it, and yelled out "CLEVA FOOKIN' PRAWNS!!!". Considering she (nor anyone else here) has seen the movie, I think I'm the only one who found it even slightly amusing.

It's still fun to quote a movie or show even though there is a good chance your audience has no idea what the reference is. I work with a lady named Mindy and she is ALWAYS "Mindy from the Network" when I refer to her. Now other folks in the office refer to her that way since they have heard it so much. (from Bolt)

my wife is currently fixing an appetizer consisting of a bowl of white shrimp. I walked into the kitchen, grabbed it, and yelled out "cleva fookin' prawns!!!". Considering she (nor anyone else here) has seen the movie, i think i'm the only one who found it even slightly amusing.

:)

Yes, but it wasn't obtuse or hard to follow. Ad really, if they were never to make a sequel the slight open endedness of it all would benefit the picture.

Actually, this is the true brilliance of the film. Like Shakespeare, who would write in a style to appeal to multiple audiences ... there is as much story as you care to look for. If all you want is a sci-fi flick, you got it. If you cared about the not-subtle apartheid angle, you got that too. If you cared to delve even deeper into "universe" crafted in the film, or the more subtle declarations on racism or humanity, it was all there for you.

The "answers" some of you have given to the questions posed just bear that out. It was really quite masterfully done.

Actually, this is the true brilliance of the film. Like Shakespeare, who would write in a style to appeal to multiple audiences ... there is as much story as you care to look for. If all you want is a sci-fi flick, you got it. If you cared about the not-subtle apartheid angle, you got that too. If you cared to delve even deeper into "universe" crafted in the film, or the more subtle declarations on racism or humanity, it was all there for you.

The "answers" some of you have given to the questions posed just bear that out. It was really quite masterfully done.Well said. It's also made me very excited to see Neill Blomkamp's next film (whatever it may be). I'm hoping D9 wasn't a fluke for him, and that he just has some serious talent for film making.

Actually, this is the true brilliance of the film. Like Shakespeare, who would write in a style to appeal to multiple audiences ... there is as much story as you care to look for. If all you want is a sci-fi flick, you got it. If you cared about the not-subtle apartheid angle, you got that too. If you cared to delve even deeper into "universe" crafted in the film, or the more subtle declarations on racism or humanity, it was all there for you.

The "answers" some of you have given to the questions posed just bear that out. It was really quite masterfully done.

Could not agree more... by far the best movie of the summer and I loved Star Trek and Inglorious Basterds.

I read someone say that if you merged Black Hawk Down, Aliens, and The Thing you would have the awesomeness that is District 9. This was a brilliant movie that I was very excited to see in theaters and my expectations were far exceeded. Why was I one of only like three people that laughed during the Prawn practice fire scene?

"DON'T POINT YOUR FOKKEN TENTACLES AT ME MUN!!!"

Could not agree more... by far the best movie of the summer and I loved Star Trek and Inglorious Basterds.

I read someone say that if you merged Black Hawk Down, Aliens, and The Thing you would have the awesomeness that is District 9. This was a brilliant movie that I was very excited to see in theaters and my expectations were far exceeded. Why was I one of only like three people that laughed during the Prawn practice fire scene?

"DON'T POINT YOUR FOKKEN TENTACLES AT ME MUN!!!"Did you really make that your gamertag (in your sig)?

Did you really make that your gamertag (in your sig)?

yes sir:p The thought of someone yelling "FOKKEN PRAWN!" in frustration after being killed by me was too funny to pass up, besides it has a nice ring to it;) So I guess the next question is where is the game for this movie?

yes sir:p The thought of someone yelling "FOKKEN PRAWN!" in frustration after being killed by me was too funny to pass up, besides it has a nice ring to it;) So I guess the next question is where is the game for this movie?Maybe I'll run into you on Live one day and the screen will say "Killed by FokkenPrawn".:p

Just got back from some Xmas shopping and am so proud to be a south African today- I have my pal retail copy sitting next to me, so allow me to
blow my own horn and say yay!
Finally we get something before everyone else!
Pics of box and screenshots coming soon
dts hd audio
bd50
you all know the rest
now I'm off to watch :)

bless my hometown of Johannesburg, now officially called district 9

Picked this up in NYC today....looks freaking amazing. Without a doubt a reference quality video presentation.

This must be one of the ugliest movies ever. It looked like CNN footage.
I don't mind digital cameras when it is in the hands of Maestro Fincher but this, oh just horrible.

This must be one of the ugliest movies ever. It looked like CNN footage.
I don't mind digital cameras when it is in the hands of Maestro Fincher but this, oh just horrible.
Are you trying to be sarcastic, or stupid? Which is it?

Yeah the movie doesn't look dirty at all on blu-ray and it didn't look dirty in the cinema. The pictures is bright, clean and jam-packed with detail. It's on par with the pixar releases IMO.

Got my copy last week and will give it a spin sometime today.

I too noticed it out on a certain retailer's shelf last night but didn't buy it as it was at full retail price. Has the street date been moved up to next Tuesday or is it still supposed to be the 22nd?

T.B.

Yeah the movie doesn't look dirty at all on blu-ray and it didn't look dirty in the cinema. The pictures is bright, clean and jam-packed with detail. It's on par with the pixar releases IMO.I was expecting to hear it looked good, but not expecting a comparison to Pixar's efforts.

It was shot on 4k digital cameras so the comparison is not unreasonable.

I posted some caps (http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showpost.php?p=17653956&postcount=80) earlier in case anyone missed them.
I remember it being shot with the Red One, and I wasn't trying to say it was impossible for it to look that good, just unexpected to hear I guess. Glad, though.:)

Thanks for the link.

EDIT: I'm on my netbook, but those caps look great from here.

Are you trying to be sarcastic, or stupid? Which is it?

Sorry to disappoint you, but neither

This must be one of the ugliest movies ever. It looked like CNN footage.
I don't mind digital cameras when it is in the hands of Maestro Fincher but this, oh just horrible.

You do realize that was the style they were going for?

Sure, but that don't mean I have to dig it.
I like my movies to look like film.

Wasn't to fond of Public Enemies either, but it sure looked a lot better than this crap.
And did I forget to mention that the CGI sucked?
District was maybe the biggest disappointment of the year.

And did I forget to mention that the CGI sucked?
District was maybe the biggest disappointment of the year.Now I don't believe your claim of being neither sarcastic or stupid. Trolling maybe?

Now I don't believe your claim of being neither sarcastic or stupid. Trolling maybe?

Don't feed the troll.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a3/troll.jpg

And did I forget to mention that the CGI sucked?

And did I forget to mention that you're something that rhymes with 'dock', has the same amount of letters and starts with a 'c' ?

The CGI in this film was, in my opinion, flawless (by CGI standards).

Time for some post(ers) too be removed!
And I was just looking for info on "D9".
Bummer.

Time for some post(ers) too be removed!
And I was just looking for info on "D9".
Bummer.

Buy it. It kicks arse. Trust me.

The CGI in this film was, in my opinion, flawless (by CGI standards).

Looking forward to watch this on Blu

This was an awesome movie and marks the start of what will be an impressive career for blomkamp. The movie does have filmlike qualities...while a few segments are processed the cameras following the main narrative are awesome! The picture is so bright, detailed and full of contrast. I was not expecting It to look so incredible. This is best non-cg flick I've seen on blu.

If all you want is a sci-fi flick, you got it. If you cared about the not-subtle apartheid angle, you got that too. If you cared to delve even deeper into "universe" crafted in the film, or the more subtle declarations on racism or humanity, it was all there for you.


And yet there are many simpletons upon which the apartheid analogy just flew right over their heads. When I see those people I can't help but shudder and think about how although it's great they made their money, this is really an arthouse film not for the masses.

IMHO, if you can't appreciate the aparatheid allegory, you aren't giving this film it's due. It's like a seven year old watching Family Guy or classic Simpsons: Sure they are entertained by cute animated characters, but they don't "get it."

Having seen the first ever screening of this film in San Diego at Comic-Con and again during wide release, I can't imagine that it pop on blu-ray visually. A good audio track (DTS-MA? True HD? How about some old fashioned 7.1 uncompressed PCM?) will make up for it though.

i didn't see this in the theaters and i'm blind buying this, but i'm hoping i will enjoy it....

The CGI in this film was, in my opinion, flawless (by CGI standards).

Really?
I didn't found the prawns believable for one sec. That was a major hangup. Rest of the CG was good.

Really?
I didn't found the prawns believable for one sec. That was a major hangup. Rest of the CG was good.

Well, I'll agree with you that the prawns looked as fake as the vast majority of CGI in any film does but where the filmmakers deserve their accolades is that they passed off the same quality of CGI that virtually every other Hollywood film takes six times the budget to accomplish.

Really?
I didn't found the prawns believable for one sec. That was a major hangup. Rest of the CG was good.

Completely disagree. I thought it was absolutely believable and phenomenal. Still the best movie of the year...although Up In The Air is damn close

I broke down and bought it yesterday and watched it last night. I thoroughly enjoyed it as much as when I saw it in theaters last Summer and while I agree with some critics that the parallels to apartheid and general racial segregation are heavy handed and there's at least one major plot hole (which I won't spoil) that undermines the climax, I also think District 9 is still one the the best and most satisfying sci-fi movies of the past decade.

Having seen the film in a theater, imo the blu-ray perfectly and faithfully presents the movie on HD home video. Sure, the way it's filmed especially with some of the footage "degraded" to look like broadcast tv and the majority shot in high contrast "shaky-cam," it's not the overall showcase HD some viewers may have hoped for. But there *are* a great number of very clean, sharp scenes that are good home theater demo material for those looking for that sort of thing.

I skimmed through some of the bonus features and watched the numerous, but unfortunately mostly superfluous deleted scenes. There are a couple deleted scenes that are worth a look, such as a almost Starship Troopers-like "instructional film" on how the aliens reproduce (and how to "abort" the progeny), but most of the scenes add nothing to the story and were wisely left on the cutting room floor. There is one scene that explains how one (sympathetic) narrator grew to know the central character, Wikus Van De Merwe but it's rather awkwardly acted and directed which probably explains why it wasn't included in the film. I unexpectedly enjoyed the outtakes in the deleted scenes segment and in the various "Making Of" features of the actor who played the live action "Christopher" in the gray CG reference suit and stilts - he speaks all his lines in English, not "alien" as in the finished film.

As I mentioned, the audio (and sound) is excellent on the blu-ray. The only thing I noticed a bit of a problem with (on my Panny BD55), was the menus seemed to load rather slowly and with some clunky jumps from one menu to another. Also, I didn't get the reason for having what appear to be identical menus (except for the background scenes from the film) accessed by either the human or alien icon. Also, big thumbs down for having forced previews you can only skip through *before* the menu loads.

T.B.

I loved this movie! I'm not familiar with the guy that played the lead, but he did a great job IMO. I've been saying "Get this fooker off of me" ever since I saw it lol:D

Awesome film, Awesome picture and Awesome sound.

Awesome film, Awesome picture and Awesome sound.

Kudos to that. This is the blu-ray to own if you want to show your home theater's stuff.

completely disagree. I thought it was absolutely believable and phenomenal. Still the best movie of the year...although up in the air is damn close

+1

Only two more days to go down here in NZ - releases Weds 16th. Woohoo!

Completely disagree. I thought it was absolutely believable and phenomenal. Still the best movie of the year...although Up In The Air is damn close

Yes, this looks stunning:

http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/1180/00011m2tssnapshot200912q.png

Yes, this looks stunning:

http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/1180/00011m2tssnapshot200912q.png

Completely agree. I just don't understand how anyone could criticize the effects in the film...especially with the budget they had to work with.

Yes, this looks stunning:

http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/1180/00011m2tssnapshot200912q.png

+1 looks good!

Completely agree. I just don't understand how anyone could criticize the effects in the film...especially with the budget they had to work with.

Yeah, I don't get the criticism of the effects at all. The effects work look completely natural in the confines of the film, especially considering they had to be integrated into the shaky-cam mode it was filmed. I am *not* a big fan of full tilt CGI effects, especially how it's being overused in most mainstream sci-fi genre movies these days but this movie not only uses them appropriately, but they work and fit in the film's surroundings *naturally.*

T.B.

Watched the Blu last night. Absolutely incredible video transfer from Sony on this one. One of the most detailed I've seen in awhile. The audio is outstanding as well. Definitely worth a buy. Still one of my favorite movies of 2009!!

Watched the Blu last night. Absolutely incredible video transfer from Sony on this one. One of the most detailed I've seen in awhile. The audio is outstanding as well. Definitely worth a buy. Still one of my favorite movies of 2009!!
Nice! It's been a while since I've been able to look forward to getting a BD with the proper combination good action, writing, directing, and acting, all wrapped up in a sci-fi package that doesn't require checking your brain at the door.

Miss this movie in theaters !

My copy will ship this week, normally :)

Anyone like this film? I've heard a lot of folks say it is dumb as hell.

I wouldn't say that but it certainly didn't live up to the hype for me. There was nothing terribly original about it as everyone was claiming. Its all stuff you've seen in a dozen other sci-fi stories. But its well made and mostly fun to watch. Its a throwback to the more hardcore sci-fi movies of the 80s.
I agree with all of this, but with emphasis on the highlighted parts. It has a dirty, gritty, and intense mood to it.

Anyone like this film? I've heard a lot of folks say it is dumb as hell.

You could say that about any movie depending on your point of view.

A previous poster said he did not like it because the allegory to apartheid was too obvious. When watching the film, the following in mind:
1) there was some irony in that the Black Africans who were victims of apartheid implemented apartheid against the prawns when their livelihoods were negatively impacted.
2) District 9 is a play on words on one of the townships in South Africa - District 6.
3) The SA Blacks attacking the prawns plays right in to a current social dynamic that has cost a number of people their lives in real life: killing of immigrants by locals because the "foreigners" are taking local jobs.

I believe that to appreciate District 9 fully, a viewer needs to understand that SA is very complex politically. The film covered several of these themes quite well.

Yes, this looks stunning:

http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/1180/00011m2tssnapshot200912q.png

yeah, down to the reflectivity of the tape on his outfit. the cgi completely blended with practical and you really can't tell what's real imho.

Completely agree. I just don't understand how anyone could criticize the effects in the film...especially with the budget they had to work with.
Some people just want all video too look like "The Tonight Show".
That's all.
Hey, I've been taken out of the enjoyment of a flick by the directors 'style' B4.
"SPR" was meant too look like WWII filmstock. I was OK w/that.
"D9" was meant too look like CNN.
It brings the story too 'life'; live in our time. It's made too look like it was shot today.
However, "300" too me is a joke!
Was there "fake" film grain in the time of the Spartans?!?!
Was the graphic novel grainy?!?!
No!
And, "MV" way-over-did-it, IMO, w/excessive digital artifacts added.
Is there a ton of "grain" in 21st century Miami?!?!
Was there excessive film grain on the 70's TV show?
No.

Film is art.
Not everyone likes all art.

Some people just want all video too look like "The Tonight Show".
That's all.
Hey, I've been taken out of the enjoyment of a flick by the directors 'style' B4.
"SPR" was meant too look like WWII filmstock. I was OK w/that.
"D9" was meant too look like CNN.
It brings the story too 'life'; live in our time. It's made too look like it was shot today.
However, "300" too me is a joke!
Was there "fake" film grain in the time of the Spartans?!?!
Was the graphic novel grainy?!?!
No!
And, "MV" way-over-did-it, IMO, w/excessive digital artifacts added.
Is there a ton of "grain" in 21st century Miami?!?!
Was there excessive film grain on the 70's TV show?
No.

Film is art.
Not everyone likes all art.

That was in the 70's? I thought it was the 80's?

I agree with all of this, but with emphasis on the highlighted parts. It has a dirty, gritty, and intense mood to it.

Like Bladerunner and Robocop...

I wouldn't say that but it certainly didn't live up to the hype for me. There was nothing terribly original about it as everyone was claiming. Its all stuff you've seen in a dozen other sci-fi stories. But its well made and mostly fun to watch. Its a throwback to the more hardcore sci-fi movies of the 80s.

for me i thought it was pretty original. i dont watch many sci fi movies though. i havent seen other movies with drone aliens stuck on earth, and all they want to do is leave.

i've seen movies with aliens invading earth, but nothing like D9.

i want to say more but dont want to spoil it for anyone.

Alien Nation and V already did the whole alien immigrant thing. Sure they put their own spin on it but it's hardly a new concept.

I'd say having destitute aliens in a South African Shanty town, layered with a commentary on Apartheid, and a gun that can shoot a pig is pretty freaking original!

I love that gravity gun scene. I've been following Neal's videos on youtube for some time and had really been looking forward to his take on Halo. This movie just reaffirms to me Microsofts loss in not maintaining their deal with Blomkamp and Jackson.

Although I do want to see another District 9-verse film, I'm really looking forward to anything Blomkamp puts out. He's a creative, hardworking, and most of all, original, director.

By the way BUY THIS DISC. The video is just amazing. I mean really amazing.

I'd say having destitute aliens in a South African Shanty town, layered with a commentary on Apartheid, and a gun that can shoot a pig is pretty freaking original!

I love that gravity gun scene. I've been following Neal's videos on youtube for some time and had really been looking forward to his take on Halo. This movie just reaffirms to me Microsofts loss in not maintaining their deal with Blomkamp and Jackson.

Although I do want to see another District 9-verse film, I'm really looking forward to anything Blomkamp puts out. He's a creative, hardworking, and most of all, original, director.

By the way BUY THIS DISC. The video is just amazing. I mean really amazing.

No doubt. I couldn't help but think as I was watching this movie, how good they could make the Elites look, considering how good the prawns looked.

"The Beav"
http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film2/DVDReviews48/district_9_blu-ray.htm

No doubt. I couldn't help but think as I was watching this movie, how good they could make the Elites look, considering how good the prawns looked.

Yeah it's really a damn shame. His Halo commercials were INCREDIBLE. The one where they are making the Warthogs and all the weapons was really neat.

Personally, I'm glad we got D9 rather than Halo.

Yes, this looks stunning:

http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/1180/00011m2tssnapshot200912q.png

Well, again, with their budget, they did amazingly well, but put that shot in motion and that's when verisimilitude starts to go out the window.

Well, again, with their budget, they did amazingly well, but put that shot in motion and that's when verisimilitude starts to go out the window.

Like most forums, you will hear takes that run the gamut from hate to love and somewhere inbetween for most of us...

But in reality almost everyone I know who saw the film theatrically thought the effects looked phenomenal, including myself. And not just for a 30m film but period. The 30m price tag only adds insult to injury to films like Tformers 2 and the ilk that spend 7 months and 40m to render 3 frames of cgi.

Sorry, but this is some of the best CGI I have seen in ages. Bu its gotten to the point that if it isnt fake and overdone people think something is wrong...

Well, again, with their budget, they did amazingly well, but put that shot in motion and that's when verisimilitude starts to go out the window.
Actually, it looks even better in motion. With a still frame, I can spot the CG. But when I saw this in the theater, I thought many of those effects shots were done practically with prosthetics and makeup. The CG with the prawns is extremely well done.

Actually, it looks even better in motion. With a still frame, I can spot the CG. But when I saw this in the theater, I thought many of those effects shots were done practically with prosthetics and makeup. The CG with the prawns is extremely well done.

Agreed. I didn't want to comment on what was CGI and what wasn't but throughout the film I thought most of the Prawns looked like at least composite prosthetic/cgi layered shots.

The fact I even thought that is a testament to the films special effects.

I thought many of those effects shots were done practically with prosthetics and makeup. The CG with the prawns is extremely well done.Same here. The CGI/live action line was way too blurry for me to pick anything out

those captures from the D9 bluray from beaver looked amazing!

Actually, it looks even better in motion.

You and I will have to disagree on that point. Not that I wish to belabor it, though, since, most CGI looking blatantly artificial to me aside, this was nonetheless extremely good CG work. It may have looked fake, but it was a million times more believable and convincing than just about anything in, say, G.I. JOE, which was several multiples of D9's budget.

It may have looked fake, but it was a million times more believable and convincing than just about anything in, say, G.I. JOE, which was several multiples of D9's budget.I don't even think the budget should be factored into it. D9's CGI was excellent for any budget.

When I watched D9, I had barely heard of it, so I was not caught up in the hype. I had no idea the prawns were even CG. Were they all CG or are some of the close-ups prosthetic? No matter, it worked beautifully.

I don't even think the budget should be factored into it. D9's CGI was excellent for any budget.

Not sure I follow your thinking--shouldn't that be the very reason that it should be "factored in", accomplishing $150-million-dollar-quality effects work on a relative shoestring budget?

I was disappointed when i watch it. It was not a good choice to watch at breakfast time:)

I like the way they look at the alien way of thinking and pointing out that they have some feelings too, etc. But the Last Battlestar Galactica Movie was better than that in this approach.

There were lack of something in the movie that i couldn't express just i could say that i don't like it enough. May be the reason that there were 3 genres in it comedy, thriller and sci-fi. i don't like these three types at the same time. It was meant to be funny but it wasnt.

I was disappointed when i watch it. It was not a good choice to watch at breakfast time:)

I like the way they look at the alien way of thinking and pointing out that they have some feelings too, etc. But the Last Battlestar Galactica Movie was better than that in this approach.

There were lack of something in the movie that i couldn't express just i could say that i don't like it enough. May be the reason that there were 3 genres in it comedy, thriller and sci-fi. i don't like these three types at the same time. It was meant to be funny but it wasnt.

I don't think it was meant to be funny at all. Sure, some parts are chuckle worthy but most of the comedy is of the black variety as most of the violence is very ethically challenging up until the end finale.

I do think the film was tonally challenged and it did suffer a bit for it but then again it also gave it unique feel thats hard to pinpoint.

Alien Nation and V already did the whole alien immigrant thing. Sure they put their own spin on it but it's hardly a new concept.

alien nation a V..isnt that about aliens that want to take over the planet?
i havent seen alien nation or V in a long long time, but i dont remember the aliens being put into camps.

alien nation a V..isnt that about aliens that want to take over the planet?

haven't seen alien nation or the old V series but the new series of V they are wanting to take over the planet. they are definitely not put in camps wanting to go home....

I see this is 1.85 aspect... Hmmm. Odd. I'd prefer scope.

War of the Worlds was a sci-fi release at 1.85. SO, I guess it is not without precident

Got my copy last night and I really enjoyed it. PQ quality was pretty good and the LFE was pounding at times.

Sterling review from Blu-ray.com (!)

http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/District-9-Blu-ray-Review/7594/

Hands down the best scifi flick of the last decade...and ohhh, I did not know that it was shot using the Red One camera...cool (!). Can't wait ! :eek:

I see this is 1.85 aspect... Hmmm. Odd. I'd prefer scope.

I prefer scope films as well. Unfortunately, I suspect that D-9's relatively modest budget did not allow for the more expensive Panavison scope cameras....unless it was the director's preferred aspect choice....or, maybe the Red One cameras employed are not scope-capable, I'm not sure.

The filmmakers were trying to emulate a news broadcast/documentary style for a big chunk of the film so I don't think 2.35:1 would've worked.

I didn't see this one in the summer so I can't wait!

Got my copy last night and I really enjoyed it. PQ quality was pretty good and the LFE was pounding at times.

How did you get your copy?

How did you get your copy?

I dont know about the other guy but it starting shipping from certain UK retailers Tuesday, my copy should arrive tomorrow as my copy of The Hurt Locker that was sent the same day arrived this morning.

Mine is "Shipping Soon" and I am lookig forward to seeing this one again. A Monday delivery would be just fine with me.

I dont know about the other guy but it starting shipping from certain UK retailers Tuesday, my copy should arrive tomorrow as my copy of The Hurt Locker that was sent the same day arrived this morning.

Figured, but was hoping something else. :)

Got my copy last night and I really enjoyed it. PQ quality was pretty good and the LFE was pounding at times.
Hi Lotc, the bluray of District 09 have spanish subtitles?

I see this is 1.85 aspect... Hmmm. Odd. I'd prefer scope.

War of the Worlds was a sci-fi release at 1.85. SO, I guess it is not without precident


I prefer what the director wants which for this film is obviously 1:85. Would not want it any other way.

I prefer what the director wants which for this film is obviously 1:85. Would not want it any other way.

True, but I would not be surprised to see this director go scope in future projects as he gets comfortable with a larger budget.

Sterling review from Blu-ray.com (!)

http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/District-9-Blu-ray-Review/7594/

Hands down the best scifi flick of the last decade...and ohhh, I did not know that it was shot using the Red One camera...cool (!). Can't wait ! :eek:

From the review

"Each element lends to District 9 a distinct feel, and all told the film offers a nonstop roller coaster ride of emotions and visuals that make it one of the year's -- and perhaps the decade's -- most unique motion pictures."

Not just for SciFi genre but "motion picture" in general...

(not sure if I used the right form for quotations :))

True, but I would not be surprised to see this director go scope in future projects as he gets comfortable with a larger budget.

Maybe, maybe not.........just like this film, it depends on his vision I am sure, but budget has NOTHING to do with this particular film being 1:85 in my opinion.

Maybe, maybe not.........just like this film, it depends on his vision I am sure, but budget has NOTHING to do with this particular film being 1:85 in my opinion.Someone a few posts up mentioned the style of the movie (somewhat documentary "real" footage type thingy) wouldn't lend itself well to a scope format, and I agree. I'd MUCH rather a movie be shot wide, as long as the material is appropriate. But, then, I'd still be happy to get this one in scope too, but I do think 1.85 is appropriate.

EDIT: It was Kram's post.

Someone a few posts up mentioned the style of the movie (somewhat documentary "real" footage type thingy) wouldn't lend itself well to a scope format, and I agree. I'd MUCH rather a movie be shot wide, as long as the material is appropriate. But, then, I'd still be happy to get this one in scope too, but I do think 1.85 is appropriate.

EDIT: It was Kram's post.


Yeah, it seems 1:85 is much more appropriate for this film for the reasons you mention. I think Kram nailed it:)

Hi Lotc, the bluray of District 09 have spanish subtitles?

My copy lists English, English Hard of Hearing, French & Hindi

You know what pisses me off? A couple of weeks ago, you could allegedly get a set of free, exclusive collector cards from Best Buy for pre-ordering "any version" of HARRY POTTER AND THE HALF-BLOOD PRINCE. The only problem? The website didn't recognize the Best Buy exclusive Death Eater mask version as a qualifier. I let it slide. Now, I try to order the Best Buy exclusive of DISTRICT 9 with bulletproof vest slipcover and production notes booklet but, once again, bestbuy.com doesn't recognize that as qualifying for their pre-order bonus of D9 lithograph and dog tags, even though they continue to use the term "any version". :mad:

I prefer scope films as well. Unfortunately, I suspect that D-9's relatively modest budget did not allow for the more expensive Panavison scope cameras....unless it was the director's preferred aspect choice....or, maybe the Red One cameras employed are not scope-capable, I'm not sure.

We shot District 9 with Cooke S4i prime lenses and Angenieux Zooms, all A-list lenses!

Choice of 1.85 a creative choice.

Steven Soderbergh's Che was shot on RED Ones with Panavision Anamorphic lenses.

Jonathan Smiles.
Digital Production Supervisor (RED Camera Supervisor on District 9)
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1211866/filmoyear

We shot District 9 with Cooke S4i prime lenses and Angenieux Zooms, all A-list lenses!

Choice of 1.85 a creative choice.

Steven Soderbergh's Che was shot on RED Ones with Panavision Anamorphic lenses.

Jonathan Smiles.
Digital Production Supervisor (RED Camera Supervisor on District 9)
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1211866/filmoyearNice. Thanks for the info. :)

Choice of 1.85 a creative choice.



Good info, thanks:)

Yeah, it seems 1:85 is much more appropriate for this film for the reasons you mention. I think Kram nailed it:)

Doesn't bother me either way. Ill enjoy it just the same:)

looking forward to watching the tomorrow for the first time. i didn't get around to seeing it in the theaters but wanted too.

1.85 is fine for this film. Seriously, everything doesn't have to be in scope.

The Proposal, Marley and Me, Slumdog Millionaire and The Hangover were in scope. Why? (M&M was a Fox movie. So that's why...)

Of course, both Elizabeth movies were in 1.85. Those probably should've been in scope.

Hi Lotc, the bluray of District 09 have spanish subtitles?

On the back it only lists French, English, and Hindi...sorry no spanish.

Alien Nation and V already did the whole alien immigrant thing. Sure they put their own spin on it but it's hardly a new concept.

The premise in V is entirely different. In V, aliens come to Earth under the pretense of friendship and goodwill, when in fact, their real agenda is quite the opposite. It is also an allegory concerning the horrors of Fascism and Nazism.

Some importers and 7.1 audiophiles may be interested to hear this.

District 9 soon to be released in The Nordic countries/Scandinavia will have a 24-bit dts HD Master Audio 7.1 audio track. Subtitled in Finnish, Swedish, Danish and Norwegian. I don't know about the region coding but it's coming from the same distributor as Pulp Fiction and Sin City which were region free.

http://www.fs-film.fi/showPage.php?page_id=1128&movieId=2519

Release date is January 15 in Finland. It may or may not be released before that in the other Nordic countries.

No, Alien Nation is a thinly veiled allegory for how immigrants are treated in America. District 9 is a thinly veiled allegory for how Zimbabwean immigrants are treated in South Africa. Both use aliens as stand-ins. Google 'alien nation district 9' and you'll see I'm not the only one who saw similarities.

I'm pretty astonished that there are actually people who had to notice similarities to identify the allegory for D9 (not saying that is you, just referring to this Google discussion which implies that there are large numbers of people who didn't pick up on it from the get-go). (guess I shouldn't be, but I digress) I thought it was pretty obvious the theme PJ was shooting for just by watching the trailer. I was immediately impressed with the choice of approach. I look forward to seeing it, but good or bad, it was a damn clever vehicle to explore this theme, imo.

I thought it was pretty obvious the theme PJ was shooting for just by watching the trailer

Think you mean NB.

Hope i'll receive my copy this week to finally watch this movie ! :)

just went and got my copy of D9 and will be watching it sometime today....

I am going to do my best to resist the urge...received District 9 today. I am getting new speakers as a gift on Christmas Eve. I want to experience this one for the first time with the new speakers.

District 9 is a thinly veiled allegory for how Zimbabwean immigrants are treated in South Africa.

Say whaaat??? Maybe the black people who live in District 9, yes, but District 9 is a beat you over the head Apartheid allegory.

Even "District 9" is a reference to District Six, Cape Town, in which people were forcibly relocated under the Apartheid policy.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_Six,_Cape_Town

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_9

The title and premise of District 9 were inspired by events that took place in District Six, Cape Town during the apartheid era.

I'm shocked this isn't clear.

My disc is out for delivery. Very excited to finally see and hear this one on my own rig at home.

PQ is excellent with extremely good detail. SQ is really excellent as well. This is a reference/demo disc.

just got done watching this and i must say i liked it. it was a blind buy and at the beginning of the disc i was afraid i made a mistake but it really picked up close to the middle of the movie. must say i really like the alien weapons in this movie!

PQ is excellent with extremely good detail. SQ is really excellent as well. This is a reference/demo disc.
Certainly good to hear another good review for the a/v quality.

just got done watching this and i must say i liked it. it was a blind buy and at the beginning of the disc i was afraid i made a mistake but it really picked up close to the middle of the movie. must say i really like the alien weapons in this movie!Glad you liked it. It's always nice when a blind buy turns out good.

Can anyone comment on the steelbook exlusive at Future shop in canada?

Glad you liked it. It's always nice when a blind buy turns out good.


yea i don't do too many blind buys (which with dvds i never would do a blind buy, but with blu ray i've bought about 5 blind buys).

i did like D9 but it's not in my top 3 best movies i've seen this year but i would say it is in the top 5.

Picked this one up with another of the $5.00 off any Blu-ray coupon at Target. Great but at $14.99 net cost.

just rented this. imo this is the best looking Blu Ray yet. one reason might be because it has a video-look/feel. sound is top notch, tho having seen this in theater makes me wish i had a HT room big enough for those huge speakers in the movie theater so i can really get that kick butt mid-range sound that my speakers lack.

Can anyone comment on the steelbook exlusive at Future shop in canada?

Picked up the SB today from F/S....other than the metal case and different artwork, the content is the same. The SB is $3 more. I usually get SB editions if it's a movie I've enjoyed, or if it's the same price as the non-SB release. Btw, I thought the textured slip cover & artwork on the regular release was pretty neat too....it took me awhile to decide.

Can those target coupons still be printed off?

Can those target coupons still be printed off?

yes....but you can only print 2 per computer

Can those target coupons still be printed off?


If you are going to buy from Target, you might as well try and get a pricematch from Walmart.com where it is $17.86........add in the coupon and $12.86+tax. Worked for me today with the 1 page printout off walmart.com.

Just got done watching it. Incredible audio experience for a great movie. I haven't seen the picture on the projector yet (just the 40" LCD), but it looks like it's going to be great.

Just got done watching it. Incredible audio experience for a great movie. I haven't seen the picture on the projector yet (just the 40" LCD), but it looks like it's going to be great.
I agree that the HD audio was outstanding, reference quality by any measure. The PQ was just fine, too, but not quite as incredible as the audio.

District 9 is a great film. Despite all the talk about its underlying allegorical significance, I don't think it's necessary to pay the slightest attention to that aspect of the film to enjoy it. It tells a ripping tale and is filled with memorable characters. It's great entertainment, even if you are like me, and go out of your way to avoid "message movies."

District 9's star, Sharlto Copley, was a childhood friend of the movie's director, Neil Blomkamp. Copley has had very little film experience but his terrific performance as the naive Wikus impressed me deeply. Without Copley's wonderful performance, the film wouldn't have worked, it's as simple as that.

Maybe, maybe not.........just like this film, it depends on his vision I am sure, but budget has NOTHING to do with this particular film being 1:85 in my opinion.

I agree. If the film warrants it, 2.35:1 it is...if not, then going wide just for the sake of going wide is disingenuous to the the medium.

We shot District 9 with Cooke S4i prime lenses and Angenieux Zooms, all A-list lenses!

Choice of 1.85 a creative choice.

Steven Soderbergh's Che was shot on RED Ones with Panavision Anamorphic lenses.

Jonathan Smiles.
Digital Production Supervisor (RED Camera Supervisor on District 9)
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1211866/filmoyear

Nice! Thanks for the insider info! :)

District 9's star, Sharlto Copley, was a childhood friend of the movie's director, Neil Blomkamp. Copley has had very little film experience but his terrific performance as the naive Wikus impressed me deeply. Without Copley's wonderful performance, the film wouldn't have worked, it's as simple as that.
Fully agreed. It was great to see an unknown actor pull off the performance he did here.

These prawns were not seasoned to taste - I got suckered in along with the family, and found this to be an unsatisfying mess of a movie. Wife almost made me walk out. Oddly, my mother liked it - she's not often into these things, and absolutely doesn't get the LOTR movies, but liked this. Huh.


I couldn't agree more. "Unsatisfying mess" This was "Alien Nation" meets the "Fly" (Jeff Goldblum version) meets "Black Hawk Down" meets "Robocop" It was a cliched filled mess.

It was great to see an unknown actor pull off the performance he did here.

Right on. Like the movie itself is a slap in the face of overpriced blockbusters like TF2 and GI Joe, Copley makes some 7-figure Hollywood actors look like complete jokes.

Right on. Like the movie itself is a slap in the face of overpriced blockbusters like TF2 and GI Joe, Copley makes some 7-figure Hollywood actors look like complete jokes.He and Blomkamp have set the bar pretty high for themselves after this.

Like the movie itself is a slap in the face of overpriced blockbusters like TF2 and GI Joe

District 9 will be appreciated and enjoyed long after those 2 disgraceful wastes of celluloid are gone and forgotten.

Can anyone comment on the steelbook exlusive at Future shop in canada?

A friend from Canda picked me up a copy so I'll report back when I receive it in the mail.

I couldn't agree more. "Unsatisfying mess" This was "Alien Nation" meets the "Fly" (Jeff Goldblum version) meets "Black Hawk Down" meets "Robocop" It was a cliched filled mess.

Although I enjoyed the film, I tend to agree with this. The Robocop influence was blatant from my perspective and you could also clearly see the other movie influences as well. For me this was not really a bad thing since I thought it was done very well, but just goes to show how hard it is to make a TRULY original film which this is not IMO. But like I said, it was done well and I enjoyed it. Kind of wish I would have just rented it, but luckily I am not out too much cash;)

As far as the scope vs 1:85......this movie was absolutely more convincing with the 1:85 AR choice considering the documentary aspect in the first part of the film. Scope would have not worked as well.

Although I enjoyed the film, I tend to agree with this. The Robocop influence was blatant from my perspective and you could also clearly see the other movie influences as well. For me this was not really a bad thing since I thought it was done very well, but just goes to show how hard it is to make a TRULY original film which this is not IMO. But like I said, it was done well and I enjoyed it. Kind of wish I would have just rented it, but luckily I am not out too much cash;)

I'm not picking up the BLATANT Robocop influence save the corporate greed angle which was handled entirely differently and Robo turning on DCP briefly to get rid of of some corporate greed mongers which was by choice whereas in D9 Wikus had no choice. The Fly, I guess, insomuch that he was changing (as in it happened by accident and not because of an experiment gone awry not to mention that even towards the end Wikus would still prefer to be human whereas Goldblum is all about the change)...and Alien Nation, sure, can't argue that but even then its only in generic set up and not in visual presentation or tone. But to me as a whole it had its own vibe that broke the chains of its influences. The references to the movies mentioned were only in set up and not in tone and presentation.

And its funny that I think Avatar is a cliche ridden mess which is basically Aliens meets Pocahontas meets Lilo and Stitch...unfortunately, unlike D9 Avatar couldn't shake its likeness to the movies it reminded me of and in a lot of ways was worse than them.

I'm not picking up the BLATANT Robocop influence save the corporate greed angle which was handled entirely differently and Robo turning on DCP briefly to get rid of of some corporate greed mongers which was by choice whereas in D9 Wikus had no choice. The Fly, I guess, insomuch that he was changing (as in it happened by accident and not because of an experiment gone awry not to mention that even towards the end Wikus would still prefer to be human whereas Goldblum is all about the change)...and Alien Nation, sure, can't argue that but even then its only in generic set up and not in visual presentation or tone. But to me as a whole it had its own vibe that broke the chains of its influences. The references to the movies mentioned were only in set up and not in tone and presentation.

And its funny that I think Avatar is a cliche ridden mess which is basically Aliens meets Pocahontas meets Lilo and Stitch...unfortunately, unlike D9 Avatar couldn't shake its likeness to the movies it reminded me of and in a lot of ways was worse than them.

Yeah, we all see things differently. I have not seen Avatar yet so I cant comment on that. The Robocop influence smacked me right in the face.

Like I said though, for me District 9 is not something I would call anywhere close to totaly original (there was some orignal elements of course) and it was clearly (IMO) a suicide influence from many different films. I thought it was done very well though and the lack of originality is certainly not a bad thing in this case.

The audio in this movie was great, but I'm sure this has been said many times in this thread. My wife told me that her ear drums were vibrating.

I didn't see this movie at the theater so I didn't know what to expect. After viewing this movie, I kept thinking what was the point of it. I just wanted to see those aliens start killing people or that ship, that just sat there, start firing death rays at some one or something. Maybe a rogue alien or two that were pure evil. This movie needed a hook or twist but it never happened.

My wife said this was the worst movie she has ever seen.

I didn't see this movie at the theater so I didn't know what to expect. After viewing this movie, I kept thinking what was the point of it. I just wanted to see those aliens start killing people or that ship, that just sat there, start firing death rays at some one or something. Maybe a rogue alien or two that were pure evil. This movie needed a hook or twist but it never happened.That wasn't the purpose of this one. It wasn't meant to be an action sci-fi film. Anyone expecting that would be disappointed. We have Independence Day for that.;)My wife said this was the worst movie she has ever seen.I posted a while back, either in this thread or on another forum, that I'd be very surprised if hardly any woman liked this movie at all. I won't even bother trying to get my wife to watch it. She wants sci-fi like, well.....Independence Day.

I didn't see this movie at the theater so I didn't know what to expect. After viewing this movie, I kept thinking what was the point of it.

same here. if the whole movie would have been like the end then that, for me, would have made the whole movie great, instead of good. the beginning really was a drag and well to a point kinda boring.

that ship, that just sat there,

the ship was just a prop in the whole movie nothing more nothing less just a reminder that the aliens were there.

don't get me wrong i like D9 and i'm glad that i bought it, but for me it could have been much more than it was. if i was going to judge this movie by the first half then i would be selling it and the last half of it is it's saving grace for me. it definitely didn't have me from beginning to end like avatar did.

I couldn't agree more. "Unsatisfying mess" This was "Alien Nation" meets the "Fly" (Jeff Goldblum version) meets "Black Hawk Down" meets "Robocop" It was a cliched filled mess.
This just goes to show that there is no accounting for taste -- good and bad. Fortunately for those of us who loved District 9, our opinion represents the view of an overwhelming percentage of viewers and critics. IMDb voters gave District 9 an average score of 8.4 out of 10 (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1136608/), which places it in the top half of IMDb's list of the Top 250 best films ever made. According to Rotten Tomatoes, 90% of the critics gave District 9 positive reviews (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/district_9/).

Right on. Like the movie itself is a slap in the face of overpriced blockbusters like TF2 and GI Joe, Copley makes some 7-figure Hollywood actors look like complete jokes.

Up until this month I have only shut off two movies in my entire life without watching them through to the end. This month I shut off both TF2 and GI Joe after about 30 minutes in. I certainly hope this isn't a trend otherwise I'll have to find a new hobby.

My wife said this was the worst movie she has ever seen.

Your wife is absolutely right, we both agree with her.

the beginning really was a drag and well to a point kinda boring.


I enjoyed the beginning and I liked what the film was going for in the early stages, but from my perspective the way they executed it felt a bit cheesy and gave the film an unfortunate cheapness for me. Nothing major, but it could have been executed a bit better IMO.

Although I enjoyed the film, I tend to agree with this. The Robocop influence was blatant from my perspective and you could also clearly see the other movie influences as well. For me this was not really a bad thing since I thought it was done very well, but just goes to show how hard it is to make a TRULY original film which this is not IMO. But like I said, it was done well and I enjoyed it. Kind of wish I would have just rented it, but luckily I am not out too much cash;)

As far as the scope vs 1:85......this movie was absolutely more convincing with the 1:85 AR choice considering the documentary aspect in the first part of the film. Scope would have not worked as well.

Well, on the commentary track, the director mentions STAR WARS as an influence..."STAR WARS in a really bad place."

Well, on the commentary track, the director mentions STAR WARS as an influence..."STAR WARS in a really bad place."

That to me is interesting. Out of all the movies I felt this was inspired by during my viewing last night, Star Wars never popped into my head. Curious to watch this again with that in mind.

I enjoyed the beginning and I liked what the film was going for in the early stages, but from my perspective the way they executed it felt a bit cheesy and gave the film an unfortunate cheapness for me. Nothing major, but it could have been executed a bit better IMO.

once it got to were they actually went into D9 i started liking it more, but getting to that point was kinda boring too me.

after watching most of the making of D9 stuff on the disc i have more respect for D9 (not sure if this is a spoiler or not but better safe that sorry) seeing as a lot of the dialog was improvised. i didn't know that when i was watching it. so that just puts a new out look on how well the main actor did.

I thought this was a fabulously entertaining movie. I thoroughly enjoyed it.

I thought this was a fabulously entertaining movie. I thoroughly enjoyed it.

Not only that, but I saw it the day after AVATAR -- and I found DISTRICT 9 to have everything Cameron's simplistic, overblown and overpraised movie lacked. For a fraction of the budget too.

once it got to were they actually went into D9 i started liking it more, but getting to that point was kinda boring too me.

after watching most of the making of D9 stuff on the disc i have more respect for D9 (not sure if this is a spoiler or not but better safe that sorry) seeing as a lot of the dialog was improvised. i didn't know that when i was watching it. so that just puts a new out look on how well the main actor did.

IMO, that's not a spoiler. So people who haven't yet seen the movie shouldn't fear reading your "spoiler."

IMO, that's not a spoiler. So people who haven't yet seen the movie shouldn't fear reading your "spoiler."


k wasn't sure i didn't know about it and didn't want to ruin it for someone, but i don't read up on movies either. i just go by the few trailers i see and make up my mind if i want to see it or not. that might be the reason i loved Avatar cause i went in and knew hardly anything about it, i just saw 2 different trailers once a piece so i didn't have my self overhyped and didn't have extremely high expectations. that's how i do all of my movies