View Full Version : Raleigh, NC - HDTV
TWC blocks analog cable with a passive filter. however, the filter does not block in-the-clear QAM. i think cable modem and QAM video share the same channels/frequencies so it isn't possible to block the QAM video with a passive filter without also blocking RR. if you have RR (or earthlink cable modem), you should be able to receive all the channels TWC sends in-the-clear QAM.
tarheelone 07-29-09, 09:38 PM May be added? I'm glad they're confident in their upcoming plans.
Looks like Time Warner finally made up there mind. Got this email today. They were gonna add the HD version too but it looks like they are just going to add the SD version for now.
Hey sports fans! Beginning August 1st, the YES Network (Yankee Entertainment and Sports) will be available to Time Warner Cable Sports and Games Tier customers in North and South Carolina. YES Network will be available on Channel 334. YES Network includes Emmy Award winning programming like Yankeeography, CenterStage, The Joe Girardi Show, Yankees Batting Practice Today, Yankees Magazine, Yankees Classics, Yankees on Deck and a host of Yankees-centric programming. The YES Network’s Yankees and Nets game telecasts and their respective encore presentations will not be available in North and South Carolina due to league territorial restrictions
RMartin631 07-30-09, 06:32 AM This may have already been covered but there's a lot of pages here....
Does anybody know when WTVD will be fixing whatever is wrong with them? We were picking them up here in the Greenville area but now that they've dropped back down to 11 we can't. I had heard a rumor that they were applying to do something or the other to extend their range?
Any info on this?
donnied4rko 07-30-09, 09:06 AM TWC blocks analog cable with a passive filter. however, the filter does not block in-the-clear QAM. i think cable modem and QAM video share the same channels/frequencies so it isn't possible to block the QAM video with a passive filter without also blocking RR. if you have RR (or earthlink cable modem), you should be able to receive all the channels TWC sends in-the-clear QAM.
Thanks! I just confirmed this last night. I disconnected my antenna and connected my tuner right to the cable outlet, and now I can get WTVD again. I even get a few local carolina stations, one of which was showing a replay of a Durham Bulls game last night.
Scooper 07-30-09, 09:11 AM This may have already been covered but there's a lot of pages here....
Does anybody know when WTVD will be fixing whatever is wrong with them? We were picking them up here in the Greenville area but now that they've dropped back down to 11 we can't. I had heard a rumor that they were applying to do something or the other to extend their range?
Any info on this?
The FCC is aware of the situation, but so far - nothing has come out about what (if anything) is being looked at. Best suggestion I have is to use a proper hi-VHF antenna - using one I have no problems getting WTVD, but then, I'm about 23 miles @ 020 from them as well.
frankpc 07-30-09, 09:13 AM This may have already been covered but there's a lot of pages here....
Does anybody know when WTVD will be fixing whatever is wrong with them? We were picking them up here in the Greenville area but now that they've dropped back down to 11 we can't. I had heard a rumor that they were applying to do something or the other to extend their range?
Any info on this?
Pretty sure they are working with the FCC on adding power, etc. Lots of folks complaining, does your antenna have VHF capabilities?
Frank
I had heard WTVD wants to raise power. The problem is, if they do this, WNCT and WCTI will have to both agree to interference in their signals. Also there is a station in Charlotte area WTVI that has the same frequency 11 , and they will have to agree also. 11 was not a good choice if you ask me, but I'm not an engineer, or an expert. lol
etk29321 07-30-09, 12:51 PM I'm only 15 miles from the transmitter for WTVD, and I only get 24% signal strength (yes, the antenna is VHF/UHF). It's really annoying seeing as I can get pretty good lock on WITN in washington, nc and WYMY in greensboro (reflection of something I suspect) on this same antenna. I just checked tvfool, and it actually listed WTVD as 1Edge instead of LOS too. Prior to the channel shift, I got every channel perfectly. About the only thing I can think to try now is to raise the height, but that means climbing on the roof.
RMartin631 07-30-09, 01:09 PM I'm using a 4228 with a CM amp. It works very well on UHF but VHF is so-so.
R Martin, you live in Ayden, practically right under the WNCT/10 transmitter (and not far from WCTI/12) and wonder why you can't get WTVD/11? Obviously, WTVD needs to improve their signal, but as long as they stay on 11, I imagine you can say goodby to recieving WTVD in that area....
dgmayor 07-30-09, 04:10 PM Looks like Time Warner finally made up there mind. Got this email today. They were gonna add the HD version too but it looks like they are just going to add the SD version for now.
Hey sports fans! Beginning August 1st, the YES Network (Yankee Entertainment and Sports) will be available to Time Warner Cable Sports and Games Tier customers in North and South Carolina. YES Network will be available on Channel 334. YES Network includes Emmy Award winning programming like Yankeeography, CenterStage, The Joe Girardi Show, Yankees Batting Practice Today, Yankees Magazine, Yankees Classics, Yankees on Deck and a host of Yankees-centric programming. The YES Network’s Yankees and Nets game telecasts and their respective encore presentations will not be available in North and South Carolina due to league territorial restrictions
Hey Sports Fans? I'm a sports fan and I wouldn't watch two seconds of that crap. But then again I'm from Boston ;) GIMME NESN TWC!!
tarheelone 07-30-09, 05:59 PM Hey Sports Fans? I'm a sports fan and I wouldn't watch two seconds of that crap. But then again I'm from Boston ;) GIMME NESN TWC!!
Originally on the Charlotte Channel change page they had up that they were going to add both YES and NESN and both in HD. Then it changed to just YES in SD. Guess there are some Yankee fans making the channel addition decisions. Alot of people are made about the fact we can get YES but still haven't seen MASN.
RMartin631 07-30-09, 06:57 PM R Martin, you live in Ayden, practically right under the WNCT/10 transmitter (and not far from WCTI/12) and wonder why you can't get WTVD/11? Obviously, WTVD needs to improve their signal, but as long as they stay on 11, I imagine you can say goodby to recieving WTVD in that area....
I have WNCT at 8 miles and WCTI at over 25. They're coming in almost directly from the side of my 4228. I can get WTVD at night. They almost come in in the daytime but not quite. Signal strength is around 30.
SingleBbl 07-31-09, 04:36 PM The tech quickly determined that it's not a signal strength problem and a scan after removing the filters was no help either. When I mentioned that the 3576 was getting all the channels OK (50-1 came back sometime while we were out of town this week), he started making phone calls. Net-net, there is a known (to TWC) problem with Panny's getting the HD signals. One of the other managers in his office is experiencing it himself and they are working to resolve it. He mentioned in passing that they have had a number of calls for the same thing.
He left me with a phone number to contact his manager by Wednesday if the HD channels don't come back. This is far from perfect but it sure beats being told that there's a problem with "one of the cables in the wall".
Sorry for the delay in posting this update. I've been wrestling with a health issue.
I won't bore you with a blow-by-blow account. In summary, TWC continues to own up to an issue with their current QAM signal and some Panny HDTV's but I have not seen any real progress on a solution. In my last exchange with them yesterday, I was asked for the model of my TV which I provided.
I would appreciate it if anyone having this problem would provide their Panny TV model numbers.
Will
kckranz 08-01-09, 07:09 AM Sorry for the delay in posting this update. I've been wrestling with a health issue.
I won't bore you with a blow-by-blow account. In summary, TWC continues to own up to an issue with their current QAM signal and some Panny HDTV's but I have not seen any real progress on a solution. In my last exchange with them yesterday, I was asked for the model of my TV which I provided.
I would appreciate it if anyone having this problem would provide their Panny TV model numbers.
Will
I'm having the same issue, plus no 5.1 = no TV GOS :(
TH42PX600U
prerunnerv6 08-03-09, 04:48 PM I'm only 15 miles from the transmitter for WTVD, and I only get 24% signal strength (yes, the antenna is VHF/UHF). It's really annoying seeing as I can get pretty good lock on WITN in washington, nc and WYMY in greensboro (reflection of something I suspect) on this same antenna. I just checked tvfool, and it actually listed WTVD as 1Edge instead of LOS too. Prior to the channel shift, I got every channel perfectly. About the only thing I can think to try now is to raise the height, but that means climbing on the roof.
I'm still getting used to how these signals work. I live 39 miles from the WTVD transmitter and the signal comes in 70-80%. But I live 26 miles from PBS transmitter and I still can't pick it up....even though it used to come in 80-90% before the transition.
Trip in VA 08-03-09, 04:51 PM Last I heard, WUNC-25 hopes to be on their top-mounted antenna by the end of the week. That comes from someone I consider to be VERY reliable. Of course, if something goes wrong, that could be delayed.
The power level will still be reduced, but they'll gain almost 500 feet. There's still another month worth of work before they can up the power to 1000 kW from the 45 kW or whatever they're running now.
- Trip
prerunnerv6 08-03-09, 04:59 PM Best suggestion I have is to use a proper hi-VHF antenna - using one I have no problems getting WTVD, but then, I'm about 23 miles @ 020 from them as well.
This is what I had to do also. Modifying my coat-hanger antenna to include longer V lengths helped more with VHF signals.
ziltink 08-03-09, 05:52 PM Last I heard, WUNC-25 hopes to be on their top-mounted antenna by the end of the week. That comes from someone I consider to be VERY reliable. Of course, if something goes wrong, that could be delayed.
The power level will still be reduced, but they'll gain almost 500 feet. There's still another month worth of work before they can up the power to 1000 kW from the 45 kW or whatever they're running now.
- Trip
I just started picking up UNC today and I couldn't receive it at all since the switch over. Not sure if it will go in and out while they're finalizing things or if this is permanent. I was getting about 80 percent, just like before the switch. I'm using a Channel Master converter box and an amplified in door antenna in my attic in North East Raleigh.
Trip in VA 08-03-09, 07:05 PM Well, keep us updated. I'll pass along reception reports if he's not reading here already.
- Trip
Ictusbrucks 08-03-09, 08:02 PM Does anybody else have a SA 8300HD box and notice that the black levels seem gray, almost like it is outputting RGB instead of YCbCr???
It seems the box is capable of outputting black... when I change channels the screen goes all black except for the info-box at the bottom, but then a split second later the background is dark gray instead of black.
I have a Kuro Elite so its very noticeable. Is this just the broadcast signals themselves that are not true black? I tried every channel I could think of and its the same across the board.
It looks exactly like what I see if I play a regular DVD with my Oppo-83 and set colorspace to RGB instead of YCbCr. But for the SA8300hd I cannot find any colorspace options. In fact alot of options seem missing for the last year of so since TWC switched to the 'new' box firmware...
Ictusbrucks 08-03-09, 08:22 PM I just reconnected the SA8300hd with component cables instead of HDMI, and the blacks are jet black. So its definitely something to do with the SA8300HD and the Kuro 141FD. Receiver is a Pioneer SC-05 that does no video processing over HDMI.
scsiraid 08-03-09, 08:34 PM Does anybody else have a SA 8300HD box and notice that the black levels seem gray, almost like it is outputting RGB instead of YCbCr???
It seems the box is capable of outputting black... when I change channels the screen goes all black except for the info-box at the bottom, but then a split second later the background is dark gray instead of black.
I have a Kuro Elite so its very noticeable. Is this just the broadcast signals themselves that are not true black? I tried every channel I could think of and its the same across the board.
It looks exactly like what I see if I play a regular DVD with my Oppo-83 and set colorspace to RGB instead of YCbCr. But for the SA8300hd I cannot find any colorspace options. In fact alot of options seem missing for the last year of so since TWC switched to the 'new' box firmware...
The 8300HD DOES output RGB. I have mine connected via HDMI to a DVDO Edge Video Processor whose display confirms that it is in fact receiving RGB (with Video levels) from the 8300HD.
Ictusbrucks 08-03-09, 09:35 PM I suspected it's outputting RGB... I was hoping it would output YCbCr... guess not. I called TWC and they said there's no way to modify the colorspace.
I went into the input options for my Pioneer 141FD and found I could change between RGB (0-255) and RGB (16-235). I had it on 'Auto' because all of my inputs like bluray and gameconsoles all go through my receiver as one HDMI cable so setting 16-235 would be clamping all my other devices, and wouldn't let them choose YCbCr.
But setting the TV itself to 16-235 does fix the black issue of the SA8300HD.
Only way I can think to fix this is to get a 1x2 HDMI splitter and use another input when watching TV so I can set the 2nd input to use RGB 16-235.... my harmony remote can automatically switch inputs when switching activities.
But I was hoping to get YCbCr over HDMI which would also probably fix it without needing an HDMI splitter.
Not sure why the 'Auto' mode isn't correctly using 16-235 from the DVR... that would be nice.
Hmmm... I can't really get it reliably, but I saw a blip of signal on WUNC today... so maybe good things are coming soon. I'll have to start paying attention again.
I have been seeing the "..channel not available message try again.." a lot lately - today it is USA-HD,Bravo-HD and SyFy-HD. Yesterday it was Hist=HD and Bio-HD. They all seem to come back after awhile(5 minutes to over 2 hours). This seems to be getting worse over the last few weeks. Is anybody else seeing this?
Erik Garci 08-04-09, 10:45 AM Not sure why the 'Auto' mode isn't correctly using 16-235 from the DVR... that would be nice.
I suspect that the 8300HD is sending the wrong flag. That is, the 8300HD is sending the video data as Limited RGB (16-235) but sending the flag for Full RGB (0-255). When the TV is in Auto mode, it relies on the flag to determine what type of signal it is, even if the flag is wrong. By setting the TV itself to Limited RGB, you are forcing the TV to ignore the flag and to treat the video as Limited RGB.
scsiraid 08-04-09, 01:43 PM I suspect that the 8300HD is sending the wrong flag. That is, the 8300HD is sending the video data as Limited RGB (16-235) but sending the flag for Full RGB (0-255). When the TV is in Auto mode, it relies on the flag to determine what type of signal it is, even if the flag is wrong. By setting the TV itself to Limited RGB, you are forcing the TV to ignore the flag and to treat the video as Limited RGB.
The Edge VP is detecting my 8300 as RGB with Video levels (not PC).. which results in correct black levels even when processed by the Edge whose output is set to Ycc. That seems to indicate that the flagging is correct.
Ictusbrucks 08-04-09, 01:50 PM Thanks for the information
So somehow my TV is not getting the correct flag... maybe the receiver is somehow messing with it? Tonight I will try a direct hookup bypassing the receiver. I will be surprised if the Pioneer SC-05 is changing the signal since it doesn't even let you modify the HDMI video options.
frankpc 08-04-09, 05:57 PM I have been seeing the "..channel not available message try again.." a lot lately - today it is USA-HD,Bravo-HD and SyFy-HD. Yesterday it was Hist=HD and Bio-HD. They all seem to come back after awhile(5 minutes to over 2 hours). This seems to be getting worse over the last few weeks. Is anybody else seeing this?
TW brought us a new box (Samsung) to replace our second bad SA box. We had a number of channels "not available" until we rebooted the box. That brought them all back .
I was hoping for better performance from the Samsung box but in recorded playback mode it performs worse than the SA box.
Frank
cucamelsmd15 08-04-09, 06:05 PM Well, despite having my new CM4228HD, I still cant pull in UNC-TV. :(
jimholcomb 08-04-09, 07:52 PM I have been seeing the "..channel not available message try again.." a lot lately - today it is USA-HD,Bravo-HD and SyFy-HD. Yesterday it was Hist=HD and Bio-HD. They all seem to come back after awhile(5 minutes to over 2 hours). This seems to be getting worse over the last few weeks. Is anybody else seeing this?
A few weeks back I was getting it a lot and I contacted support and was told to cold boot my box. I didn't really feel like doing that so I ignored that bit of advice but the problem went away the next day. A coincidence, I'm sure.
toadfannc 08-05-09, 07:41 AM Anyone else getting picture break ups on their SA8300HD? I've rebooted but it's still happening (as of Wed AM, 8/5). I don't see it on other HD stations, although I do see a lot of SDV ("xxx not available, try again") issues on channels like ESPNews HD, History HD, and Biography HD. I'd call TWC but I know the CSRs are pretty useless. Just wanted to see if it's only me.
ziltink 08-05-09, 08:36 AM Well, despite having my new CM4228HD, I still cant pull in UNC-TV. :(
I'm still picking it up in North East Raleigh since Monday I think. Not sure what changed, but I'm not complaining. Not much on networks at certain times, I like having a UNC alternative.
Trip in VA 08-05-09, 09:22 AM Last night, I was getting some amazing tropo. Once of the things I managed to lock in was WNCR-LD 41 from Tarboro. It has three SD streams, all labeled WNCR-TV, all airing the same programming which I could not identify before the signal vanished on me. (Didn't manage to get a data capture for my website in time, either.)
Amusingly, the 41-3 stream on it had the whole bottom half of the picture garbled for some reason, while 41-1 and 41-2 were fine.
- Trip
VisionOn 08-05-09, 09:45 AM A few weeks back I was getting it a lot and I contacted support and was told to cold boot my box. I didn't really feel like doing that so I ignored that bit of advice but the problem went away the next day. A coincidence, I'm sure.
That's their answer to everything because the CSR technical knowledge is non-existent when it comes to SDV.
Problems like this that randomly appear are nearly always TWC issues with SDV implementation or very occasionally a problem with your outside drop. The box is rarely a factor.
ncsugrad 08-05-09, 12:27 PM Anyone else getting picture break ups on their SA8300HD? I've rebooted but it's still happening (as of Wed AM, 8/5). I don't see it on other HD stations, although I do see a lot of SDV ("xxx not available, try again") issues on channels like ESPNews HD, History HD, and Biography HD. I'd call TWC but I know the CSRs are pretty useless. Just wanted to see if it's only me.
I've noticed ESPN-HD (TWC Ch. 290) breaking up over the past few days also. No problems with any other HD channels.
I recorded the Pocono race Monday afternoon only to get home and find it virtually unwatchable. Funny thing was, Sunday afternoon when the race was originally scheduled the signal was perfectly fine.
I know one thing... TWC better get this figured out before football season starts. Dish and DirecTV have some pretty good deals right now! ;)
IamtheWolf 08-05-09, 05:51 PM Anyone else getting picture break ups on their SA8300HD? I've rebooted but it's still happening (as of Wed AM, 8/5). I don't see it on other HD stations, although I do see a lot of SDV ("xxx not available, try again") issues on channels like ESPNews HD, History HD, and Biography HD. I'd call TWC but I know the CSRs are pretty useless. Just wanted to see if it's only me.
Had that problem awhile ago. Signal strength. Check all your connections, check the Diag screen(s) and then call for a visit (if necessary).
I know, everything was fine....Same here. They boosted the signal and added a better (newer?) splitter.
deepblueNC 08-05-09, 11:19 PM Just a quick question. I'll appreciate your help.
Is there anyone in Raleigh/Durham area getting DD 5.1 audio from Time Warner Cable without a cable box?
I've basic cable and I'm watching clear QAM channels. Many TV shows state that they are in DD 5.1, but my receiver shows only 2.0 channels. I also tried OTA as an alternative, but still I could not get DD 5.1 when watching CSI. With OTA, the signal level was 77%, I don't know whether that would make a difference, that is, whether you need to be above a certain level to get DD.
Before asking Sony to repair my TV (Sony V5100), I wanna make sure that the problem is the TV not Time Warner cable.
toadfannc 08-06-09, 07:09 AM I've noticed ESPN-HD (TWC Ch. 290) breaking up over the past few days also. No problems with any other HD channels.
I recorded the Pocono race Monday afternoon only to get home and find it virtually unwatchable. Funny thing was, Sunday afternoon when the race was originally scheduled the signal was perfectly fine.
I know one thing... TWC better get this figured out before football season starts. Dish and DirecTV have some pretty good deals right now! ;)
Yeah, I've noticed that ESPN-HD has been breaking up. And, virtually everything that I DVR breaks up and skips, etc. Might be my box after all.
vidiot1985 08-06-09, 07:36 AM ...
Is there anyone in Raleigh/Durham area getting DD 5.1 audio from Time Warner Cable without a cable box?
...
I believe I'm able to receive 5.1 audio over TWC clear QAM without a cable box.
Looking at some HD shows my BeyondTV DVR has recorded, during some commercials the audio stream shows only Stereo being available while during the HD program a 5.1 audio stream is available.
How do you have your receiver hooked up? Is it from the digital audio output from your TV? If so, your TV's digital audio output might downmix all inputs it receives to a stereo output. My TVs do that, unfortunately.
nitdawg 08-06-09, 10:19 AM I believe I'm able to receive 5.1 audio over TWC clear QAM without a cable box.
Looking at some HD shows my BeyondTV DVR has recorded, during some commercials the audio stream shows only Stereo being available while during the HD program a 5.1 audio stream is available.
How do you have your receiver hooked up? Is it from the digital audio output from your TV? If so, your TV's digital audio output might downmix all inputs it receives to a stereo output. My TVs do that, unfortunately.
I can get 5.1 over QAM either direct through my TV or through my HTPC. I agree, the culprit can be your TV. Only the digital audio output on the TV will throw 5.1 to the receiver via a TV source. If the source is something external (i.e. not using the tuner in the panel) then it only sends 2 channels.
deepblueNC 08-06-09, 10:29 AM I believe I'm able to receive 5.1 audio over TWC clear QAM without a cable box.
How do you have your receiver hooked up? Is it from the digital audio output from your TV? If so, your TV's digital audio output might downmix all inputs it receives to a stereo output. My TVs do that, unfortunately.
Thanks, this was very helpful. Now, I know the problem is the TV for sure. The digital audio out of the TV is connected to the receiver.
I talked to Sony Tech Support yesterday, they told me that if the source is my TV's tuner, I should be able to get DD 5.1 audio, so, I guess my TV's tuner may be defective.
zim2dive 08-06-09, 10:39 AM Thanks, this was very helpful. Now, I know the problem is the TV for sure. The digital audio out of the TV is connected to the receiver.
I talked to Sony Tech Support yesterday, they told me that if the source is my TV's tuner, I should be able to get DD 5.1 audio, so, I guess my TV's tuner may be defective.
Many TVs will not output 5.1 audio b/c of DRM. You may want to find a thread for your specific TV model here at AVS and double check how it handles audio from the QAM tuner.
Oldemanphil 08-06-09, 09:08 PM Just a quick question. I'll appreciate your help.
Is there anyone in Raleigh/Durham area getting DD 5.1 audio from Time Warner Cable without a cable box?
I've basic cable and I'm watching clear QAM channels. Many TV shows state that they are in DD 5.1, but my receiver shows only 2.0 channels. I also tried OTA as an alternative, but still I could not get DD 5.1 when watching CSI. With OTA, the signal level was 77%, I don't know whether that would make a difference, that is, whether you need to be above a certain level to get DD.
Before asking Sony to repair my TV (Sony V5100), I wanna make sure that the problem is the TV not Time Warner cable.
My Vizio TVs get dd5.1 from TWC QAM (no box) when it is being broadcast. Of course, I have to use a optical cable connection from my TV to a Sony receiver in order to hear it. It won't work with any other type of connection such as L-R audio cables on my set.
prerunnerv6 08-06-09, 11:56 PM Well, despite having my new CM4228HD, I still cant pull in UNC-TV. :(
I did a re-scan yesterday. Finally got UNC-TV for a little while. But only at 10% signal and frequent drop outs. This morning it didn't come in at all and a rescan removes the channels.
I'll see how it goes next week.
vidiot1985 08-07-09, 08:06 AM Many TVs will not output 5.1 audio b/c of DRM. You may want to find a thread for your specific TV model here at AVS and double check how it handles audio from the QAM tuner.
One other thing to try is to go the TV's setup menus (if the original poster hadn't already tried that). There might be a configuration screen for the audio output that lets you choose the type of output from the digital audio out. DVD players and cable boxes commonly have these and so might some TVs I guess (especially if the Sony tech support claims the TV can output 5.1 from its internal tuners, though maybe they meant from the ATSC tuner, which may have different capabilities in this regard than the QAM tuner).
drewwho 08-07-09, 01:47 PM Hi,
I just got a new toy (Zotac ION A-U) and I'm re-evaluating my PVR solutions. Last night, I recorded a test clip 2 times on 2 different tuners. The recording was last night's Mentalist. I've been playing it back on 3 different front devices (ION Windows 7RC with Windows Media Center, ION Ubuntu 9.04 with MythTV VDPAU, and SageTV HD100 extender) and looking for defects in playback.
On all 3, I see at least 2 small skips in the first 30 seconds or so of the show. The first skip is when the crow flies off the parking meter, and the second skip is a few seconds later, when the camera pans to the "Missing" poster. In the last skip, it is almost like a frame is out of order as the poster moves quickly back to the left, and then back to the previous position.
If anybody has that on their DVR, can you confirm these glitches? It seems strange that 2 different tuners on 2 different computers would have glitches in the recording at the same point. Also, the recording and playback logs from MythTV did not mention any problems with the recording, and they're usually very verbose about damaged recordings.
Thanks,
Drew
nitdawg 08-07-09, 02:06 PM On all 3, I see at least 2 small skips in the first 30 seconds or so of the show. The first skip is when the crow flies off the parking meter, and the second skip is a few seconds later, when the camera pans to the "Missing" poster. In the last skip, it is almost like a frame is out of order as the poster moves quickly back to the left, and then back to the previous position.
If anybody has that on their DVR, can you confirm these glitches? It seems strange that 2 different tuners on 2 different computers would have glitches in the recording at the same point. Also, the recording and playback logs from MythTV did not mention any problems with the recording, and they're usually very verbose about damaged recordings.
Thanks,
Drew
So I will check tonight, but it sure sounds like it was the broadcast coming in to your HTPC if the playback glitches were independent of either tuner or front-end.
7MC is pretty slick.
drewwho 08-07-09, 04:06 PM So I will check tonight, but it sure sounds like it was the broadcast coming in to your HTPC if the playback glitches were independent of either tuner or front-end.
7MC is pretty slick.
Thanks for checking. Yes, 7MC is really slick.. The HD100 with Sage is slick as sandpaper, but it seems to have the best playback. But it is otherwise so clunky I was really hoping that the Ion could match it.
Drew
tommy122 08-09-09, 02:12 PM Does anyone else besides me find the 720p commercials inserted by TWC on 1080i channels to be annoying?
scsiraid 08-09-09, 02:33 PM Does anyone else besides me find the 720p commercials inserted by TWC on 1080i channels to be annoying?
Yes....
jrelmore 08-11-09, 09:29 PM NCN 17.1, normally the strongest signal is the worst tonight during America's got Talent. Seems all local broadcasters have their bad days. Have communicated with a couple stating they have times when they are not transmitting at full power. Why not? shouldn't there be an On switch, then put a lock on it so no one accidentally turns it Off?
This OTA DTV is not all it was promised to be.
scsiraid 08-11-09, 09:33 PM NCN 17.1, normally the strongest signal is the worst tonight during America's got Talent. Seems all local broadcasters have their bad days. Have communicated with a couple stating they have times when they are not transmitting at full power. Why not? shouldn't there be an On switch, then put a lock on it so no one accidentally turns it Off?
This OTA DTV is not all it was promised to be.
Interesting that 17.1 is your strongest signal... It is my weakest here in apex (compared to 5,50,22,28 and even 11). Im using a 4228HD in the attic.
Trip in VA 08-11-09, 09:56 PM The tropospheric ducting is intense this evening. I'm decoding WNCT without turning the antenna, WNCR-LD made my signal light flash (and got me a clean decode when aimed that way), and my signal is way down on several local signals.
Your issues with WNCN might be related to ducting bringing in either WFXR or WLTX.
- Trip
gstelmack 08-12-09, 02:57 PM Does anyone else besides me find the 720p commercials inserted by TWC on 1080i channels to be annoying?
I'm more interested in the fact that local commercials seem to be 15 seconds off as what appear to be TWC-inserted ads into national streams (including an ad for how great TWC advertising is) keep cutting in to the middle of commericals that appear to be national ads.
My favorite has been the ad for TWC advertising that cuts off another ad to say how great they are :D
drewwho 08-12-09, 03:09 PM Does anybody know what happened to WRAL's mobile DTV signal? They seem to be broadcasting about 3.5Mb/s of null pids rather than mobile DTV these days..
Thanks,
Drew
Trip in VA 08-12-09, 04:31 PM Does anybody know what happened to WRAL's mobile DTV signal? They seem to be broadcasting about 3.5Mb/s of null pids rather than mobile DTV these days..
Thanks,
Drew
It comes and goes. Sometimes it's there and sometimes it isn't. I caught it as recently as last week with the M/H on the air.
- Trip
nitdawg 08-13-09, 08:14 AM Last I heard, WUNC-25 hopes to be on their top-mounted antenna by the end of the week. That comes from someone I consider to be VERY reliable. Of course, if something goes wrong, that could be delayed.
The power level will still be reduced, but they'll gain almost 500 feet. There's still another month worth of work before they can up the power to 1000 kW from the 45 kW or whatever they're running now.
- Trip
Trip, any news on progress regarding this?
Thanks!
Trip in VA 08-13-09, 11:33 AM I've sent off another e-mail, I'll let you know when I hear a response.
- Trip
bakerm5 08-13-09, 02:27 PM I lost the WUNC signal around noon for about 10 minutes today, and then the signal came in strong (was breaking up prior). My daughter wasn't too happy, no Curious George during lunch. But not a problem with it since it came back. Was this perhaps the movement/swapping of the antenna?
Trip in VA 08-13-09, 09:48 PM Definitely possible. My contact at UNC has yet to answer me, so maybe he's been busy with it all day...
- Trip
I don't know what changed, but I can get UNC digital for the first time on my Sony in the bedroom (extra splitter inline). The LG in the living room could get it all along.
Apparently there is now enough signal to overcome the extra splitter :cool:
ldmccall 08-16-09, 02:04 AM Many TVs will not output 5.1 audio b/c of DRM. You may want to find a thread for your specific TV model here at AVS and double check how it handles audio from the QAM tuner.
Thanks for making this point. I have an HTPC and when I try to pass on audio from my Sony TV to the receiver it only passes stereo. Of course Sony's manual doesn't detail anything.
LazyTom 08-16-09, 08:24 AM For the past two weeks I have not been getting audio on a single channel on TWC cable - the SYFY HD channel. All other of my HD channels are fine - no problems at all.
When I called it took some time for TWC to acknowledge that there was a problem at the head-end which they say they have fixed - but not for me - I still have the problem. TWC now says they will send out a tech rep, but... how can it be my home equipment if it is a single channel?
Anyone have a clue how a single channel can lose audio?
LT
scsiraid 08-16-09, 01:54 PM For the past two weeks I have not been getting audio on a single channel on TWC cable - the SYFY HD channel. All other of my HD channels are fine - no problems at all.
When I called it took some time for TWC to acknowledge that there was a problem at the head-end which they say they have fixed - but not for me - I still have the problem. TWC now says they will send out a tech rep, but... how can it be my home equipment if it is a single channel?
Anyone have a clue how a single channel can lose audio?
LT
Hmm... its fine here in apex. Do you have to problem on more than one set?
dundakitty 08-17-09, 08:26 AM I've lost audio on a channel before. A rescan of the channels brought it back. I don't have a set-top-box, TWC feeds directly to my TV. I do get ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC, and PBS in HD.
kckranz 08-17-09, 10:39 AM For the past two weeks I have not been getting audio on a single channel on TWC cable - the SYFY HD channel. All other of my HD channels are fine - no problems at all.
When I called it took some time for TWC to acknowledge that there was a problem at the head-end which they say they have fixed - but not for me - I still have the problem. TWC now says they will send out a tech rep, but... how can it be my home equipment if it is a single channel?
Anyone have a clue how a single channel can lose audio?
LT
Toggle through your SAP/Audio options (button on remote) while tuned to that channel and see if the audio stream returns.
Trip in VA 08-17-09, 11:54 AM I lost the WUNC signal around noon for about 10 minutes today, and then the signal came in strong (was breaking up prior). My daughter wasn't too happy, no Curious George during lunch. But not a problem with it since it came back. Was this perhaps the movement/swapping of the antenna?
I just got word back that yes, they're now on the top-mounted antenna, but still at reduced power. If all goes as planned, they hope to power up to 1000 kW by the end of the month.
- Trip
LazyTom 08-17-09, 04:13 PM Thanks all for your suggestions and confirmations.
I called my neighbor and they also do not have audio on 267 (SyFy HD), although they do have the picture.
Tech rep said "oh, we'll get back to you". Not holding my breath here.
LT.
I just got word back that yes, they're now on the top-mounted antenna, but still at reduced power. If all goes as planned, they hope to power up to 1000 kW by the end of the month.
- Trip
Good to know.
I noticed that I am able to scan it now... not really watchable, lots of breaking up... but still progress. Leaves me with hope that when they boost their power I'll be ok again without having to do anything to my config.
ziltink 08-18-09, 07:50 AM Good to know.
I noticed that I am able to scan it now... not really watchable, lots of breaking up... but still progress. Leaves me with hope that when they boost their power I'll be ok again without having to do anything to my config.
I have been receiving it for a while now, occasionally it will drop for about 1 or 2 minutes at the time, but it's been a pretty good signal, 80 - 100 percent.
Trip in VA 08-18-09, 10:39 AM WUNC is currently at about 45 kW, so going up to 1000 kW is about 12 dB or so. 12 dB is a lot of signal--there are some people who currently get no reception on WUNC other than a tiny blip on the meter that will start receiving it reliably when the power increases.
- Trip
SugarBowl 08-18-09, 11:16 AM For the past two weeks I have not been getting audio on a single channel on TWC cable - the SYFY HD channel. All other of my HD channels are fine - no problems at all.
When I called it took some time for TWC to acknowledge that there was a problem at the head-end which they say they have fixed - but not for me - I still have the problem. TWC now says they will send out a tech rep, but... how can it be my home equipment if it is a single channel?
Anyone have a clue how a single channel can lose audio?
LT
I lose audio quite a bit. I've noticed it mainly on my Tivo Series 3 with cablecards. Usually when i first turn on the TV for viewing the channel will have no audio. Flipping the channel has always fixed it.
drewwho 08-18-09, 11:26 AM WUNC is currently at about 45 kW, so going up to 1000 kW is about 12 dB or so. 12 dB is a lot of signal--there are some people who currently get no reception on WUNC other than a tiny blip on the meter that will start receiving it reliably when the power increases.
- Trip
Can you remind us what power / elevation they were at before the transition?
I guess I'm just lucky, but I've found that even with the lower elevation and lower power, I could actually receive them *better* post transition than I ever could pre-transition. This is using a CM4228 and an LG 5th gen tuner based PCI card. I guess it must have something to do with them using UHF twenty-something rather than UHF 59, and them being across the RDU flight path from me.
I'm really hoping that after they go full power, I can start getting them off the back of my tower-aimed 4228, and fold my UNC dedicated tuner back into the pool.
Drew
Trip in VA 08-18-09, 11:33 AM It was something like 1400' 893.2 kW on channel 59. They had been at 1007' 45 kW on channel 25 but now should be at 1522' 45 kW, and will go up to 1522' 1000 kW.
- Trip
It was something like 1400' 893.2 kW on channel 59. They had been at 1007' 45 kW on channel 25 but now should be at 1522' 45 kW, and will go up to 1522' 1000 kW.
- Trip
So when all is said and done, they'll be on higher power and higher elevation than pre-transition.
That should bode well for me then as I was getting WUNC quite nicely pre-transition with my current setup.
RSMoonwalks 08-24-09, 08:24 AM What has happened.....
No messages in the past 5-6 days.......
has this forum been MOVED ???????
I don't normally send post here but I do enjoy reading it...
Thanks,
I picked up WUVC and WTNC-LP last night down in Onslow county. lol Even WTVD! although weaker than the LP.
I've been getting channel 4 for a few days now... so something definitely improved right around the end of last week.
What has happened.....
No messages in the past 5-6 days.......
has this forum been MOVED ???????
I don't normally send post here but I do enjoy reading it...
Thanks,
It's become a hangout for cheapskates who spend thousands on a TV then hook it up to a coat hanger so they can watch all that GREAT :rolleyes: network TV for free.
Who's switched to U-verse ??? It's available where I live now, but I've never seen their HD. Does it really suck as bad as what I read ???
SugarBowl 08-31-09, 04:17 PM Who's switched to U-verse ??? It's available where I live now, but I've never seen their HD. Does it really suck as bad as what I read ???
we got a flyer in the mail saying it was available. It certainly didn't look any cheaper than time warner so i don't think we'll be switching.
nitdawg 09-01-09, 09:31 AM It's become a hangout for cheapskates who spend thousands on a TV then hook it up to a coat hanger so they can watch all that GREAT :rolleyes: network TV for free.
I'm all up for discussing all the great cable programming out there, where to start?
roybishop 09-01-09, 11:34 AM Please post your city and subdivision where it's being offered. My address shows not available and I'm curious what they're deploying it. Thanks!
nitdawg 09-01-09, 03:06 PM Please post your city and subdivision where it's being offered. My address shows not available and I'm curious what they're deploying it. Thanks!
According to AT&T my street in Morrisville doesn't even exist, so still waiting.
dslate69 09-02-09, 02:01 PM Who's switched to U-verse ??? It's available where I live now, but I've never seen their HD. Does it really suck as bad as what I read ???
Hello old friend.
I'd be interested to hear your findings on the U-verse shortcomings as I hold your knowledge on this particular subject in somewhat high regard. ;)
I am happy with D* but love to fill my head with facts that I can spout off at the water cooler. The knock I have heard is the number of simultaneous HD streams are limited, although I don't know to what extent that would effect someone recording and sending multiple streams around the house.
Hello old friend.
I'd be interested to hear your findings on the U-verse shortcomings as I hold your knowledge on this particular subject in somewhat high regard. ;)
I am happy with D* but love to fill my head with facts that I can spout off at the water cooler. The knock I have heard is the number of simultaneous HD streams are limited, although I don't know to what extent that would effect someone recording and sending multiple streams around the house.
I'll give you the scoop of what I know when I get caught up. I'm in NYC this week installing two hotel HD head ends at a couple of upscale boutique hotels. I had the thrill of a lifetime riding up one of those cage elevators attached to the outside of a 52 story project at 30th and Ave of the Americas. Not for the faint of heart.:eek::eek::eek:
Scooper 09-04-09, 07:16 PM Hello old friend.
I'd be interested to hear your findings on the U-verse shortcomings as I hold your knowledge on this particular subject in somewhat high regard. ;)
I am happy with D* but love to fill my head with facts that I can spout off at the water cooler. The knock I have heard is the number of simultaneous HD streams are limited, although I don't know to what extent that would effect someone recording and sending multiple streams around the house.
Well - according to this thread - http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1138881 - You may not want U-Verse after all..
It's Sunday a.m. and I doubt anyone will reply all that soon, but...
I picked up a HDDVR from the Southpoint mall TWC kiosk on Friday to use with a new bdrm tv. They gave me a battered SA8350 that looks like it's been through a house fire and is missing a 'foot'. I didn't really notice the extent of the damage till I got home, but I also really didn't care. I propped up the missing foot, hooked everything up, set up some shows to record and whatever, and then discovered over the course of the weekend that the box regularly locks up, requiring a hard boot, and resets all settings to default each time, including any recording setups. So, it's basically useless.
I looked up the hours for the Southpoint kiosk and they're open today at noon, but it also says "Box swap upgrade ONLY". Does this somehow mean they're going to refuse to swap out this broken box for a working one?
I know from experience that a) at least one of the employees there has a phenomenally bad attitude and b) they don't actually answer the associated phone number so I can't call and ask this in advance. If anyone has an idea of what 'box swap upgrade only' is likely going to mean to me, let me know.
Perhaps it means "drop off the SA and go buy a HDTiVo instead."
nitdawg 09-06-09, 09:53 AM It's Sunday a.m. and I doubt anyone will reply all that soon, but...
I picked up a HDDVR from the Southpoint mall TWC kiosk on Friday to use with a new bdrm tv. They gave me a battered SA8350 that looks like it's been through a house fire and is missing a 'foot'. I didn't really notice the extent of the damage till I got home, but I also really didn't care. I propped up the missing foot, hooked everything up, set up some shows to record and whatever, and then discovered over the course of the weekend that the box regularly locks up, requiring a hard boot, and resets all settings to default each time, including any recording setups. So, it's basically useless.
I looked up the hours for the Southpoint kiosk and they're open today at noon, but it also says "Box swap upgrade ONLY". Does this somehow mean they're going to refuse to swap out this broken box for a working one?
I know from experience that a) at least one of the employees there has a phenomenally bad attitude and b) they don't actually answer the associated phone number so I can't call and ask this in advance. If anyone has an idea of what 'box swap upgrade only' is likely going to mean to me, let me know.
Perhaps it means "drop off the SA and go buy a HDTiVo instead."
Unfortunately when you are the local cable co monopoly there is no incentive to care about much of anything. When they loose more customers they just keep raising the rates. Try the TWC place in Cary to swap our your box, they usually have quite a stash on hand. Sometimes it like going to the DMV with the most miserable people, but other times its been a breeze.
HDTivo brings on the cablecard and maybe some more headache, but I can't speak on that (although I'm sure you can get some feedback here an on other forums if you go that route).
-NitDawg
Bruce Watson 09-06-09, 12:39 PM It's Sunday a.m. and I doubt anyone will reply all that soon, but...
I picked up a HDDVR from the Southpoint mall TWC kiosk on Friday to use with a new bdrm tv. They gave me a battered SA8350 that looks like it's been through a house fire and is missing a 'foot'. I didn't really notice the extent of the damage till I got home, but I also really didn't care. I propped up the missing foot, hooked everything up, set up some shows to record and whatever, and then discovered over the course of the weekend that the box regularly locks up, requiring a hard boot, and resets all settings to default each time, including any recording setups. So, it's basically useless.
I looked up the hours for the Southpoint kiosk and they're open today at noon, but it also says "Box swap upgrade ONLY". Does this somehow mean they're going to refuse to swap out this broken box for a working one?
I know from experience that a) at least one of the employees there has a phenomenally bad attitude and b) they don't actually answer the associated phone number so I can't call and ask this in advance. If anyone has an idea of what 'box swap upgrade only' is likely going to mean to me, let me know.
Perhaps it means "drop off the SA and go buy a HDTiVo instead."
I have felt your pain in the past. That's why I dropped TWC like the rotten apple they seem to be a couple of years ago.
Next week (if it's cool enough and all the parts show up) I'll haul my lazy tail and an HDTV antenna to the roof. With an HDTV antenna, a blu-ray player, and Netflix, who needs TWC?
Sod 'em if they provide crappy customer service!
scsiraid 09-06-09, 12:43 PM Perhaps it means "drop off the SA and go buy a HDTiVo instead."
Come on in... the water is fine....
Thanks for the replies.
After talking it over with the husband at breakfast, we went and bought a HDTiVo and I guess I'll begin the process of obtaining a ccard/TA from TWC. I didn't bother going to the mall kiosk because it's just going to irritate me if they won't take the SA back there. I'm pretty sure they insist on a service call for the cablecard anyway, I'll give the SA box to the tech at that time.
(Backstory: I'm a longtime TiVo user (series 1/series 2), eventually ditched it and built a lvrm HTPC, been screwing around with that ever since, with and without TWC service depending on how much they are irritating me at any given time. (Sometimes I just grab clear QAM + ATSC and shut the tv service off.) We just bought a decent tv for the bedroom and I have been unable to think of any better DVR solution because there just isn't room for a HTPC unless I buy a case with a better form-factor and blah blah blah. I can't find an extender device that really looks like it would do what I want. And I had forgotten exactly how much the SA DVRs suck or I would have skipped that whole step and bought the tivo in the first place.)
Now to figure out whether this thing will tune anything on its own until I get a cablecard.
pkscout 09-06-09, 08:24 PM Perhaps it means "drop off the SA and go buy a HDTiVo instead."
Or it could mean cancel cable and throw an antenna on your roof. If you don't watch much sports you can get some of the cable stuff from Hulu or Amazon Video on Demand. That's what we did and we spend way less on a few Amazon on Demand TV shows than we did for just analog cable.
Like I said, I do go through phases of ATSC or clear QAM only. I've got a channelmaster out back.
Believe me, I'm not thrilled to be beholden to TWC but I've still got too much of a dependency on instant-gratification network and basic-cable television. :)
Does anyone know the current time frame or procedure for getting a tuning adapter? I've tried to fill out the webform but it's giving me a vague error. I'm hoping this just means the form won't work until my account shows an active cablecard.
rttaylor619 09-07-09, 10:41 AM Does the local Cary/Raleigh/Durham TWC still push the local HD channels out without requiring a set top box? I heard that they used to, but then recently, as of june, no longer rebroadcast them in clear QAM ... can anyone confirm this?
I got an HDTV this weekend, and have the basic cable package (no box, just 2-26) ... and was hoping that I could still get the UNC-TV HD broadcast, and local sports broadcasts.
I guess I can go out and get an antennae, but I was hoping to just get it via digital QAM transmission.
drewwho 09-07-09, 01:50 PM Does the local Cary/Raleigh/Durham TWC still push the local HD channels out without requiring a set top box?
Yes.
Drew
drewwho 09-07-09, 01:54 PM isn't room for a HTPC unless I buy a case with a better form-factor and blah blah blah. I can't find an extender device that really looks like it would do what I want
What do you want an extender to do? Have you considered the tiny SageTV HD200? That will do everything regular SageTV does -- TV playback with automatic commercial skipping, ripped DVD & blueray playback, video podcasts, photos, music, and will (slowly) work with a PlayOn server to view Hulu, NetFlix, etc.
Drew
Bruce Watson 09-07-09, 03:59 PM I'm going to install an HDTV antenna (CM 4220HD, props and thanks to WRAL) on the roof this week if all the parts show up. Just about every local station I'm interested in has a transmitter at the Garner antenna farm. Even WUNC is rumored to be installing a (low power) repeater there (when will it be active?).
Since most everything is at the Garner antenna farm I thought the smart thing to do would be to aim at the center of the farm and see if I can do without a rotator. Part of the KISS principle and all.
The question is, how can I locate the center? IOW, who's broadcasting from the center tower?
This may be a moot question as I'm over near Meridith College. AntennaWeb shows me a whopping two degree spread (145 - 147 degrees, at 12.6-12.7 miles). Perhaps my antenna can't provide enough resolution to differentiate the various towers at this distance anyway. Still, while I'm at it I might as well try and do the best job I can, yes?
Any tips/pointers for a newbie on pointing an antenna are gratefully received!
Terrestrial TV antennas are not like satellite dishes. They usually DO NOT have to be spot on to get a signal, and sometimes they actually work better turned slightly away from the tower depending on the surroundings of the particular area you are in. Best thing to do is just put it out there, and aim approximately and see what happens. If the signal is a little low, turn antenna back and forth, or up and down until signal peaks. It may take a few times doing this before you get the best results.
Scooper 09-07-09, 05:40 PM If you can receive WRAL, and WTVD - you can receive everything in Garner. Only WTVD is on it's own tower right now, all other stations are on the same tower. I don't know where WUNC is planning on putting their channel 30 translator out there, but you should be OK what ever they do.
Hi,
My SA 8300HD just died after 3 years of loyal service. I'll be exchanging it tomorrow. Not sure what I'll be given as a replacement. Any recommendations on if I should ask for another 8300HD or try the newer 8300HDC?
Oh, I don't use an external drive at this time, but might like to try in the future.
Any advice would be appreciated.
Sooke
larc919 09-08-09, 01:34 AM If you can receive WRAL, and WTVD - you can receive everything in Garner. Only WTVD is on it's own tower right now, all other stations are on the same tower.There are three towers at the farm. Any idea what the third one is for? Is that just somebody's spare in case one gets brought down as WRAL's did by ice in Dec 1989?
Scooper 09-08-09, 08:38 AM There are three towers at the farm. Any idea what the third one is for? Is that just somebody's spare in case one gets brought down as WRAL's did by ice in Dec 1989?
It was WNCN's analog tower. They may be keeping it as a "just in case" like you said.
Retspin 09-08-09, 10:16 AM It was used for the analogs for WRAL, WRAZ and WRDC. There are at least two FM's on it now, WQDR and WRAL-FM. According to the FCC database, WRDC digital is on that tower also. I guess they are using the old analog 28 antenna.
Would be interested to hear from anyone who has very recently, or is able to this week, obtain a Tuning Adapter for a TiVoHD from TWC Carolinas.
The webform doesn't seem to work (I was told 24 hours after cablecard install it would; going on 48 now..."Order not Accepted"), and the CSRs either hang up on me or tell me someone will call me back.
I don't understand why dealing with them always has to be an enormous hassle.
Also, can someone confirm that quite a lot of channels are SDV now? I had it in my head that it was mostly just the HDs added this year, but that seems not to be the case. This is making the TiVO HD into an expensive semi-brick if I can't get a TA.
Thanks in advance.
According to AT&T my street in Morrisville doesn't even exist, so still waiting.
Well, they know I am here in off Morrisville-Carpenter, but they will only give me 3.0 DSL instead of 6.0 even though we have fiber running on the curb here. I would like to get Uverse just for the internet and phone service. I would not get TV from them though, I'm happy with DirecTV and the "cheap over the air TV".
toadfannc 09-10-09, 10:36 AM For those who were hoping that TWC would add the NFL Network (and/or NFL RedZone) for the 2009 season ... forget it.
http://blog.timesunion.com/sportsmedia/nfl-network-releases-statement-in-regard-to-time-warner/2410/
Looks like the model that the NFL used to make a deal with Comcast (and just about every other cable/sat company) is not good enough for TWC.
Those of us on Directv lost Versus, and ESPN classic. These companies keep putting themselves first, and not their customers. Comcast is the reason we lost VS.
NCCaniac 09-10-09, 02:53 PM Those of us on Directv lost Versus, and ESPN classic. These companies keep putting themselves first, and not their customers. Comcast is the reason we lost VS.
Hmm....I'm on Dish, which has recently been touting the option of adding NFL RedZone as an add-on channel. Dish still has Versus and ESPN Classic, but of course, only Directv has NFL Sunday Ticket.
Not as much impact from competition as I would like to see, but having TWC, Directv, Dish, and now AT&T U-verse coming into the mix....the more the better.
popweaverhdtv 09-10-09, 05:38 PM Those of us on Directv lost Versus, and ESPN classic. These companies keep putting themselves first, and not their customers. Comcast is the reason we lost VS.
ESPN Classic is currently available on Ch. 208 via D* (watching it right now: featuring the 1982 NCAA Final of Georgetown vs. UNC).
Bruce Watson 09-10-09, 07:25 PM If you can receive WRAL, and WTVD - you can receive everything in Garner. Only WTVD is on it's own tower right now, all other stations are on the same tower. I don't know where WUNC is planning on putting their channel 30 translator out there, but you should be OK what ever they do.
Got the last of my antenna installation parts delivered this afternoon, and it was cloudy and cool. No time like the present and all that...
Long story short, I forgot my compass, so I just stuck the antenna mast in the mount, took a wild-ass guess and pointed it to where I thought Garner might be, and tightened it finger tight (knowing I'd be back making aiming adjustments). Went down to the TV room and had the TV make a sweep though the channels. I was hoping to get one or two. Damn if it didn't come up with like 27! The TV's software signal strength meter says I hit WRAL 5-1 at 88 out of 100. Not bad for wild-ass guess.
Interestingly, I picked up all three of WUNCs channels (my little 4220HD is pointed like 170 degrees *away* from Chapel Hill) with excellent strength. I'm assuming that's the repeater in Garner? My TV isn't telling me what frequency it's actually seeing so I don't know for sure.
Also, I'm picking up all three of WTVD's channels. This I did *not* expect since the 4220HD is just a couple of UHF bowties. Am I seeing a UHF repeater? Or is 11 close enough to the bottom of the UHF band for the antenna? IOW, how am I picking this up with a lowly 4220HD?
Anyway, thanks to everyone in the group for the encouragement. Pretty cool to just stick an antenna on the roof and get such good results. Piece of pie!
Scooper 09-10-09, 07:48 PM It is quite possible if you're close enough to get WUNC off the backside. and that your antenna works well enough on 11 to get it (my UHF antenna doesn't - I'm too far away in a bad environment - trees - but I do have VHF antenna that works great for 11 and FM). No UHF repeater for 11, and the last I knew WUNC's channel 30 translator isn't up yet. So, you're doing great !
Bruce Watson 09-10-09, 08:05 PM It is quite possible if you're close enough to get WUNC off the backside. and that your antenna works well enough on 11 to get it (my UHF antenna doesn't - I'm too far away in a bad environment - trees - but I do have VHF antenna that works great for 11 and FM). No UHF repeater for 11, and the last I knew WUNC's channel 30 translator isn't up yet. So, you're doing great !
What's that sayin'? Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn once in a while? I guess today was my day. ;-) It *is* a little like hitting 10 green lights in a row. Doesn't happen often, but I'll take it when I can get it.
What's that sayin'? Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn once in a while? I guess today was my day. ;-) It *is* a little like hitting 10 green lights in a row. Doesn't happen often, but I'll take it when I can get it.
If you're not seeing any errors or breakups in the pictures, then you're all set! Next, you might try for eastern NC channels. :cool:
When I post here with a problem, and then get it resolved, I usually like to post a follow-up in case some poor sod comes along with the same problem. In this case it's not going to be that useful. I was struggling to get a Tuning Adapter (necessary for SDV channels on a HD TiVo) from TWC, because the online form just kept spitting Order Not Accepted for me (and you can probably image how productive my five or six phone calls to customer support were). In the end, a friend of a friend managed to get an installer to bring one out on the truck--I'm still not sure how and I believe this would be difficult to accomplish with a regular call to customer support. So my solution isn't too useful to others. However, I did want to mention that if the webform doesn't work, if you take yourself down to the office (not a mall kiosk but a real office) the csrs there can get into a form on their terminals to have one mailed to you via FedEx from Raleigh. Or so I was told.
I don't get the sense there are too many TWC-HDTiVo users on this thread, as I recall, but I did want to post the follow-up for posterity. Sorry for any interruption.
Hi folks,
I'm new to the area -- just relocated from Central Maine into an apartment on the Morrisville/Cary line.
I've been getting ATSC reception for my tunerless HDTV monitor. I have an old VOOM satellite receiver using it just for OTA receptio. I've found there is a problem with both area CBS stations (WRAL-5 RF 48 & WFMY-2 RF 51) -- they cause the VOOM box to shut down and reboot when you tune to them. This problem has been reported elsewhere:
http://www.highdefforum.com/local-hdtv-info-reception/18340-local-pbs-hdtv-resets-voom-fta-reciever.html
The top PBS engineer from the PBS corporation wrote back to me and said that he was able to obtain a VOOM box for his test lab and was able to re-create the problem. He told me all the nitty gritty details about why the problem is happening and confirmed that my local station did change their broadcast signal they just probably are not aware of the change because this particular change would have been made by PBS corporate. From what I gathered, he said that even with their digital broadcast they were using an analog carrier to send the TV guide information. They changed this to a digital signal for the TV guide and it causes the Voom box to crash. He said that he would work to correct the problem. He said if VOOM was still in business they would probably have issued a firmware upgrade to fix the problem. He was very nice and sounded very authoritative on the subject but I still cannot get PBS to work.
I get the crashes for all of the channel 2 subchannels, and for channel 5-1 (5-2 tunes OK).
Has anyone experienced similar problems? Does anyone know how to contact the engineers at WRAL or WFMY?
I'm trying to look for a more modern ATSC tuner, but it isn't in my budget. I was shocked to see tuners still > $100.
Thanks,
Joe
Scooper 09-12-09, 03:48 PM While it isn't HD, you could consider finding an converter box for much cheaper. It would get you by until you can swing something better.
vidiot1985 09-13-09, 07:08 AM Have you considered a tuner for your computer (assuming you have one capable of HD playback through your HDTV monitor)?
You can get an ATSC tuner card or USB stick for ~$30 and up these days (e.g. search for "atsc tuner" at newegg.com), and you get recording capability with it.
Those of us on Directv lost Versus, and ESPN classic. These companies keep putting themselves first, and not their customers. Comcast is the reason we lost VS.
ESPN CLassic has been moved to a higher programming package as part of the deal to move ESPNU down to the lower level package and also to allow DirecTV to (eventually, when they lauch their next satellite in like February 2010) carry ESPNU HD. It has not been removed from DirecTVm just exchanged for another ESPN channel. This came out of ESPN's desire to have ESPNU moved down to the basic package for all cable and sat companies and was negotiated by them with all the providers over a 1 or 2 year period. They are not sure what to do with ESPN Classic long term and may eventually change it around as well.
They did take Versus down, but in the past, DirecTV has been really good about getting deals done and has not been holding channels hostage like Dish Net and some cable companies routinely do. Either, they have changed their negotiation strategy from the past or the Versus thing is an exceptionally difficult negotiation. Lots of accusations back and forth, but that fact that Versus is owned by Comcast makes me want to give DirecTV the benefit of the doubt on this one.
I'll admit, I do like having ESPNU, since I watched it over the weekend for college football.:)
However, I do miss Versus. I hope they get this worked out before my hockey starts next month.
MattWarner 09-14-09, 10:20 PM ...DirecTV has been really good about getting deals done and has not been holding channels hostage like Dish Net and some cable companies routinely do. Either, they have changed their negotiation strategy from the past or the Versus thing is an exceptionally difficult negotiation. Lots of accusations back and forth, but that fact that Versus is owned by Comcast makes me want to give DirecTV the benefit of the doubt on this one.
From DirecTV's Twitter Account:
Many asked about terms. DIRECTV already pays Versus more than any independent distributor and yet Comcast seeks a 20%+ hike on that rate. We offered to carry Versus through Sept while talks continued -- Comcast declined. We've heard you - its time Comcast hears from you!
So, I would agree with Lee that I'm giving DirecTV the benefit of the doubt. I'm not sure I want any provider able to hike rates up 20% for a single channel.
tarheelone 09-16-09, 05:45 PM The following channel additions have been announced on the Charlotte TWC channel change page. Since TWC has been adding channels at the same time statewide for the past year one can assume(and hope) that we will get them here as well.
October 28, 2009: The following channels will be added:
Lo Mejor On Demand - (Free On Demand)
HBO2 HD - (requires subscription to HBO)
HBO Signature HD - (requires subscription to HBO)
HBO Family HD - (requires subscription to HBO)
HBO Comedy HD - (requires subscription to HBO)
HBO Zone HD - (requires subscription to HBO)
HBO Latino HD - (requires subscription to HBO)
BBC America HD - (Digital Basic)
Fox Sports Carolinas HD - (Basic Cable plus HD converter)
Headline News HD - (Basic Cable plus HD converter)
Investigation Discovery HD - (Digital Basic)
MSNBC HD - (Basic Cable plus HD converter)
truTV HD - (Basic Cable plus HD converter)
TCM HD - (Basic Cable plus HD converter)
October 28, 2009: The following channels will be added:
Lo Mejor On Demand - (Free On Demand)
HBO2 HD - (requires subscription to HBO)
HBO Signature HD - (requires subscription to HBO)
HBO Family HD - (requires subscription to HBO)
HBO Comedy HD - (requires subscription to HBO)
HBO Zone HD - (requires subscription to HBO)
HBO Latino HD - (requires subscription to HBO)
BBC America HD - (Digital Basic)
Fox Sports Carolinas HD - (Basic Cable plus HD converter)
Headline News HD - (Basic Cable plus HD converter)
Investigation Discovery HD - (Digital Basic)
MSNBC HD - (Basic Cable plus HD converter)
truTV HD - (Basic Cable plus HD converter)
TCM HD - (Basic Cable plus HD converter)
Well, we already get FSC HD. Unless they're making it a full-time channel?
Also, how is a 'HD converter' different from their other digital boxes?
tarheelone 09-16-09, 08:16 PM Well, we already get FSC HD. Unless they're making it a full-time channel?
They already have it in Charlotte as well. So the guess is that Fox Sports is finally getting around to making it a full time channel.
drewwho 09-17-09, 10:41 AM A while back, there were complaints from people with vizio TVs about not being able to correctly view some material broadcast on our local 720p channels due to Vizio bugs handling TFF/RFF telecine flags in 720 material. I'm now being bit by this for a different reason, and I was wondering if any of you had contacted WRDC?
WRDC recently started showing ST:TNG re-runs, and their encoder is doing the TFF/TFF thing. I can *watch* them fine (since I use a hardware based extender), but when I try to compress them, the fast motion is jerky, because the SageTV transcoding software (based on ffmpeg) doesn't understand the TFF/RFF flags.
So, have any of you with Vizios had problems watch ST:TNG on 28.1 at 11pm?
Thanks,
Drew
gstelmack 09-18-09, 10:17 AM The following channel additions have been announced on the Charlotte TWC channel change page. Since TWC has been adding channels at the same time statewide for the past year one can assume(and hope) that we will get them here as well.
Oh sure, NOW they add all the HBO HDs, announcing it the day after I dropped HBO and Cinemax because we were using the HD OnDemand for movies more than the two of them combined...
tamarawadams 09-18-09, 04:59 PM Ok guys - I need your help! I am in Garner, and I can get UNC TV(PBS) on all of my TVs except the main TV for which we use the same antenna type as the other TVs. The only difference is instead of a traditional converter box, this TV has the DTV-Pal DVR. Some of the rooms that get PBS are more hindered with obstacles for the antenna than the main TV, so I don't think this is the problem. Any suggestions? My 2 & 4 year olds are dying to get PBS back (and frankly, so am I)!
You might be surprised how antenna work (or don't).
I have 2 Dish receivers... and the exact same antenna in my bedroom picks up more channels than in my living room... and in my living room I can put the antenna higher AND go through 1 less wall towards the antenna farm.
I don't have any concrete answers for you... but antenna adjustment sometimes does act like the sum-being-greater-than-the-parts.
neumannu47 09-20-09, 08:58 AM We have the TW SA 8300 DVR. My Toshiba LCD TV reports that all HD shows are 1080i. Is that resolution the maximum that is available from TW or from this box? Is there no 1080p? The TV is 1080p capable.
We don't have a Blu-Ray player yet, so I guess I have never even seen 1080p. Or am I misunderstanding something?
zim2dive 09-20-09, 10:44 AM We have the TW SA 8300 DVR. My Toshiba LCD TV reports that all HD shows are 1080i. Is that resolution the maximum that is available from TW or from this box? Is there no 1080p? The TV is 1080p capable.
We don't have a Blu-Ray player yet, so I guess I have never even seen 1080p. Or am I misunderstanding something?
I don;t think there is any broadcast 1080p material (or probably the material is there, but no one broadcasts 1080p)
Dish and Direct (and maybe TWC) do some limited PPV 1080p movies (but a majority are not)
drewwho 09-21-09, 08:48 AM I lost NBC17 last night around 10PM (just after the bizarre interception in the Dallas / NYG game). It had been fine for about 10 minutes, and then suddenly, "no signal". All other channels were coming in fine (had switched over from the Emmy's when my wife went to bed).
I checked again this morning, and I still didn't have a signal as of 8:30 or so. So I broke out the Linux dvb tools, and noticed that it had a very high Bit Error Rate and an unusually low signal. Eg:
$ azap WNCN
using '/dev/dvb/adapter0/frontend0' and '/dev/dvb/adapter0/demux0'
tuning to 491028615 Hz
video pid 0x0000, audio pid 0x0000
status 00 | signal fd70 | snr e2d6 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 |
status 1f | signal dd20 | snr 7f2c | ber 00003f30 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal dec0 | snr 80c4 | ber 00004a40 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal dbe0 | snr 7e82 | ber 000030f0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal dfd0 | snr 7e60 | ber 00002ad8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e3e0 | snr 83a2 | ber 00001d78 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e3b0 | snr 7dd6 | ber 00001680 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal dfb0 | snr 8408 | ber 000016e0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal df60 | snr 84a2 | ber 00001928 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal dc70 | snr 813c | ber 00002038 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal dff0 | snr 813c | ber 00001ed8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal de00 | snr 83f8 | ber 00001528 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e320 | snr 81f8 | ber 00001420 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e2a0 | snr 7c70 | ber 00001a00 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e1e0 | snr 844c | ber 000017d8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e2c0 | snr 7f82 | ber 000019b8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal df30 | snr 7f92 | ber 000014c8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e230 | snr 7f4e | ber 00001490 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e310 | snr 833c | ber 00001ba0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal de90 | snr 812c | ber 000019b8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e5c0 | snr 842a | ber 00000e98 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e0d0 | snr 7e82 | ber 00000d18 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e830 | snr 7f5e | ber 00000d50 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e450 | snr 84d4 | ber 00000a60 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e5f0 | snr 8608 | ber 00000638 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e310 | snr 86e6 | ber 000007b8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e010 | snr 8480 | ber 000008f0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e1a0 | snr 87c2 | ber 00000cf0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e720 | snr 87a0 | ber 00000a20 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e7b0 | snr 897e | ber 00000498 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e4d0 | snr 82a2 | ber 000004a0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e320 | snr 87d4 | ber 00000850 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e6b0 | snr 855e | ber 000007b0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e570 | snr 87b2 | ber 00000688 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e190 | snr 8580 | ber 000007d0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e300 | snr 854c | ber 00000548 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e6f0 | snr 877e | ber 000003b8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e8f0 | snr 867e | ber 00000380 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e520 | snr 87a0 | ber 000002e8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e4e0 | snr 883a | ber 00000408 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e730 | snr 83e6 | ber 00000408 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e690 | snr 8928 | ber 00000318 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e890 | snr 863a | ber 000002c0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e600 | snr 884c | ber 00000298 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e3e0 | snr 855e | ber 00000360 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e8c0 | snr 8690 | ber 000002c0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e8f0 | snr 896c | ber 000002b0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e8a0 | snr 87c2 | ber 00000260 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e670 | snr 855e | ber 00000390 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e690 | snr 853a | ber 00000310 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e550 | snr 883a | ber 00000228 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e830 | snr 87a0 | ber 000002b8 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal e4e0 | snr 875c | ber 000002c0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal eae0 | snr 88d4 | ber 00000190 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
<...>
status 1f | signal f480 | snr caf0 | ber 00000010 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal f460 | snr c714 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal f510 | snr c772 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal f4c0 | snr c338 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal f490 | snr c5fa | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal f430 | snr c85e | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal f310 | snr c714 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal f3f0 | snr c8ea | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal f2f0 | snr c8bc | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal efd0 | snr c82e | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal f300 | snr c978 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal f270 | snr c742 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal f4c0 | snr cb20 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
status 1f | signal f2f0 | snr c4e0 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK
While I watched, the signal gradually increased, and the BER dropped to zero, and now I can get it fine..
So was NBC17 having a problem, or was this just me? I've never seen anything like this before, and it was happening with multiple tuners.
Drew
Trip in VA 09-21-09, 08:50 AM Probably tropospheric ducting. The WTFDA mailing list lit up last night with people seeing Virginia and North Carolina stations in New York.
- Trip
drewwho 09-21-09, 09:42 AM Probably tropospheric ducting. The WTFDA mailing list lit up last night with people seeing Virginia and North Carolina stations in New York.
- Trip
So you're saying that another, non-local channel overwhelmed WNCN's transmitter on UHF 17? Do you have any idea what station it might have been? I've got a CM4228 pointed at WNCN and I'm only 20 miles from it.. I generally have excellent reception. Is there anything I can / should do to prevent this from happening again? This never happened when WNCN was at its pre-transition frequency in the 50s.
Thanks,
Drew
Trip in VA 09-21-09, 09:45 AM That's because channel 55 was relatively clean. The nearest digital 55 was... probably 0.9 kW worth of WHAG in Hagerstown. The nearest analog 55 was WMYT in Charlotte, but ATSC was designed to better handle co-channel analog interference.
Channel 17 has competition from WFXR-DT in Roanoke, WKTD-CD in Norfolk, and WLTX-DT in Columbia. There's not a whole lot you can do about tropospheric ducting; it's pretty rare that it's strong enough to wipe out a local signal but it does happen.
- Trip
drewwho 09-21-09, 09:58 AM That's because channel 55 was relatively clean. The nearest digital 55 was... probably 0.9 kW worth of WHAG in Hagerstown. The nearest analog 55 was WMYT in Charlotte, but ATSC was designed to better handle co-channel analog interference.
Channel 17 has competition from WFXR-DT in Roanoke, WKTD-CD in Norfolk, and WLTX-DT in Columbia. There's not a whole lot you can do about tropospheric ducting; it's pretty rare that it's strong enough to wipe out a local signal but it does happen.
- Trip
I guess it is not directional, then? I have my 4228 aimed at the towers in Garner, and all those stations would be way off to the side, where the 4228 is supposed to be quite weak.
Drew
Trip in VA 09-21-09, 10:03 AM At some point, I've had all of my locals wiped out from signals off the back and/or sides of my antennas. Tropospheric ducting can make signals from distant locations stronger than even local signals. My antenna is aimed at Roanoke, 90 degrees off from Raleigh, and yet WFXR does sometimes get wiped out by WNCN. I can tell because WRAL and some of the others will be maxing out my signal meters and WFXR just disappears.
All it has to do is raise the noise floor under the signal you want high enough that the tuner can't decode it. (ATSC requires a 15 dB signal/noise ratio to decode.)
- Trip
I hope this past weekend was not what we can expect from WRAL from now on. The ACC game went long due to multiple rain delays at the site in Clemson. At 3:30 when the Tennessee Florida game was supposed to be starting, the Clemson BC game had just started the second rain delay which would have been at least 30 mintues and ended up being about 45. The announcers were just chatting and showing filler mixed with shots of the empty stadium and rain. This went on for some time.
I can understand not switching to the national CBS game if there is still action going on, but to show nothing but rain?
How about using the subchannel you have to show one or the other instead of some old movies on this and that TV or whatever it is called?
How about throwing up a crawl saying what is going on so that the viewers can be informed?
They eventually cut over to the Tenn-FL game after 20 or 30 minutes, but this was only after lots of calls (at least I assume so, I got busy signals for at least 15 minutes trying to call them.)
Luckily I was able to watch the beginning of the Tenn-FL game on CBS.com but this is not what I expect from the leading station in the area.
Plus, I would really like it if WRAL would fix the sound screw ups every time they do a logo insertion. IT was very obvious on the Emmys last night. It is better than last year, but still quite noticeable.
Trip in VA 09-21-09, 12:03 PM In regard to our discussion about ducting earlier, someone on the mailing list in Massachusetts is STILL able to decode WGPX-14 as of 11AM. This is a very unusual event.
- Trip
drewwho 09-21-09, 12:51 PM In regard to our discussion about ducting earlier, someone on the mailing list in Massachusetts is STILL able to decode WGPX-14 as of 11AM. This is a very unusual event.
- Trip
No offense to the DX-er crowd, but I'm hoping it doesn't happen again. Especially during a close SNF game!
Drew
Trip in VA 09-21-09, 05:19 PM It can and will happen again, though as I said, it's usually not intense enough to wipe out local reception at such a close distance.
When it happens, you might try looking for other signals of the same network affiliation. For example, try putting in 32-1 and you might see WITN 7-1, or 44-3 might give you WECT 6-1.
- Trip
drewwho 09-21-09, 05:23 PM It can and will happen again, though as I said, it's usually not intense enough to wipe out local reception at such a close distance.
When it happens, you might try looking for other signals of the same network affiliation. For example, try putting in 32-1 and you might see WITN 7-1, or 44-3 might give you WECT 6-1.
- Trip
I almost never watch live tv, though, so by the I'd normally notice this, a few days or weeks would pass. I just happened to be "lucky" enough to see this last night... :)
Drew
Trip in VA 09-23-09, 12:27 AM WTVD has requested to increase power from 20.7 kW to 45 kW.
- Trip
WTVD has requested to increase power from 20.7 kW to 45 kW.
- Trip
That's good news! WTVD has been the one channel that's borderline for me, so increased power is always welcome.
Any idea on the possible timeframe?
That's good news! WTVD has been the one channel that's borderline for me, so increased power is always welcome.
Any idea on the possible timeframe?
No way to know how long it will be. First it has to be approved by the FCC. Then the station will test things and make sure there is not too much interference to other stations. Often times (from what I understand) something might look OK on paper, and what actually occurs in the real scheme don't always match up exactly as expected. Four or five other channels had to agree to interference from this move. If it does work out, WTVD would have a killer signal that goes further than any of the other channels (in most fringe spots) from the same area it appears from the coverage map I saw.
drewwho 09-23-09, 09:45 AM If it does work out, WTVD would have a killer signal that goes further than any of the other channels (in most fringe spots) from the same area it appears from the coverage map I saw.
Now, if they'd only scale back 11-2 to 480i and boost the bandwidth on 11-1, people might actually want to watch them.
Drew
tarheelone 09-23-09, 12:58 PM October 28, 2009: The following channels will be added:
Classic On Demand - Channel 512
Thriller On Demand - Channel 513
Kids/Teens On Demand - Channel 514
Action On Demand - Channel 515
Comedy On Demand - Channel 516
Drama On Demand - Channel 517
Lo Mejor On Demand - Channel 547
HBO 2 East HD - Channel 414
HBO Signature East HD - Channel 415
HBO Family East HD - Channel 416
HBO Comedy East HD - Channel 417
HBO Zone East HD - Channel 418
HBO Latino East HD - Channel 419
BBC America HD - Channel 235
Fox Sports Carolina HD - Channel 272
Headline News HD - Channel 232
Investigation Discovery HD - Channel 236
truTV HD - Channel 242
MSNBC HD - Channel 233
TCM HD - Channel 243
toadfannc 09-23-09, 01:31 PM October 28, 2009: The following channels will be added:
Classic On Demand - Channel 512
Thriller On Demand - Channel 513
Kids/Teens On Demand - Channel 514
Action On Demand - Channel 515
Comedy On Demand - Channel 516
Drama On Demand - Channel 517
Lo Mejor On Demand - Channel 547
HBO 2 East HD - Channel 414
HBO Signature East HD - Channel 415
HBO Family East HD - Channel 416
HBO Comedy East HD - Channel 417
HBO Zone East HD - Channel 418
HBO Latino East HD - Channel 419
BBC America HD - Channel 235
Fox Sports Carolina HD - Channel 272
Headline News HD - Channel 232
Investigation Discovery HD - Channel 236
truTV HD - Channel 242
MSNBC HD - Channel 233
TCM HD - Channel 243
Nice additions. Weather Channel HD (which TWC already has a national distribution agreement for and is on many TWC division line-ups) would be nice for us blue-hairs.
And, of course-- NFL Network (and Red Zone) and MASN would be very welcome for us sports nuts. But, TWC has taken a hard line with these 2-- I don't see it happening in this lifetime, unfortunately.
Now, if they'd only scale back 11-2 to 480i and boost the bandwidth on 11-1, people might actually want to watch them.
Drew
I 2nd that. While WTVD is lower signal for me than many others, I do get it pretty solid... but haven't watched nearly as much since the 11.2 sub-channel went to pseudo HD and cut into the main channel bandwidth.
Retspin 09-23-09, 04:41 PM I 2nd that. While WTVD is lower signal for me than many others, I do get it pretty solid... but haven't watched nearly as much since the 11.2 sub-channel went to pseudo HD and cut into the main channel bandwidth.
Yeah I agree, I can get WCTI out of New Bern and it looks so much better than WTVD. But they only have one sub-channel instead two, and that makes all the difference.
I called WRAL regarding the issue I posted about the Game going long this past weekend. Thay actually called me back pretty quickly. They said that had gotten a decent number of complaints. Their contract with Raycom requires them to carry the whole broadcast, so they were kind of screwed. I suggested that if this happens again to just use 5.2 for the CBS national game until the ACC game is on and everyone would be happy and they said they would look into that. The only issue I see is that peopel who were expecing a movie on This TV might not be happy, but maybe they can plan around that. Hopefully none of the games will go long enough again to matter.
But, at the very least, they do care about listeners enough to actually return a call.
Unlike WTVD, who I called the same day (Monday) and I have yet to hear back from regarding the sound issues I am having with my Denon 1909. The center channel is often way low and the surround is shifted hard left. I know in the past others have mentioned similar issues, but not recently. Am I crazy. Has anyone noticed sound problems on WTVD lately?
StinDaWg 09-24-09, 06:10 PM I have a Windows 7 htpc and I'm considering getting a few tuners so that I can record QAM to my pc. I already have a HD DVR from Time Warner but with the small hard drive they give us and only having 2 tuners it makes it difficult to record everything I want at all times. My question is this... I have read reports that cable systems are pretty flaky when it comes to assigning QAM channel numbers. Constantly changing numbers, having to rescan to find where they went to ect. Does Time Warner do this? If that is the case I might be better off just getting a $10 antenna from Wal-Mart and using a ATSC tuner. At least that way I would know the channel numbers won't change. Any suggestions?
Also, do the channels show up in Media Center as actual or virtual as shown by this chart?
http://www.silicondust.com/hdhomerun/lineup_web/US:27540#lineup_800232
roybishop 09-25-09, 11:17 AM Windows 7 is much better for QAM. It shows both the guide and live TV channels as the virtual numbers.
I have a Windows 7 htpc and I'm considering getting a few tuners so that I can record QAM to my pc. I already have a HD DVR from Time Warner but with the small hard drive they give us and only having 2 tuners it makes it difficult to record everything I want at all times. My question is this... I have read reports that cable systems are pretty flaky when it comes to assigning QAM channel numbers. Constantly changing numbers, having to rescan to find where they went to ect. Does Time Warner do this? If that is the case I might be better off just getting a $10 antenna from Wal-Mart and using a ATSC tuner. At least that way I would know the channel numbers won't change. Any suggestions?
Also, do the channels show up in Media Center as actual or virtual as shown by this chart?
http://www.silicondust.com/hdhomerun/lineup_web/US:27540#lineup_800232
drewwho 09-25-09, 02:25 PM Windows 7 is much better for QAM. It shows both the guide and live TV channels as the virtual numbers.
Just make sure your tuner has windows support for QAM. I could never get my el-cheapo Kworld USB tuner to work with 7MC and QAM. It works fine with 7MC and ATSC, and it works fine with MythTV and QAM under Linux, but even after 2 driver versions, and a few hours trying registry hacks, I still couldn't make it work on 7MC for QAM.
As to cable flakiness.. The biggest problem I've seen is that TWC will screw up the CVT (cable virtual channel table) that controls mapping logical channels (eg, 5-1) to physical channels (85-4). This freaks MythTV out (or did back when I used QAM regularly a few years ago). I cannot speak to 7MC, since I could never get QAM to work at all with it. I decided to go with an attic antenna for a variety of reasons..
Drew
StinDaWg 09-25-09, 05:25 PM Just make sure your tuner has windows support for QAM. I could never get my el-cheapo Kworld USB tuner to work with 7MC and QAM. It works fine with 7MC and ATSC, and it works fine with MythTV and QAM under Linux, but even after 2 driver versions, and a few hours trying registry hacks, I still couldn't make it work on 7MC for QAM.
Is this the tuner you have?
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1182508
nitdawg 09-25-09, 07:01 PM I have a Windows 7 htpc and I'm considering getting a few tuners so that I can record QAM to my pc. I already have a HD DVR from Time Warner but with the small hard drive they give us and only having 2 tuners it makes it difficult to record everything I want at all times. My question is this... I have read reports that cable systems are pretty flaky when it comes to assigning QAM channel numbers. Constantly changing numbers, having to rescan to find where they went to ect. Does Time Warner do this? If that is the case I might be better off just getting a $10 antenna from Wal-Mart and using a ATSC tuner. At least that way I would know the channel numbers won't change. Any suggestions?
Also, do the channels show up in Media Center as actual or virtual as shown by this chart?
http://www.silicondust.com/hdhomerun/lineup_web/US:27540#lineup_800232
I've used both OTA and QAM on with 7MC. Both work well, but it took more work up front for setting up the QAM. All the channel data is there, but I had to manually assign channel data for a handful of channels, like WUNC, and a few others, but that's not that big of a deal. OTA was a bit easier and I can't honestly say I see any PQ difference between the 2.
drewwho 09-25-09, 07:52 PM Is this the tuner you have?
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1182508
Yep. As I mentioned in the PM, even though it doesn't work for QAM in 7MC, it has a really good ATSC tuner.
Drew
StinDaWg 09-25-09, 08:00 PM Yep. As I mentioned in the PM, even though it doesn't work for QAM in 7MC, it has a really good ATSC tuner.
Drew
That even makes it more confusing because there are reviews on Newegg of QAM working on Windows 7 just fine. You said you were using the RC. I have the final RTM (7600) perhaps that will work? I guess the only way to find out is to buy and try unless someone else has this tuner.
drewwho 09-25-09, 08:25 PM That even makes it more confusing because there are reviews on Newegg of QAM working on Windows 7 just fine. You said you were using the RC. I have the final RTM (7600) perhaps that will work? I guess the only way to find out is to buy and try unless someone else has this tuner.
They appear to have released new drivers on 2009/08/25, which is about 3 weeks after I got the box and played with QAM on 7MC. I have not tried these drivers, perhaps they allow for QAM support on 7MC. I had been using the previous drivers, which are like a year older (and didn't explicitly support Win7). If I get a chance, I'll try the new driver..
Drew
drewwho 09-25-09, 08:27 PM I've used both OTA and QAM on with 7MC. Both work well, but it took more work up front for setting up the QAM. All the channel data is there, but I had to manually assign channel data for a handful of channels, like WUNC, and a few others, but that's not that big of a deal. OTA was a bit easier and I can't honestly say I see any PQ difference between the 2.
Will 7MC allow you to record 2 sub-channels from the same multiplex with the same tuner? Eg, if you're using QAM and you want to record something from both 50-1 and 11-1 (which are both subchannels on the same physical QAM channel on TWC) and have only one tuner will that work?
Thanks,
Drew
drewwho 09-27-09, 08:37 AM They appear to have released new drivers on 2009/08/25,
Still no QAM with the latest kworld driver on 7MC (7100) for me. Its possible I'm just being an idiot. 7MC thinks the tuner is ATSC only, and only talks about "antenna" stuff in setup, and finds no channels when connected to TWC. I even tried an "ATSCMode=2" hack I found in the GBPVR forums. The hardware is fine -- MythTV works well on the same box with QAM.
Drew
nitdawg 09-28-09, 11:47 AM Still no QAM with the latest kworld driver on 7MC (7100) for me. Its possible I'm just being an idiot. 7MC thinks the tuner is ATSC only, and only talks about "antenna" stuff in setup, and finds no channels when connected to TWC. I even tried an "ATSCMode=2" hack I found in the GBPVR forums. The hardware is fine -- MythTV works well on the same box with QAM.
Drew
That's goofy. I would say its a driver/hardware issue with 7MC. QAM is supported in Media Center in Vista (with TV pack installed) and is supported out of the box in 7MC
When you go to setup your TV signal in 7MC, instead of selecting the automatically determine my TV signal, so to manual setup of your tuner, select QAM and then continue through the setup to see if that works.
Like here:
https://b2gwqw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1mZQRurE94F5wOTij9YkWwvI3DrhCQFVLGA1JIpq7YMnbBGZV6mxgZHXwU_ qXUqA0EBgnn_0fKC9vLfS38za1oINYZweqoL1G53H3gVsu4ba7G-LQKsTjd4vOSCD1rIVjxjef-hnuKZY5Gmh6k14vE-g/20090604_1548385.png
nitdawg 09-28-09, 11:51 AM Will 7MC allow you to record 2 sub-channels from the same multiplex with the same tuner? Eg, if you're using QAM and you want to record something from both 50-1 and 11-1 (which are both subchannels on the same physical QAM channel on TWC) and have only one tuner will that work?
Thanks,
Drew
Granted you have 2 tuners, yes.
drewwho 09-28-09, 12:21 PM When you go to setup your TV signal in 7MC, instead of selecting the automatically determine my TV signal, so to manual setup of your tuner, select QAM and then continue through the setup to see if that works.
I'm never given that screen, it just automatically starts detecting TV signals. Maybe this is a difference between 7100 and the RTM builds?
Drew
drewwho 09-28-09, 12:22 PM Granted you have 2 tuners, yes.
So thats a "no" then. ;)
MythTV can record 2 digital channels with a single tuner (as long as they share the same physical channel). It has so many cool features like this, I just wish its handling of telecined material didn't suck so badly.
Drew
nitdawg 09-28-09, 12:40 PM I'm never given that screen, it just automatically starts detecting TV signals. Maybe this is a difference between 7100 and the RTM builds?
Drew
Hmmm, I'm running 7100. Under settings, TV, configure TV signal (trying to remember here at work)...I'll dig more when I get home.
nitdawg 09-28-09, 12:44 PM So thats a "no" then. ;)
MythTV can record 2 digital channels with a single tuner (as long as they share the same physical channel). It has so many cool features like this, I just wish its handling of telecined material didn't suck so badly.
Drew
That's slick...didn't know that about Myth. Me (and more importantly my wife) is so used to the 7MC gui I'll probably never get around to messing with Myth and Sage. It does the job with my tuner card quite well (Hauppage 2250) and I've found OTA a bit more pain-free than QAM just in terms of channel mapping, guide data, etc.
modforce 09-28-09, 09:43 PM I just picked up a 5' extension pole to get my antenna higher then my roof peak. I don't have a ladder high enough to reach the peak and the roof is 12/12 pitch so I am not climbing that, now that I am older I am not as roof freindly as I used to be! My question is, must I ground my antenna with a grouding rod since I will be elevating it higher then roof peak? I am using the rod that Radio Shack sells.
CCsoftball7 09-29-09, 08:41 AM I just picked up a 5' extension pole to get my antenna higher then my roof peak. I don't have a ladder high enough to reach the peak and the roof is 12/12 pitch so I am not climbing that, now that I am older I am not as roof freindly as I used to be! My question is, must I ground my antenna with a grouding rod since I will be elevating it higher then roof peak? I am using the rod that Radio Shack sells.
The antenna should be grounded regardless. If it is outside, ground it.
modforce 09-29-09, 08:51 AM The antenna should be grounded regardless. If it is outside, ground it.
What is the best way to ground it? A grounding rod or can I tie it into the grounding rod that the electrical panel uses?
CCsoftball7 09-29-09, 09:02 AM What is the best way to ground it? A grounding rod or can I tie it into the grounding rod that the electrical panel uses?
I would use a separate grounding rod just for the antenna.
Scooper 09-29-09, 09:36 AM I would use a separate grounding rod just for the antenna.
NEC says ALL grounds should be tied together.
What is the best way to ground it? A grounding rod or can I tie it into the grounding rod that the electrical panel uses?
Yes. Ground to the rod below your electric panel or meter. If you use a second ground rod, it must be bonded to the main ground.
I would use a separate grounding rod just for the antenna.
Tie both grounds together so they will be at the same potential. Otherwise, a near by strike could cause a voltage difference between the two grounds and the current will flow from one ground to the other via your equipment.
Just because both are ground doesn't mean that they will be at the same potential with a nearby strike.
Bruce Watson 09-30-09, 05:51 PM I've got a little CM 4220-HD (two bow-ties) roof mounted and pointed toward WUNC in Chapel Hill (I'm over near Meridith College so I've got reasonable elevation). The signal strength meter in my set says I'm getting strong signal (92-100%).
Yet, in the bad weather we had on Monday I was getting some drop outs. A scattering of pixels visually, and some random loss of audio. Just enough to annoy my wife. :eek: Clear-ish nights like last night I got a good solid picture with no drop outs at all in the two hours I was paying attention.
So... here's the dumb newbie question: what causes the drop outs?
I did enough research to learn WUNC is broadcasting on UHF channel 25 (537.25 MHz). At least I think they are. That works out to a wave length of something around 22 inches I think (if I did the math right). So a quarter wave is like 5.5 inches which puts us in the range of pine tree leaves, yes?
Is it possible that I'm just seeing interference from moving leaves on trees? And rain would of course cause a lot of leaf motion. I'm just guessing here. :rolleyes:
If not that, what are the likely causes? And what can I do about them?
And yes, I'm already thinking bigger antenna. But it would be nice if I can get the little one to work since it's already here. And no, I can't really go any higher. To clear the tree tops I'd likely need another 75+ feet anyway and that's just not going to happen.
LIkely you were experiencing multi-path. Turn the antenna a bit and see if that helps next time it rains, (which I think will be Saturday) If not, consider a narrow antenna like a yagi or an 8 bay bowtie.
modforce 09-30-09, 09:40 PM Thanks for the advice on the ground. I guess I will do this later in the week as I am ready to say good bye to cable and save that $52 per month!
$52 a month is all you pay in the Triangle? Down here in Jacksonville, cable is $64 a month for just ANALOG!
nitdawg 10-01-09, 11:51 AM LIkely you were experiencing multi-path. Turn the antenna a bit and see if that helps next time it rains, (which I think will be Saturday) If not, consider a narrow antenna like a yagi or an 8 bay bowtie.
So I've heard about multi-path alot, what exactly is it in regards to reception? Is it simply something that disrupts the path of the incoming signal causing the original and the disrupted signal to be out of phase at the point of the antenna?
I take it this is most likely caused by physical impediments?
Multi path is just as simple as it sounds... Two or more signal paths from the same channel coming into your antenna. One would be from the tower, and the others could be off of another house, or structure nearby. There could be reflections off of trees too. The idea is to receive only one signal, and that is done by turning the antenna to disrupt all but the desired path, or to put up an antenna that can be aimed and that rejects signals from the sides of the transmitter.
Bruce Watson 10-01-09, 01:42 PM LIkely you were experiencing multi-path. Turn the antenna a bit and see if that helps next time it rains, (which I think will be Saturday) If not, consider a narrow antenna like a yagi or an 8 bay bowtie.
I would have expected multi-path to be more or less constant -- not weather related. I mean, the buildings aren't moving. But the tree trunks are... Interesting thought.
tarheelone 10-03-09, 12:08 AM Looks like FS Carolinas had finally gone HD full time! Oh color bars how we will miss thee. Also looks like they will be showing a good chunk of Canes game in HD this year.
nitdawg 10-03-09, 10:47 AM LIkely you were experiencing multi-path. Turn the antenna a bit and see if that helps next time it rains, (which I think will be Saturday) If not, consider a narrow antenna like a yagi or an 8 bay bowtie.
Any specific Yagi's you recommend?
neumannu47 10-03-09, 07:09 PM Has anyone noticed the distorted sound on the TWC analog channels are in Cary? It's way overmodulated.
vidiot1985 10-04-09, 01:24 AM I don't know what you mean by "overmodulated", but I've noticed that the few things I record on my DVR from WNCN 7 analog on TWC have audio sync problems, while stuff I record from WNCN 217 digital on TWC are fine. I don't know if it's a problem with my DVR or the signal.
I've also noticed that WRAL 255 digital's audio is *very* loud compared to the other channels I watch regularly.
Has anybody noticed in the past week or so that NBC17 has a very annoying flicker often? Other than the huge annoyance, I'm posting here to make sure that it's happening to everybody and not just me, because recently I put an Avermedia ATSC/ClearQAM tuner card and I'm getting the regular HD channels from Time Warner Cable, using Windows Media Center from Windows 7 RC to watch and record. The flicker is not present in any other channel, so the obvious conclusion would be that it's NBC17's problem, but I would like to know if anybody else noticed it to be sure before I call them. It might be a problem on TWC's side.
The flicker gets recorded, I paused some of the shows where it was more evident (last week's The Office and Heroes in special) and I went frame by frame and I could see how some frames were either more bright or less bright than normal. Right now I'm watching Heroes from last Monday and it's really distracting.
StinDaWg 10-04-09, 10:24 PM Today a family member went to pick up another HD DVR box from Time Warner (Cary Towne Center) to use in the bedroom. When she came home I was excited to see she had the box waiting for me because I was not going to pick it up until next week. Anyways, I was surprised to see that the box she brought home was just in a plastic bag that said Time Warner. It had the box, power cable, coax cable, and remote with batteries. At first inspection the box was obviously used because it had scratches on it and it was not even the same model number of the box we have in the other room. The box we have in the living room is a 8240HDC with a manufacturer date of March 2009. This box was a 8300HDC with a manufacturer date of June 2007! It also had an older style remote that I have never seen before and it was not backlit like the one we have in the living room. It also did not have some of the buttons on it like On Demand. It was also very dirty and was crusted with gunk on the sides. Now, I have no problem getting a used box it if works, but I have probably got a dozen boxes from Time Warner over the years and every time it has been a new or at least looked new box that came in an official Time Warner cardboard carry case, complete with a fresh remote, power cables, component cables, instruction manual, welcome kit ect. They also told me the lady asked her if she needed a "HD cable" and if so it would cost an extra $30. She declined because I have 3 or 4 HDMI cables laying around but are they seriously trying to charge $30 for a component cable now? They have always gave me one for free no questions asked. Is this a new policy for Time Warner to give out old boxes and remotes and just throw them in a plastic bag? And charging $30 for a Component cable I mean come on. Do you think it was because she went to the one at the Towne Center mall and not an official Time Warner office? My relative said the lady working there didn't really seem like she knew what she was doing or knew anything about the product.
Is there any major differences between the 8300HDC and 8240HDC boxes? I'm guessing they run the same software and the guide and everything looks the same so I will probably keep the box and just go back and ask for the newer remote because I really don't like the one they gave me.
I'm getting a bunch of "This channel is not currently available try again later" on some of the HD channels as well. I'm guessing this is a SDV issue and happens quite often from what I hear.
vidiot1985 10-05-09, 08:00 AM ...
The flicker gets recorded, I paused some of the shows where it was more evident (last week's The Office and Heroes in special) and I went frame by frame and I could see how some frames were either more bright or less bright than normal. Right now I'm watching Heroes from last Monday and it's really distracting.
I have not noticed this on NBC, but have noticed it on CBS, in particular on The Late Show with David Letterman in HD, but not The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson in HD.
alex7577 10-05-09, 10:14 AM I just got an email from TWC about a cable box software upgrade on Oct. 6th. Does anyone have an details on this?
I see on rabbitears.info that WRAL is supports Mobile TV. I get that Mobile TV is TV on a mobile, or handheld, device like a phone, but exactly how does it work? Does the handheld device require a special antenna? Is it IPTV? Is there a charge?
Thanks.
I don't know how mobile TV works but I do know that it takes away more of the bandwidth from WRAL's HD channel 5.1. As soon WRAL added this Mobile TV service the main HD channel suffered a large quality loss. They are now down to ridiculously low bit rates for 1080i. Visible macro blocks on fast movement is a constant joy. WRAL, once one a leader in local HDTV technology, has degraded it's picture down to the point of being one of the worst CBS affiliates in the country. Raleigh HDTV is pitiful now as far as picture quality is concerned with WRAL CBS and WTVD ABC. WTVD has the idiotic dual 720p and one 480i fighting for bandwidth. Pretty soon it will all look worse than youtube.
tarheelone 10-05-09, 01:19 PM I just got an email from TWC about a cable box software upgrade on Oct. 6th. Does anyone have an details on this?
Where do you live? Greensboro and the surrounding areas are finally getting "upgraded" from SARA to Navigator starting tomorrow. I suppose it is also possible that we are also getting a new navigator update as it has been a while since we got one and we are now several versions behind. 8300HDC boxes in Charlotte were updated last week.
StinDaWg 10-05-09, 03:17 PM I read on another forum that Time Warner is starting to roll out new boxes to replace the SAs. Samsung SMT-H3090 is the model number I believe. They come in either 160GB or 320GB. They are already available in Charlotte, NY, Orlando and a few other places. Anyone have any insider info on when we may be getting these boxes in the Raleigh area?
http://www.samsung.com/us/system/consumer/product/2008/05/09/smt_h3090twc/SMT-H3090_dimensien.jpg
http://www.samsung.com/us/consumer/tv-video/digital-set-top-box/hdtv-tuners/SMT-H3090/TWC/index.idx?pagetype=prd_detail
csimon2 10-05-09, 03:19 PM Where do you live? Greensboro and the surrounding areas are finally getting "upgraded" from SARA to Navigator starting tomorrow. I suppose it is also possible that we are also getting a new navigator update as it has been a while since we got one and we are now several versions behind. 8300HDC boxes in Charlotte were updated last week.I got this email (x2) today as well. I live in Apex (TWC Cary) and have 8300HD and 4250HD boxes. Pretty sure I am running Navigator on both boxes though (definitely on the 8300).
easternncnewswat 10-05-09, 03:23 PM I don't know how mobile TV works but I do know that it takes away more of the bandwidth from WRAL's HD channel 5.1. As soon WRAL added this Mobile TV service the main HD channel suffered a large quality loss. They are now down to ridiculously low bit rates for 1080i. Visible macro blocks on fast movement is a constant joy. WRAL, once one a leader in local HDTV technology, has degraded it's picture down to the point of being one of the worst CBS affiliates in the country. Raleigh HDTV is pitiful now as far as picture quality is concerned with WRAL CBS and WTVD ABC. WTVD has the idiotic dual 720p and one 480i fighting for bandwidth. Pretty soon it will all look worse than youtube.
I have to say I agree with you here... I stopped by WRAL on Sunday to check out the bull-riding championship or something another and their pq was god awful during that. Last night's news over on WRAZ looked pretty bad too. What the heck is 50.3 even going for? It's just an SD simulcast.
I hate complaining about things, but I also noticed over the weekend that WRAL now looks as bad if not worse than WTVD. Their news (WRAL) looked like it was almost standard def being aired in just a wide screen 16:9 format. Wasn't sure whether to place blame on TW cable or what was being transmitted. I think they better back off some bandwidth on THIS TV.
I am now glad I get ENC broadcasts, at least for network viewing. WNCN still looks half way decent, and that's amazing considering they used to be the worst.
tarheelone 10-05-09, 03:58 PM I got this email (x2) today as well. I live in Apex (TWC Cary) and have 8300HD and 4250HD boxes. Pretty sure I am running Navigator on both boxes though (definitely on the 8300).
All boxes in the Triangle are running Navigator now so I guess it just means that maybe we are going to get an update. Raleigh and Greensboro are run out of the same head end now so they may be applying the newest version across the board. Guess we'll find out early in the morning.
tarheelone 10-05-09, 04:07 PM I read on another forum that Time Warner is starting to roll out new boxes to replace the SAs. Samsung SMT-H3090 is the model number I believe. They come in either 160GB or 320GB. They are already available in Charlotte, NY, Orlando and a few other places. Anyone have any insider info on when we may be getting these boxes in the Raleigh area?
http://www.samsung.com/us/system/consumer/product/2008/05/09/smt_h3090twc/SMT-H3090_dimensien.jpg
http://www.samsung.com/us/consumer/tv-video/digital-set-top-box/hdtv-tuners/SMT-H3090/TWC/index.idx?pagetype=prd_detail
There have been a few reports on here since June that people have been getting this boxes in the Triangle. I know at one time there was a report that they where handing them out from the service center in Chapel Hill. Folks who have used them in Charlotte and other markets have been having problems with them. They run the ODN version of Navigator(same as the 8300HDC) which has been spotty. They just got an update the other day that seems to have helped with some issues. Other than the larger hard drive there isn't much benefit to them yet. They do have a 16X9 guide but it's just the regular guide stretched with no extra data. Although the extra hard drive is nice, I'm sticking with my 8300HD until they get all the navigator issues worked out.
Today I took one of my 8240HDC's to the Raleigh TWC office to exchange for another. This one was spontaneously rebooting watching recorded programs and also mysteriously jumping to the end of recorded programs. I SPECIFICALLY asked for a Samsung and was told they were not giving them out anymore due to all the issues they had with them. I said to the CSR, "You mean they're worse than this!!!", while pointing at the 8240 and she just gave me a blank look. She gave me an older, beat up 8300HDC and said they have given less trouble. While it is loud and looks rode hard and put up wet, it appears to work so far. I was a DirecTivo user for nearly 8 years. In those 8 years and through two generations, I never had the problems with two of them that one SA DVR from TWC has in a week. I don't know how any DVR could possibly be worse than these Scientific Atlanta boxes from Time Warner. Seriously, someone should be fired.
Trip in VA 10-05-09, 05:55 PM I see on rabbitears.info that WRAL is supports Mobile TV. I get that Mobile TV is TV on a mobile, or handheld, device like a phone, but exactly how does it work? Does the handheld device require a special antenna? Is it IPTV? Is there a charge?
Thanks.
In no particular order:
1) No special antenna other than maybe a pole like you'd see on the old LCD watchman TVs.
2) No charge. Free.
3) It is not IPTV. It's just like any TV stream. However, there are ways to have the device store a program, or something.
4) As far as how it works, I am not really certain. I know it consumes some of the bandwidth from the stream, but I don't know the details. jsmar from the Denver thread has been studying it extensively and would be able to answer better than I can.
- Trip
IamtheWolf 10-05-09, 06:13 PM Received a voice message when I returned home from work. 1 or more of my boxes they said. I have 2 x SA8300HD, 1 SA8300HDC and 1 x 4240. We'll see....
Today I took one of my 8240HDC's to the Raleigh TWC office to exchange for another. This one was spontaneously rebooting watching recorded programs and also mysteriously jumping to the end of recorded programs. I SPECIFICALLY asked for a Samsung and was told they were not giving them out anymore due to all the issues they had with them. I said to the CSR, "You mean they're worse than this!!!", while pointing at the 8240 and she just gave me a blank look. She gave me an older, beat up 8300HDC and said they have given less trouble. While it is loud and looks rode hard and put up wet, it appears to work so far. I was a DirecTivo user for nearly 8 years. In those 8 years and through two generations, I never had the problems with two of them that one SA DVR from TWC has in a week. I don't know how any DVR could possibly be worse than these Scientific Atlanta boxes from Time Warner. Seriously, someone should be fired.
I got the Samsung box from the Atlantic Ave. office about 3 months ago. I asked for one and after some pleading I got one. I read about the box in some thread here and got the uncompressed AC3 audio to work with my new Denon receiver and I can say that I did notice a difference. I have not had any issues with the box either. Did anyone find out what the update is for?
fasterthanyours 10-05-09, 11:17 PM Got the same phone call today on my cell, my main account contact #. Also got an email on my acct email address.
This should be interesting, can't wait to see what it does now.
Looks like WTVD was granted their STA of 45kW. Most of you should see a big jump on your meter when they turn up the juice.
That is good about WTVD. I wonder how long it will take them to up the power?
drewwho 10-06-09, 11:39 AM 4) As far as how it works, I am not really certain. I know it consumes some of the bandwidth from the stream, but I don't know the details. jsmar from the Denver thread has been studying it extensively and would be able to answer better than I can.
I don't have dvbtraffic output handy, but the introduction of this nonsense took the file sizes of 1 hour primetime recordings from roughly 6.75GB/hr to 6.06GB/hr for me. After this drop, I've noticed an increase in macroblocking in fast motion, and even some glitching in scenes with a lot of panning (eg, opening scenes of The Mentalist are great to demonstrate this) where it looks like frames have been dropped by the WRAL encoder.
As far as I know, the only market for this mobile DTV seems to be the captive audience on city buses in Raleigh. The least they could do would be to turn this useless nonsense off during primetime and during sports, or at least throttle its bandwidth back to nothing.
I'm thinking about moving my antenna outside so that I can pick up WFMY 100% reliably and avoid WRAL.
Drew
Trip in VA 10-06-09, 11:45 AM I don't have dvbtraffic output handy, but the introduction of this nonsense took the file sizes of 1 hour primetime recordings from roughly 6.75GB/hr to 6.06GB/hr for me. After this drop, I've noticed an increase in macroblocking in fast motion, and even some glitching in scenes with a lot of panning (eg, opening scenes of The Mentalist are great to demonstrate this) where it looks like frames have been dropped by the WRAL encoder.
Last I looked, the Mobile DTV was taking up 2.75 Mbps on WRAL. I actually have this number listed on RabbitEars under Technical Data. (Mobile DTV is static bitrate and cannot be varied like the other streams.)
As far as I know, the only market for this mobile DTV seems to be the captive audience on city buses in Raleigh. The least they could do would be to turn this useless nonsense off during primetime and during sports, or at least throttle its bandwidth back to nothing.
At the moment, that's the case. Once consumer hardware becomes available next year, it should be available in laptops/netbooks, cell phones, and other portable devices. Whether or not that actually happens... we'll see.
I'm thinking about moving my antenna outside so that I can pick up WFMY 100% reliably and avoid WRAL.
Drew
Not the worst idea. They have an SD weather sub and a blank sub that uses no bandwidth.
- Trip
drewwho 10-06-09, 11:54 AM The main story on newsandobserver.com is "Light voting reported in Wake, Durham"
Let's hope that our local stations don't slice and dice our primetime HD tonight with results from elections that very few people even care about enough to bother to vote in. Personally, I early voted, and if I want to see the election results, I'll look at newsandobserver.com, or wral.com..
Drew
drewwho 10-06-09, 12:02 PM At the moment, that's the case. Once consumer hardware becomes available next year, it should be available in laptops/netbooks, cell phones, and other portable devices. Whether or not that actually happens... we'll see.
As I posted before, even the gadget crazy Koreans don't bother to use mobile DTV, so I doubt that it will catch on with Joe Sixpack. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/12/korea_mobile_tv_flop/ From the article "TMC found that only 1.17 per cent of the mobile TV-equipped audience was watching - peaking at 3.58 per cent during the commute rush hour"
Since there's essentially no effective mass transit here, I doubt we'd see even that much of a peak during commute time (or else we'd see a lot more collisions).
Drew
frankpc 10-06-09, 03:32 PM I've also had the TW Samsung box for a few months. The reboots have settled down a bit and the larger hard drive is nice. That said, no former Sat user would be happy. Clunky to use, even basic things like fast forward and rewind in recorded material is inconsistent. If I had a reasonable look angle to the Sats, I would ditch TW in a heartbeat.
Frank
Satch Man 10-06-09, 03:32 PM I read on another forum that Time Warner is starting to roll out new boxes to replace the SAs. Samsung SMT-H3090 is the model number I believe. They come in either 160GB or 320GB. They are already available in Charlotte, NY, Orlando and a few other places. Anyone have any insider info on when we may be getting these boxes in the Raleigh area?
http://www.samsung.com/us/system/consumer/product/2008/05/09/smt_h3090twc/SMT-H3090_dimensien.jpg
http://www.samsung.com/us/consumer/tv-video/digital-set-top-box/hdtv-tuners/SMT-H3090/TWC/index.idx?pagetype=prd_detail
The new TWC boxes are the Samsungs 3090 and the newest just released is the Samsung 3270. For some strange reason, PIP has been disabled on the 3270. BUT the 3270 does have a 300GB hard drive, (as opposed to 160GB in the 3090's and 8300's.) The 3270's main release area is San Diego. TWC Division President Bob Barlow has said that Samsung's 3270 box is not supporting PIP. Others say the lack of PIP in the 3270 is a bug and Samsung and TWC are playing the blame game with responsibility for it. So there is no PIP in the 3270's (for now.)
The SA-8300 HDC and the Samsung 3090 run the same OCAP version of Navigator with the same functions and features. The Samsung 3090 is the newest widestream box.
The current MDN boxes will still be supported with updates. The latest version being reported in NYC is now 2.4.6-21. The widespread update is now, or soon will be 2.4.6-19. Navigator 3.0 for MDN is being tested and Keyword Search is being worked on for all versions of Navigator (MDN/ODN) Longer program listings and remote DVR management are also being tested for Navigator. No word on release dates, but I would estimate not till next year.
Jack
StinDaWg 10-06-09, 05:14 PM Well, I woke up today and my cable box was powered off, thus I'm guessing there was a software update and it rebooted. However, I see no difference in anything today.
Bruce Watson 10-06-09, 05:17 PM After this drop, I've noticed an increase in macroblocking in fast motion, and even some glitching in scenes with a lot of panning (eg, opening scenes of The Mentalist are great to demonstrate this) where it looks like frames have been dropped by the WRAL encoder.
I'm a newbie to digital video. I've been having "fun" trying to correlate what seem to be visual errors with signal problems -- mostly multipath in my case perhaps.
I used to get WRAL stunningly clearly. Since these postings about WRAL decreasing bit rate on their signal I have in fact noticed some decline. I've seen what looks like pixelation at edge boundries during fast motion -- is this what you are calling macroblocking? I haven't seen any glitches in pans however.
I guess what I'm looking for is a source for the correct "jargon" so I'll know how to describe what I see. Is there anywhere on the 'net where one can go to learn the broadcast digital video jargon and see some examples of what the various problems look like? I'm just looking for a little education.
I think you are on the right path to understanding.
I'm no expert. This may not be exact but I'll try to explain what I mean by macroblocking.
MPEG2 is the video compression that our over the air (OTA) High Definition broadcasting system uses. Most if not all current cable HD uses the same system.
MPEG2 divides the picture into squares or blocks (macroblocks) of pixels during compression.
720p has 3600 macroblocks, 1080i has 8160 macroblocks
MPEG2 can compress still or nearly still images very efficiently, but it needs more bitrate for high motion video. When the bitrate of the video is too low to handle the amount of motion, one of the artifacts produced is visible blocks in the areas of high motion.
When I can see visible groups of blocks during fast motion, I know the channel is not giving enough bitrate to properly encode the video signal with MPEG2. It is "macroblocking".
modforce 10-07-09, 05:54 PM Panasonic firmware can be found at
http://www.pasctraining.panasonic.com/firmware/index.html
It definetly pays to read back through this thread. I found the above update and was able to update my dvd player/tuner. I was not aware that I could do that. Now I am receiving more channels then before! Thanks for making us aware.
nitdawg 10-08-09, 12:47 PM UNC-TV: EXCLUSIVE NEWS FOR FACEBOOK FANS LIKE APRIL GREEN: UNC-TV Announces an Exciting New Service Coming on November 1...UNC-EX (http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=276328110653&ref=mf)
So I guess this is re-branding of the UNC-NC channel?
ziltink 10-08-09, 01:49 PM UNC-TV: EXCLUSIVE NEWS FOR FACEBOOK FANS LIKE APRIL GREEN: UNC-TV Announces an Exciting New Service Coming on November 1...UNC-EX (http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=276328110653&ref=mf)
So I guess this is re-branding of the UNC-NC channel?
Will this be an HD or SD channel? I am wondering if they will do like WTVD and have two HD channels and the Kids SD channel.
bakerm5 10-09-09, 10:11 AM Looks like WTVD was granted their STA of 45kW. Most of you should see a big jump on your meter when they turn up the juice.
How soon do we think this will happen? Can't find anything on WTVD's web site or on FCC's web site for a power increase date. Probably don't know where to look.
jmduncan 10-09-09, 05:58 PM This morning at about 7am I was able to decode WTVD for the first time at 130 miles away. I could probably get it more often if it weren't for the much closer signal on ch11 from WTVI in Charlotte. I'm curious if I'll be able to get it more consistently when/if WTVD increases their power.
Of course, there was a lot of tropo this morning.:D I also decoded WNCT-9 and WCTI-12 in New Bern at over 200 miles! They both came in at over 50% signal strength.
How soon do we think this will happen? Can't find anything on WTVD's web site or on FCC's web site for a power increase date. Probably don't know where to look.
I have no idea... I just know that it is a good sign for those who have been complaining about bad signals from them since the transition. A lot of OTA people in eastern portions of the Raleigh market have switched to WCTI ABC out of New Bern because they can't see WTVD. Although they still may choose to stay with WCTI if they want good HD pictures.
modforce 10-10-09, 08:11 AM I am able to get UNC but it seems to break up alot. I am in Willow Spring on the Fuquay side. Not sure if I ought to rasie the antenna higher to the peak and add a 5' rod or not. It does comes in but it scrambles a little for a couple minutes. Signal on everything else is fine. Maybe they will turn up the power a little bit to help things out.
Although they still may choose to stay with WCTI if they want good HD pictures.
I was coming here to post just how horrible WTVD is looking now. The NASCAR race yesterday was as bad as I have ever seen WTVD look. Very littel detail overall and horrible compression artifacts around all the graphics. It literally looked like some old 28.8 streaming Real video from 1996 at times.
CCsoftball7 10-12-09, 03:22 PM I was coming here to post just how horrible WTVD is looking now. The NASCAR race yesterday was as bad as I have ever seen WTVD look. Very littel detail overall and horrible compression artifacts around all the graphics. It literally looked like some old 28.8 streaming Real video from 1996 at times.
I didn't see the NASCAR race because I'm boycotting WTVD. A station should be fined for not allowing sufficient bandwith to the main station (11.1).
Scooper 10-12-09, 03:38 PM I didn't see the NASCAR race because I'm boycotting WTVD. A station should be fined for not allowing sufficient bandwith to the main station (11.1).
Are you looking at the same WTVD OTA (11.1) that I am ?
CCsoftball7 10-13-09, 09:06 AM Are you looking at the same WTVD OTA (11.1) that I am ?
Yep...and if you look at scene changes, fast panning cameras, etc. you'll notice macroblocking, muted colors, and an overall "hazy" look. It is not acceptable. Therefore, I won't watch it and encourage others who see the same issues to do the same.
Has TWC bumped their rates recently?
Trying to figure out how adding a $2.50 cable card bumped my monthly bill up by twelve bucks, especially since I also removed the HD universal package at the same time.
vidiot1985 10-14-09, 07:22 AM Have you gotten that extra $12 on more than one bill?
Maybe they charged you for the installation:
http://www.timewarnercable.com/Carolinas/shop/pricing.html
Installation
...
Change of service equipment $9.95/ea
gstelmack 10-14-09, 09:38 AM Has TWC bumped their rates recently?
Trying to figure out how adding a $2.50 cable card bumped my monthly bill up by twelve bucks, especially since I also removed the HD universal package at the same time.
Mine went up back in July when I hit my 1 year anniversary. I had the two-year price-locked deal, where of course price-locked means "1 year in we can raise your rates". I missed that fine print...
It was not installation, paid that on a prior statement.
I think I did have some special deal and I probably lost it when I changed service. I'll give them a call.
NCCaniac 10-14-09, 01:34 PM It was not installation, paid that on a prior statement.
I think I did have some special deal and I probably lost it when I changed service. I'll give them a call.
It was these kinds of things and the constant rate increases that caused me to leave TWC years ago for sat.
Bruce Watson 10-14-09, 03:07 PM It was these kinds of things and the constant rate increases that caused me to leave TWC years ago for sat.
And me for OTA. That and the fact that I never looked at 7/8 or more of the channels they forced me to take to get the few that I actually wanted. What TWC needs is real competition.
Until then, my antenna works fine for local channels, some good ones that TWC doesn't carry. Most of the series I wanted to see from the cable channels make their way to Blu-ray or at least DVD eventually, so I rent them through Netflix. True, I'm a year or two late to the party, but it's just entertainment. Ain't that big a deal.
drewwho 10-14-09, 04:02 PM Most of the series I wanted to see from the cable channels make their way to Blu-ray or at least DVD
Amen to what you said above about not watching 7/8 of the junk you pay for. I get the 3 or 4 cable series that I'm interested in via Hulu within a few hours of their broadcast on cable. The only thing I really miss from TWC is ESPN and FSN, but there are sports bars & friends' parties for that.
Drew
NCCaniac 10-15-09, 12:04 PM What TWC needs is real competition.
I am hoping that u-Verse and the ever increasing availability of shows on the internet will add to the competition for cable and sat and start driving prices down. It would be great if somebody offered an a la carte service, but the networks will never go for that in their pricing structure.
RMartin631 10-18-09, 07:04 AM I have no idea... I just know that it is a good sign for those who have been complaining about bad signals from them since the transition. A lot of OTA people in eastern portions of the Raleigh market have switched to WCTI ABC out of New Bern because they can't see WTVD.
I'm one of those whiners. I was playing around with my antennas this morning trying to get WTVD to come in consistantly. I have a RS 75" and a CM 4228. Still no luck. I just need a little more signal!
Scooper 10-18-09, 10:38 AM Yep...and if you look at scene changes, fast panning cameras, etc. you'll notice macroblocking, muted colors, and an overall "hazy" look. It is not acceptable. Therefore, I won't watch it and encourage others who see the same issues to do the same.
OK - I was watching the NASCAR race last night - looking for what you're describing - I don't see it. BTW - my TV is a 32 inch 1368x768 pixel Olevia. It's either doing an outstanding job of hiding it or it's not there. Or you're watching on a considerably larger set.
Trip in VA 10-18-09, 11:24 AM OK - I was watching the NASCAR race last night - looking for what you're describing - I don't see it. BTW - my TV is a 32 inch 1368x768 pixel Olevia. It's either doing an outstanding job of hiding it or it's not there. Or you're watching on a considerably larger set.
Last time I was WTVD (which was, admittedly, several months ago), I definitely saw lots of pixelation. It was much worse on 11-2, but 11-1 showed it as well.
- Trip
Bruce Watson 10-18-09, 12:00 PM Yep...and if you look at scene changes, fast panning cameras, etc. you'll notice macroblocking, muted colors, and an overall "hazy" look. It is not acceptable. Therefore, I won't watch it and encourage others who see the same issues to do the same.
I was seeing some of this last night -- on WRAL. I was switching back and forth between WRAL and WFMY watching CSI Miami. The WFMY signal was better. WRAL's signal was muting the colors a little and seemed to have less clarity, especially with motion, and every once in a while I could see some macroblocking where there was both motion and a contrast boundary (dark / light).
You'd think they would learn a lesson from watching print media slowly die off. Print media sold out their subscribers in favor of the advertisers, causing their subscriptions to decline. Which in turn caused their ad revenue to decline. Repeat until at bottom of drain.
If the broadcasters think they are immune from this, they are sadly mistaken. If they won't provide a quality signal that's worth watching, I won't spend any time watching it.
Did something good happen with WTVD this weekend?
Admittedly very much unscientific, unless perhaps it is related to the cold spell that also just started...
but my Dish receiver had been roughly 72-74 signal strength on WTVD since the changeover. Solid for me, but lower than it had been... but this weekend I'm getting a pretty solid 83 signal.
Am wondering if it's just the weather being more conducive OR if they upped the power or something?
CCsoftball7 10-19-09, 08:58 AM OK - I was watching the NASCAR race last night - looking for what you're describing - I don't see it. BTW - my TV is a 32 inch 1368x768 pixel Olevia. It's either doing an outstanding job of hiding it or it's not there. Or you're watching on a considerably larger set.
I'm watching on a 70" SXRD 1080p set. Believe me, you can see it. My set does an outstanding job with motion. But, it also shows flaws in transmission quite well. :)
Scooper 10-19-09, 09:04 AM I'm watching on a 70" SXRD 1080p set. Believe me, you can see it. My set does an outstanding job with motion. But, it also shows flaws in transmission quite well. :)
I was going to say 70 inches magnifies any flaws too...
CCsoftball7 10-19-09, 09:12 AM I was going to say 70 inches magnifies any flaws too...
I have had this set for about 18 months. I can easily recall from before the quality of WTVD. When 11-2 first started broadcasting in 720p, it was quite evident in the drop in PQ. I'm just sad to see it go this way.
Scooper 10-19-09, 10:19 AM Did something good happen with WTVD this weekend?
Admittedly very much unscientific, unless perhaps it is related to the cold spell that also just started...
but my Dish receiver had been roughly 72-74 signal strength on WTVD since the changeover. Solid for me, but lower than it had been... but this weekend I'm getting a pretty solid 83 signal.
Am wondering if it's just the weather being more conducive OR if they upped the power or something?
WTVD does have their STA to boost power approved , so maybe ? ...
No real improvement seen here, however...
OK - I was watching the NASCAR race last night - looking for what you're describing - I don't see it. BTW - my TV is a 32 inch 1368x768 pixel Olevia. It's either doing an outstanding job of hiding it or it's not there. Or you're watching on a considerably larger set.
a 32" tv isn't going to "expose" mpeg macroblocking like a 70" tv will. the smaller the TV, the less dependence on high quality encoding. try standing closer to your 32" TV, like maybe 2 feet away. any macroblocking should be more apparent.
drewwho 10-19-09, 02:00 PM I have had this set for about 18 months. I can easily recall from before the quality of WTVD. When 11-2 first started broadcasting in 720p, it was quite evident in the drop in PQ. I'm just sad to see it go this way.
I have a 46" Sony LCD that I sit rather close to, and I notice it too.
I think that 11-1's quality started to go downhill well before 11-2 started broadcasting in so-called "HD". I record some syndicated re-runs on WTVD (SG Atlantis, used to record SG-1). Anyway, I noticed that they dropped their bitrate from ~6.5GB/hr to 4.5GB/hr quite a while back, well in advance of 11-2 going 720p. I'll bet network owned stations turned up the compression nation wide as some sort of feasibility study for using a 720p sub. We should have complained a year ago, and maybe we could have stopped this.
Drew
Trip in VA 10-19-09, 05:02 PM They actually were complaining in Houston. I watch every thread that deals with OTA, and they noticed the moment the compression levels changed in Houston. You can guess how much difference their complaints made.
- Trip
Scooper 10-20-09, 10:49 AM As I'm reading TSReader Lite this morning -
11.1 is around 10.5 MBPS
11.2 is around 5.5 MBPS
11.3 is around 1.25 MBPS
drewwho 10-20-09, 01:22 PM As I'm reading TSReader Lite this morning -
11.1 is around 10.5 MBPS
11.2 is around 5.5 MBPS
11.3 is around 1.25 MBPS
Sorry to be pedantic, but you mean mega-BITS (Mb) per second, not mega-BYTES (MB) per second. Eg, 10.5 Mbps or 10.5 Mb/s.
At any rate, your numbers are pretty close to what I've observed. As far as my eyes can tell, you need at least 13.5Mb/s for decent quality MPEG2 with 720p , and 15Mb/s for 1080i. This kind of makes sense. When you do the math, 1080i has to update roughly 12.5% more pixels at 30 frames/second than 720p does at 60 frames/second.
If they could just drop 11.2 from 720p to 480i and run it at 2.5Mb/s, 11.1 might look 1/2 way decent again, and 11.2 would certainly look better itself. What idiots..
Drew
WTVD does have their STA to boost power approved , so maybe ? ...
No real improvement seen here, however...
FYI, late last night I was seeing a steady 92 signal strength...
Either they have made a major boost OR it was just the cold/clear air being much more conducive to transmission. Will have to see over time what happens.
Scooper 10-20-09, 03:19 PM Sorry to be pedantic, but you mean mega-BITS (Mb) per second, not mega-BYTES (MB) per second. Eg, 10.5 Mbps or 10.5 Mb/s.
At any rate, your numbers are pretty close to what I've observed. As far as my eyes can tell, you need at least 13.5Mb/s for decent quality MPEG2 with 720p , and 15Mb/s for 1080i. This kind of makes sense. When you do the math, 1080i has to update roughly 12.5% more pixels at 30 frames/second than 720p does at 60 frames/second.
If they could just drop 11.2 from 720p to 480i and run it at 2.5Mb/s, 11.1 might look 1/2 way decent again, and 11.2 would certainly look better itself. What idiots..
Drew
YOu're probably right on the bits / bytes - but that was the numbers I saw this morning. I was also observing that these are not "static" values - so I'm betting they are using Stat-muxes to "rob Peter to pay Paul".
|
|