afx
01-04-07, 12:50 AM
going to paint my new screen very soon, maybe this weekend or early next weekend.
for awhile, i've only been using standard def sources; it was always 4:3 FS/LB. it came out to an image res of 80"x60". so now that i'm really going putting my mini-theater together, i'll be using hd sources more frequently -- all the sources i've been using previously can now be used via hd. so with hd, the AR will be 16:9 and i'll have an image res of something like 80"x45".
in your opinions, is it worth painting (yes, i'll be painting my next screen) to the 4:3 80x60" which keeps the standard def option open? or have many of you found that you've left the 4:3 behind? i hate the idea that i'll one day have to use a standard def source for something.
also, with the smaller screen size, it'll help keep the job simpler for me, since i'm a first time screen painter. and it'll also keep my masking system simpler as well.
thanks.
for awhile, i've only been using standard def sources; it was always 4:3 FS/LB. it came out to an image res of 80"x60". so now that i'm really going putting my mini-theater together, i'll be using hd sources more frequently -- all the sources i've been using previously can now be used via hd. so with hd, the AR will be 16:9 and i'll have an image res of something like 80"x45".
in your opinions, is it worth painting (yes, i'll be painting my next screen) to the 4:3 80x60" which keeps the standard def option open? or have many of you found that you've left the 4:3 behind? i hate the idea that i'll one day have to use a standard def source for something.
also, with the smaller screen size, it'll help keep the job simpler for me, since i'm a first time screen painter. and it'll also keep my masking system simpler as well.
thanks.