I wonder why wireless subs haven't been introduced. It seems like a natural: very low bandwidth, and typically subs are powered already. Almost a no-brainer.

I believe you can use this ... not sure if anyone on this forum as tried it ...

http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/volume_11_4/buttkicker-rf-link-12-2004.html

What? Admiral Rickover, you want them to run on nuclear power?
P.S. Which wire did you want to eliminate?

I would think another option would be to use the AC wiring itself as the distribution system, which would also inherently filter out hum. Alarm and environmental control systems like X10 already use such technology. The power companies already use such technology to distribute broadband digital data via AC networks. A relatively low density data stream such as an audio feed for a sub would be fairly easy to accomplish.

The wireless would be a no brainer. The buttkicker is chopping on the right tree, but needs to be smaller; I could see a unit that plugs in in-line with the power cord (wall wart and main unit combined) as being more desirable.

The buttkicker is chopping on the right tree, but needs to be smaller

I've thought about using the buttkicker for wireless, but heard that it wasn't all that reliable.

Have you heard different.

What? Admiral Rickover, you want them to run on nuclear power?
P.S. Which wire did you want to eliminate?

The signal cable. But you knew that, didn't you.

The signal cable. But you knew that, didn't you.

Hey he could be Nikolai Tesla for all we know...