View Full Version : HL-S5687W vs. HL-S6187W


footballcoach
01-29-07, 05:17 PM
Hello,

I'm trying to make my way through the huge HL-S**87W thread, but this question is pretty specific and I feel it would get lost in the other thread.

Both of these sets have 1920x1080p resolutions. Does the 61" set have any less quality picture due to the larger size of the screen?

In other words is the 56" set sharper or more clear in appearance due to being smaller? Given the extra size of the 61" I am wondering if the pixel ratio or something similar affects the overall quality of the image vs. that of the 56"?

Thanks,

-footballcoach

Commex
01-29-07, 06:35 PM
The extra 5" is worth the price difference to me. I couldent live with myself if i knew i could have obtained 5" more in my provided space. The sharpness is the same to the naked eye afaik.

htwaits
01-29-07, 06:41 PM
Both of these sets have 1920x1080p resolutions. Does the 61" set have any less quality picture due to the larger size of the screen?In theory, because the same image is being enlarged from 50" to 56" and on to 61" inches the smallest set will have the best "theoretical" picture quality. Depending on how you plan to use the TV, the difference between 56" and 61" is probably not significant.

What will be your viewing distance, and how important are movies in your viewing habits?

Kenal0
01-29-07, 06:50 PM
In theory, because the same image is being enlarged from 50" to 56" and on to 61" inches the smallest set will have the best "theoretical" picture quality. Depending on how you plan to use the TV, the difference between 56" and 61" is probably not significant.

What will be your viewing distance, and how important are movies in your viewing habits?

If you are watching a lot of HD content then definitely go bigger, if you are watching SD then you will have to make a choice for SLIGHT quality over size.
Kenal0

footballcoach
01-29-07, 08:25 PM
In theory, because the same image is being enlarged from 50" to 56" and on to 61" inches the smallest set will have the best "theoretical" picture quality. Depending on how you plan to use the TV, the difference between 56" and 61" is probably not significant.

What will be your viewing distance, and how important are movies in your viewing habits?

Thanks for the replies guys. Very helpful to know! :)

My viewing distance would be 8-11 feet I suppose. This is probably the sweet spot for 61" I am thinking. I looked at both sets today and was very impressed with the 61". Just want to be sure that I am looking at all the details and know about any "gotcha's" in advance. The resolution issue stood out at me since it's the same and I didn't want to discover after the fact that the 61" doesn't give as accurate or as high-quality of picture because of the larger size.

I would say this particular set will be used as follows:

60% HDTV, SDTV
25% DVD, Movies
15% Video Games (360, Wii, PS2)

Thanks again,

-footballcoach

bfdtv
01-29-07, 09:21 PM
My viewing distance would be 8-11 feet I suppose.At that range, you definitely want the 61". Moreover, if your viewing distance is typically 11', you could step up to the 71" version.

I recommend 50" for 6', 55" for 7', 60" for 8-10', and 70" for 11-12'.

Watching high-definition football on a 70" from 10-12' is simply awesome.

footballcoach
01-29-07, 09:26 PM
Thanks! Final Question: Is the Best Buy 4 year service plan worth it on these sets? I bought my Mits 65907 and a 3 year warranty (which I never used) back in 2000.

Just curious if these sets are worth the extra $400 to cover it for 4 years. I believe Samsung warrants the set for a year parts and labor unless I am mistaken?

-footballcoach

bfdtv
01-29-07, 09:28 PM
footballcoach,

In general, it's a good idea to buy a service plan with today's displays. If a problem is going to develop, chances are it is going to be in the first 18-24 months.

I'm not familiar with the specifics of the Best Buy plan, there may be a better after-market option (I don't know).