hazchem1
03-09-07, 06:37 PM
I have a pair of Mission 704a floorstanding loudspeakers. I bought them in 2001 for £400 which was half the price they were selling at in other places. After all this time I have began looking at new speakers.
Thinking that an almost ten year old pair of speakers would easily be out matched by what was available in todays market I began shopping with a budget of £1000 in mind. My first choice was Monitor Audio Gs20 which were no good, sounded like they were choking and someone was playing an MP3 through them. I then tried Spendor, Acoustic Energy and QUAD all of which lacked in one way or another.
Oh dear I thought......better up the budget to about £1500 pounds or so. I was talked into listening to Monitor Audio Gs60 Gold series at a price tag of £2000. After listening for a while and not beig impressed I decided it was the test room acoustics and took the speakers home for a shot in my own pad.
What I heard actually surprised me a lot. The differance between them and my Missions was very, very slight. The Mon Auds had them on the top end with a little more accuracy and brightness. But the Missions had them at the mid and bottom end with fuller base and a better sound stage presence with an altogether wider mid range and a more solid sound. The Mon Aud base was punchier and more accurate but the whole sound felt processed and sounded like.....well.....speakers!! I can close my eyes with the Missions and feel as if the band are on stage in front of me.
What gives?? One of the so called greats being outperformed by Ten year old speakers that were under half the price when they were sold back then??? Not only that but all of the other ones I tried were even worse. The £1600 Spendors I wouldn't have taken for free!!!!!
Is there any other avenue to try or are we just all being ripped off by companies who rather than say that they are at the pinnacle of speaker technology would rather keep changing design and making the speakers pricier hoping that along the way no one will notice?
Thinking that an almost ten year old pair of speakers would easily be out matched by what was available in todays market I began shopping with a budget of £1000 in mind. My first choice was Monitor Audio Gs20 which were no good, sounded like they were choking and someone was playing an MP3 through them. I then tried Spendor, Acoustic Energy and QUAD all of which lacked in one way or another.
Oh dear I thought......better up the budget to about £1500 pounds or so. I was talked into listening to Monitor Audio Gs60 Gold series at a price tag of £2000. After listening for a while and not beig impressed I decided it was the test room acoustics and took the speakers home for a shot in my own pad.
What I heard actually surprised me a lot. The differance between them and my Missions was very, very slight. The Mon Auds had them on the top end with a little more accuracy and brightness. But the Missions had them at the mid and bottom end with fuller base and a better sound stage presence with an altogether wider mid range and a more solid sound. The Mon Aud base was punchier and more accurate but the whole sound felt processed and sounded like.....well.....speakers!! I can close my eyes with the Missions and feel as if the band are on stage in front of me.
What gives?? One of the so called greats being outperformed by Ten year old speakers that were under half the price when they were sold back then??? Not only that but all of the other ones I tried were even worse. The £1600 Spendors I wouldn't have taken for free!!!!!
Is there any other avenue to try or are we just all being ripped off by companies who rather than say that they are at the pinnacle of speaker technology would rather keep changing design and making the speakers pricier hoping that along the way no one will notice?