View Full Version : CraigM Mit owners, listen up!


Mr Bob
03-24-07, 09:11 PM
This is a reprint from about a month ago, of a review I did recently on a CraigM Mit.


I just completed a redo on a Craig Miller Mit, and the result is absolutely breathtaking. If any owners out there are contemplating replacing their set because it doesn't look the way Craig left it anymore, WAIT! Let me at it first.

The unit is a WS 65909, and is the centerpiece of its owner's home cinema, tricked out with M&K digital surround audio, in its own dedicated viewing room.

It's owner just bought a Panny 1080p DLP for his front room, and comparing the 2, found his Mit set really wanting in comparison. So he called me and got in on my current SoCal visit.

His optics were the primary problem. They were very dirty, as ALL CRT RPTV optics will be, after 4 years. The mirror as well. 30 KV of HV really does a number on the internal optics of ALL CRT RPTVs. Luckily enough, tho, Mit seals their lenses in there nice and tight, and he did not need the deeper optics cleaning, as Pioneer owners do.

I found his grayscale to be absolutely sound, even after 4 years. I changed the RCUT by one click, but a consumer would never know the difference. It was only to remove a small bit of overall redness in the darks, which completely disappears when color is present. I could have left it alone and nobody would have ever known the difference.

I found the same thing on the color decoding, changed absolutely nothing there, and both scanrates passed my Accupel's test with flying colors.

The only thing I did to really change things on it after fully cleaning the optics, was to basically reverse his contrast and brightness settings.

He had left the brightness at 21. I found this to allow way too much haziness in the darks, so I took it down to 13. Much better. The blacks then clamped to black properly. Before, there was never a true black, there was always a filminess over the picture, rather than the true nature of movie film, which is to have the blacks clamp properly and disappear, wherever it should be fully black in the picture. It now clamps to black properly.

He had left the sm contrast at 22. Original factory setting is usually 36. IMHO, this 22 setting is not enough, and doesn't allow for a really punchy picture. He runs his user contrast at midpoint, which of course on a Mit is 80-90% up, which is fine by me, esp. on a 4 year old set. I left that alone as well, with all user settings centerpointed.

I put the contrast back to its original 36, took the brightness down to 13, left everything else at midpoint as usual after a cal, and the picture is now absolutely stunning. Leaps out at you.

We watched Gray's Anatomy on it tonight together - he, his wife and I - and several times during this hourlong event he commented on how dazzling the picture looks. He no longer considers the DLP downstairs the better set.


Craig Miller did incredible work, and left a legacy like nobody else in the calibration field when he retired. He was booked months in advance, deservedly so, and worked exclusively on Mits's.

But he has now retired.

I have not.

Please allow me to restore your Craig Miller set to its former glory. It is NOT worn out, and his grayscale and color decoding settings will probably need no redoing, presenting fleshtones like you would not believe.

I would recommend my br/contr settings in place of his, if this TV is any indication. And the optics cleaning.

But don't even THINK about replacing it! It would be a crime.


Mr Bob


PS - Even if you don't own a CraigM calibrated set, you might enjoy reading the results of a thread on this and other websites I started a little while ago entitled, "Don't dump your CRT RPTV!" It has had resounding response, and is quite fascinating reading, from all those who share my views on the subject.

Mr Bob
03-24-07, 09:14 PM
This is a little add-on for those in the LA area, please forgive any redundance!


Mr Bob


CraigM owners have a special situation going, as with optics cleaning and just moderate retweaking, your unit can be restored completely to the impeccable state it was left in by Craig and Sue.

If you want that, I can do that for you. Cost would be roughly half my normal rates, possibly even less, if the above story is any indication.

I am scheduled for a Pioneer repair and calibration in LA at the end of the week of April 2-6, and am hoping for a few other jobs during the first of the week. This could be repairs, calibrations, or even just optics cleanings.

ALL CRT RPTVs begin to need optics cleaning desperately going into their 3rd year of life - or 3rd year since original calibration if cleaning was done at that time - and it just gets worse from then on. Don't let your depth perception and dynamic punch be compromised by the 30KV of HV your set uses every day, just in being turned on. It turns your optics into powerful dust magnets and eventually really does a number on your ability to see into dark areas of the picture and actually make out detail. It also eliminates any chance for "gleam" in your image dynamics, because of the automatic haze around bright objects against black backgrounds.

I would be willing to do entire cal tours JUST on optics cleanings, it's that important!

Whether you choose to spring for the relatively minor cost of what it takes to retweak Craig's calibration back to full efficacy or not (due to the natural drift that happens over the years) the bleariness in all CRT RPTVs over 3 years old - or 3 years since cleaning - simply doesn't need to be there. Professional grade optics cleaning is cheap, compared to the immense effect it has on your picture.

There are potential hazards to doing this op, so give careful consideration to whether you want to take your possibly irreplaceable optical components in your hands by attempting to do it yourself. There are horror stories available...

See my website for more info. Email me for before and after photos of its improvements on a 7 year old Pioneer.


To join up, contact me ASAP so we can get the plane flights in place -


Mr Bob

Mr Bob
02-24-08, 09:54 AM
Knight Rider


http://img70.imageshack.us/img70/9717/21808knightriderontosh0fc4.jpg[/URL]

http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/6820/21808knightriderontosh0vk5.jpg[/URL]

http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/8831/21808knightriderontosh0ho9.jpg[/URL]

http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/896/21808knightriderontosh0bi4.jpg[/URL]

http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/5149/21808knightriderontosh0zx3.jpg[/URL]

http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/2344/21808knightriderontosh0rx9.jpg[/URL]



Lena Headley, from 300 (queen of Sparta) - Sarah Conner Chronicles

http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/2540/21808knightriderontosh0es0.jpg[/URL]

Mr Bob
02-24-08, 09:55 AM
Night sky - try THAT with bulb driven fixed pixel! Or dirty optics...

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/7627/21808knightriderontosh0vg1.jpg

http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/1073/21808knightriderontosh0fh4.jpg

Scooby Doo commercial - notice the head's moving on farthest right side guy, 2 images of his left hand, from 2 different frames -

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/6059/21808knightriderontosh0dm5.jpg

Corrupt sheriff - blurry from slo-mo, to keep the pause bar outa there -

http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/9561/21808knightriderontosh0op2.jpg

Mr Bob
02-24-08, 09:56 AM
Doesn't LOOK like a db, does it?

http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/2265/22308csiontosh003vm7.jpg[/URL]

Dean Cain, guest appearance

http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/6123/22308csiontosh009ep3.jpg[/URL]

Mr Bob
11-28-08, 11:58 AM
Just finished adding another shim to my CRT array, a la (thanks!) Owen, for a total of 2.25" - 3 shims of 3/4" each, 4 of them - to my 73" Mit. I added a spot of white glue between the shims and under them, for stability. This makes half again the amount of shimmage I had before today, with just 2 shim thicknesses each x4, for 1.5" of shimmage for the last few months -

Took this opportunity to reclean the lens tops, it had been a year or so since last time, made a noticeable difference. Mit's HDreadys don't need the deeper optics cleaning, they don't allow an air gap between the lenses and the coolant covers, like the Elites do.

I think my shots are being compromised by being in jpeg, which I have heard reduces the res automatically. I checked my cam and can't find any way to redo any of that inside the cam, so it must by the automatic Windows uploading from my cam. Any input welcome on that. Kodak Z712 IS.

After redoing the focus, geometry and convergence - grayscale and colorations stayed the same as before, basically all by eye on the colorations - here's the results -



http://img388.imageshack.us/img388/6892/112808victoriassecretshnq5.jpg[/URL]

Slightly overexposed, but appropriate to the brilliance of the runway
http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/1599/112808victoriassecretshmf5.jpg[/URL]

http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/7840/112808victoriassecretshmk8.jpg[/URL]

Hard to get the crowd shadow details and still have the diamond sparkle without it white crushing out
http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/8902/112808victoriassecretshyj4.jpg[/URL]

http://img388.imageshack.us/img388/9672/112808victoriassecretshhs0.jpg[/URL]

Slight movement blur on this one, mostly on her outfit
http://img388.imageshack.us/img388/2586/112808victoriassecretshns4.jpg[/URL]

Blur on this one only on her right shoe and at the top of her rack (no not that one, the one she's WEARING...!)
http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/7339/112808victoriassecretshyi5.jpg[/URL]