wajo
08-12-07, 10:46 PM
Since the original thread on TIVO suing Echostar for patent infringement seems to be in limbo, awaiting archiving, here's the latest on Forgent vs. Echostar and TIVO vs. Echostar. (http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/327239_echostar11.html)
Echostar/Dish beats Forgent. Forgent patent ruled invalid in May, judge denies new trial Aug 9 and orders Forgent to pay Echostar $90K for court costs. Before trial (in May?), DirectTV paid Forgent $8M to settle... dum-de-dum-dum!
TIVO still winning and Echostar sets aside $94M to pay, pending appeal. After U. S. Patent Office review, TIVO retains two jury-awarded claims, needs only one.
For those who didn't read the original thread, TIVO patented a "Timewarping System" that reads like the specs for a HDD DVR and our beloved HDD DVDRs, and they sued Echostar/Dish for using DVRs in their system that used their patented ideas. Forgent had a preceding patent for a "remote tele-conferencing system" that they claimed Echostar also violated. (These are only "the general ideas" and may be wrong... all the many pertinent details are in that other thread.)
Echostar/Dish beats Forgent. Forgent patent ruled invalid in May, judge denies new trial Aug 9 and orders Forgent to pay Echostar $90K for court costs. Before trial (in May?), DirectTV paid Forgent $8M to settle... dum-de-dum-dum!
TIVO still winning and Echostar sets aside $94M to pay, pending appeal. After U. S. Patent Office review, TIVO retains two jury-awarded claims, needs only one.
For those who didn't read the original thread, TIVO patented a "Timewarping System" that reads like the specs for a HDD DVR and our beloved HDD DVDRs, and they sued Echostar/Dish for using DVRs in their system that used their patented ideas. Forgent had a preceding patent for a "remote tele-conferencing system" that they claimed Echostar also violated. (These are only "the general ideas" and may be wrong... all the many pertinent details are in that other thread.)