Kosty
08-22-07, 12:04 PM
I submitted this in the insider thread, but I would like other thoughts on my conclusions.
If a small content provider wanted to produce 25,000 or 100,000 HD discs do the mandatory AACS costs for Blu-ray make a significant difference?
AACS is required on all Blu-ray discs and is listed as so here http://www.pacificdisc.com/PricingBluRay.html To pacificdisc or any insider:
Am I correct in understanding that the AACS fees that are mandatory to Blu-ray would add substantially to the to cost of Blu-ray production?
As much as 23% extra cost for a 25,000 run of SL BD25 discs with 3 check discs and a master?
Could HD DVD be as much as $19,000 cheaper for a 25,000 unit run and $36,000 cheaper for a 100,000 unit run? Here's my breakdown based on your charts, assuming 3 check discs and one master:
scenario lowest cost, 3 check disc 1 master
25,000 100,000 25,000 100,000
SL 15GB HD DVD $33,500 $129,000 $1.34 $1.29 (no AACS)
DL 30GB HD DVD $40,750 $145,000 $1.63 $1.45 (no AACS)
SL 25GB Blu-ray $52,500 $165,000 $2.09 $1.65
DL 50GB Blu-ray Not Available
Any mastering/authoring costs not included, setup included
I calculated this as follows:
http://www.pacificdisc.com/PricingBluRay.html
http://www.pacificdisc.com/PricingHD-DVD.html
If I understand things correctly: If an independent producer wanted to produce and release a 25,000 and 100,000 order, on Blu-ray, hey have to use AACS. They could choose to include AACS on HD DVD to avoid the costs but are obligated to use it on Blu-ray.
Dual layer 50GB Blu-ray discs are not available from you.
For replication of a single layer 25GB Blu-ray disc:
25,000 seems to be the run rate economic break point, with costs going down to $1.59 per disc and avoiding the mastering charges.
100,000 is the most economic rate obviously , with costs going down to $1.45 per disc and also avoiding the mastering charges.
But, every time a check disc is created, they incur a $2,500 cost for AACS fees and after they start final production the fees are an additional $0.10 per unit?
So if they have 3 check discs and one final master the Blu-ray mandatory AACS fees increase the Blu-ray replication cost by
= (4 x $2500) + ($0.10 x 100,000)
= $10,000 + $10,000
= $20,000 mandatory AACS fees for the 100,000 unit Blu-ray run
and
= (4 x $2500) + ($0.10 x 25,000)
= $10,000 + $2,500
= $12,500 mandatory AACS fees for the 25,000 unit Blu-ray run
Of course , those cost would be occurred for HD DVD production as well, if the content provider wanted to include AACS, but they could choose to avoid them if they wished.
The base replication cost for the 25,000 25GB Blu-ray discs is $1.59 for 25,000 units for a total running cost of $39,750.
The base replication cost for the 100,000 25GB Blu-ray discs is $1.45 for 100,000 units for a total running cost of $145,000.
Am I correct in seeing that the mandatory AACS requirement would add $20,000 in fees to a replication run of 100,000 25GB Blu-ray discs that would have a base cost $145,000 so that the total price would be $165,000 under that scenario?
That would equate out to $1.65 per unit.
The mandatory AACS fees with 3 check disc and a master would be alone $20,000/$165,000 = adding 12.1% of the cost of a 100,000 unit replication??
=========================================================
Am I correct in seeing that the mandatory AACS requirement would add $12,500 in fees to a replication run of 25,000 25GB Blu-ray discs that would that would have a base cost $39,750 so that the total price would be $52,500 under that scenario?
That would equate out to $2.09 per unit.
The mandatory AACS fees with 3 check disc and a master would be alone $12,500/$52,500 = adding 23.8% of the cost of a 25,000 unit replication??
=========================================================
So for a 25,000 unit 25GB single layer Blu-ray replication the total cost is a minimum $52,500 or $2.09 per unit.
So for a 100,000 unit 25GB single layer Blu-ray replication the total cost is a minimum $165,000 or $1.65 per unit.
=========================================================
For a HD DVD 15GB single layer replication the cost would be $1.34 each for 25,000 units for a base cost of $33,500 with AACS fees optional .That would be a total cost of 1.34 per disc.
For a HD DVD 15 GB single layer replication the cost would be $1.29 each for 100,000 units for a base cost of $129,000 with AACS fees optional .That would be a total cost of 1.29 per disc.
For a HD DVD 30GB double layer replication the cost would be $1.63 each for 25,000 units for a base cost of $40,750 with AACS fees optional .That would be a total cost of 1.63 per disc.
For a HD DVD 30 GB double layer replication the cost would be $1.45 each for 100,000 units for a base cost of $145,000 with AACS fees optional .That would be a total cost of 1.45 per disc.
=========================================================
So if a content provider wanted to produce 25,000 or 100,000 discs in both format , at the lowest costs, with AACS being mandatory for Blu-ray and 3 check discs:
scenario lowest cost, 3 check disc 1 master
25,000 100,000 25,000 100,000
SL 15GB HD DVD $33,500 $129,000 $1.34 $1.29 (no AACS)
DL 30GB HD DVD $40,750 $145,000 $1.63 $1.45 (no AACS)
SL 25GB Blu-ray $52,500 $165,000 $2.09 $1.65
DL 50GB Blu-ray Not Available
Any mastering/authoring costs not included, setup included
It would seem that the mandatory AACS fees and extra costs fora small content provider would make Blu-ray substantially more expensive to produce.
Under the scenario I provided, with 3 check discs, and no AACS used for HD DVD, a small studio could possibly save $19,000 by using 15GB HD DVD discs or $11,700 by using 30GB HD DVD discs over a BD25 for a small 25,000 replication. A lot of niche content could fit on the 15GB discs using VC-1 or AVC.
They would save $36,000 or $16,000 for 100,000 discs over the Blu-ray total costs.
Would that not be possibly a significant factor in deciding whether or not to release a low volume selling product in HD or not?
If a small content provider wanted to produce 25,000 or 100,000 HD discs do the mandatory AACS costs for Blu-ray make a significant difference?
AACS is required on all Blu-ray discs and is listed as so here http://www.pacificdisc.com/PricingBluRay.html To pacificdisc or any insider:
Am I correct in understanding that the AACS fees that are mandatory to Blu-ray would add substantially to the to cost of Blu-ray production?
As much as 23% extra cost for a 25,000 run of SL BD25 discs with 3 check discs and a master?
Could HD DVD be as much as $19,000 cheaper for a 25,000 unit run and $36,000 cheaper for a 100,000 unit run? Here's my breakdown based on your charts, assuming 3 check discs and one master:
scenario lowest cost, 3 check disc 1 master
25,000 100,000 25,000 100,000
SL 15GB HD DVD $33,500 $129,000 $1.34 $1.29 (no AACS)
DL 30GB HD DVD $40,750 $145,000 $1.63 $1.45 (no AACS)
SL 25GB Blu-ray $52,500 $165,000 $2.09 $1.65
DL 50GB Blu-ray Not Available
Any mastering/authoring costs not included, setup included
I calculated this as follows:
http://www.pacificdisc.com/PricingBluRay.html
http://www.pacificdisc.com/PricingHD-DVD.html
If I understand things correctly: If an independent producer wanted to produce and release a 25,000 and 100,000 order, on Blu-ray, hey have to use AACS. They could choose to include AACS on HD DVD to avoid the costs but are obligated to use it on Blu-ray.
Dual layer 50GB Blu-ray discs are not available from you.
For replication of a single layer 25GB Blu-ray disc:
25,000 seems to be the run rate economic break point, with costs going down to $1.59 per disc and avoiding the mastering charges.
100,000 is the most economic rate obviously , with costs going down to $1.45 per disc and also avoiding the mastering charges.
But, every time a check disc is created, they incur a $2,500 cost for AACS fees and after they start final production the fees are an additional $0.10 per unit?
So if they have 3 check discs and one final master the Blu-ray mandatory AACS fees increase the Blu-ray replication cost by
= (4 x $2500) + ($0.10 x 100,000)
= $10,000 + $10,000
= $20,000 mandatory AACS fees for the 100,000 unit Blu-ray run
and
= (4 x $2500) + ($0.10 x 25,000)
= $10,000 + $2,500
= $12,500 mandatory AACS fees for the 25,000 unit Blu-ray run
Of course , those cost would be occurred for HD DVD production as well, if the content provider wanted to include AACS, but they could choose to avoid them if they wished.
The base replication cost for the 25,000 25GB Blu-ray discs is $1.59 for 25,000 units for a total running cost of $39,750.
The base replication cost for the 100,000 25GB Blu-ray discs is $1.45 for 100,000 units for a total running cost of $145,000.
Am I correct in seeing that the mandatory AACS requirement would add $20,000 in fees to a replication run of 100,000 25GB Blu-ray discs that would have a base cost $145,000 so that the total price would be $165,000 under that scenario?
That would equate out to $1.65 per unit.
The mandatory AACS fees with 3 check disc and a master would be alone $20,000/$165,000 = adding 12.1% of the cost of a 100,000 unit replication??
=========================================================
Am I correct in seeing that the mandatory AACS requirement would add $12,500 in fees to a replication run of 25,000 25GB Blu-ray discs that would that would have a base cost $39,750 so that the total price would be $52,500 under that scenario?
That would equate out to $2.09 per unit.
The mandatory AACS fees with 3 check disc and a master would be alone $12,500/$52,500 = adding 23.8% of the cost of a 25,000 unit replication??
=========================================================
So for a 25,000 unit 25GB single layer Blu-ray replication the total cost is a minimum $52,500 or $2.09 per unit.
So for a 100,000 unit 25GB single layer Blu-ray replication the total cost is a minimum $165,000 or $1.65 per unit.
=========================================================
For a HD DVD 15GB single layer replication the cost would be $1.34 each for 25,000 units for a base cost of $33,500 with AACS fees optional .That would be a total cost of 1.34 per disc.
For a HD DVD 15 GB single layer replication the cost would be $1.29 each for 100,000 units for a base cost of $129,000 with AACS fees optional .That would be a total cost of 1.29 per disc.
For a HD DVD 30GB double layer replication the cost would be $1.63 each for 25,000 units for a base cost of $40,750 with AACS fees optional .That would be a total cost of 1.63 per disc.
For a HD DVD 30 GB double layer replication the cost would be $1.45 each for 100,000 units for a base cost of $145,000 with AACS fees optional .That would be a total cost of 1.45 per disc.
=========================================================
So if a content provider wanted to produce 25,000 or 100,000 discs in both format , at the lowest costs, with AACS being mandatory for Blu-ray and 3 check discs:
scenario lowest cost, 3 check disc 1 master
25,000 100,000 25,000 100,000
SL 15GB HD DVD $33,500 $129,000 $1.34 $1.29 (no AACS)
DL 30GB HD DVD $40,750 $145,000 $1.63 $1.45 (no AACS)
SL 25GB Blu-ray $52,500 $165,000 $2.09 $1.65
DL 50GB Blu-ray Not Available
Any mastering/authoring costs not included, setup included
It would seem that the mandatory AACS fees and extra costs fora small content provider would make Blu-ray substantially more expensive to produce.
Under the scenario I provided, with 3 check discs, and no AACS used for HD DVD, a small studio could possibly save $19,000 by using 15GB HD DVD discs or $11,700 by using 30GB HD DVD discs over a BD25 for a small 25,000 replication. A lot of niche content could fit on the 15GB discs using VC-1 or AVC.
They would save $36,000 or $16,000 for 100,000 discs over the Blu-ray total costs.
Would that not be possibly a significant factor in deciding whether or not to release a low volume selling product in HD or not?