View Full Version : HELP - The Value of Rear Projection vs LCD?


Wade4308
08-27-07, 03:17 PM
For about a month, I have been evaluating various HDTVs to determine whether or not I wanted to take the plunge and if so, which set would be best for me. I quickly eliminated plasma due to the high reflection on the screen. I have that problem with my current analog tv and I don't want it again.

I really like the rear projection tvs and have found some great bargains such as a Toshiba 57 inch set for $1099 plus shipping and a Sony LCoS 55 inch set for about half price. I really prefer the rear projection, especially the cost, and in fact the only thing I prefer about the LCD over the rear projection is the viewing angle. Much better, of course, on the LCD.

So, here is my remaining problem and I am hoping that some of you with plenty of experience with these technologies will give me some feedback. I was within minutes of pulling the trigger on a Sony KDS-55A2020 yesterday when I suddenly realized that in all my evaluation I had not factored in the long term cost of replacement bulbs. Yes, I knew these sets would need replacement bulbs but I have not done the math to look at the true value over time. So, I started thinking about it and it seems that the HDTV set would probably run roughly 3000 hours per year in my house. Assuming that figure, it seems that I would need to replace the bulb every 2 years on average and since I am a person who keeps his toys a long time, I figure I would have the set at least 10 years. That being the case, it would seem that I would need to endure the aggravation and the cost of replacing the bult at least 5 times during the life of the set. Assuming an average of $200 per bulb, that is an extra cost over the life of the set of $1000 plus 5 episodes of aggravation until the bulb got replaced. When I add that to the original cost, I have as much or more money invested than I would have with getting a 52" LCD and I don't have to be limited in my viewing angle.

Having stated all that, what I would like to hear from you HDTV experienced folks is whether or not my logic is flawed and/or are there any similar costs with LCD that I need to factor into the lifetime costs?

I sure would appreciate any information because at the prices of these sets, I cannot afford to make a mistake since I am retired and living on a limited fixed income.

nicknomo
08-27-07, 04:29 PM
LCD isn't going to cost you more over time... The projection will..

I'm willing to put up with it, as the picture quality is worth it to me.. However LCD's are definitely less hassle and less long term costs assosciated with them.

JOHNnDENVER
08-27-07, 04:50 PM
No plasma? No projector lamps? Well I think 52" LCD direct views are pretty cool.


It does seem right now, the cost is close to $1K or so more than the best deal 52" RP displays, so for 10 years that would be a wash right?

JonDotCom
08-27-07, 04:52 PM
I think DLP is still the best compromise. I own 2.