View Full Version : Multichannel News - FCC's Martin has to dump Dual Carriage & All Bits for cableco's


Ken H
09-12-07, 10:05 AM
Martin Forced To Dump His Dual Carriage Plan
Operators Will Have to Carry Analog and Digital Signals For Only Three Years

By Ted Hearn -- Multichannel News, 9/11/2007 9:35:00 PM

Washington -- The cable industry scored a decisive political victory Tuesday night when Federal Communications Commission chairman Kevin Martin had to dump a draconian digital TV plan that cable vowed to contest in court, perhaps rupturing the harmony needed by the industry-government effort to shift the nation to all-digital broadcast TV in early 2009 without a massive consumer rebellion.

After an 11-hour delay to the start of its monthly meeting, the FCC voted 5-0 at about 10 p.m. to require cable systems to distribute local TV stations that demand carriage in both analog and digital formats for a three-year period starting Feb. 18, 2009. That’s the day after all 1,756 full-power TV stations must turn off their analog signals and rely exclusively on their digital feeds. Cable systems that are all-digital are exempt from the FCC’s dual carriage mandate.

Martin’s plan called for dual must carry without the 2012 sunset, which the FCC did reserve the right to extend. Lobbying pressure from the National Cable & Telecommunications Association forced Martin to yield not only on perpetual dual carriage but also on a second priority: Requiring cable systems to transmit “all content bits” in a digital TV signal, thereby eliminating the use of signal compression and statistical multiplexing that husband bandwidth.

“We are pleased that the FCC’s action today adopts cable’s carriage plan. And we are pleased that the FCC dropped an ill-considered mandate that would have turned back the clock on decades of digital technology innovation,” said NCTA president Kyle McSlarrow in a statement of praise that probably means no major court fight looms.

Martin was upbeat even though his plan unraveled when he couldn’t find any takers during daylong backroom negotiations.

“I think it’s always important to reach a compromise with all of the commissioners. Today, I think analog cable consumers were the big winner,” Martin said.

Although NCTA could cheer the results, small operators that lack the clout of their big MSO brethren came away disappointed as the FCC refused to grant a blanket dual carriage waiver to small systems. Systems with 552 MHz or less may apply for FCC waivers, a bureaucratic obstacle that keeps Martin and his staff in firm control of the process, just like they did over set-top box waivers.

“It’s not fair to ask tiny rural systems to engage lawyers in Washington when a single exemption would have sufficed,” said FCC Democratic member Jonathan Adelstein, who dissented on forcing small operators to apply for waivers.

Martin did not have the same concern.

“I think we provided them an opportunity if they actually have constraints on their capacity to be able to demonstrate that and we’ll take a look at it,” Martin said.

Martin told a reporter after the meeting that cable operators will not be able to raise regulated basic tier rates to recover the cost of adding duplicative local TV signals.

“I think the reason why is that there is no additional cost for must carry channels,” Martin said. “There is no additional cost for must carry broadcast stations because they don’t get reimbursed like a retransmission consent station.”

posg
09-12-07, 10:39 AM
If I read between the lines, this ruling only applies to stations who elect "must-carry" status, i.e. religious and shopping channels, and not to stations who negotiate "retransmission consent".

So it will be up to those stations requesting consent to negotiate "dual carriage" as a condition, but not as a mandate. Am I correct?

fredfa
09-12-07, 10:44 AM
Correct, posg.

Ken H
09-12-07, 12:00 PM
Although it is a great idea, I'm not surprised about the All Bits not getting approval. It was tilting at windmills, at best.

nakedeye
09-12-07, 08:26 PM
I wasn't even aware there was some sort of an all bits proposal out there. Shame it got caned.

JimboG
09-12-07, 11:11 PM
I wasn't even aware there was some sort of an all bits proposal out there. Shame it got caned.

"All bits" could have prompted a rash of multicasting and even unidirectional data casting. What I would have preferred to see would be "all bits" just for the primary video program. "All bits" or no substantial visual degradation from all bits of the primary video program would encourage better video quality while not lending must carry legitimacy to multicast crap that robs video bandwidth from a station's primary video offering.

Then again, the FCC's "degrade no further than any channel" standard should keep the cable companies from mucking things up too much. Hopefully...:)

bfdtv
09-13-07, 12:15 AM
"All bits" could have prompted a rash of multicasting and even unidirectional data casting. What I would have preferred to see would be "all bits" just for the primary video program.I agree that would have been nice.

Unfortunately, the folks who care about HD PQ weren't the ones pushing for all bits.

videobruce
10-28-07, 09:33 AM
How does this affect all the non local analog channels (services) in the basic (non digital) tiers??

kenglish
10-28-07, 10:18 AM
How does this affect all the non local analog channels (services) in the basic (non digital) tiers??

They can all go away, ASAP.

(Might as well just get an antenna :p )

videobruce
10-28-07, 10:58 AM
Which means this doesn't apply to any of the 'cable' offerings, correct? They can do what they want with them?
IOWs' if you just subscribe to 'basic' (analog) cable, you would/could wind up with 4 or 5 OTA analog channels through cable?

JimboG
10-28-07, 02:49 PM
Which means this doesn't apply to any of the 'cable' offerings, correct? They can do what they want with them?
IOWs' if you just subscribe to 'basic' (analog) cable, you would/could wind up with 4 or 5 OTA analog channels through cable?

Possibly, though many local franchising authorities probably will push for Public, Educational, and Government (PEG) channels to remain available without a set top box.

videobruce
10-29-07, 07:19 AM
I can't imagine having 4 or 5 'locals' and a couple of mandated gov't channels would be worth anyones time. :rolleyes:
It would make more sense (if they are planning to drop all those analog channels), to supply those with a older TV a converter box for that basic tier and have those newly digital channels 'in the clear' just as they are now in analog form.
The operators solve the issue of supplying oes with analog sets and they get at least 2x or 3x more channel capacity from those 70 (or so) analog channels.