View Full Version : HD Seems To Confuse Nielsen


fredfa
10-30-07, 09:54 PM
Nielsen Gives Fuzzy Picture of HDTV Penetration
Nielsen Numbers Don’t Jibe with Consumer Electronics Association Figures
By Glen Dickson Broadcasting & Cable 10/30/2007

Measurement giant Nielsen (http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6494998.html) finally released estimates of high-definition-set penetration for both the total United States and Local People Meter markets, and the overall numbers may surprise some consumer-electronics manufacturers and programmers as being rather low -- particularly given the recent momentum of HD-set sales and launches of new HD networks.

They may also disappoint advertisers, which have long been seeking clarity on the actual size of the HD audience.

Nielsen found that only 13.7% of TV households in the United States -- or roughly 15.5 million out of 112.8 million total U.S. TV households -- are equipped with HD televisions and HD tuners capable of receiving HDTV signals, a status Nielsen described as “HD Capable.”

Nielsen didn’t define what an “HD tuner” means, but a conversation with a Nielsen spokesman indicated that it could mean an integrated ATSC (Advanced Television Systems Committee) tuner in the set or a connected HD-capable cable or satellite set-top (there are also over-the-air set-tops that receive HD signals, albeit few).

That 13.7% figure is much lower than research from the Consumer Electronics Association (http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6482550.html), the trade group representing HDTV-set manufacturers. The CEA estimated that HDTV household penetration in July 2007 stood at 32% -- or some 36 million homes, going by Nielsen’s household numbers -- and would rise to 36% by year-end. The CEA put the total number of HDTV sets sold by year-end 2006 at 39.9 million, climbing to 60.6 million by the end of this year, and it said one-third of HD households own multiple sets.

Of course, not all HDTV sets are actually used to watch HD programming -- something both set-makers and programmers have long lamented. Industry research has generally indicated that anywhere from 40%-60% of HD sets are still being fed exclusively with standard-definition content, either because consumers don’t know any better or they haven’t bothered to sign up for HD cable or satellite service or to hook their TVs up to over-the-air antennas to receive local broadcast HD signals.

The CEA’s own research, in fact, indicated that in 2007, only 44% of HDTV owners are actually receiving HD programming. A CEA spokesperson explained that this was because many consumers buy the wide-screen sets simply to watch DVD movies.

But Nielsen sees HDTV consumption in a more optimistic light. Its HDTV estimates -- based on in-home collection by its field staff in metered samples and currently limited to National and Local People Meter samples -- suggested that 11.3% of U.S. TV households, or some 12.7 million homes equipped with HD televisions and HD tuners, receive at least one HD network or station, a category it calls “HD Receivable.” And those 12.7 million homes are included within the overall 15.5 million household total, which would indicate that some 82% of homes with HD sets are actually using them to watch HDTV.

That 82% usage number, frankly, is far more surprising than Nielsen’s HDTV household estimate, as it would suggest a much higher adoption of HDTV content among HD set-owners than even the most optimistic network programmers and engineers would claim. When repeatedly asked for further clarification, a Nielsen spokesman stood by the numbers. But he added that Nielsen had actually found that some 21% of U.S. households, or 23.6 million, have HD displays but not necessarily tuners.

Using that larger number from Nielsen -- which inexplicably was not included in its press release -- means that only 53.8% (the aforementioned 12.7 million) of HDTV-display owners are using them to consume HD content. That usage number falls more in line with CEA research and other industry studies.

In market-by-market breakdowns, Nielsen found that Los Angeles has the highest penetration of HD Capable homes, with 20.4%, or some 1.2 million households, while New York has the highest penetration of HD Receivable homes with some 17.5%, or 1.3 million households.

But the market-by-market numbers don’t include a total for HDTV displays, regardless of whether or not they have tuners, so they similarly lack clarity and suggest an adoption of HD content that is probably much higher than reality. For example, a quick look at the data Nielsen released would suggest that 1.29 million of the 1.33 million HD Capable homes in the New York DMA -- or some 97% -- are watching HD content.

Nielsen also released some demographic data on HDTV, reporting that 10.4% of U.S. Hispanic or Latino households are HD Capable and 8.2% are HD Receivable, while 8.1% of African-American households are HD Capable and 6.9% are HD Receivable.

http://www.broadcastingcable.com/index.asp?layout=articlePrint&articleID=CA6495849

Ken H
10-30-07, 10:49 PM
HD Seems To Confuse NielsenWell, it sure seems to confuse enough people around here....

Kib
10-30-07, 11:14 PM
Well, it sure seems to confuse enough people around here....

Congrats Ken, you win "Post of the Week" !!!

Rick_R
10-31-07, 05:20 PM
Another issue with HD penetration is what percentage of those watching a show are watching it in HD.

My friend with only OTA SD watches one or two shows a week. My HD household watches several shows a night. Many HD households watch TV all evening long. The point is the heavy TV households are more likely to watch HDTV. The light TV households do not. Thus for any given HD show the number watching in HD is far greater than the household penetration of HD.

Rick R

limacharliewhisk
10-31-07, 05:37 PM
I have one friend who bought a plasma because his old CRT broke. But he only gets 1 HD OTA channel, and doesn't want to pay for a HD package thru cable or satellite.

Another friend got a plasma also, but he says that it would cost him at least $100/month to get a HD package (not sure if it was his cable or satellite provider). Instead, he opts for the basic package for $50/month and whatever OTA channels he can get.

Of course, I watch HD shows every night and plan to enjoy my first full season of basketball in HD.

It is quite interesting that there is such a large discrepency between the Nielsen and the CEA numbers.

petergaryr
10-31-07, 06:06 PM
I have one friend who bought a plasma because his old CRT broke. But he only gets 1 HD OTA channel, and doesn't want to pay for a HD package thru cable or satellite.

Another friend got a plasma also, but he says that it would cost him at least $100/month to get a HD package (not sure if it was his cable or satellite provider). Instead, he opts for the basic package for $50/month and whatever OTA channels he can get.

Of course, I watch HD shows every night and plan to enjoy my first full season of basketball in HD.

It is quite interesting that there is such a large discrepency between the Nielsen and the CEA numbers.

100 people surveyed....top 10 answers on the board....
Topic is: "Things you can make survey results mean"...... :D

NetworkTV
10-31-07, 07:24 PM
The point is the heavy TV households are more likely to watch HDTV. The light TV households do not.
I don't buy this. In fact, I'd say it's the opposite. People who only watch SD actually have a tendency to have their TV's running anytime they're at home and awake. My parents qualify. Literally, when they walk in the door, the TV goes on. When they wake up, the TV goes on. It only goes off when they leave the house or go to bed. Several other people I know with SD sets do exactly the same thing. The TV just chatters away all day long whenever someone is home.

Of course, the TV is often background noise other than for news, primetime programming and daytime soaps in those situations, but TV tends to be more of a companion to those who have SDTVs.

On the other hand, the people I know who have HDTV sets only have them on a few hours a day. Why? They have HD DVRs. The DVR records the shows and they watch them when they have time. They aren't missing anything when the TV is off. They can shut if off when guests stop by or dinner time rolls around. The shows will be on the hard drive when they get to them.

Finally, I think HD viewers tend to be more choosy about the shows they watch. While the SD folks will sit through local news, local avail primetime and national primetime and finally the late news and talk shows, HD viewers tend to only watch shows they really want to see.

MeowMeow
11-01-07, 12:41 AM
Methodology question: are the Neilsen numbers recorded by self-reporting or are they actually checking the equipment in homes?

petergaryr
11-01-07, 07:14 AM
Methodology question: are the Neilsen numbers recorded by self-reporting or are they actually checking the equipment in homes?

I'd like to know that myself. When the technicians came to hook me up, they messed with my setup for close to an hour---with several calls back to their tech support. They finally decided that my system was "too complex" so they left.

This was a year or so ago and at that time they needed to open the TV and install some equipment inside the set itself.

JMCecil
11-01-07, 07:20 AM
I have personally gone to 4 peoples homes that I can hit with rocks from my house and figured out why each wasn't getting HD. The only reason they figured out they weren't getting HD was by seeing an HD show on my TV. Then I get the "Damn, your HD TV picture is WAAAAAAAAAAAY better than mine". The reason in each case was simple. They had just hooked up their old cable box to their new TV. Two were actually paying for the Digital/HD access package, but the cable company never told them they needed new boxes to receive the HD picture. They just let them sign up and pay for it. One did actually have the cable company come out and they did install a new box, however they just replaced the old SD box with a referb SD box.

MeowMeow
11-01-07, 10:16 AM
They just let them sign up and pay for it. One did actually have the cable company come out and they did install a new box, however they just replaced the old SD box with a referb SD box.

Indeed. And that is one of the reasons I wonder about self-reporting. Because self-reporting should yield an over-expression of HD households, by virtue of folks who think they have HD (there are people with analog sets who buy HD packages and don't quite get any of it) and people with HD sets who for various reasons aren't getting an HD source (there are people who think the TV magically makes it all HD).

I'm moving into a new house this weekend, and I got to talking with my neighbor about the HD subject because of the antenna. Having explained the rudimentary stuff (you need an HDTV plus an HD source) he declared it all too confusing and surrendered.

Of course, as was mentioned, people don't really understand any of it until you fire the TV up and let them see the difference.

cjb101
11-01-07, 11:37 AM
So wait, where's the confusion?

Nielsen found that only 13.7% of TV households in the United States -- or roughly 15.5 million out of 112.8 million total U.S. TV households -- are equipped with HD televisions and HD tuners capable of receiving HDTV signals, a status Nielsen described as “HD Capable.”
The CEA estimated that HDTV household penetration in July 2007 stood at 32%
The CEA’s own research, in fact, indicated that in 2007, only 44% of HDTV owners are actually receiving HD programming.

0.32 * 0.44 = 0.14

14% is pretty damn close to 13.7%. Sounds like their numbers actually match up really well.


The only confusion seems to be on the part of the author. He just gets his math all screwed up in this paragraph:

But Nielsen sees HDTV consumption in a more optimistic light. Its HDTV estimates -- based on in-home collection by its field staff in metered samples and currently limited to National and Local People Meter samples -- suggested that 11.3% of U.S. TV households, or some 12.7 million homes equipped with HD televisions and HD tuners, receive at least one HD network or station, a category it calls “HD Receivable.” And those 12.7 million homes are included within the overall 15.5 million household total, which would indicate that some 82% of homes with HD sets are actually using them to watch HDTV.

That 15.5 million is the number with HD sets and HD tuners. It's not really surprising that 82% of those people actually get an HD channel. The number with HD sets but without HD tuners is obviously much higher.