Wet1
11-27-07, 01:55 PM
I picked up a very slightly used AE2000u recently and decided to give some feedback on this PJ for those who might be interested. This review is long, so for those who want the quick summary, go to the end just before the pictures. I should also add that I don't have access to my test equipment so all comments are subjective. When I get my equipment back, I'll try to add numbers.
I've had two other projectors (PJs) in this same room (our bedroom) over the last nine months so I thought I'd add my thoughts how the AE2000u performs against these other two PJs as well. The reason I'm doing this, is so folks can get a feel for what to expect as these three PJs cover all three technologies and vastly different price points. Obviously the Panasonic AE2000u is a LCD PJ and is one of the cheapest 1080p PJs on the market. The other two PJs are the more expensive 1080p JVC RS1 which is LCOS, and relatively inexpensive 720p Mitsubishi HD1000U DLP, both very popular PJs in their price categories.
Packaging and PJ Size
First thing I noticed when I received the AE2000u was the detail in the packing. The Panny came very well packed, double boxed, styrofoam, and nicely covered in a protective wrap. More PJ manufactures should consider taking these steps since some are still skimping on the packing quality. If Panasonic can sell a PJ at this price with this level of shipping protection, there's no reason more expensive PJs should come with anything less. And for the Sim2 guys, this might be a deal breaker... no satin or velvet bag with the Panasonic.
The remote that comes with the AE2000u is well laid out. It lights up nicely and is easy to read, even in the darkest of theaters. The controls are easy to use and self explanatory. The remote also learns and can be used as a universal remote if you desire to use it as such. Frankly, I didn't expect to get a remote this nice with a PJ at this price level.
Although I knew this PJ was fairly large, I didn't expect it to be quite as large as it was. I bought this PJ to replace the Mits HD1000u in our bedroom. I was surprised to see the Panny is at least twice the size as the HD1000u and weighs at least two or three times as much. It almost looks like the HD1000u on steroids. The AE2000u is only a little smaller than the RS1 and weighs less as well, but the JVC has a more attractive design.
Setup and Lens Notes
Hanging the PJ was no problem and it went up w/o any fuss. The PJ comes with a safety cable which I thought was a nice touch. Like most LCD PJs, the AE2000u has a nice range of zoom and lens shift. The mechanisms are easy to use and don't feel cheesy, like those found on the RS1. The lens is larger than I expected and has motorized zoom and focus. I should note the PJ has built in patterns for focusing and the automated lens has a very nice fine movement which makes getting it dialed in a snap... Walk up to the screen and just give the remote a couple of taps and the image dials in nicely without over shooting. Nice and painless. Much easier (and faster) than fighting with the manual lens on the HD1000u and RS1.
I checked the MC and CA on my PJ and I'm pleased to see it's very tight all around the screen. This was a major complaint I had with my RS1 as the MC (mostly red) could easily be seen from normal viewing distances when text or pop-up menus were displayed on sold color backgrounds. I don't think this AE2000u has more than 1/2 a pixel of MC anywhere on the screen and it's nearly perfect throughout most of the screen. Single chip DLP has a huge advantage having no MC, but this Panny is nearly perfect in this regard.
Noise
One of the first things that pleasantly surprised me was just how quiet this PJ is. I've only had the RS1 and the HD1000u in this room, but all have been mounted directly over the pillows on our bed. The RS1 was fairly quiet in it's econo mode (it was pretty loud in the normal bulb setting), and the DLP wasn't quiet, but it wasn't loud either (although the color wheel makes a very annoying high pitch noise that I certainly wont miss). The AE2000u by comparison is much quieter than either of the two mentioned PJs. In its econo setting it's whisper quiet and only slightly louder in normal mode. Even in high altitude mode the fan is not bad at all (more on that later).
I played around with the two bulb settings and found the econo setting to be fine for our application. The screen we are using in our BR is only about 84" diagonal (+/-). I made it myself and the paint I used is a very light gray with a poly topcoat for protection and a slight increase in gain. I never tested the gain, but I'd guess it's probably about 1.2. Anyway, the econo setting was more than enough for us, even in the dimmer color mode presets. I lent my light meter to a friend a couple of weeks ago, so I haven't been able to take any readings. Just going by eye, I'd guess the normal mode is about 15 - 20% brighter.
Contrast Ratio
The CR on the Panny is pretty good. Again, I haven't tested it, but in our darkly painted BR, it's more than satisfactory in this regard. Color 1 mode was mostly used on the Panny for these subjective comparisons, although the on/off CR in the less accurate color modes (such as Normal and Dynamic) is noticeably better. My guess is the 2500-3000:1 native and 6500-7000:1 with the DI numbers I've seen mentioned are pretty accurate. Regardless what the numbers suggest, the CR is very good in real world use. The DI on this machine is 100% seamless, I could not see it in use, nor can I here it working. I expected the DI to be a significant handicap compared to the other two machines since they didn't have the DI, but that wasn't really the case at all. In fact, I found the DI on the Panny to be so seamless, that I haven't bothered turning it off. The DI on the Panasonic has come a long way from the pumping, over active, noisy DIs of many of the past machines. Nice job Panasonic!
As one would expect, the AE2000u has superior on/off contrast compared to the Mits HD1000u, but it's not as good as the RS1. With a full fade to black, the HD1000u looks gray in comparison. The AE2000u has decent black levels, but the RS1 is slightly darker in a complete blackout. For the CRT guys looking for a point of reference, both the AE2000u and the RS1 still easily fail the hand puppet test. With that said, fades to black are more than sufficient for most, especially those coming from older or non-1080p PJs.
Surprisingly, the large differences in the on/off CR numbers is not completely what one sees when watching most movies since very little time is spend in near blackness. The ANSI CR on these guys are also noticeably different, although again, I don't have the equipment on hand to give actual numbers. In anything other than very dim scenes, the DLP not surprisingly has a little more pop to the image than the LCD or the LCOS machines, despite it being at a huge on/off CR disadvantage. The AE2000u appears to have just as much, if not more inter-scene CR than the RS1 during anything but the darkest of scenes. If I had to take a guess, I say the ANSI CR on the HD1000u is probably around 500:1, the AE2000u is around 400:1 and the RS1 is around 300:1 as each has a noticeable incremental jump. Interestingly, they appear to rank in the opposite order for ANSI CR as they do in on/off CR. In this regard, it would be nice to be able to have your cake and eat it too, but I'm still waiting for such a machine. DLP still has more pop in bright scenes and the JVC outperforms it at the lower light levels, but in overall viewing, the AE2000u provides a pleasing balance of CR in under most viewing conditions.
Color
The color on the AE2000u is absolutely superb out of the box using the Color 1 preset mode. This means a lot coming from me as I'm almost as picky as our resident color Nazi's Bob S. and Tom H. in this regard. This is truly the first PJ I've ever owned where I found myself satisfied with the color as it shipped from the factory. In fact, I can't even tell you anything about the color controls on this PJ because I haven't once felt a need to adjust anything, it's simply excellent OOTB! Actually, the factory calibration is one of the strongest attributes with this PJ. The gray scales, gamma, and color are excellent as shipped, I can't imagine any level of tweaking or further calibration can make this PJ significantly better. A big congratulations to Panasonic, I hope other manufactures take note. Another nice touch is the fact that Panasonic has also given the user about 7 other color presets which range from very accurate (Color 1) to the extremely bright and less accurate Dynamic mode. I've found Color 1 to be my favorite, and a couple of others to pretty good as well (Cinema 1 comes to mind). It seems Panasonic has placed a filter in the light path for use in the Color and Cinema modes which improves color accuracy, but at the same time decreases light output. If brightness is a concern, the Normal and Dynamic presets are the way to go since the filter is pulled out of the light path.
Using the Color 1 preset on the AE2000u, it's no contest compared to the other two PJs, the colors are simply much more accurate on the Panny. The cheap HD1000u is actually pretty good after a few tweaks, but its greens do push towards yellow a little. The Panny does not have any of the pea-green issues the Mits has been criticized for. It really shows in foliage and even in reflections and highlights as the AE2000u doesn't have the yellow/green tint that I find mildly annoying (although more than acceptable given the $900 price of the HD1000u). Overall, the Mits has relatively good colors, but the AE2000u is clearly much better.
The Color 1 colors on the AE2000u compared to the JVC are night and day. As many of you know, I've been more than vocal about the oversaturated colors on the JVC. You can't begin to understand how oversaturated the colors on the RS1 are, until you have a chance to see them on something like the Panny in the Color 1 mode... the difference is not in the least subtle. Glowing grass, taxies, and faces are a thing of the past and simply look much more natural on the Panasonic. For those who actually prefer the more oversaturated colors of the JVC (and I certainly understand there are plenty of people who like this), I've found the Normal preset on the Panasonic to give a similar picture, although I believe it has a slightly cooler color temp compared to the RS1. In fact, I find myself using the Normal mode on the AE2000u during the day as it's brighter and the extra pop of the colors seems to work well under more challenging lighting conditions. I should also note the Color 1 mode on the Panny is significantly dimmer than the RS1 (probably about 200 lumen dimmer), but the Normal mode (which has more similar colors to the JVC) I believe is brighter than the RS1.
Since I'm using the AE2000u on a smaller screen, the light output in the Color 1/economy setting is more than sufficient for my application. I should warn others that this combination will likely be too dim on 110"+ screens w/o the use of high gain screen material. For those with very large screens, with the bulb set to the higher setting and using the Normal mode, this PJ can push out a lot of light and the picture quality (color) would likely be more than acceptable to all but the color Nazi crew.
HD vs. SD
In this regard the Panasonic is a mixed bag. When viewing SD material, it doesn't perform as well through my PC connection. I should note that we watch HDM (BR and HD DVD) exclusively in our bedroom, but I also lay in bed and use the PJ as a display for the computer as well (which we also use to watch SD cable through the MS Media Center on the PC). All of the HDM is piped in via HDMI connection and the PC is hooked up through it's lower quality connection (I don't even have a DVI video card). I don't know why, but everything displayed through the PC on this PJ is very soft. The HD1000u was razor sharp through the same connection and even the RS1 which had poor MC was sharper as well. I haven't had a chance to look at any SD DVD over HDMI yet, but I would hope it's much better upconverted over HDMI than what I'm seeing through the PC connection. I don't watch SD DVD anymore, but I would like to have an answer. I'll have to report back on this.
With HD material this PJ is excellent and crisp. The single chip DLP is still sharper than the LCD or LCOS, but like the RS1, the AE2000u has a nice film like image. I've watched about 10 HDM movies on the AE2000u so far and I have no issues at all with it's HD capabilities.
As many of you know, Panasonic uses their proprietary Smooth Screen technology to eliminate SDE. This has been a complaint in the past as it has left the picture much too soft. Well, I can report that the SS implementation is way better on the AE2000u than any of Panny's previous models. There is basically zero SDE with this PJ and the picture is surprisingly pretty sharp. I won't go as far as to say it's razor sharp like on a good single chip DLP, but from normal viewing distances it's pretty crisp.
Features
The AE2000u also has some nice features. First, the Panny can do internal scaling for CIH setups. For those (like myself) who might want to use an anamorphic lens with their PJ, the fact that this PJ does not require an expensive outboard video processor is a big bonus. Both the HD1000u and the RS1 require external processing for CIH scaling, although the more costly RS2 does have this handy feature. The Panasonic also has some calibration features which are unique to this PJ. It has a waveform monitor included (mostly seen on professional equipment) which "measures the level of brightness output from a given video signal source. This feature also now automatically verifies that the source device is outputting at full dynamic range, and quickly makes adjustments to optimize it for your home theater setting. Users can easily see a graphical representation of any changes made to the unit's color settings." The AE2000u also has a handy split screen feature which allows you to make adjustments on one side of the screen while you can see the original on the other side for a baseline reference. Pretty slick. And for those who like to tweak, Panasonic has also included 18 presets slots for the user to build and label their own custom calibration presets. Another neat feature is their Detail Clarity Processor which "analyzes frequency characteristics of each frame in three dimensions (horizontal, vertical, and along the time axis) and applies necessary sharpness at varying degrees to create natural, life-like images with exceptional clarity." I've played with this feature and found it works very well on pristine source material, but it also exacerbates film grain so I suggest this feature is left off if you don't like seeing grain. The grain level seen with this feature on is similar to the RS1 which has also be criticized for exacerbating film grain.
Concerns
Overall I'm very impressed with the AE2000u, but I do have some concerns. I've owned LCD PJs in the past and I've found they do have some issues, the most common problems being dust and uniformity. LCD PJs have an open light path which welcomes dust to ruin your pristine picture. A couple of particles can cause havoc on PQ. The AE2000u does have a good air filter on it, but chances are at some point dust will make its way in and when it does, you have three choices... Send it out for cleaning, clean it yourself, or live with the bust blob in the picture. Fortunately, it's easy to take the cover off the PJ and clean it yourself, but it's still a hassle. I can see that my PJ does have a very small partial of dust to the left of center in the image, luckily it can only barely be seen when the screen is completely black and you have to REALLY look for it (nothing obvious by any means). At this point it's certainly nothing that would ever bother me, but it is a subtle reminder that at some point there will be larger more problematic particles that find their way in which might be seen in the picture. Most DLP and LCOS machines have sealed light paths, so this is not as much as a concern with these other technologies.
The other major concern I have with LCD PJs is uniformity. I tested my PJ at 15 hours and again at 40 hours and I see no significant uniformity issues, but I again know from past experience that this could be an issue in the future. I've read that some other people have seen some uniformity issues on their AE2000u (like any LCD PJ) after 30+ hours. At this point I don't know what's causing the problem to occur, but I suspect it could be heat related. Until I find out what might be causing the problem and how many PJs are being effected by it, I've decided to leave my PJ set to the high altitude fan mode for additional cooling. Even with the fans set to this higher speed, I have no problems with the noise level (it sounds like air coming through an AC duct) and it might be cheap insurance against uniformity issues, plus increase bulb life. I went into the utility menu and noted that temp one was reading 96* and temp two was around 169* in the econo bulb setting with the fans in HA mode, this should be plenty cool.
It's probably worth mentioning that the owners manual cautions that using this PJ over 6 hours per day and 2000 hours per year might accelerate wear to the optic parts. I suspect this is one of the typical CYA statements, but it does make me question the longevity of such a product. Time will tell, but again, I'm leaving the fan in its high altitude setting to extend life until I know more about the longevity of these PJs.
Summary
Pros:
Nice packaging
No SDE
Sharper image with updated Smooth Screen
Easy to use automated lens
Nice (lighted) remote
PJ can be bright in Normal and Dynamic modes
Very quiet
Good CR
Excellent color & OOTB calibration
Nice selection of factory preset color modes.
Will do CIH scaling internally
Neat custom features
Cons:
Larger PJ size
Soft image with PC input
On/off CR still not as good as LCOS (although ANSI CR might be improved)
Light output fairly low in accurate color mode
LCD issues (Dust and Uniformity)
No velvet/satin bag.
I've had two other projectors (PJs) in this same room (our bedroom) over the last nine months so I thought I'd add my thoughts how the AE2000u performs against these other two PJs as well. The reason I'm doing this, is so folks can get a feel for what to expect as these three PJs cover all three technologies and vastly different price points. Obviously the Panasonic AE2000u is a LCD PJ and is one of the cheapest 1080p PJs on the market. The other two PJs are the more expensive 1080p JVC RS1 which is LCOS, and relatively inexpensive 720p Mitsubishi HD1000U DLP, both very popular PJs in their price categories.
Packaging and PJ Size
First thing I noticed when I received the AE2000u was the detail in the packing. The Panny came very well packed, double boxed, styrofoam, and nicely covered in a protective wrap. More PJ manufactures should consider taking these steps since some are still skimping on the packing quality. If Panasonic can sell a PJ at this price with this level of shipping protection, there's no reason more expensive PJs should come with anything less. And for the Sim2 guys, this might be a deal breaker... no satin or velvet bag with the Panasonic.
The remote that comes with the AE2000u is well laid out. It lights up nicely and is easy to read, even in the darkest of theaters. The controls are easy to use and self explanatory. The remote also learns and can be used as a universal remote if you desire to use it as such. Frankly, I didn't expect to get a remote this nice with a PJ at this price level.
Although I knew this PJ was fairly large, I didn't expect it to be quite as large as it was. I bought this PJ to replace the Mits HD1000u in our bedroom. I was surprised to see the Panny is at least twice the size as the HD1000u and weighs at least two or three times as much. It almost looks like the HD1000u on steroids. The AE2000u is only a little smaller than the RS1 and weighs less as well, but the JVC has a more attractive design.
Setup and Lens Notes
Hanging the PJ was no problem and it went up w/o any fuss. The PJ comes with a safety cable which I thought was a nice touch. Like most LCD PJs, the AE2000u has a nice range of zoom and lens shift. The mechanisms are easy to use and don't feel cheesy, like those found on the RS1. The lens is larger than I expected and has motorized zoom and focus. I should note the PJ has built in patterns for focusing and the automated lens has a very nice fine movement which makes getting it dialed in a snap... Walk up to the screen and just give the remote a couple of taps and the image dials in nicely without over shooting. Nice and painless. Much easier (and faster) than fighting with the manual lens on the HD1000u and RS1.
I checked the MC and CA on my PJ and I'm pleased to see it's very tight all around the screen. This was a major complaint I had with my RS1 as the MC (mostly red) could easily be seen from normal viewing distances when text or pop-up menus were displayed on sold color backgrounds. I don't think this AE2000u has more than 1/2 a pixel of MC anywhere on the screen and it's nearly perfect throughout most of the screen. Single chip DLP has a huge advantage having no MC, but this Panny is nearly perfect in this regard.
Noise
One of the first things that pleasantly surprised me was just how quiet this PJ is. I've only had the RS1 and the HD1000u in this room, but all have been mounted directly over the pillows on our bed. The RS1 was fairly quiet in it's econo mode (it was pretty loud in the normal bulb setting), and the DLP wasn't quiet, but it wasn't loud either (although the color wheel makes a very annoying high pitch noise that I certainly wont miss). The AE2000u by comparison is much quieter than either of the two mentioned PJs. In its econo setting it's whisper quiet and only slightly louder in normal mode. Even in high altitude mode the fan is not bad at all (more on that later).
I played around with the two bulb settings and found the econo setting to be fine for our application. The screen we are using in our BR is only about 84" diagonal (+/-). I made it myself and the paint I used is a very light gray with a poly topcoat for protection and a slight increase in gain. I never tested the gain, but I'd guess it's probably about 1.2. Anyway, the econo setting was more than enough for us, even in the dimmer color mode presets. I lent my light meter to a friend a couple of weeks ago, so I haven't been able to take any readings. Just going by eye, I'd guess the normal mode is about 15 - 20% brighter.
Contrast Ratio
The CR on the Panny is pretty good. Again, I haven't tested it, but in our darkly painted BR, it's more than satisfactory in this regard. Color 1 mode was mostly used on the Panny for these subjective comparisons, although the on/off CR in the less accurate color modes (such as Normal and Dynamic) is noticeably better. My guess is the 2500-3000:1 native and 6500-7000:1 with the DI numbers I've seen mentioned are pretty accurate. Regardless what the numbers suggest, the CR is very good in real world use. The DI on this machine is 100% seamless, I could not see it in use, nor can I here it working. I expected the DI to be a significant handicap compared to the other two machines since they didn't have the DI, but that wasn't really the case at all. In fact, I found the DI on the Panny to be so seamless, that I haven't bothered turning it off. The DI on the Panasonic has come a long way from the pumping, over active, noisy DIs of many of the past machines. Nice job Panasonic!
As one would expect, the AE2000u has superior on/off contrast compared to the Mits HD1000u, but it's not as good as the RS1. With a full fade to black, the HD1000u looks gray in comparison. The AE2000u has decent black levels, but the RS1 is slightly darker in a complete blackout. For the CRT guys looking for a point of reference, both the AE2000u and the RS1 still easily fail the hand puppet test. With that said, fades to black are more than sufficient for most, especially those coming from older or non-1080p PJs.
Surprisingly, the large differences in the on/off CR numbers is not completely what one sees when watching most movies since very little time is spend in near blackness. The ANSI CR on these guys are also noticeably different, although again, I don't have the equipment on hand to give actual numbers. In anything other than very dim scenes, the DLP not surprisingly has a little more pop to the image than the LCD or the LCOS machines, despite it being at a huge on/off CR disadvantage. The AE2000u appears to have just as much, if not more inter-scene CR than the RS1 during anything but the darkest of scenes. If I had to take a guess, I say the ANSI CR on the HD1000u is probably around 500:1, the AE2000u is around 400:1 and the RS1 is around 300:1 as each has a noticeable incremental jump. Interestingly, they appear to rank in the opposite order for ANSI CR as they do in on/off CR. In this regard, it would be nice to be able to have your cake and eat it too, but I'm still waiting for such a machine. DLP still has more pop in bright scenes and the JVC outperforms it at the lower light levels, but in overall viewing, the AE2000u provides a pleasing balance of CR in under most viewing conditions.
Color
The color on the AE2000u is absolutely superb out of the box using the Color 1 preset mode. This means a lot coming from me as I'm almost as picky as our resident color Nazi's Bob S. and Tom H. in this regard. This is truly the first PJ I've ever owned where I found myself satisfied with the color as it shipped from the factory. In fact, I can't even tell you anything about the color controls on this PJ because I haven't once felt a need to adjust anything, it's simply excellent OOTB! Actually, the factory calibration is one of the strongest attributes with this PJ. The gray scales, gamma, and color are excellent as shipped, I can't imagine any level of tweaking or further calibration can make this PJ significantly better. A big congratulations to Panasonic, I hope other manufactures take note. Another nice touch is the fact that Panasonic has also given the user about 7 other color presets which range from very accurate (Color 1) to the extremely bright and less accurate Dynamic mode. I've found Color 1 to be my favorite, and a couple of others to pretty good as well (Cinema 1 comes to mind). It seems Panasonic has placed a filter in the light path for use in the Color and Cinema modes which improves color accuracy, but at the same time decreases light output. If brightness is a concern, the Normal and Dynamic presets are the way to go since the filter is pulled out of the light path.
Using the Color 1 preset on the AE2000u, it's no contest compared to the other two PJs, the colors are simply much more accurate on the Panny. The cheap HD1000u is actually pretty good after a few tweaks, but its greens do push towards yellow a little. The Panny does not have any of the pea-green issues the Mits has been criticized for. It really shows in foliage and even in reflections and highlights as the AE2000u doesn't have the yellow/green tint that I find mildly annoying (although more than acceptable given the $900 price of the HD1000u). Overall, the Mits has relatively good colors, but the AE2000u is clearly much better.
The Color 1 colors on the AE2000u compared to the JVC are night and day. As many of you know, I've been more than vocal about the oversaturated colors on the JVC. You can't begin to understand how oversaturated the colors on the RS1 are, until you have a chance to see them on something like the Panny in the Color 1 mode... the difference is not in the least subtle. Glowing grass, taxies, and faces are a thing of the past and simply look much more natural on the Panasonic. For those who actually prefer the more oversaturated colors of the JVC (and I certainly understand there are plenty of people who like this), I've found the Normal preset on the Panasonic to give a similar picture, although I believe it has a slightly cooler color temp compared to the RS1. In fact, I find myself using the Normal mode on the AE2000u during the day as it's brighter and the extra pop of the colors seems to work well under more challenging lighting conditions. I should also note the Color 1 mode on the Panny is significantly dimmer than the RS1 (probably about 200 lumen dimmer), but the Normal mode (which has more similar colors to the JVC) I believe is brighter than the RS1.
Since I'm using the AE2000u on a smaller screen, the light output in the Color 1/economy setting is more than sufficient for my application. I should warn others that this combination will likely be too dim on 110"+ screens w/o the use of high gain screen material. For those with very large screens, with the bulb set to the higher setting and using the Normal mode, this PJ can push out a lot of light and the picture quality (color) would likely be more than acceptable to all but the color Nazi crew.
HD vs. SD
In this regard the Panasonic is a mixed bag. When viewing SD material, it doesn't perform as well through my PC connection. I should note that we watch HDM (BR and HD DVD) exclusively in our bedroom, but I also lay in bed and use the PJ as a display for the computer as well (which we also use to watch SD cable through the MS Media Center on the PC). All of the HDM is piped in via HDMI connection and the PC is hooked up through it's lower quality connection (I don't even have a DVI video card). I don't know why, but everything displayed through the PC on this PJ is very soft. The HD1000u was razor sharp through the same connection and even the RS1 which had poor MC was sharper as well. I haven't had a chance to look at any SD DVD over HDMI yet, but I would hope it's much better upconverted over HDMI than what I'm seeing through the PC connection. I don't watch SD DVD anymore, but I would like to have an answer. I'll have to report back on this.
With HD material this PJ is excellent and crisp. The single chip DLP is still sharper than the LCD or LCOS, but like the RS1, the AE2000u has a nice film like image. I've watched about 10 HDM movies on the AE2000u so far and I have no issues at all with it's HD capabilities.
As many of you know, Panasonic uses their proprietary Smooth Screen technology to eliminate SDE. This has been a complaint in the past as it has left the picture much too soft. Well, I can report that the SS implementation is way better on the AE2000u than any of Panny's previous models. There is basically zero SDE with this PJ and the picture is surprisingly pretty sharp. I won't go as far as to say it's razor sharp like on a good single chip DLP, but from normal viewing distances it's pretty crisp.
Features
The AE2000u also has some nice features. First, the Panny can do internal scaling for CIH setups. For those (like myself) who might want to use an anamorphic lens with their PJ, the fact that this PJ does not require an expensive outboard video processor is a big bonus. Both the HD1000u and the RS1 require external processing for CIH scaling, although the more costly RS2 does have this handy feature. The Panasonic also has some calibration features which are unique to this PJ. It has a waveform monitor included (mostly seen on professional equipment) which "measures the level of brightness output from a given video signal source. This feature also now automatically verifies that the source device is outputting at full dynamic range, and quickly makes adjustments to optimize it for your home theater setting. Users can easily see a graphical representation of any changes made to the unit's color settings." The AE2000u also has a handy split screen feature which allows you to make adjustments on one side of the screen while you can see the original on the other side for a baseline reference. Pretty slick. And for those who like to tweak, Panasonic has also included 18 presets slots for the user to build and label their own custom calibration presets. Another neat feature is their Detail Clarity Processor which "analyzes frequency characteristics of each frame in three dimensions (horizontal, vertical, and along the time axis) and applies necessary sharpness at varying degrees to create natural, life-like images with exceptional clarity." I've played with this feature and found it works very well on pristine source material, but it also exacerbates film grain so I suggest this feature is left off if you don't like seeing grain. The grain level seen with this feature on is similar to the RS1 which has also be criticized for exacerbating film grain.
Concerns
Overall I'm very impressed with the AE2000u, but I do have some concerns. I've owned LCD PJs in the past and I've found they do have some issues, the most common problems being dust and uniformity. LCD PJs have an open light path which welcomes dust to ruin your pristine picture. A couple of particles can cause havoc on PQ. The AE2000u does have a good air filter on it, but chances are at some point dust will make its way in and when it does, you have three choices... Send it out for cleaning, clean it yourself, or live with the bust blob in the picture. Fortunately, it's easy to take the cover off the PJ and clean it yourself, but it's still a hassle. I can see that my PJ does have a very small partial of dust to the left of center in the image, luckily it can only barely be seen when the screen is completely black and you have to REALLY look for it (nothing obvious by any means). At this point it's certainly nothing that would ever bother me, but it is a subtle reminder that at some point there will be larger more problematic particles that find their way in which might be seen in the picture. Most DLP and LCOS machines have sealed light paths, so this is not as much as a concern with these other technologies.
The other major concern I have with LCD PJs is uniformity. I tested my PJ at 15 hours and again at 40 hours and I see no significant uniformity issues, but I again know from past experience that this could be an issue in the future. I've read that some other people have seen some uniformity issues on their AE2000u (like any LCD PJ) after 30+ hours. At this point I don't know what's causing the problem to occur, but I suspect it could be heat related. Until I find out what might be causing the problem and how many PJs are being effected by it, I've decided to leave my PJ set to the high altitude fan mode for additional cooling. Even with the fans set to this higher speed, I have no problems with the noise level (it sounds like air coming through an AC duct) and it might be cheap insurance against uniformity issues, plus increase bulb life. I went into the utility menu and noted that temp one was reading 96* and temp two was around 169* in the econo bulb setting with the fans in HA mode, this should be plenty cool.
It's probably worth mentioning that the owners manual cautions that using this PJ over 6 hours per day and 2000 hours per year might accelerate wear to the optic parts. I suspect this is one of the typical CYA statements, but it does make me question the longevity of such a product. Time will tell, but again, I'm leaving the fan in its high altitude setting to extend life until I know more about the longevity of these PJs.
Summary
Pros:
Nice packaging
No SDE
Sharper image with updated Smooth Screen
Easy to use automated lens
Nice (lighted) remote
PJ can be bright in Normal and Dynamic modes
Very quiet
Good CR
Excellent color & OOTB calibration
Nice selection of factory preset color modes.
Will do CIH scaling internally
Neat custom features
Cons:
Larger PJ size
Soft image with PC input
On/off CR still not as good as LCOS (although ANSI CR might be improved)
Light output fairly low in accurate color mode
LCD issues (Dust and Uniformity)
No velvet/satin bag.