Kevin McCarthy
12-23-07, 12:16 PM
Well, it was about a year ago that I began the "First Impressions of the new JVC thin (Slim D-ILA) RP sets" thread. JVC seemed to have made a major advance in compact, wall-mountable rear projection, and we looked forward to the sets with interest. They were supposed to come out last January (for the 58") and March (for the 65"), but were both very late, and unlike the previous HD-xxFC/FH/FN97 sets, the new Slim models have essentially no retail presence. I remained interested in getting the larger 65" set, and due to the lack of any retail availability, had to buy it sight unseen. I purchased the set from Brian Pool at Tape Works Texas, who was very professional and helpful. The only other trustworthy site offering these sets is B&H Photo Video, but their price is higher. Beware of the scam shops that claim to sell this set. It arrived last week, followed by the wall mount. I now have it fully installed, with the set mounted on a wall behind a drop-down 100" Dalite High Power screen and JVC RS-1 front projector. We use the RS-1 for evening cinema or occassional big screen Direct TV viewing, while using the 65S998 for more casual and day-time viewing. This is a probably unique case of "coaxial three chip LCOS", one RP and one FP, both as it happens, from JVC.
Given the news of Sony exiting the rear projection market, and the absence of more than a couple of RP sets at most major retailers, it may be that RP's days are numbered. In my opinion, though, they continue to offer the best picture quality and the best price for a large TV. Their power savings is another trendy plus these days. I have no mis impressions regarding the vitality of this new "Owner's Thread", though. To the best of my knowledge, there is only one other AVS poster who owns a 65S998, and I'm not sure if there are ANY 58S998 owners who post on AVS. If it weren't for the geometry issue, I'd think JVC has pulled off the best rear projection set out there, but with the trickle of ~ 20 per month entering the country, it is destined to remain a rarity.
In a nutshell, here are my first impressions of the JVC 65S998:
Pros:
* Picture Quality: With a few important qualifiers as described below, the picture is awesome. Bear in mind that this TV replaced an old SD set connected to analog cable (Comcast). We had Direct TV with their HD-DVR service installed just before the 65S998 showed up. Granted, we had been watching movies on the killer JVC RS-1 and high power screen for the last six months, but the overall impression is pretty amazing. Incredible detail, vivid colors, more than ample brightness, no motion artifacts, etc. While I will be candid about the flaws that I notice, these have to be viewed in the overall context of an amazing TV.
* Set Depth: JVC did a great job here. This set is way ahead of all other rear projection competitors when it comes to their thickness for a given diagonal size (10.4" for a 58" diagonal; 11.6" for a 65" diagonal). These depths hardly compare with flat panel sets, of course, but that's pretty much a given.
* LCOS Technology: JVC worked with Hughes decades ago to give birth to LCOS technology. They have been at it longer than anyone else, and it shows. Sony has gotten close, but as the RS-1 front projector (which I own) demonstrates with its 15,000:1 native contrast ratio (doubled to 30,000 in the new RS-2), JVC is the king when it comes to LCOS. Their implementation in rear projection sets, while not as advanced as that of their front projectors, is still better than Sony; they have never had to address "green blob" issues, and the fill factor is very high.
* Wall mountable design: The new HD-58S998 and 65S998 have flat backs, and are intended for wall mounting (although some will still choose to place this set on a conventional stand). For thicker rear projection sets from competing firms, this would be ridiculous, not to mention a bizarre structural cantilever. See below for my experience in wall mounting.
* Ultra-thin bezel. At 10 mm (0.4 inches), this set is essentially all picture. Many flat panel sets come up short here, with wide bezels, although to be fair, the thin bezel does not extend to the bottom, which is ~ 9 inches high.
* Build quality: At 115 and 141 pounds, respectively, these sets are hardly lightweights. Part of the weight is an expensive aluminum frame, which is a real step ahead of all plastic sets. From everything I can see, the build quality appears to be excellent.
* Viewing angle: The horizontal viewing angle is very impressive; the picture still looks great even when you are looking at a grazing angle. The vertical angle is more than adequate; the picture does not degrade much at all when moving from the floor to sitting to standing.
* Sound System: These sets have a pretty awesome 30 watt sound system, with a built-in subwoofer. Granted, some users will employ a separate surround sound receiver and speakers to handle audio, but for anyone who just wants to turn on a TV and get great sound, this set does it.
* Electrical power efficiency: While these JVC sets, at 219 watts, are essentially comparable in power consumption to competitive rear projection sets, they are much more power efficient than plasmas or LCD sets, especially at the larger (65") size. Typical 65" plasmas burn three times as many watts, and 65" LCD sets burn twice as many watts. For example, the Panasonic PH-65PZ750U plasma weighs 180 lbs, and consumes 795 watts; you won't find this on the web site specs; it is conveniently buried at the back of their manual. If we as a nation move to LCD and plasma flat panel sets, while at the same time demanding large (>60") TV's, there will be significant consequences in energy consumption and environmental impacts.
Neutral issues:
Audible noise: This is a mild annoyance on the RS-1 front projector. The 65S998 has an interesting cooling design, passing air from right to left along the lower base of the set. There is audible air or fan noise, but it is of a very low wooshh that is pretty easy to tune out.
Cons:
* Color saturation: The 65S998 shares with its RS-1 front projector brother an over saturated color gamut, particularly for green, and this can lead to difficulties rendering grass in outdoor scenes. The grass can look a little unrealistically lime-neon. I'll add some screen shots that reveal this. If you turn down the color control till it looks normal, overall colors are too muted. Since the remote is different, I can't use the same keys to enter the service menu as on the Fx97 sets; I have a question on how to enter the service menu before JVC. If I could access separate RGB color controls, that could help, although this still doesn't fix the issue on the RS-1.
* Smell: I think this is behind us, but for the first few days there was a slightly burnt smell emenating from the set, which my wife especially objected to. I think we're over this.
* Geometry: This has been a major complaint about these sets. Early models had a problem in which horizontal lines in the upper third of the image curved upwards at the ends. This set has pretty good horizontal and vertical lines at the center and edges of the image, but suffers from concave outwards vertical lines about 2/3rds of the way out from center. It is noticeable and objectionable, particularly since the problem occurs right where 4:3 content is pillarboxed. I want this repaired; we will see how I do.
* Silk Screen Effect: This is one basic drawback to rear projection. It can consist of a glitter or sparkles from points on a white field, or a fixed pattern film that is tied to the screen, and shows up during pans. There are no sparkles visible with this set, but there is a filmy fixed pattern issue. When I drop the brightness down to -20 or so, it is less obvious, but that setting crushes the blacks. On some content it is completely invisible; on others, it is present and can be distracting. I have seen it in both bright and low light level scenes.
* Price: There is no doubt about it; these sets are not priced competitively with other RP sets. Granted, they have some unique strengths, but a price nearly double their peers is not supportable.
* No Center Channel capability: This is a step backward from the FH97 and FN97 models of last year. It is a stupid oversight. These sets frequently find themselves as part of a 5.1 home theater, and the need to co-locate a central speaker with the TV is ridiculous.
* No Contrast adjustment: There is a "Picture" control that might have some elements of a contrast control, but attempts to use this with the Brightness control to reduce SSE while avoiding crushing blacks has not yet yielded a suitable compromise. All of the picture setting descriptions are so terse as to leave one confused; the iris control, for example, ranges from -10 to +10, and is simply described as "The iris adjusts the level of brightness on the TV screen".
I bought the 65S998 wall mount. It was huge, but it works well. A steel U-shaped bracket bolts to your wall, although my mounting location was centered on a stud, so I had to drill holes for the left and right stud 16" to either side. This was an oversight. A full-sized steel tube and wood affair attaches to the rear of the set, while welded base brackets and a wooden shelf support the weight. The set with back and base then hooks onto the wall bracket, and can slide to the left or right before you snug up some bolts. The thin 11.6" depth of the set became 16" once the wall mount was added; I could have machined up a thinner version, but the added depth wasn't obvious when I ordered the wall mount, and it's not as though I needed a machining project right now.
A few pictures of the set follow. One is as it arrived, still in the box. It's BIG. The next is a screen shot from 2001: A Space Odyssey. The second is the same shot, with the drop down screen in front. Note the curvature of the doorway in the RP image compared to the straight lines on the FP image. The next two are shots of the wall mounting. I'll have to add a new post or two to load the other pictures.
Given the news of Sony exiting the rear projection market, and the absence of more than a couple of RP sets at most major retailers, it may be that RP's days are numbered. In my opinion, though, they continue to offer the best picture quality and the best price for a large TV. Their power savings is another trendy plus these days. I have no mis impressions regarding the vitality of this new "Owner's Thread", though. To the best of my knowledge, there is only one other AVS poster who owns a 65S998, and I'm not sure if there are ANY 58S998 owners who post on AVS. If it weren't for the geometry issue, I'd think JVC has pulled off the best rear projection set out there, but with the trickle of ~ 20 per month entering the country, it is destined to remain a rarity.
In a nutshell, here are my first impressions of the JVC 65S998:
Pros:
* Picture Quality: With a few important qualifiers as described below, the picture is awesome. Bear in mind that this TV replaced an old SD set connected to analog cable (Comcast). We had Direct TV with their HD-DVR service installed just before the 65S998 showed up. Granted, we had been watching movies on the killer JVC RS-1 and high power screen for the last six months, but the overall impression is pretty amazing. Incredible detail, vivid colors, more than ample brightness, no motion artifacts, etc. While I will be candid about the flaws that I notice, these have to be viewed in the overall context of an amazing TV.
* Set Depth: JVC did a great job here. This set is way ahead of all other rear projection competitors when it comes to their thickness for a given diagonal size (10.4" for a 58" diagonal; 11.6" for a 65" diagonal). These depths hardly compare with flat panel sets, of course, but that's pretty much a given.
* LCOS Technology: JVC worked with Hughes decades ago to give birth to LCOS technology. They have been at it longer than anyone else, and it shows. Sony has gotten close, but as the RS-1 front projector (which I own) demonstrates with its 15,000:1 native contrast ratio (doubled to 30,000 in the new RS-2), JVC is the king when it comes to LCOS. Their implementation in rear projection sets, while not as advanced as that of their front projectors, is still better than Sony; they have never had to address "green blob" issues, and the fill factor is very high.
* Wall mountable design: The new HD-58S998 and 65S998 have flat backs, and are intended for wall mounting (although some will still choose to place this set on a conventional stand). For thicker rear projection sets from competing firms, this would be ridiculous, not to mention a bizarre structural cantilever. See below for my experience in wall mounting.
* Ultra-thin bezel. At 10 mm (0.4 inches), this set is essentially all picture. Many flat panel sets come up short here, with wide bezels, although to be fair, the thin bezel does not extend to the bottom, which is ~ 9 inches high.
* Build quality: At 115 and 141 pounds, respectively, these sets are hardly lightweights. Part of the weight is an expensive aluminum frame, which is a real step ahead of all plastic sets. From everything I can see, the build quality appears to be excellent.
* Viewing angle: The horizontal viewing angle is very impressive; the picture still looks great even when you are looking at a grazing angle. The vertical angle is more than adequate; the picture does not degrade much at all when moving from the floor to sitting to standing.
* Sound System: These sets have a pretty awesome 30 watt sound system, with a built-in subwoofer. Granted, some users will employ a separate surround sound receiver and speakers to handle audio, but for anyone who just wants to turn on a TV and get great sound, this set does it.
* Electrical power efficiency: While these JVC sets, at 219 watts, are essentially comparable in power consumption to competitive rear projection sets, they are much more power efficient than plasmas or LCD sets, especially at the larger (65") size. Typical 65" plasmas burn three times as many watts, and 65" LCD sets burn twice as many watts. For example, the Panasonic PH-65PZ750U plasma weighs 180 lbs, and consumes 795 watts; you won't find this on the web site specs; it is conveniently buried at the back of their manual. If we as a nation move to LCD and plasma flat panel sets, while at the same time demanding large (>60") TV's, there will be significant consequences in energy consumption and environmental impacts.
Neutral issues:
Audible noise: This is a mild annoyance on the RS-1 front projector. The 65S998 has an interesting cooling design, passing air from right to left along the lower base of the set. There is audible air or fan noise, but it is of a very low wooshh that is pretty easy to tune out.
Cons:
* Color saturation: The 65S998 shares with its RS-1 front projector brother an over saturated color gamut, particularly for green, and this can lead to difficulties rendering grass in outdoor scenes. The grass can look a little unrealistically lime-neon. I'll add some screen shots that reveal this. If you turn down the color control till it looks normal, overall colors are too muted. Since the remote is different, I can't use the same keys to enter the service menu as on the Fx97 sets; I have a question on how to enter the service menu before JVC. If I could access separate RGB color controls, that could help, although this still doesn't fix the issue on the RS-1.
* Smell: I think this is behind us, but for the first few days there was a slightly burnt smell emenating from the set, which my wife especially objected to. I think we're over this.
* Geometry: This has been a major complaint about these sets. Early models had a problem in which horizontal lines in the upper third of the image curved upwards at the ends. This set has pretty good horizontal and vertical lines at the center and edges of the image, but suffers from concave outwards vertical lines about 2/3rds of the way out from center. It is noticeable and objectionable, particularly since the problem occurs right where 4:3 content is pillarboxed. I want this repaired; we will see how I do.
* Silk Screen Effect: This is one basic drawback to rear projection. It can consist of a glitter or sparkles from points on a white field, or a fixed pattern film that is tied to the screen, and shows up during pans. There are no sparkles visible with this set, but there is a filmy fixed pattern issue. When I drop the brightness down to -20 or so, it is less obvious, but that setting crushes the blacks. On some content it is completely invisible; on others, it is present and can be distracting. I have seen it in both bright and low light level scenes.
* Price: There is no doubt about it; these sets are not priced competitively with other RP sets. Granted, they have some unique strengths, but a price nearly double their peers is not supportable.
* No Center Channel capability: This is a step backward from the FH97 and FN97 models of last year. It is a stupid oversight. These sets frequently find themselves as part of a 5.1 home theater, and the need to co-locate a central speaker with the TV is ridiculous.
* No Contrast adjustment: There is a "Picture" control that might have some elements of a contrast control, but attempts to use this with the Brightness control to reduce SSE while avoiding crushing blacks has not yet yielded a suitable compromise. All of the picture setting descriptions are so terse as to leave one confused; the iris control, for example, ranges from -10 to +10, and is simply described as "The iris adjusts the level of brightness on the TV screen".
I bought the 65S998 wall mount. It was huge, but it works well. A steel U-shaped bracket bolts to your wall, although my mounting location was centered on a stud, so I had to drill holes for the left and right stud 16" to either side. This was an oversight. A full-sized steel tube and wood affair attaches to the rear of the set, while welded base brackets and a wooden shelf support the weight. The set with back and base then hooks onto the wall bracket, and can slide to the left or right before you snug up some bolts. The thin 11.6" depth of the set became 16" once the wall mount was added; I could have machined up a thinner version, but the added depth wasn't obvious when I ordered the wall mount, and it's not as though I needed a machining project right now.
A few pictures of the set follow. One is as it arrived, still in the box. It's BIG. The next is a screen shot from 2001: A Space Odyssey. The second is the same shot, with the drop down screen in front. Note the curvature of the doorway in the RP image compared to the straight lines on the FP image. The next two are shots of the wall mounting. I'll have to add a new post or two to load the other pictures.