ferky1
01-07-08, 03:44 PM
I am in the market for a 65"+ TV for a room with a 15'+ viewing distance, but my budget maxes out at $4,000. I think that (1) the budget, which really needs to be closer to $3,000, (2) the fact that I'm not comfortable with any second tier manufacturers that you can generally find on the internet or Costco and (3) the fact that I need to make the purchase in the next 15-45 days, means that I am looking at RPTV, because name-brand plasma and LCD just don't fit the budget. Please tell me if I've overlooked some plasma or LCD (or other) options.
If I do go with RPTV in the 65-73" range, am I essentially buying a dead technology? I know that Sony and others have gotten out of the RP game, but it sounds like Mitsubishi and Samsung are still sticking with it. I am currently looking at the Mits WD-65/737xx or WD-65/738xx as very reasonably priced options, but I can't help but question my decision to go with a bigger RP (73") over a smaller plasma/LCD (60"). Any thoughts as to whether I'd be better with the plasma/LCD technology, albeit on a smaller screen, over RPTV on a 73" from 15+ feet?
If I do go with RPTV in the 65-73" range, am I essentially buying a dead technology? I know that Sony and others have gotten out of the RP game, but it sounds like Mitsubishi and Samsung are still sticking with it. I am currently looking at the Mits WD-65/737xx or WD-65/738xx as very reasonably priced options, but I can't help but question my decision to go with a bigger RP (73") over a smaller plasma/LCD (60"). Any thoughts as to whether I'd be better with the plasma/LCD technology, albeit on a smaller screen, over RPTV on a 73" from 15+ feet?