|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#152 | Link | |
|
Advanced Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#153 | Link |
|
AVS Special Member
|
If the board of investors at Warner (or whomever pushed them into it) can make them publish titles on BluRay, why aren't the other studios (Fox, Disney) getting similar orders from the top?
It's ridiculous that Warner shareholders would even want them to publish BluRay titles when they stand to gain so much more if HD-DVD wins, added to the fact that BluRay sales are pitiful. I would cast a skeptic eye on whatever person, or persons are responsible for that decision within Warner. |
|
|
|
|
|
#158 | Link | |
|
Just Call Me Mole
|
Yes, the Samsung Slimfits are CRT based HDTVs. For only $750, it is a GREAT HDTV and better than most of the LCD and Plasmas I've seen.
Quote:
HD ![]() SD ![]() It is hard to take shots on my TV since CRT aren't pic friendly. Plus, I don't have the best camera in the world. These pictures don't do justice like I would like. Now notice in the HD shots, the blacks look flat with some grey in them. THIS LOOKS HORRIBLE. Now if it's supposed to look like that, then this is not a reference disc, at all. The Death Eaters are wearing black robes, so they should be black. It seems like the robes are trying to stick out too much or something. The blacks are like this throughout the scene and it is unwatchable. Which is a shame because I am a HUGEEEE Harry Potter fan. This is the only HD and BR disc that is like this as I put in other darker movies and they did not do this at all. Trust me, if they did, I wouldn't still have this TV.
__________________
The Mole is here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#161 | Link |
|
Just Call Me Mole
|
I used a feather from a Peacock.
DVE ![]() Probably the same one most people used. But calibrating my TV wouldn't fix this problem. As I said before, other HD/BR and SD look perfectly fine in dark spots. Not this disc. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire looks horrible. Plain and simple. Why is this SO hard to understand??
__________________
The Mole is here. |
|
|
|
|
|
#162 | Link |
|
Senior Member
|
Arn't the Sammy Slimflats pretty much garanteed to have geometry issues? That's the reputation I've heard of this dispay for some reason. Hopefully pick this title up Friday, can't wait.
__________________
The Look and Sound of Perfect |
|
|
|
|
|
#163 | Link | ||||
|
Advanced Member
|
Quote:
Really dark? No, but dark. Which is obvious since it's on a graveyard at night. But everything is well defined, shadowdetail is good. Colors are somewhat muted (in comparison to HP 1 to 3), but that's the case in the whole movie, not just in this scene. Quote:
Most LCDs have trouble with signal processing, this may show in some scenes, but not in others. I'm well aware of that fact. That is why I don't use LCDs to judge the image quality of discs. That is also the reason why an external video processor should be used whenever possible and native resolution/framerate should be fed to the display. Quote:
Quote:
Your using the SD version of DVE to calibrate your input. This is not very accurate and not the prefered way to do a calibration. Each input should be calibrated seperately (for SD and HD) and for each signal type a seperate memory block should be used to store the settings of the calibration. So one for 480p60, one for 720p60, one for 1080i60, one for 1080p60 and so on. Ideally, you should also use HD test patterns, especially for colorspace calibration. I'll take some pics when I get home, which will probably be friday night. So expect the pics on friday or saturday, depending at what time I get home friday.
__________________
- Stephan |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#164 | Link |
|
Just Call Me Mole
|
Yes, I am aware of the different blocks for each resolution, which I do. I am just waiting for DVE's HD disc to come out.
Besides, everything I use is either upconverted to 1080i or is 1080i (except for my Wii.) So there is no real need for different blocks.
__________________
The Mole is here. |
|
|
|
|
|
#165 | Link | |
|
Advanced Member
|
Quote:
__________________
- Stephan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#166 | Link |
|
Member
|
Just took my own pictures and with my display it's the opposite. HD DVD looks much better than the SD DVD. Or maybe it's my poor photo skills :P
HD http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/5264/dscf0013yk8.jpg SD http://img110.imageshack.us/img110/2691/dscf0015fh3.jpg Tried to post the pictures but they were too big! So just click on the links. |
|
|
|
|
|
#173 | Link | |
|
Screenshot scientist
|
Quote:
Regarding my contribution to the debate: yes, it's dark, and yes, a lot of the dark scenes look rather murky, but this strikes me as being intentional. Especially in the case of the dream sequence at the start, you can also see, if you boost the brightness excessively, what looks like a motion blur effect that I suspect was intentionally added to make the whole thing seem hazy and indistinct. I certainly wasn't bothered by the black levels at any time while watching. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#176 | Link | |
|
Advanced Member
|
Quote:
I'm using the Toshiba A1 via HDMI->DVI into Lumagen VisionPro HDP where the signal gets properly de-interlaced to 1080p, framerate converted from 60Hz to 48Hz and from there via DVI into a Sony VW-100. I'll try to post pictures tomorrow and will also throw in some pics from my Sony KDS-70R2000 (european version of the KDS-70XBR2) which I'm using in my living room.
__________________
- Stephan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#177 | Link |
|
Senior Member
|
I just re-watched the HP GOF HD-DVD tonight and I have to say, I'm even more impressed with the PQ than the first time I watched it. I'm watching it on my Panny ae900u projector at 70" (I have a small living room) from the HD-A1 at 1080i via HDMI, and every scene looked rich and 3-dimensional, maybe a little too much so (the CGI on some of the castle pans stood out as a little cheesy looking). On my display all of the dark scenes had great contrast and detail, I'm still very happy I imported this one, it was worth it.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|