AVS Forum


Google™ Search AVS:

Go Back   AVS Forum > Audio Area > Audio theory, Setup and Chat



Reply
Forum Jump
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-01-07, 03:10 PM   #1   |  Link


gordong11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 431
noob...optical vs. coax?

I'm curious which is better?

I'm buying an HD DVD player, and I'm curious which would be best, if any to to be hooked into a Yamaha YSP-800 DSP.

I love this Yamaha, and currently I'm using both optical and coax, but my ear isn't trained well enough to notice a difference, but for the new player I thought I'd try to do it right.

So a Monster THX optical cable vs. a Monster THX 4ft. Digital coaxial cable...which is better in theory?
gordong11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-07, 03:38 PM   #2   |  Link
Targus
AVS Special Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,617
Quote:
which is better in theory?
neither.
Targus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-07, 05:19 PM   #3   |  Link
ekb
AVS Special Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lawrenceville, NJ
Posts: 4,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Targus
neither.
Just to elaborate - neither will work (properly).

Ed
ekb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-07, 05:20 PM   #4   |  Link
gordong11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 431
??? neither? please explain...are you saying analog will be better?
gordong11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-07, 05:55 PM   #5   |  Link
bassbone57
Advanced Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Huskerland
Posts: 716
Try the search feature. There are TONS of past threads covering this in detail. They all have the same information since this is such a common question. Check one of those out and you will have all of the info you could ever want.

-K
__________________
ISF Calibrator
Audyssey Pro Installer

Go Big Red!!!
bassbone57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-07, 06:49 PM   #6   |  Link
ChrisWiggles
Perpetually Confused
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,965
Quote:
So a Monster THX optical cable vs. a Monster THX 4ft. Digital coaxial cable...which is better in theory?
Neither. They're both SPDIF interfaces and in theory they do exactly the same thing. In reality this holds true basically too, it's not a very complicated interface and is quite robust. Also, you probably overpaid for those particular cables.
__________________
Source Settings Guide

Discover the best radio station on earth: kexp.org
ChrisWiggles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-07, 08:07 PM   #7   |  Link
ekb
AVS Special Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lawrenceville, NJ
Posts: 4,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by gordong11
??? neither? please explain...are you saying analog will be better?
The new audio formats are not passed at all over the coax and optical connections. They are only passed over HDMI as multichannel PCM once decoded in the player or multichannel analog after decoding and D to A conversion in the player.

Ed
ekb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-07, 08:10 PM   #8   |  Link
louthewiz
Resident Enforcer
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Brooklyn U.S.A.
Posts: 4,081
http://www.monoprice.com/products/su...d=10229&style=
louthewiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-07, 08:16 PM   #9   |  Link
Targus
AVS Special Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,617
Quote:
noob...optical vs. coax?

I'm curious which is better?
Neither one is 'better' then the other, they both deliver the signal.
Targus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-07, 08:23 PM   #10   |  Link
ekb
AVS Special Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lawrenceville, NJ
Posts: 4,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Targus
Neither one is 'better' then the other, they both deliver the signal.
What we're all trying to tell him is that niether deliver the signal.

Ed
ekb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-07, 08:25 PM   #11   |  Link
ChrisWiggles
Perpetually Confused
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,965
Quote:
Originally Posted by ekb
What we're all trying to tell him is that niether deliver the signal.

Ed
Sure they deliver the signal, just not full high-res.
__________________
Source Settings Guide

Discover the best radio station on earth: kexp.org
ChrisWiggles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-07, 08:34 PM   #12   |  Link
ekb
AVS Special Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lawrenceville, NJ
Posts: 4,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisWiggles
Sure they deliver the signal, just not full high-res.
That's what the "(properly)" meant in my post #3.

Ed
ekb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-07, 01:53 PM   #13   |  Link
MichaelJHuman
AVS Special Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 9,452
To clarify...

1) Both work for passing Dolby Digital or DTS; Assuming the cables are competent, neither should deliver a a "better" signal*
2) For best audio from high def players, you need analog outs, or HDMI; If you choose HDMI, you need a RX that does 5.1-7.1 over HDMI via PCM

* Both cables should pass a bit identical stream. Some people claim a better cable reduces jitter. Others claim most jitter is inaudible. There are countless threads online devoted to this sort of debate if you are bored.
MichaelJHuman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-07, 02:22 PM   #14   |  Link
thedingo13
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 140
Question...if you go the analog route...do you then need a special receiver that will do 5.1 or 7.1 from an analog signal...or will any 7.1 receiver do this?
thedingo13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-07, 04:13 PM   #15   |  Link
MichaelJHuman
AVS Special Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 9,452
Its as simple as checking the RX's specs for presence and number of analog inputs.
MichaelJHuman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-07, 04:16 PM   #16   |  Link
thedingo13
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 140
Ah..so if each analog input has only a red and white connection, then my receiver only supports two-channel analog input.
thedingo13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-07, 03:28 PM   #17   |  Link
vinay60
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 35
Hello,

I thought I have setup my system in the best possible way until I read this post.
I have connected the Oppo DVD player to HK AVR240 via an optical cable for a 5.1 setup. Does it mean that it would be better if I were to connect 5.1 output from the DVD player to the HK receiver 5.1 input? I always thought that 'digital' will be better than 'analog'. Or is it true only when I am using it with the HDMI interface and the RX does not support HDMI audio?

FYI, I am not using HDMI cable from Oppo yet as my TV does not support HDMI input. For now it's just component video out to the TV from the Oppo. Thanks.
vinay60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-07, 05:33 PM   #18   |  Link
trekguy
AVS Special Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Near Mt Diablo--SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinay60
I have connected the Oppo DVD player to HK AVR240 via an optical cable for a 5.1 setup. Does it mean that it would be better if I were to connect 5.1 output from the DVD player to the HK receiver 5.1 input? I always thought that 'digital' will be better than 'analog'. Or is it true only when I am using it with the HDMI interface and the RX does not support HDMI audio?
.
Maybe or maybe not. If the DVD player has better DACs or surround effect processors than the AVR, then using the discrete 5.1 audio outs may make a difference you can hear. If the player has some processing option not on your AVR that you like, such as re-eq you may want to use the 5.1 analog outs.

If the AVR has better DACs or sound field processors you may be able to hear the difference and will want to a digital coax or optical connection to the AVR.

Most people vote for using the AVR's processors via a digital connection on the assumption that the AVR is going to be better or to avoid extra cables, or because they can hear a difference. I've never tried it myself -always digital to the AVR.
__________________
The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd.
-Bertrand Russell
trekguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-07, 12:24 PM   #19   |  Link
Sonic icons
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Boulder County, Colorado
Posts: 176
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinay60
Hello,

I thought I have setup my system in the best possible way until I read this post.
I have connected the Oppo DVD player to HK AVR240 via an optical cable for a 5.1 setup. Does it mean that it would be better if I were to connect 5.1 output from the DVD player to the HK receiver 5.1 input? I always thought that 'digital' will be better than 'analog'.
The digital connection that you have now - making use of surround sound processing and D/A convertors in the HK receiver, rather than the Oppo (970 or 981) player - is most likely best for listening to CDs and standard DVDs (DVD-Video, usually with Dolby Digital or DTS surround sound).

However, there are some types of discs with "higher-resolution" audio that cannot be sent over the optical digital connection. These include DVD-Audio and SACD, that can play on your existing Oppo 970 or 981 player. As well as the audio tracks of many (most?) HD-DVD and Blu-Ray discs (of course, you would need a new player for either of those). To listen to the high-resolution audio with your existing receiver, you would need to use the 5.1 analog inputs.
Sonic icons is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump

AVS Forum > Audio Area > Audio theory, Setup and Chat



Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:28 PM.


Load Balanced and Protected By
 

Hosting Services Powered By

Page generated in 0.21731210 seconds (100.00% PHP - 0% MySQL) with 9 queries

Copyright ©1995 - 2009 AVS Forum.com, Inc. - All Rights Reserved. No information may be posted elsewhere without written permission.