|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1 | Link |
|
|
VMD Insider
|
You heard it here first.
Heres the info I have so far:No exact release date yet but look for it around July. Sony had originally planned to make it a holiday release with new content. But they couldn't create the content they wanted so the release date got pushed up. It will be a BD50 with the following specs: Video: AVC Audio: 16bit PCM and TrueHD (either 20bit or 24bit, not confirmed yet) An exchange program is still planned for current owners. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | Link | |
|
MMA Fighter
|
Quote:
May I ask how you know this? What are you sources? Do you have any links to the following news that are relieable sources? Sounds awesome if true I love this movie! Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | Link |
|
End User Clinician
AVS CLUB MEMBER
|
Is this an April fools thread?
![]()
__________________
438 Blu ray titles! Latest Fav- The Hangover For my unbiased Reviews, Screen shots and more go to: http joerodhometheater.com/about.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | Link | |
|
Advanced Member
|
Quote:
and if DolbyTrueHD than without dialog normalization ![]() can't wait Marek |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | Link |
|
Senior Member
|
Out of curiosity, what's the excitement? Do people like the movie that much and want to see it at its finest, or is it an assumption that it will be a fantastic reference disk based on the fact that the DVD was so outstanding?
Is there any reason to assume the latter? Aren't the Blu-ray movies going back to film and re-doing the transfer process anyway, so isn't it irrelevant which movies looked best on dvd? Just curious, I'd like to understand this. Incidentally, I liked the movie. But I think of it more as a reference dvd that's great for testing, than a classic Sci-fi flick. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | Link | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | Link | |
|
AVS Special Member
|
Quote:
Thanks for the info.
__________________
"Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject, so you know you are getting the best possible information." - Michael Scott |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | Link | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | Link | |
|
AVS Special Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | Link | |
|
Cranky Member
|
Quote:
Except for The Fifth Element, which for some reason was taken from a much worse master than the Superbit DVD.
__________________
Josh Z Critic, High-Def Digest Contributor, Home Theater Magazine Curator, Laserdisc Forever My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect those of my employers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | Link | |
|
AVS Special Member
|
Quote:
No comparison. The only reason I don't have T5E on BD already is that I knew this release was coming. I'll finally be able to pick this bad boy up. Nice.
__________________
"Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject, so you know you are getting the best possible information." - Michael Scott |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | Link | |
|
AVS Special Member
|
Quote:
Love it or hate it, T5E is an amazing eye candy movie and holds a soft spot for HT enthusiasts around the world. This is a really great olive branch from Sony. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | Link | |
|
AVS Special Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | Link | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
If they want to got this route, it seems to me it should just be a single 20/24-bit PCM track or a single 20/24-bit TrueHD track. I would imagine a 16-bit PCM + 20/24-bit TrueHD would occupy more space than a single 20/24-bit PCM... and of course offer no advantages. (Course if there is extra room - no harm either.) (I'm assuming TrueHD has an approximate 40-50% compressoin ratio like FLAC... though maybe sparse audio in the surround channels results in alot better compression.) BD doesn't require a TrueHD decoder. I'm assuming if BD becomes mainstream, there will always be low-end players w/o the decoeder, just as low-end DVD players still exist that can't decode DTS. Last edited by obispo21; 04-06-07 at 02:03 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|