|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1 | Link |
|
|
Senior Member
|
(Posted this thread under my boyfriend's account over at the PS forums but couldn't get any real answers. Thought I'd take it to the experts - you guys!)
I have a 42" plasma EDTV (Enhanced Definition Television). There is DEFINITELY a sound benefit to blu-ray, but am I getting any picture benefit, as my TV can only handle 480p widescreen (although it will accept 720p and 1080i inputs)? I'm guessing I'll still get the benefits of less/no comprehension and won't see the artifacting that plagued standard DVD (any other compression problems I'll avoid?). Am I guessing correctly, or is the only benefit I'm getting with blu-ray the sound (and wow, what a difference playing in 6.1 surround sound!)? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | Link | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
So there won't even be any benefits thanks to the lack of compression on blu-ray discs? This EDTV was a huge investment for us and it's only a year old. We couldn't even think of upgrading for at least another 3 years and now I've got this blu-ray player that's apparently useless, outside of the better sound quality. I was sure there would be a difference thanks to the lack of compression. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | Link |
|
Member
|
My EDTV definately looks a lot better playing Blu-Ray discs @ 1080i on my PS3 than on my 420p DVD player.
That's probably because my TV accepts 1080i and scales it internally to fit but it still looks much better than normal 420p DVD to me.
__________________
Mac - As in PowerMac G4 cube which i use for my HTPC. :) Wit is educated insolence. -Aristotle |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | Link | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | Link | |
|
Hookem Horns
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | Link | |
|
AVS Special Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | Link |
|
Advanced Member
|
This isn't really great advice guys - no offense.
Lots of studies have been done on this kind of question - will more resolution information be better after down-rezzing than the native resolution? The Dcinema industry wanted to know if a 4K source that was downconverted to 2K and projected on a 2K projector would be better than a 2K source on a 2K projector. The answer was that the 4K source downconverted to 2K was vastly superior. http://digitalcontentproducer.com/ma...ial/index.html Look in the section way down the page that is titled, "2K, 4K, Digital Cinema" and you'll see 3 images to compare for yourself. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | Link | |
|
Hookem Horns
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | Link | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
__________________
Mac - As in PowerMac G4 cube which i use for my HTPC. :) Wit is educated insolence. -Aristotle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | Link | |
|
46&2 is ahead of me
|
Quote:
A very very distant second is the number of pixels on your TV (of course were talking a specific range here, ie 10 pixels won't cut it... )To be more direct I would say that Blu-Ray will have an advantage over DVD on every existing display in the world today including my crappy analog 480i CRT. Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | Link | |
|
Advanced Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|