Now I'm a new 2160 owner. I'm testing the QP of the records mainly real time (if possible) to "DVD" vs "HDD to DVD" (dubbing High vs HQ), using L1. (Time recorded: 1 minute)
Using isobuster, I extract the files to my PC and this is what I get:
1. The file size recorded directly from L1 to DVD its smaller.
2. The file dubbed in High have some codec problems in one of my PC.
3. The file dubbed in HQ don't have problems, and its (of course) bigger.
Over the QP, it seems that HQ gives a better result, using a 200% zoom the picture has more pixels than the other in High mode... now is that good? I still don't know, because HQ mode (REAL-TIME DUB) is "slow"
Anyway, after reading this post
, I only want to know if HQ is really better than High, or if its only a codec illusion because it "re-encodes the entire program".High VS HQ
Which image is better?
AVSForum UR my only hope. Thanks.