Originally Posted by MississippiMan
I was pretty sure that was your intent, only that the process involved, based on what you read elsewhere, was only going to result in some degree of discord as well as a removal of any such posted link by the Moderator...as has been the case before.
Encouraging someone else to do what you yourself already know from personal experience is not allowed seems rather...well, any name you put on it, it still isn't right. Instead you could ask Tangled to PM you that info, read it, report back what was in fact related, or simply go back and ask for it personally, therein maintaining both Forum decorum and the wishes of the Forum management.
That can be done across the entire scope of all available sources...and no one can say it's not OK for someone to attempt such. But that is not the issue, nor does it relate to both what was stated about the specific application being discussed here, how it was stated and by whom, and why direct links to such are not allowed because of the source. It's not my rule....but as the very individual who was the intended focus of the remarks, as well as the one whose advice and determination was so adamantly called into dispute, I feel I do have a specific right to address such if it comes to bear.
It's easy enough to ascertain a way to accomplish the posting of pertinent and correct information by researching and over-viewing varied sources without given service and exposure to those who post with the primary intent to discount and belittle, especially at the expense of actually giving correct information. And ya know....it never starts here on AVS...that should speak for itself.
A great idea....simply take the best focused, closest possible shot you can, then put into your Photo Editor and try resizing a cropped area up to 400%. That might do it. Don't worry about being "beat to it"...every varied and seperate example only adds to the available information.
Well we both knew that was going to be the case. I had stated several times that very observation, and posted some excellent images as well. I certainly would not post such if I felt I would be taken to task and proven wrong. Not a lot of sense in that.
In the end of it all, any degree of slight variance from absolute perfection can be dealt with. Very slight color shifts can be calibrated out, any slight amount of sharpness restored easily enough, especially if the screen's surface does not accentuate pixelation. In my 2.35:1 projects involving Spandex, I used a Darbee Darblet to counter the Panasonic's Softer image that is a product of it's "Smooth Screen" technology. You on the other hand have a Lycos-based JVC with a ultra sharp image and no pixel structure natively...without assistance.
Knowing all that, as well as knowing so much more about a variety of things "PJ-Screen" related should keep anyone so informed from making false or derogatory statements simply for effect. But still it happens, and unfortunately for those reasons. And when that happens, people needing assistance and advice can lose out terribly by missing out on just the type information smokarz
so rightly stated is so desirable...and the right of everyone to be privy to.
So let's get back to discussing the excellent prospects inherent in Spandex applications! And let's see some Screen shots!