Playing 5.1 source material on a 7.1 setup - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 22 Old 09-08-2011, 07:27 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
Flacjunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 46
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
What do you old surround hands with 7.1 setups do to utilize the rears when listening to 5.1 source material?

Or do you not use the rears with music?

I'm generally not a big fan of matrixing, but if I want the rears to play I have to use the Dolby PLIIx Music mode, and that doesn't sound quite right to me.

But I'm in a listening environment where my very directional MTM side surrounds cannot be aimed with my ears directly on axis (They're permanently mounted too high), yet I can with the rears.
Flacjunky is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 22 Old 09-08-2011, 07:55 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
rdgrimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nuevo Mexico
Posts: 16,225
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked: 221
I use PLIIx-Movie mode for everything, music mode sounds odd to me too. Movie mode sounds very natural and engaging.
rdgrimes is offline  
post #3 of 22 Old 09-09-2011, 12:39 PM
Senior Member
 
quattroatl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 253
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 29
I never even thought to try Dolby PLIIx with any 5.1 material such as sacd's or dvd-a's.

I convert to Dolby PLIIx 7.1 with 2 channel material all the time. I will try 7.1 when I get home with some sacd's and dvd-a's when I get home tonight and report back.
quattroatl is offline  
post #4 of 22 Old 09-12-2011, 11:21 AM
Senior Member
 
quattroatl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 253
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 29
So I tried out 7.1 with my sacd's and dvd-a's. I like it, so PL IIx cinema mode for me moving forward!

Correct me if I'm wrong but it appears with my setup, the 5.1 stays intact and true. The PLIIx just adds the 2 rears into the mix. In short, the 5.1 channels are not changed at all.

The Doors Perception boxset upmixed from 5.1 to 7.1 sounded exceptionally good!
quattroatl is offline  
post #5 of 22 Old 09-13-2011, 09:03 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Zen Traveler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,142
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Liked: 316
I absolutely love converting 5.1 to "7.1" on my Home Theater. I have rather large speakers all of the way around with 2 capable subs. A Denon AVR-4806/DVD-3910 combo. using DenonLink with only the AVRs matrixing function, and it works great....Sanjay explained that the surround information is mixed in either a mono or stereo format (or something similar) and gives an actual "6."1 effect with multichannel music!

Pretty much all of the Talking Heads Dual-disks are excellent source material for taking advantage of this effect with Burning Down the House being my absolute favorite to show off my Home Theater.

Unfortuantely, last week my DVD-3910 stopped playing SACDs so now I must get another player....Thinking about a refurbished DVD-2930...
Zen Traveler is offline  
post #6 of 22 Old 09-13-2011, 05:46 PM
Member
 
ar surround's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 70
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I often use Lexicon Logic 7 as an overlay to 5.1 surround discs. I find that it greatly improves the sound field on 5.1 recordings that are not mixed all that well. However, I also find it detrimental at times to 5.1 recordings that are extremely well mixed such as those by Steven Wilson or that already have a lot of natural ambiance. In those instances I prefer straight 5.1 with the surrounds simply duplicated in the rears.

I also use PLIIx Music to enhance DD 5.1 recordings such as Steve Miller's "Fly Like an Eagle" with excellent results.
ar surround is offline  
post #7 of 22 Old 09-13-2011, 07:48 PM
AVS Special Member
 
holt7153's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 3,214
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked: 105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zen Traveler View Post


Pretty much all of the Talking Heads Dual-disks are excellent source material for taking advantage of this effect with Burning Down the House being my absolute favorite to show off my Home Theater.

Totally agree--I've recommended this disc a few times here on AVS.

******************
Somebody told me it was frightening how much topsoil we are losing each year, but I told that story around the campfire and nobody got scared.
holt7153 is online now  
post #8 of 22 Old 09-13-2011, 07:53 PM
AVS Special Member
 
primetimeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 3,731
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Liked: 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by quattroatl View Post

So I tried out 7.1 with my sacd's and dvd-a's. I like it, so PL IIx cinema mode for me moving forward!

Correct me if I'm wrong but it appears with my setup, the 5.1 stays intact and true. The PLIIx just adds the 2 rears into the mix. In short, the 5.1 channels are not changed at all.

The Doors Perception boxset upmixed from 5.1 to 7.1 sounded exceptionally good!

With PLIIx Cinema, sounds that are in both the SR and SL get moved to the back surrounds. With PLIIx Music, the SBR plays the same content as SR and the SBL plays same content as SL. In general terms anyway.
primetimeguy is online now  
post #9 of 22 Old 09-14-2011, 09:52 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
sdurani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Monterey Park, CA
Posts: 19,369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1008 Post(s)
Liked: 865
Quote:
Originally Posted by quattroatl View Post

Correct me if I'm wrong but it appears with my setup, the 5.1 stays intact and true. The PLIIx just adds the 2 rears into the mix. In short, the 5.1 channels are not changed at all.

Only with PLIIx Music, not PLIIx Movie. See below.
Quote:
Originally Posted by primetimeguy View Post

With PLIIx Cinema, sounds that are in both the SR and SL get moved to the back surrounds. With PLIIx Music, the SBR plays the same content as SR and the SBL plays same content as SL. In general terms anyway.

Pretty close. The main difference is after the surround-back information is extracted to the rear speakers, PLIIx Movie mode cancels that info from the side speakers (to emphasize rear-vs-side separation) while PLIIx Music mode doesn't (to emphasize rear-plus-side envelopment).

Sanjay
sdurani is online now  
post #10 of 22 Old 09-15-2011, 05:01 AM
AVS Special Member
 
ca1ore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 1,798
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Don't most modern surround sound processors have a 5.1 to 7.1 upmix mode wherein the extra 2 channels are synthesized from the 5.1 mix? Seems to me you give it a listen versus native and decide for yourself.

Certainty and conviction are a sure sign you don't know what you're talking about! The world is not black and white, rather shades of grey!
ca1ore is offline  
post #11 of 22 Old 09-15-2011, 08:29 AM
Senior Member
 
quattroatl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 253
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdurani View Post
Only with PLIIx Music, not PLIIx Movie. See below. Pretty close. The main difference is after the surround-back information is extracted to the rear speakers, PLIIx Movie mode cancels that info from the side speakers (to emphasize rear-vs-side separation) while PLIIx Music mode doesn't (to emphasize rear-plus-side envelopment).
I have to do more critical listening because on my Denon 3310, the display shows Multi-In + PLII c for cinema or m for music. When I choose m for music, the front soundstage sounds more spread out and different from the original 5.1. With multi-in and plii+c, the upconverted 7.1 sounds more similar to the original 5.1 mix.

With many sacd's and dvd-a's, I leave it on 5.1 as it sounds the best that way as mentioned by another user.
quattroatl is offline  
post #12 of 22 Old 09-28-2011, 02:26 AM
AVS Special Member
 
derrickdj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,460
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 94 Post(s)
Liked: 146
Listening with HT can't be compared to radio or other sources for a fair comparison. So, do we actually know what it sounded like when the artist mixed it? Most audiophiles strive for listening experience to be a close to the artist intentions as possible. But on a practical note, pick the format that you like, 5.1, 7.1 or two channel stereo. Sometimes we get caught up in all these format and miss the big picture. That is to enjoy your setup.

Klipsch RF 7 based HT 7.4, Pioneer SC 35, Acurus 200 Five, Dayton 18 Ultimxa Dual Sub Cab(2), Dayton 18 Ultimax Large Vented Sub Cab (2), on Berhinger I Nuke DPS amps, Samsung BDP F 7500, Asus/My Book Live HPC 4 TB

Yaquin VK 2100 amp, McIntosh XR 5 speakers, Samsung BDP F 7500
derrickdj1 is offline  
post #13 of 22 Old 01-10-2013, 05:04 AM
AVS Special Member
 
shinksma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wandering the intertubes, on the way to damnation
Posts: 2,825
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 15
Sorry to resurrect such an old thread (yay for zombie threads!), but I've been experimenting a bit recently with my system and thought I'd chime in with some of my opinion-based observations on 5.1 into 7.1:

My system has been 5.1 since the start. I use towers in all positions (the four corners are essentially identical, three-ways with a 12" woofer, but the center is a smaller tower of a completely different brand, which no doubt causes timbre-matching issues). I use these speakers because they sound good, handle the power I push through them, and they are paid for (the four corners are all about 30 years old now - replaced the rubber surrounds once already). They aren't anything fancy, but everyone likes the sound when we watch movies, commenting on how smooth and natural it seems, not harsh or boomy, etc. I have dual Epik Empires up front, so I don't rely on the speakers for anything below 50 or 60Hz.

I recognize they won't last forever, and perhaps it is time to start researching upgrades. If I want 5.1 I could go with towers all around, but if I want to go 7.1 then bookshelf speakers might be a better choice - I can mount the rear surrounds up high behind the third row of seating. I would prefer to have identical speakers all around, including the center, which is very possible with bookshelves. So as an experiment, I hooked up a spare pair of Sony bookshelf speakers as rear surrounds. (I use these same speakers in a 5.1 set-up in the living room, and they are quite good value, IMHO). I did some basic level matching and EQing, but did not bother running Audyssey on my Onkyo 808. I may do that this weekend, but I have found I don't like the results Audyssey gives - the sound is too "muffled" for lack of a better word.

I had a chance to do some listening last night. Played the first couple of track from Opeth's Blackwater Park 5.1 disk (DTS track) and the first four or five songs from Neil Young's Harvest. I tried out PL IIx Music and Movie, and compared to straight multichannel audio. I have two possible Main Listening Positions in the room - center of front row or center of middle row. In both spots, the non-matrixed 5.1 multichannel presentation sounded as expected, but when I engaged either PL IIx mode it seemed to be a little more "enveloping" from the rear. While there were differences in Music vs Movie, I didn't feel either was bad - it might depend on the source material more than anything. I'll do some jazz or classical this weekend, and throw in a bunch of Steven Wilson / Porcupine Tree, of course.

In case anyone is curious or wants to comment: my two current faves for investigating further for possible speakers are the Klipsch line (which I have heard RF-82s in person and did not find them harsh) and the HSU bookshelves - both horn-based, but very different it seems. Ask me again in a week, and it might be two other brands. So I'll be trolling the speaker forum for a while, and whenever the day comes when I feel the need to replace my current hardware, I may actually be prepared to make a decision... eek.gif

Anyway, just a light ramble on some recent observations, with some context to help explain. More comments will likely follow.

shinksma

My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect those of my captors.
shinksma is offline  
post #14 of 22 Old 01-10-2013, 07:41 AM
AVS Special Member
 
gbaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,139
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked: 33
My Bryston SP3 automatically converts 5.1 DD material to 7.1 EX.biggrin.gif
gbaby is offline  
post #15 of 22 Old 01-10-2013, 10:04 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
sdurani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Monterey Park, CA
Posts: 19,369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1008 Post(s)
Liked: 865
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinksma View Post

In both spots, the non-matrixed 5.1 multichannel presentation sounded as expected, but when I engaged either PL IIx mode it seemed to be a little more "enveloping" from the rear.
Isn't that what would be expected: 4 speakers can literally surround you (provide greater wrap-around envelopment) than 2 speakers can.

Sanjay
sdurani is online now  
post #16 of 22 Old 01-11-2013, 05:34 AM
AVS Special Member
 
shinksma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wandering the intertubes, on the way to damnation
Posts: 2,825
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdurani View Post

Isn't that what would be expected: 4 speakers can literally surround you (provide greater wrap-around envelopment) than 2 speakers can.

Yes, that was the expected result. But sometimes the unexpected happens, and I wanted to verify.

Plus, there was the possibility that while more enveloping, it might have been less enjoyable, or seemed muddied.

I was/am most concerned with whether 7 speakers, when used with material originally mixed for 4.0, would Do Something Bad to the rear channels. My 5.1set-up has the the rears almost at 135 deg from the point of view of the front row MLP (fronts at about 45 or maybe 50 deg). Which seems to work very well for the original DSOTM quad mix, for example. When I listen to stuff mixed for the "recommended" 5.1 layout, the middle row MLP seems like a better spot, since the rears are at about 120 deg (and the fronts at 35 or 40 deg). Adding two speakers to the mix (pun intended) might help with 5.1 material but might be detrimental to 4.0 material (all IMHO of course - others may differ in their experiences). I intend to do more listening this weekend with a variety of 4.0 and 5.1 mixes, and a bunch of movies that are in "native" 7.1.

shinksma

My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect those of my captors.
shinksma is offline  
post #17 of 22 Old 01-12-2013, 03:36 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Zen Traveler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,142
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Liked: 316
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinksma View Post

Sorry to resurrect such an old thread (yay for zombie threads!), but I've been experimenting a bit recently with my system and thought I'd chime in with some of my opinion-based observations on 5.1 into 7.1...

shinksma

My original comments are above and I still LOVE converting 5.1 music into 7.1 using 2 subwoofers and large speakers all of the way around and I listen to almost exclusively multichannel music. smile.gif
Zen Traveler is offline  
post #18 of 22 Old 02-07-2013, 03:55 PM
Advanced Member
 
randman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 536
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
I configured my processor to use PLIIx by default since most material is 5.1 and I have a 7.1 system. What happens if the movie is 7.1 (like DTS HD MA or Dolby TrueHD), and I use PLIIx? Does it still do any processing?
randman is offline  
post #19 of 22 Old 02-07-2013, 08:01 PM
AVS Special Member
 
BIslander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,545
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 61 Post(s)
Liked: 128
Nope.
BIslander is offline  
post #20 of 22 Old 02-12-2013, 10:34 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Selden Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 6,796
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 235 Post(s)
Liked: 384
Don't forget that Dolby ProLogic II and IIx have more features enabled when Music mode is selected. Most receivers allow you to control the mixing across the front three speakers (changing the width of the soundstage) as well as the front-to-back balance. You may have to dig through your receiver's menu to find the adjustments.

Selden
Selden Ball is offline  
post #21 of 22 Old 03-25-2013, 02:39 PM
Advanced Member
 
shingdaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 531
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
* I've recently upgraded to a new surround system, and find that Dolby Pro IIx music mode brings a much more immersive sound when converting 2 channel audio. I have the main surrounds placed beside the listener (as they are intended) and find that Dolby knows how to create that phsyco acoutsic signature similar to putting on a pair of headphones, music has better penetration dimensionally in the room, and the sound stage somewhat deepens horizontally and ambiantly. The rear surrounds also help deepen and expand the soundstage cues for music. 5.1 to 7.1 Movies also benefit from the extra surrounds at the rear, and bring a more lively home theatre experience.
shingdaz is offline  
post #22 of 22 Old 04-19-2013, 02:58 PM
Member
 
Gary Seven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 40
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked: 19
I have Paradigm Studio 100's as the main and Studio 20s in the rear. On the sides, I have the ADP 590s. While the ADP 590s sound ok for music, I much prefer the Studio 20 to play so I have two configurations and calibrations done... one for movies using the Denon as the decoder of codecs for 7.1 and one with the Oppo (using external inputs on the Denon) for 5.1. Unfortunately, this requires me to swap out the speakers manually which is rather quick with banana clips but the minor effort is worth it as it sounds fantastic. Personal preference as I like to listen to music directly with no additional coding to color the music... 2 channel music as 2 channel, 5.1 as 5.1. I like to hear the mix as intended.
Gary Seven is offline  
Reply Surround Music Formats

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off