Official Rythmik Audio Subwoofer thread - Page 533 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 70Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #15961 of 16562 Old 06-13-2014, 07:23 PM
Advanced Member
 
qguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked: 59
I had a 12 inch MK before I had my F15, I was blown away, the Rythmik dances circles around the M&K. I am pretty sure two F12 would blow you away.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace Deprave View Post
I'm sure my expectations will be far exceeded going with the 2 F12s. The only sub I've ever had is my old Velodyne, and it only has a 10" driver, a 100 watt amp, and only is rated down to 28Hz. It is vented, and was much better than anything else I auditioned at the time, but that was 15 years ago, and my budget was $500.

Thanks!

Last edited by qguy; 06-13-2014 at 07:45 PM.
qguy is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #15962 of 16562 Old 06-13-2014, 11:02 PM
AVS Special Member
 
basshead81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,852
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 1397
Quote:
Originally Posted by smitty8451 View Post
I built two Rythmik subs using the DS1510 woofers and PEQ600XLR3 amps and am utilizing an Antimode 8033 SII and have had great results. I am using a Yamaha CX-A5000 preamp that utilizes YPAO. A friend of mine has the Marantz 8801 and one weekend we did side by side comparisons using passive AB switches and believe it or not my system with the Antimode sounded much better even after he spent over an hour calibrating his system using Audysee. I think any stand alone sub eq will do a better job than than Audsyee, YPAO, MCAC as you have much more control of the settings/filters ect.
Good info!! I too am a believer that a stand alone sub eq setup works much better then any room correction software. Most of the big DIY guys seem to use this approach as well which speaks volumes imo.
basshead81 is offline  
post #15963 of 16562 Old 06-14-2014, 06:37 AM
Advanced Member
 
rcohen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 997
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 144 Post(s)
Liked: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by basshead81 View Post
Good info!! I too am a believer that a stand alone sub eq setup works much better then any room correction software. Most of the big DIY guys seem to use this approach as well which speaks volumes imo.
I've gotten good results with XT32 and great results with Dirac Live.
rcohen is offline  
post #15964 of 16562 Old 06-14-2014, 10:38 AM
Member
 
rak306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Syracuse NY
Posts: 153
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rythmik View Post

.... The difference of these mass difference is very subtle and yet look at all the speaeker measurement with noisy background and poor resolution. That is why we keep going back to the same conclusion -- there is no difference.

Brian,

I am not following what you are saying here. Is it that people don't make good measurements, and wrongly conclude there is no difference in speakers with different mass?

As I see it, the math models of speakers (TS parameters) assume away the non-linearities. As a result, all speakers have the same damped harmonic solution - with the only difference being the Qs (electrical and mechanical), resonant frequency, size, and power handling. And one can equalize them all to be the same. So one might conclude that all similar speakers can be made to sound the same (which is non-sense).

Left out of many speaker specifications are distortion measurements.

IMO all speakers specification should include distortion vs frequency curves with inputs at 0 dB (re rated output), -6 dB, -10 dB, for various input frequencies (e.g. 1/2fo, fo, 2fo).

This would be very telling. Transistors, A/D converters, power amplifiers, all include distortion measurements - why don't speakers? Is it because they are not very good (like 3%-10%)?

Last edited by rak306; 06-14-2014 at 10:39 AM. Reason: clarify
rak306 is offline  
post #15965 of 16562 Old 06-14-2014, 01:29 PM
Advanced Member
 
rcohen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 997
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 144 Post(s)
Liked: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by rak306 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rythmik View Post

.... The difference of these mass difference is very subtle and yet look at all the speaeker measurement with noisy background and poor resolution. That is why we keep going back to the same conclusion -- there is no difference.

Brian,

I am not following what you are saying here. Is it that people don't make good measurements, and wrongly conclude there is no difference in speakers with different mass?

As I see it, the math models of speakers (TS parameters) assume away the non-linearities. As a result, all speakers have the same damped harmonic solution - with the only difference being the Qs (electrical and mechanical), resonant frequency, size, and power handling. And one can equalize them all to be the same. So one might conclude that all similar speakers can be made to sound the same (which is non-sense).

Left out of many speaker specifications are distortion measurements.

IMO all speakers specification should include distortion vs frequency curves with inputs at 0 dB (re rated output), -6 dB, -10 dB, for various input frequencies (e.g. 1/2fo, fo, 2fo).

This would be very telling. Transistors, A/D converters, power amplifiers, all include distortion measurements - why don't speakers? Is it because they are not very good (like 3%-10%)?
I would be really interested to see an article or discussion on the differences (pros, cons) between using feedback (amp and/or servo) versus using signal processing to correct for speaker distortion.
rcohen is offline  
post #15966 of 16562 Old 06-14-2014, 01:35 PM
AVS Special Member
 
DonH50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monument CO
Posts: 6,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Liked: 254
My off-the-cuff comments not to be confused with Brian's thoughts: In general the earlier in the chain you correct the errors the easier they are to fix. DSP correction requires a very accurate speaker/driver model that will likely get blown out by interaction with the room anyway, or an acoustic sense and feedback scheme that is difficult to implement cleanly and make stable. I've used analog and digital signal processing to correct errors from various components in an RF chain, no reason to think it would be much different for audio. In some ways much harder if you try acoustic sensors, the loop delay is a killer.

Many years ago I built a servo sub using a dual voice-coil woofer and compared it to non-servo and the best subs of the time (mid-80's, Velodyne, many passive designs up to and including a pair of Hartley's in an HQD system). The results sold me on servo and I've been there ever since.

IME/IMO - Don

"After silence, that which best expresses the inexpressible, is music" - Aldous Huxley
DonH50 is offline  
post #15967 of 16562 Old 06-14-2014, 03:45 PM
Member
 
rak306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Syracuse NY
Posts: 153
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonH50 View Post
My off-the-cuff comments not to be confused with Brian's thoughts: In general the earlier in the chain you correct the errors the easier they are to fix. DSP correction requires a very accurate speaker/driver model that will likely get blown out by interaction with the room anyway, or an acoustic sense and feedback scheme that is difficult to implement cleanly and make stable. I've used analog and digital signal processing to correct errors from various components in an RF chain, no reason to think it would be much different for audio. In some ways much harder if you try acoustic sensors, the loop delay is a killer.
...

IME/IMO - Don
Yes loop delay is a bad thing, but only if you are trying to correct errors at a higher closed loop bandwidth than the loop can support (like you trying to control your room temp. by constantly tweaking the thermostat and not waiting long enough to know what the changes in temp setting did to the room temp - you end up with an oscillation).

I don't think there is very much feedback signal delay in Brian's servo loop. The feedback signal is from the sensor coil (in the speaker coil assembly) driving a cable a few inches going to an OP amp.

To me, the key to a servo solution working is an accurate feedback sensor. If the sensor is not accurate - the servo will not be accurate.

A source of non-linearity in a speaker is a variable BL depending on coil position in the gap. It seems to me that would also affect the feedback sense coil. Non the less, I think the servo drives are the way to go - I have 2 of Brian's dual 8" kits, and I love them.
rak306 is offline  
post #15968 of 16562 Old 06-14-2014, 10:03 PM
AVS Special Member
 
DonH50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monument CO
Posts: 6,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Liked: 254
The loop delay problem I mentioned was with acoustic sensors, which can add 10's of us to ms (or 10's of ms for a mic at the listener's position) delay. As I said, I used a similar servo loop ages ago and agree that such a design can be readily stabilized.

Brian discussed the BL impact at one point; I'm sure he'd be willing to do so again if the post is not easy to find (I did not look tonight -- tired, and this is a big thread!)

I have designed amplifiers and data converter circuits for VHF through W band. I am very familiar with trying to deal with loop delay, and the problem of explaining why an amplifier is a great oscillator...

"After silence, that which best expresses the inexpressible, is music" - Aldous Huxley
DonH50 is offline  
post #15969 of 16562 Old 06-15-2014, 02:35 PM
Member
 
rak306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Syracuse NY
Posts: 153
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonH50 View Post

...
Brian discussed the BL impact at one point; I'm sure he'd be willing to do so again if the post is not easy to find (I did not look tonight -- tired, and this is a big thread!)
...
I would be interested - if you can find it.

I tried to read this entire thread awhile ago - but I gave up. Then I resorted to searching only on posts from user "Rythmik". Even that list was huge.
rak306 is offline  
post #15970 of 16562 Old 06-16-2014, 06:43 AM
AVS Special Member
 
JT78681's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,127
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Liked: 136
So I've been running my FV15HP's in 1 port mode 3db hot <60hz, 14hz/high dampening (using PEQ on amp) for a few days now. I think I have finally found the right combination of settings that I will stick with for a while. I feel like the subs aren't being over worked and retain their composure throughout the entire frequency range. It's simply tight and controlled, but punishing down low. I can only imagine what you guys with dedicated theater rooms are experiencing.

Receiver - Denon 1713
Speakers - Infinity P363's, PC351, P153's
Subs - Rythmik FV15HP's
JT78681 is offline  
post #15971 of 16562 Old 06-16-2014, 08:35 AM
Exclusively Servo
 
Rythmik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,831
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by rak306 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonH50 View Post

...
Brian discussed the BL impact at one point; I'm sure he'd be willing to do so again if the post is not easy to find (I did not look tonight -- tired, and this is a big thread!)
...

I would be interested - if you can find it.

I tried to read this entire thread awhile ago - but I gave up. Then I resorted to searching only on posts from user "Rythmik". Even that list was huge.

Our sensing coil indeed has some special design features which you can understand I don't want elaborate here. The BL profile of sensing coil is different from the BL profile of the driver coil. One MIT student bought a driver from us to finish his undergraduate thesis. He already has a better head start than others as that is a significant improvement over a regular dual voice coil driver (sorry Don, I have to point this out BTW, I also started with a dual voice driver)


-

Last edited by Rythmik; 06-16-2014 at 09:09 AM.
Rythmik is offline  
post #15972 of 16562 Old 06-16-2014, 08:52 AM
Exclusively Servo
 
Rythmik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,831
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by rak306 View Post
Non the less, I think the servo drives are the way to go - I have 2 of Brian's dual 8" kits, and I love them.

We do plan to make those as regular finished products. We will have two flavors: F8 and M8. They share basically same driver/enclosure/amp. However, in F8, there are 3 extension setting whereas in M8, one of the extension setting is designated as 50hz/24 so that it can be used as a midbass module.


Some customers have asked where we are for the FV15 replacement? To make long story short, we decide to offer the follow new models by Thanksgiving:
1) FVX15 (DS1502 aluminum driver + HX405 amp). This has the same enclosure size as FV15HP. But the new amp without PEQ control can make it more affordable. The price should be around $999, plus $140 shipping. In terms of compromise over FV15HP other than driver and PEQ, the extension setting will have 1port music, 1port HT, and 2port. There will be no independent damping and extension filter control.
2) FVX12(DS1204 aluminum driver + HX405 amp). This model has a smaller enclosure (20"H x 17" W, 22" D without grille, grille and amp control add 2"). The price is to be determined, but my goal is around $900 including shipping. It has dual tune feature similar to FVX15.


Both this models should fill up the big pricing jump we have from LV12R to FV15HP. If the pricing pressure is too much, we may even consider LVX12 (which use less expensive paper cone driver) and by doing that we can drop price by another $100.


For sealed subs, we also have L12 in the work (300WRMS amp driving 14" cube) and other models... Stay tuned.
its phillip likes this.
Rythmik is offline  
post #15973 of 16562 Old 06-16-2014, 09:01 AM
AVS Special Member
 
tvuong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,575
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Liked: 72
So the fv15hp will still be the top of the ported? Fvx15 should have similar FR as the Fv15hp? What about the F25hp?

Last edited by tvuong; 06-16-2014 at 09:03 AM.
tvuong is offline  
post #15974 of 16562 Old 06-16-2014, 09:19 AM
Exclusively Servo
 
Rythmik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,831
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by tvuong View Post
So the fv15hp will still be the top of the ported?
I know where you are going. I am not going to make fridge size subwoofers. Maybe DIY can do that in their garage

Quote:
Originally Posted by tvuong View Post
Fvx15 should have similar FR as the Fv15hp? What about the F25hp?

FVX15 scale with FV15HP pretty well. So customers will have same FR as FV15HP.


F25HP is still in the work with my contractor engineer. That one has the most uncertainty. Hope everything turns out as I have calculated.


-

Last edited by Rythmik; 06-16-2014 at 09:44 AM.
Rythmik is offline  
post #15975 of 16562 Old 06-16-2014, 09:41 AM
AVS Special Member
 
tvuong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,575
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Liked: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rythmik View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by tvuong View Post
So the fv15hp will still be the top of the ported?
I know where you are going. I am not going to make frig size subwoofers. Maybe DIY can do that in their garage
No, I am happy to still own a pair of the top dog Rythmik ported sub . The FV15hp is just the right size for its performance. I know I am all set for subs for the longest time unless I want more which I do not see, then a fridge size DIY will be it.
The FVX will be a great value sub.
tvuong is offline  
post #15976 of 16562 Old 06-16-2014, 11:33 AM
AVS Special Member
 
DonH50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monument CO
Posts: 6,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Liked: 254
[quote=Rythmik;25006050]
Quote:
Originally Posted by rak306 View Post
Our sensing coil indeed has some special design features which you can understand I don't want elaborate here. The BL profile of sensing coil is different from the BL profile of the driver coil. One MIT student bought a driver from us to finish his undergraduate thesis. He already has a better head start than others as that is a significant improvement over a regular dual voice coil driver (sorry Don, I have to point this out BTW, I also started with a dual voice driver)-
No apologies due me, Brian! My work was almost 30 years ago and I am glad to see people like you have taken it so much further! And glad I am one of the ones reaping the results.

For the record, the woofer I used also had different BL curves for each coil, but I used a simple LDI control loop and did not carry the idea nearly as far as Brian has. Of course, I was an undergrad student at the time, and Brian has a PhD plus lots of experience with control systems.

No worries - Don

"After silence, that which best expresses the inexpressible, is music" - Aldous Huxley
DonH50 is offline  
post #15977 of 16562 Old 06-16-2014, 02:33 PM
Member
 
Blacklightning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton,AB Canada
Posts: 117
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked: 28
[quote=Rythmik;25006506]
Quote:
Originally Posted by rak306 View Post
For sealed subs, we also have L12 in the work (300WRMS amp driving 14" cube) and other models... Stay tuned.
You have talked about this model before.
I would love to see this but there seems to be a lot of Models.

Sealed subs seem to be less popular and I can't see many people picking the L12 over the LV12 if the price is around the same. Another brand has a sealed and ported option in the same price range and most people recommend the ported version even for Music as both are clean.
Blacklightning is offline  
post #15978 of 16562 Old 06-16-2014, 03:35 PM
Senior Member
 
dragonleepenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 453
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked: 22
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (358.7 KB, 43 views)
dragonleepenn is offline  
post #15979 of 16562 Old 06-16-2014, 06:32 PM
Exclusively Servo
 
Rythmik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,831
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blacklightning View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rythmik View Post

You have talked about this model before.
I would love to see this but there seems to be a lot of Models.

Sealed subs seem to be less popular and I can't see many people picking the L12 over the LV12 if the price is around the same. Another brand has a sealed and ported option in the same price range and most people recommend the ported version even for Music as both are clean.

Black, I appreciate your feedback. This is thetype of feedback we really want to hear.

L12 will be our standard overseas "postal shipping" subwoofer. It is the first sub that is truly able to ship via postal office. In addition, our F12 is still a very popular model (but pricy)which means there are sealed sub die-hard customers who are willing to sacrificea bit in output. L12 entry servo sealed sub will serve that market well. Mostthe recommendations on AVS forum are based on HT-centric application.

We will also have other derivative products following L12. Your feedback on L12 allows us to adjust the qty mix.


-

Last edited by Rythmik; 06-16-2014 at 08:42 PM.
Rythmik is offline  
post #15980 of 16562 Old 06-16-2014, 07:41 PM
AVS Special Member
 
grasshoppers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: aridzona
Posts: 1,470
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Liked: 125
[quote=Rythmik;25023250]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blacklightning View Post

Black, I appreciate your feedback. This is thetype of feedback we really want to hear.

L12 will be our standard overseas "postal shipping" subwoofer. It is the first sub that is truly able to ship via postal office. In addition, our F12 is still a very popular model (but pricy)which means there are sealed sub die-hard customers who are willing to sacrificea bit in output. L12 entry servo sealed sub will serve that market well. Mostthe recommendations on AVS forum are based on HT-centric application.

We will also have other derivative products following L12. Your feedback on L12 allows us to adjust the qty mix.


-
I have been waiting very patiently for the L12 sealed sub.
Let me know when you plan on releasing them and I will
Happily be one of the first to order.
grasshoppers is offline  
post #15981 of 16562 Old 06-17-2014, 06:50 AM
3db
Advanced Member
 
3db's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 755
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked: 19
[quote=grasshoppers;25024922]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rythmik View Post

I have been waiting very patiently for the L12 sealed sub.
Let me know when you plan on releasing them and I will
Happily be one of the first to order.
I have to ask, the LV12 is the ported version and identical to the LV12-R? I would choose ported over sealed anyday from the Rythmik family. I have my LV12-R sub configured for maximum extension and its extremely tight for music. I do not detect any kind of boom or sloppyness in its output.
3db is offline  
post #15982 of 16562 Old 06-17-2014, 07:02 AM
AVS Special Member
 
enricoclaudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked: 167
[quote=3db;25032058]
Quote:
Originally Posted by grasshoppers View Post


I have to ask, the LV12 is the ported version and identical to the LV12-R? I would choose ported over sealed anyday from the Rythmik family. I have my LV12-R sub configured for maximum extension and its extremely tight for music. I do not detect any kind of boom or sloppyness in its output.
The LV12 is the same LV12R. Sometimes we forget to put the R at the end. The FV12 (port on the front) was the previous 12" ported subwoofer but we replaced it with the LV12R. The L12 will be the sealed version of the LV12R.

Best Regards,

Enrico Castagnetti
Rythmik Audio

 

My Multimedia Room Gallery

enricoclaudio is offline  
post #15983 of 16562 Old 06-17-2014, 07:05 AM
AVS Special Member
 
JT78681's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,127
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Liked: 136
[quote=3db;25032058]
Quote:
Originally Posted by grasshoppers View Post


I have to ask, the LV12 is the ported version and identical to the LV12-R? I would choose ported over sealed anyday from the Rythmik family. I have my LV12-R sub configured for maximum extension and its extremely tight for music. I do not detect any kind of boom or sloppyness in its output.
And this is why it's recommended so often. I don't think anything can beat it in the $600 dollar price range.

Receiver - Denon 1713
Speakers - Infinity P363's, PC351, P153's
Subs - Rythmik FV15HP's
JT78681 is offline  
post #15984 of 16562 Old 06-17-2014, 09:53 AM
AVS Special Member
 
eljaycanuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 5,183
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 76 Post(s)
Liked: 487
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rythmik
... we decide to offer the follow new models by Thanksgiving:
1) FVX15 (DS1502 aluminum driver + HX405 amp). This has the same enclosure size as FV15HP.
. . .
FVX15 scale with FV15HP pretty well. So customers will have same FR as FV15HP.
The FVX15 sounds intriguing! Although its FR is expected to be the same as the FV15HP's, output will likely be less. What are the "guesstimates" of how its output will compare?

Thanks!

Last edited by eljaycanuck; 06-17-2014 at 09:57 AM.
eljaycanuck is offline  
post #15985 of 16562 Old 06-17-2014, 12:12 PM
Senior Member
 
ahmedreda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 468
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Liked: 43
This is purely a guess but I would think around 3db less accross the board.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eljaycanuck View Post
The FVX15 sounds intriguing! Although its FR is expected to be the same as the FV15HP's, output will likely be less. What are the "guesstimates" of how its output will compare?

Thanks!

Last edited by ahmedreda; 06-17-2014 at 12:14 PM.
ahmedreda is offline  
post #15986 of 16562 Old 06-17-2014, 12:27 PM
AVS Special Member
 
JT78681's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,127
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Liked: 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rythmik View Post
We do plan to make those as regular finished products. We will have two flavors: F8 and M8. They share basically same driver/enclosure/amp. However, in F8, there are 3 extension setting whereas in M8, one of the extension setting is designated as 50hz/24 so that it can be used as a midbass module.


Some customers have asked where we are for the FV15 replacement? To make long story short, we decide to offer the follow new models by Thanksgiving:
1) FVX15 (DS1502 aluminum driver + HX405 amp). This has the same enclosure size as FV15HP. But the new amp without PEQ control can make it more affordable. The price should be around $999, plus $140 shipping. In terms of compromise over FV15HP other than driver and PEQ, the extension setting will have 1port music, 1port HT, and 2port. There will be no independent damping and extension filter control.
2) FVX12(DS1204 aluminum driver + HX405 amp). This model has a smaller enclosure (20"H x 17" W, 22" D without grille, grille and amp control add 2"). The price is to be determined, but my goal is around $900 including shipping. It has dual tune feature similar to FVX15.


Both this models should fill up the big pricing jump we have from LV12R to FV15HP. If the pricing pressure is too much, we may even consider LVX12 (which use less expensive paper cone driver) and by doing that we can drop price by another $100.


For sealed subs, we also have L12 in the work (300WRMS amp driving 14" cube) and other models... Stay tuned.
Brian,

Can you tell us what you are expecting the wattage to be on the HX405 amp? Also, will the FVX12 look like a smaller version of the FV15HP?

Receiver - Denon 1713
Speakers - Infinity P363's, PC351, P153's
Subs - Rythmik FV15HP's
JT78681 is offline  
post #15987 of 16562 Old 06-17-2014, 12:42 PM
AVS Special Member
 
JT78681's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,127
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Liked: 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahmedreda View Post
This is purely a guess but I would think around 3db less accross the board.
I like your setup! This makes me want to add a third FV15HP nearfield. Right now I have two up front and I'm more than satisfied, but hey you can't ever have too much bass.

Receiver - Denon 1713
Speakers - Infinity P363's, PC351, P153's
Subs - Rythmik FV15HP's
JT78681 is offline  
post #15988 of 16562 Old 06-17-2014, 02:59 PM
AVS Special Member
 
enricoclaudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahmedreda View Post
This is purely a guess but I would think around 3db less accross the board.
According to Brian the output on this subwoofer will be -3dB less across the board compared with the FV15HP.

Best Regards,

Enrico Castagnetti
Rythmik Audio

 

My Multimedia Room Gallery

enricoclaudio is offline  
post #15989 of 16562 Old 06-17-2014, 03:01 PM
AVS Special Member
 
tvuong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,575
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Liked: 72
^^ good to know.
tvuong is offline  
post #15990 of 16562 Old 06-17-2014, 03:02 PM
AVS Special Member
 
enricoclaudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT78681 View Post
Brian,

Can you tell us what you are expecting the wattage to be on the HX405 amp? Also, will the FVX12 look like a smaller version of the FV15HP?
The HX405 is a 400 watts Hypex amplifier.

Best Regards,

Enrico Castagnetti
Rythmik Audio

 

My Multimedia Room Gallery

enricoclaudio is offline  
Reply Subwoofers, Bass, and Transducers

Tags
Rythmik , Rythmik Audio , Rythmik Audio F12 Direct Servo Subwoofer , Rythmik Audio F15 Subwoofer

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off