Originally Posted by digler84
i don't get too caught up in single digit extension numbers myself. my system isn't capable of it, and i'm not go drop $5k+ to get usable variations of it.
There's definitely nothing wrong with choosing not to chase the low end. Nothing wrong with that at all. But I hate seeing the idea that it must be expensive to do so get repeated. People see posts like those, assume that it's true, and then never even bother experiencing it to decide for themselves whether to try for it.
It doesn't have to be expensive; it just takes a little effort. My previous system was flat to the single digits frequencies, and the total cost was in the 3 digits.