Peak to Peak Excursion ratings? - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 18 Old 04-29-2013, 11:46 AM - Thread Starter
Advanced Member
 
Mik James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Atlantic Canada
Posts: 855
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked: 37
Do the majority of manufacturers of subwoofer drivers use peak to peak excursion specs?

Polk's budget db series lists 18mm peak to peak excursion and i'm curious if they are just trying to win the numbers game by publishing mechanical limits or if it's the same rating other manufacturers use.

What ratings do most of the more recognized companies like Dayton normally use?
Mik James is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 18 Old 04-29-2013, 12:24 PM
Advanced Member
 
Steve1981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Liked: 55
Center to peak is the norm for reporting xmax (linear excursion) and xmech (mechanical limits).
Steve1981 is offline  
post #3 of 18 Old 04-29-2013, 01:07 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Bill Fitzmaurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 9,702
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 1356
Marketing departments use peak to peak. Engineers use xmax, which is half the peak to peak.

Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design

The Laws of Physics aren't swayed by opinion.
Bill Fitzmaurice is online now  
post #4 of 18 Old 04-29-2013, 02:24 PM
 
BeeMan458's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Magalia, CA
Posts: 8,374
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 801
Ain't peak-to-peak just Xmax times two? ...
BeeMan458 is offline  
post #5 of 18 Old 04-29-2013, 03:16 PM - Thread Starter
Advanced Member
 
Mik James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Atlantic Canada
Posts: 855
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked: 37
So those polks would actually be around 9 mm xmax then...
Mik James is offline  
post #6 of 18 Old 04-29-2013, 04:12 PM
Advanced Member
 
Steve1981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Liked: 55
That would appear to be the case if this is the driver we're looking at:
http://www.polkaudio.com/products/db1240dvc
Steve1981 is offline  
post #7 of 18 Old 04-29-2013, 04:39 PM - Thread Starter
Advanced Member
 
Mik James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Atlantic Canada
Posts: 855
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked: 37
Yeah that's the one. They list it as "Xmax Linear .728 inch/18.5 mm (peak to peak)" under the t/s parameters section.
Mik James is offline  
post #8 of 18 Old 04-29-2013, 05:02 PM
AVS Special Member
 
JHAz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,946
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 88 Post(s)
Liked: 154
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeeMan458 View Post

Ain't peak-to-peak just Xmax times two? ...

exactly how does that differ from "half the peak to peak?" They taught me in fourth grade they're the same thing. Is B is two times A then A HAS TO BE half of B.
JHAz is online now  
post #9 of 18 Old 04-29-2013, 05:51 PM
 
BeeMan458's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Magalia, CA
Posts: 8,374
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 801
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHAz View Post

exactly how does that differ from "half the peak to peak?"

It doesn't. Hence the purpose of the whistling emoticon.
BeeMan458 is offline  
post #10 of 18 Old 05-01-2013, 10:18 AM - Thread Starter
Advanced Member
 
Mik James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Atlantic Canada
Posts: 855
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked: 37
Also on the subject Ive seen mention of particular Dayton subs having underrated xmax specs, is it a similar situation where people are confusing peak to peak with xmax or are some Dayton subs actually under spec'd?
Mik James is offline  
post #11 of 18 Old 05-01-2013, 10:36 AM
Advanced Member
 
Steve1981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Liked: 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mik James View Post

Also on the subject Ive seen mention of particular Dayton subs having underrated xmax specs, is it a similar situation where people are confusing peak to peak with xmax or are some Dayton subs actually under spec'd?

Josh Ricci found the Dayton 18" HO driver to have a fair bit more useful excursion than its rated xmax, 18-20mm vs 12.5mm. In that case I suspect it is a genuine matter of being conservatively specified versus a matter of confusion.

http://www.data-bass.com/data?page=system&id=89
Steve1981 is offline  
post #12 of 18 Old 05-01-2013, 12:27 PM - Thread Starter
Advanced Member
 
Mik James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Atlantic Canada
Posts: 855
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked: 37
Someone should test some more Dayton's to see if it's a common theme smile.gif
Mik James is offline  
post #13 of 18 Old 05-01-2013, 02:39 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Bill Fitzmaurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 9,702
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 1356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve1981 View Post

Josh Ricci found the Dayton 18" HO driver to have a fair bit more useful excursion than its rated xmax, 18-20mm vs 12.5mm. In that case I suspect it is a genuine matter of being conservatively specified versus a matter of confusion.

http://www.data-bass.com/data?page=system&id=89
It depends on how you determine the figure. The traditional method was to subtract the plate thickness from the coil depth and divide by two. The modern method is via Klippel Analysis, which measures excursion at 10% THD. The latter is more accurate in real world applications, but not every manufacturer has laid out the cash for a Klippel rig.
MemX likes this.

Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design

The Laws of Physics aren't swayed by opinion.
Bill Fitzmaurice is online now  
post #14 of 18 Old 05-02-2013, 05:14 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
arnyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Grosse Pointe Woods, MI
Posts: 14,381
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 748 Post(s)
Liked: 1162
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Fitzmaurice View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve1981 View Post

Josh Ricci found the Dayton 18" HO driver to have a fair bit more useful excursion than its rated xmax, 18-20mm vs 12.5mm. In that case I suspect it is a genuine matter of being conservatively specified versus a matter of confusion.

http://www.data-bass.com/data?page=system&id=89
It depends on how you determine the figure. The traditional method was to subtract the plate thickness from the coil depth and divide by two. The modern method is via Klippel Analysis, which measures excursion at 10% THD. The latter is more accurate in real world applications, but not every manufacturer has laid out the cash for a Klippel rig.

I don't think you need to invest in Klippel's technology in order to determine Xmax. For example you can infer a driver's Xmax from how it produces bass when mounted in a common kind of box and operated in a simple but large space. Since that Xmax number is probably going to be infer performance in a similar box in a listening room, its not an invalid approach. The specifics of the box and the room relate more to SPL than Xmax. You can measure maximum displacement using ordinary shop tools or laser-based devices that are now becoming reasonable to obtain.

http://www.laserlinc.com/specs_single-axis/160s_specs.html
arnyk is offline  
post #15 of 18 Old 05-02-2013, 06:04 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Bill Fitzmaurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 9,702
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 1356
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnyk View Post

I don't think you need to invest in Klippel's technology in order to determine Xmax. For example you can infer a driver's Xmax from how it produces bass when mounted in a common kind of box and operated in a simple but large space. Since that Xmax number is probably going to be infer performance in a similar box in a listening room, its not an invalid approach. The specifics of the box and the room relate more to SPL than Xmax. You can measure maximum displacement using ordinary shop tools or laser-based devices that are now becoming reasonable to obtain.

http://www.laserlinc.com/specs_single-axis/160s_specs.html
It's certainly easy enough to measure a speaker and find the 10% THD level, anyone with an $85 mic and measuring freeware can do it. If you have sufficient skill you can use a speaker modeling program to calculate excursion at that point, or if you happen to have a laser handy you can use that. The question raised is what are you seeing when you look at a manufacturer's data sheet? It may be a measured xmax at 10% THD, it may be a calculated xmax. Or it may be a peak to peak figure that some marketing hack decided to use instead of xmax. Caveat Emptor.

Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design

The Laws of Physics aren't swayed by opinion.
Bill Fitzmaurice is online now  
post #16 of 18 Old 09-27-2013, 08:28 PM
Member
 
narutium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
JL Fathom F113 says it has a peak-to-peak excursion of 4 inches.
......does it mean that the woofer can go up from the resting position 2 inches. and go down 2 inches. altogether 4 inches?

it's so mind-blowing.
narutium is offline  
post #17 of 18 Old 09-28-2013, 05:00 AM
AVS Special Member
 
braveheart123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Lone Wolf McQuade from Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 1,816
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 115
Yes. When manufacturers list the excursion as Xmax in T/S parameters, it is one way excursion @ Lord knows what THD number. P2P is double the Xmax, which is more eye catchy for a buyer when shopping for a driver.

History is written by those who have hanged heroes ...

The best EQ is no EQ ...


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Main System: Klipsch RF-82 II, Klipsch RC-62 II, RS-52 II, Onkyo 5010, Rythmik FV15HP, PSB S300
braveheart123 is offline  
post #18 of 18 Old 09-28-2013, 06:10 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
arnyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Grosse Pointe Woods, MI
Posts: 14,381
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 748 Post(s)
Liked: 1162
Quote:
Originally Posted by narutium View Post

JL Fathom F113 says it has a peak-to-peak excursion of 4 inches.
......does it mean that the woofer can go up from the resting position 2 inches. and go down 2 inches. altogether 4 inches?

it's so mind-blowing.

It is meaningless because it will probably sound like @&$$ if you figure out how to actually make the cone do that. Its proper name is probably Xmech. Xmax rules!
arnyk is offline  
Reply Subwoofers, Bass, and Transducers

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off