Polk PSW505 or f12 question - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-16-2013, 10:32 AM - Thread Starter
Newbie
 
jhphotoart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I am looking for a descent budget sub for my first HT setup. My room is 18x15x8, and my receiver is a onkyo tx-sr805. I am looking at either the psw505 or the f12. Will these be to overpowering in this room? Which one is better? they are both 199 on amazon now.
jhphotoart is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 07-16-2013, 10:39 AM
AVS Special Member
 
steve nn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,207
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 428
Not to worry, neither will over power your room.

Klipsch RB-75
Klipsch C-7
Klipsch RB-35
On-going SW management class
Denon
PS3
steve nn is offline  
Old 07-16-2013, 08:23 PM
Advanced Member
 
Mik James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Atlantic Canada
Posts: 869
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked: 42
There have been a few threads comparing these 2 subs:

http://www.avsforum.com/t/1372356/bic-f12-or-psw505
http://www.avsforum.com/t/1459548/polk-psw505-vs-bic-f12-spl-and-clarity-below-30hz
http://www.avsforum.com/t/1324368/bic-f12-or-psw505

And more here: http://www.avsforum.com/newsearch?search=f12+psw505

There is quite a bit about the Polk being more "musical" in at least one of those threads.
The Polk also seems to have a little more power to work with (just speculation based on the specs though).
The Polk is listed on amazon as being more compact, but it also doesn't appear to have as much cone surface area as the Bic f12.
Mik James is offline  
Old 07-17-2013, 08:19 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 6,603
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 735 Post(s)
Liked: 873
I've heard and measured the BIC F12 - It's a great sub for $200 and won't try to play lower than what it can handle which is about 30hz. I've heard the Polk PSW505 but not measured it. It was coupled with some Def Tech mains with built in subwoofers. The deftech mains sounded bassier and cleaner without the Polk PSW505 than with it.

The F12 is generally considered the better sub from all the data I've seen on these two --- both are good values at the $200 pricepoint.

If I had to choose of the two - I'd pick the BIC F12 - - - especially after forum member gorilla83 who's owned both confirmed he liked the F12 better.

"Without subs it's just background music - with subs it's the main event!"
Archaea's Theatre Room
2011 KC Sub Shootout
2012 KC Blind Sub Shootout
My Subwoofer Recommendations by Pricepoint
Archaea is offline  
Old 07-18-2013, 06:38 AM
Member
 
pkrfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 15
You could also consider the Dayton Sub-1200. It sells for about $130 when not on sale.
pkrfan is offline  
Old 07-18-2013, 07:43 AM
AVS Special Member
 
basshead81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 6,435
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked: 1704
I would also check out the jbl es250.
basshead81 is offline  
Old 07-18-2013, 08:00 AM
Member
 
Daphnis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Just to delay your purchase smile.gif, you can try NXG NX-BAS-500.

Review by Jim.

Disc: I do not own NX-BAS-500.
Daphnis is offline  
 

Tags
Revel Concerta F12
Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off