Here is CEA-2010 measurement of STF-2 (from Hsu website) and NX-BAS-500 (from Sound and Vision review)
Hz Max SPL Max SPL
20 94.2 96.2
25 107.1 105.5
31.5 112.7 114
40 114 116.1
50 116.9 116.8
63 118.6 116.5
U-low Ave 20-31.5
STF-2 104.7db NX-BAS-500 108db
Low Ave 40-63
STF-2 116.5db NX-BAS-500 116.5db
Based on measurement above, do you think that they are similar performance-wise?
Your questions are answered: Speaker FAQ
HT: Energy RC-50, RC-LCR, Veritas VS Surrounds | Dual CHT SS 18.1s | Denon AVR-888 | Dayton SA1000 | Antimode 8033C
Desktop: CBM-170 SE | SVS SB-1000 | Audio-GD NFB-11 | HK 3390
Headphone & Portable HE-400 | K612 Pro | HP150 | DX50 | E12
Hsu website says 1m ground plane measurement. Brent in S&V says he peformed CEA-2010A output measurement at 3m and added +9.5db to scale the measurement to 1m reporting standard mandated by CEA-2010.
Once you drop below $500, I don't think you will find a better quality sub than Hsu's lower offerings. They would be my pick if I had to limit my budget to under $500.
AVR: Yamaha RXV-375
Display: Panasonic TH-50PC77U
LCR: Hsu HB1.2 HC1.2
Sub: (2) PSA XV15se
Blu Ray: Sony BDP-S5100
I feel the same way; I've tried some other sub $500 subs, and HSU makes a better sub IMO. If the OP can push his budget to $499, the SVS PB-1000 is definitely an upgrade.
|Hsu Research Stf 2 , Nixeus Nx 500 Fusion Xs Network Media Player|