Rythmik FV15HP efficiency - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 17 Old 04-09-2014, 11:21 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
brutal0101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 125
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
How is the FV15HP so efficient compared to other subs with similar specs such as the Hsu VTF15HP, PSA XS15.
It is also 15' and has a barely 600 watt amp.
I have never had it, I am basing my judgement on the frequency response SPL charts I have seen.
Is it really the best sub under $1500?
brutal0101 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 17 Old 04-09-2014, 11:36 AM
AVS Special Member
 
bear123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: PA
Posts: 2,440
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 146 Post(s)
Liked: 660
Quote:
Originally Posted by brutal0101 View Post

How is the FV15HP so efficient compared to other subs with similar specs such as the Hsu VTF15HP, PSA XS15.
It is also 15' and has a barely 600 watt amp.
I have never had it, I am basing my judgement on the frequency response SPL charts I have seen.
Is it really the best sub under $1500?

If you base this on the highest 16-30 Hz output, probably.  On over 30 Hz output, that would probably go to the XS30.

 

The driver quality of the FV15 is much better than the Hsu, and the amp has nearly twice the power.  Compared to the XV15, which is over $600 cheaper, same thing...better driver, more power, bigger cab.


AVR:       Yamaha RXV-375

Display:  Panasonic  TH-50PC77U

LCR:       Hsu HB1.2  HC1.2

Sub:       (2) PSA XV15se

Blu Ray:  Sony BDP-S5100

Apple TV

Harmony 650

miniDSP

bear123 is offline  
post #3 of 17 Old 04-09-2014, 11:43 AM
Advanced Member
 
Jahjd2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 547
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked: 68
I'll float a provocative question that is likely to elicit a debate: considering it's about the same cost, dual XV-15s or a single FV15HP?

Sharp LC70SQ15U
Denon 4311ci
Ascend Acoustics Towers (NrT)
Ascend Horizon Center (NrT)
Definitive Technology Surrounds BP1.2X
Rythmik E15HP
Epik Empire
Jahjd2000 is offline  
post #4 of 17 Old 04-09-2014, 11:48 AM
AVS Special Member
 
tvuong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,539
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Liked: 67
^^ Dual XV15s.
tvuong is offline  
post #5 of 17 Old 04-09-2014, 11:55 AM
AVS Special Member
 
bear123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: PA
Posts: 2,440
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 146 Post(s)
Liked: 660

If adding an additional FV15 is not an option down the road, dual XV15's would almost always be the better option imo.


AVR:       Yamaha RXV-375

Display:  Panasonic  TH-50PC77U

LCR:       Hsu HB1.2  HC1.2

Sub:       (2) PSA XV15se

Blu Ray:  Sony BDP-S5100

Apple TV

Harmony 650

miniDSP

bear123 is offline  
post #6 of 17 Old 04-09-2014, 11:59 AM
AVS Special Member
 
derrickdj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,356
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Liked: 137
Efficiency is related to amp design, cabinet size, driver construction and ect. Most subs use little energy until they are under 30 Hz or have a significant bass boost.

Klipsch RF 7 based HT 7.4, Pioneer SC 35, Acurus Five 200 amp, Chase SS 18.2(2), VS 18.1(2), Samsung BDP F 7500, Asus/My Book Live HPC 4 TB

Yaquin VK 2100 amp, McIntosh XR 5 speakers, Samsung BDP F 7500
derrickdj1 is offline  
post #7 of 17 Old 04-09-2014, 12:33 PM
Senior Member
 
purplerain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 375
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jahjd2000 View Post

I'll float a provocative question that is likely to elicit a debate: considering it's about the same cost, dual XV-15s or a single FV15HP?

I had that option, FV15HP-SE was my choice.

*ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY* 

PIONEER KRP-500M
(2) Monitor Audio RX6 towers - (1) Monitor Audio RX center - (2) Monitor Audio RX FX surrounds
(1) Rythmik FV15HP-SE sub - (1) Denon 2313CI avr
purplerain is offline  
post #8 of 17 Old 04-09-2014, 02:11 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Kini62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 2,816
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked: 305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jahjd2000 View Post

I'll float a provocative question that is likely to elicit a debate: considering it's about the same cost, dual XV-15s or a single FV15HP?

Depends a lot on your room and whether you want a lot of sub 20hz output and an overall better sounding sub. The servo and amp controls on the Rythmik make a huge difference.

Klipsch RF-62II, RC-500, RS-400, SVS PC12+,
Def Tech SC8000
Harman Kardon AVR 1600
PS3, Apple TV, Sharp 70" Qattron
Kini62 is offline  
post #9 of 17 Old 04-09-2014, 02:20 PM
AVS Special Member
 
shadyJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,358
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Liked: 446
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jahjd2000 View Post

I'll float a provocative question that is likely to elicit a debate: considering it's about the same cost, dual XV-15s or a single FV15HP?

FV15HP. It's just so much better.
shadyJ is offline  
post #10 of 17 Old 04-09-2014, 10:44 PM
Advanced Member
 
Jahjd2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 547
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked: 68
I finally ended my melodramatic search for a sub tonight. I placed an order for dual Rythmik E15HPs smile.gif .

Sharp LC70SQ15U
Denon 4311ci
Ascend Acoustics Towers (NrT)
Ascend Horizon Center (NrT)
Definitive Technology Surrounds BP1.2X
Rythmik E15HP
Epik Empire
Jahjd2000 is offline  
post #11 of 17 Old 04-10-2014, 09:14 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
brutal0101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 125
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by bear123 View Post

If adding an additional FV15 is not an option down the road, dual XV15's would almost always be the better option imo.


How's the sound quality of the XV15 compared to the FV15HP. I have read people in the past who think the sound quality of the Rythmik is clearly better. Sound quality is very important to me, it's not just about more output. If I only wanted output I could have bought a Behringer Concert sub for a lot cheaper.
brutal0101 is offline  
post #12 of 17 Old 04-10-2014, 10:39 AM
AVS Special Member
 
bear123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: PA
Posts: 2,440
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 146 Post(s)
Liked: 660
Quote:
Originally Posted by brutal0101 View Post


How's the sound quality of the XV15 compared to the FV15HP. I have read people in the past who think the sound quality of the Rythmik is clearly better. Sound quality is very important to me, it's not just about more output. If I only wanted output I could have bought a Behringer Concert sub for a lot cheaper.

From Josh Ricci's Audioholics review of the XV15:

 

"We found that the XV15 sounded clean, composed and dynamic with music, while possessing extension well below 20Hz in room with plenty of headroom to make its presence felt in a large space on movie night"

http://www.audioholics.com/subwoofer-reviews/xv-15-subwoofer

 

Data-bass measurements:

 

http://www.data-bass.com/data?page=system&id=88


AVR:       Yamaha RXV-375

Display:  Panasonic  TH-50PC77U

LCR:       Hsu HB1.2  HC1.2

Sub:       (2) PSA XV15se

Blu Ray:  Sony BDP-S5100

Apple TV

Harmony 650

miniDSP

bear123 is offline  
post #13 of 17 Old 04-10-2014, 10:46 AM
AVS Special Member
 
shadyJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,358
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Liked: 446
I consider the XV15 relatively compromised in terms of accuracy based on available measurements. That is an argument that has been done to death here, so if you want to know why, just do a forum search on the matter.
shadyJ is offline  
post #14 of 17 Old 04-10-2014, 12:45 PM
AVS Special Member
 
tvuong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,539
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Liked: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jahjd2000 View Post

I finally ended my melodramatic search for a sub tonight. I placed an order for dual Rythmik E15HPs smile.gif .
Sweet. Congrats!
tvuong is offline  
post #15 of 17 Old 04-10-2014, 01:58 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Kini62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 2,816
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked: 305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jahjd2000 View Post

I finally ended my melodramatic search for a sub tonight. I placed an order for dual Rythmik E15HPs smile.gif .

Awesome!

Just curious as to why the E instead of the regular F?

Klipsch RF-62II, RC-500, RS-400, SVS PC12+,
Def Tech SC8000
Harman Kardon AVR 1600
PS3, Apple TV, Sharp 70" Qattron
Kini62 is offline  
post #16 of 17 Old 04-10-2014, 04:25 PM
Advanced Member
 
Jahjd2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 547
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kini62 View Post

Awesome!

Just curious as to why the E instead of the regular F?

Mainly for WAF. I had to convince my wife that adding a subwoofer upfront would not only provide a big sound improvement but also be unobtrusive. The latter point being her chief concern. The output difference I read is only .5db and it's a little cheaper to boot. I think I save $150 with the E over the F for duals.

Sharp LC70SQ15U
Denon 4311ci
Ascend Acoustics Towers (NrT)
Ascend Horizon Center (NrT)
Definitive Technology Surrounds BP1.2X
Rythmik E15HP
Epik Empire
Jahjd2000 is offline  
post #17 of 17 Old 04-10-2014, 08:19 PM
AVS Special Member
 
basshead81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,581
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 1330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jahjd2000 View Post

Mainly for WAF. I had to convince my wife that adding a subwoofer upfront would not only provide a big sound improvement but also be unobtrusive. The latter point being her chief concern. The output difference I read is only .5db and it's a little cheaper to boot. I think I save $150 with the E over the F for duals.

Exactly! I would go for the E15HP over the F15HP all day. Cheaper, Smaller, and only .5db difference in output. Seems like a no brainer imo. smile.gif
basshead81 is offline  
Reply Subwoofers, Bass, and Transducers

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off