Blown Away by Cadence CSX-12 MKII - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-25-2014, 01:37 PM - Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 0
Thumbs up Blown Away by Cadence CSX-12 MKII

I recently bought the Cadence CSX-II MKII subwoofer based off forum posts here and various online reviews, and I'd like to complement those sources with my own opinion.

This subwoofer is a fantastic value. I got mine off eBay for $200 shipped (open box but unused). The first thing I noticed when FedEx dropped it off was that 1) at 76lbs, it weighs double that of any other subwoofer in its price range, and 2) it is also double the size. I opened up the package and I was extremely impressed by how well built and sturdy the cabinet was. It felt much, much more expensive and solid than any other subwoofers I have seen below $500.

I set it up with my Yamaha RX-V675 ($350 refurb at Amazon) using YPAO and tweaked from there, and the configuration that sounded best to my ears in my small room (18x16 or so) was as follows:

Front: JBL L1s ($20 for the pair at Goodwill), set to large
Center: JBL S-Center II ($50 used on eBay), great timbral match to the L1s, set to large
Subwoofer 1: Cadence CSX-12 MKII ($200 shipped open box), crossover set at 80hz
Subwoofer 2: MartinLogan Dynamo 300 ($100 on sale new on Amazon), crossover set at 80hz
Surrounds: Cambridge Soundworks by Kloss Ensemble IIs ($10 at Goodwill), set to small

I kept my old subwoofer, the MartinLogan Dynamo 300, to patch up the midrange in the front of the room. That sub only has an 8-incher in it, and it really isn't a thumper at all— it's more of a smooth but accurate musical speaker, and I suppose it's only fair that it doesn't offer much thump given its price ($130 new and shipped from Amazon). I keep it right below my center speaker to avoid localization.

The Cadence is in the rear corner of the room, and it offers the thump from around 35-50hz (where the MartinLogan is much weaker).

I was really, really pleased by how well both subs worked in unison. They provided quick, accurate, and well-blended thump to both movies and music. This subwoofer is terrifyingly loud during explosions. I could feel my heart nearly stopping while watching War of the Worlds, which is something I have never experienced with a subwoofer I could afford (below $300). The couch shook during half of the scenes in that film. Afterwards, I had to take a Xanax because I felt shell-shocked.

I have had a fair amount of experience with the MartinLogan Dynamo 1000, which is what my father has, and this Cadence sounded very, very similar for a fraction of the price. I noticed that Sound & Vision's review noted the same— this subwoofer is able to compete with a number of $1000 subwoofers. I'm sure it isn't on the same level as some nice SVSs and other hardcore subs, and this sub definitely doesn't hit much below 35hz, but for $200, I can't complain. My ears aren't that good anyways, so I don't spend too much on audio systems. I'm extremely happy with what I have!

If you can't decide between this and any of the other recommended sub-$300 subwoofers, pick this one. It feels like a much more expensive one than the other budget models, and it sounds like one too.

Last edited by sk5987; 07-26-2014 at 01:21 AM.
sk5987 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 07-25-2014, 02:42 PM
AVS Special Member
 
dsrussell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Corona, CA.
Posts: 2,156
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 647 Post(s)
Liked: 606
Congratulations. It's a nice feeling to get a sub that makes a difference, especially for the price you paid.
dsrussell is online now  
Old 07-25-2014, 05:35 PM
Advanced Member
 
Gmash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 610
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 116 Post(s)
Liked: 108
That is a good deal, and it sounds like a great bang for your buck system you have there. I would recommend setting all your speakers to small, though.
Gmash is offline  
Old 07-25-2014, 07:15 PM - Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gmash View Post
That is a good deal, and it sounds like a great bang for your buck system you have there. I would recommend setting all your speakers to small, though.
I actually tried it both ways, and my subs sound a lil' bit too muddy when I do.
sk5987 is offline  
Old 07-26-2014, 03:02 PM
Member
 
e_honda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 125
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked: 27
From what you're saying, the Cadence certainly sounds like one of the better under $400 subs out there as far as sound quality. I have the Martin Logan Abyss, which is the predecessor to the Dynamo 1000, and it is simply outstanding from a musical/SQ standpoint.

So if the Cadence has similar sound to the Dynamo 1000 at a fraction of the price, then that's very impressive. Keep in mind though, that the Dynamo 1000 is a very compact sub. It's basically a 14" cube. So it's delivering very good SQ in a much smaller package than the Cadence, so you have to figure that into the comparison as well.
e_honda is offline  
Old 07-28-2014, 03:16 PM - Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by e_honda View Post
From what you're saying, the Cadence certainly sounds like one of the better under $400 subs out there as far as sound quality. I have the Martin Logan Abyss, which is the predecessor to the Dynamo 1000, and it is simply outstanding from a musical/SQ standpoint.

So if the Cadence has similar sound to the Dynamo 1000 at a fraction of the price, then that's very impressive. Keep in mind though, that the Dynamo 1000 is a very compact sub. It's basically a 14" cube. So it's delivering very good SQ in a much smaller package than the Cadence, so you have to figure that into the comparison as well.
Certainly. The size a a big (no pun intended) detractor from the Cadence. And there's no arguing that the Dynamo probably goes deeper, and is most certainly better-made in almost every regard. But to the semi-casual ear, they sound extremely alike when it comes to SQ.
sk5987 is offline  
 
Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off