Originally Posted by Johnsteph10
Ricci -- it might be that he wants to increase awareness of his own study of craigsub's sub results...which, not coincidentially, he appeared to bump up from oblivion this morning as well.
nah, check my motives on that one. it was contribution to the public domain...a contribution to the art. not sure who else publishes (abeit short) papers in this way.
anyways, i threw the submersive numbers (15", 5.5 box vol, 1000 power) into the best ht model in the paper:
Regression Analysis: HT versus DRV_DIAM, BOX_VOL, PWR, VNT, HI_XMAX
The regression equation is
HT = 22.7 + 1.02 DRV_DIAM + 1.24 BOX_VOL + 0.00476 PWR + 2.83 VNT
+ 7.09 HI_XMAX
Predictor Coef SE Coef T P
Constant 22.736 2.924 7.77 0.000
DRV_DIAM 1.0182 0.2340 4.35 0.000
BOX_VOL 1.2420 0.2545 4.88 0.000
PWR 0.0047566 0.0006248 7.61 0.000
VNT 2.834 1.157 2.45 0.022
HI_XMAX 7.091 1.061 6.69 0.000
S = 1.656 R-Sq = 95.7% R-Sq(adj) = 94.7%
i calculate a home theater score prediction of 49.60. that's very good. beats the hsu vt3 ho + turbo as well as fathom 112. again, on ht predicted results. ties with the velodyne dd18, which was $5k sub at testing, which is consistent with mark's reports that some have suggested his price is too low.
i look forward to seeing the actual measured results.