Warner to go Blu-ray Exclusive [Confirmed] - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:34 PM - Thread Starter
Advanced Member
 
lsdavinci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 889
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT TO RELEASE ITS HIGH-DEFINITION DVD TITLES
EXCLUSIVELY IN THE BLU-RAY DISC FORMAT BEGINNING LATER THIS YEAR

Decision Made in Response to Strong Consumer Preference for Format

(January 4, 2008 - Burbank, CA) - In response to consumer demand, Warner Bros.
Entertainment will release its high-definition DVD titles exclusively in the
Blu-ray disc format beginning later this year, it was announced today by Barry
Meyer, Chairman & CEO, Warner Bros. and Kevin Tsujihara, President, Warner
Bros. Home Entertainment Group.

"Warner Bros.' move to exclusively release in the Blu-ray disc format is a
strategic decision focused on the long term and the most direct way to give
consumers what they want," said Meyer. "The window of opportunity for high-
definition DVD could be missed if format confusion continues to linger. We
believe that exclusively distributing in Blu-ray will further the potential for
mass market success and ultimately benefit retailers, producers, and most
importantly, consumers."

Warner Home Video will continue to release its titles in standard DVD format
and Blu-ray. After a short window following their standard DVD and Blu-ray
releases, all new titles will continue to be released in HD DVD until the end
of May 2008.

"Warner Bros. has produced in both high-definition formats in an effort to
provide consumer choice, foster mainstream adoption and drive down hardware
prices," said Jeff Bewkes, President and Chief Executive Officer, Time Warner
Inc., the parent company of Warner Bros. Entertainment. "Today's decision by
Warner Bros. to distribute in a single format comes at the right time and is
the best decision both for consumers and Time Warner."

"A two-format landscape has led to consumer confusion and indifference toward
high definition, which has kept the technology from reaching mass adoption and
becoming the important revenue stream that it can be for the industry," said
Tsujihara. "Consumers have clearly chosen Blu-ray, and we believe that
recognizing this preference is the right step in making this great home
entertainment experience accessible to the widest possible audience. Warner
Bros. has worked very closely with the Toshiba Corporation in promoting high
definition media and we have enormous respect for their efforts. We look
forward to working with them on other projects in the future.
lsdavinci is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:37 PM
Member
 
i70x7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 173
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Wow, so the rumors were true. This could be a HUGE blow to HD-DVD and eventually be the move that is looked upon as the reason for it's decline.

I'm glad I went neutral last week.
i70x7 is offline  
post #3 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:37 PM
Advanced Member
 
dhodory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 806
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Wow, just . . . wow! Big news indeed.

Well, guess this means I'll be waiting to buy a Profile 2.0 player. Bummer.

Debates about whether or not this kills HD DVD in 3 . . 2. . . 1
dhodory is offline  
post #4 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:38 PM
Member
 
tironside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 22
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
do you perchance have a link to where this came from, I know it will get unpleasant in here shortly

Tony

edit.

nevermind found it on usatoday

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/product...-blu-ray_N.htm

edit 2

and here

http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssC...32340820080104

edit 3 link fixed

hrmm, I wonder if its true or just someone messing with all of our heads..
tironside is offline  
post #5 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:38 PM
AVS Special Member
 
coolhand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,769
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 15
Aghast...
coolhand is offline  
post #6 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:40 PM
Advanced Member
 
desmond212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 580
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
it is on bloomberg as headline...
desmond212 is offline  
post #7 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:40 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Michael Mullis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Abingdon, MD
Posts: 3,743
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by dhodory View Post

Wow, just . . . wow! Big news indeed.

Well, guess this means I'll be waiting to buy a Profile 2.0 player. Bummer.

Debates about whether or not this kills HD DVD in 3 . . 2. . . 1


Not sure there is anything to really debate about it.
Michael Mullis is offline  
post #8 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:41 PM
AVS Special Member
 
sharkcohen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 17
I don't think this will hurt HD DVD anymore than Paramount hurt Blu-ray. I still think both formats will be with us for the near future. In the meantime, I'm glad Warner chose a side because I don't want to have to decide which format to buy their films on (I have both).

Back off man, I'm a scientist.
sharkcohen is offline  
post #9 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:41 PM
Advanced Member
 
MarekM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 993
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
MarekM is offline  
post #10 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:42 PM
Advanced Member
 
mhtom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tracy, CA USA
Posts: 552
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
DOH! I wonder if Warner is still scheduled to speak at the HD DVD group at CES. LOL.
mhtom is offline  
post #11 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:42 PM
Senior Member
 
sholmes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 209
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
If this is true, I hope everyone will use this news to reflect on the last year and a half and what a crazy ride it has been. People from both sides should remain civil and act with class. In the end, we are all high definition supporters, regardless of color.
sholmes is offline  
post #12 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:43 PM
Senior Member
 
nick2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 291
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I did expect Warner to become BD exclusive eventually, but I figured it would take them longer than this. Also, this means we will definitely have the Matrix on BD someday. (Has a release date been confirmed yet?)
nick2010 is offline  
post #13 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:44 PM
AVS Special Member
 
WiFi-Spy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,300
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked: 30
Game over

Tyler Pruitt - Technical Liaison at SpectraCal
WiFi-Spy is offline  
post #14 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:44 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Figgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Farmington, MN
Posts: 2,539
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
intresting,

Not because of the exclusivity.

More like the press release has not gone out yet from WB or TimeWarner for that matter but sources already have the scoop.....

ninjaedit:

thatr reuters link is incorrect!! Can someone post the correct reuters link?

http://www.reuters.com/article/compa...32340820080104

that is the complete link... Double check your links folks!

Do NOT let the magic smoke out because it is impossible to put the magic smoke back in!!!!
Figgie is offline  
post #15 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:45 PM
AVS Special Member
 
RAVEN56706's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Jersey City, NJ, USA
Posts: 4,671
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
sounds good... since i am neutral, it doesnt matter

2011 SUPERBOWL CHAMPIONS- New York Giants!!!

Gamertag: GENERAL CUPKAKE
RAVEN56706 is offline  
post #16 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:45 PM
Newbie
 
stahlej's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
It's nice to know there only will be one format left in a year or so now
stahlej is offline  
post #17 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:45 PM
Member
 
Wiluven's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 166
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
mehhhh just ordered a Toshiba A-35. lol
Wiluven is offline  
post #18 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:45 PM
Advanced Member
 
dhodory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 806
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Having trouble comprehending the timing of this (i.e., one business day prior to CES where Warner is scheduled to participate in the HD DVD press event)?

Wondering if: 1) it was leaked by Sony, or 2) is actually true. Certainly if it is a leak, there can be no doubt that the BDA is leaking it early to create a snowball at CES.
dhodory is offline  
post #19 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:45 PM
AVS Special Member
 
mpalmieri1203's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Pleasant Valley, NY
Posts: 2,642
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by WiFi-Spy View Post

Game over

THat's for sure. I have both formats with no preference toward either side. I am just glad that this thing will finally come to an end.

mpalmieri1203 is offline  
post #20 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:45 PM
AVS Special Member
 
theforce8686's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,453
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharkcohen View Post

I don't think this will hurt HD DVD anymore than Paramount hurt Blu-ray. I still think both formats will be with us for the near future. In the meantime, I'm glad Warner chose a side because I don't want to have to decide which format to buy their films on (I have both).

I think this opinion will be in the extreme majority. They are responsible for about 1/5 of the DVD market. There is no chance that HD can survive with just Univeral and Paramount. That simple is not enough. Also, most of assume Universal and Paramount will also rethink their strategy.
theforce8686 is offline  
post #21 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:46 PM
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Monica CA
Posts: 264
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharkcohen View Post

I don't think this will hurt HD DVD anymore than Paramount hurt Blu-ray. I still think both formats will be with us for the near future. In the meantime, I'm glad Warner chose a side because I don't want to have to decide which format to buy their films on (I have both).

I wish I could believe that. I'm red, but I have to regard the Warners move as the death blow. They've been much bigger players in all this than Paramount.
Andy_K is offline  
post #22 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:46 PM
 
Lee Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 19,369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 44
Where is the link to the OP?
Lee Stewart is offline  
post #23 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:46 PM
AVS Special Member
 
RAVEN56706's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Jersey City, NJ, USA
Posts: 4,671
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
that means no "dark knight" in hd-dvd

2011 SUPERBOWL CHAMPIONS- New York Giants!!!

Gamertag: GENERAL CUPKAKE
RAVEN56706 is offline  
post #24 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:46 PM
AVS Special Member
 
TimV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: San Francisco, Ca
Posts: 1,047
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
WOW. This is a pretty big deal. If anything, I would have expected them to go with HD DVD. No matter, as I'm neutral.

It will be interesting to see how this pans out. I'm sure some members on the forum are about to get a little rattled.

Tim Vickroy

"Besides, there's no reason we can't be civil, is there?"
TimV is offline  
post #25 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:46 PM
Senior Member
 
chaarlieee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 275
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
My Toshiba a-30 just got here this morning..

I'm expecting BD to win because of studio support.. this move could make the war end sooner.

I guess I'll have to watch the Bourne Trilogy and Transformers and then sell everything next month..
chaarlieee is offline  
post #26 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:48 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Paulidan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,967
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Warner Bros. to distribute in a single format comes at the right time and is the best decision both for consumers and Time Warner."

No Jeff, you are being entierly dishonest here. The "Right" time would have been a month before the start of the Christmas selling season. You wanted to move as many Blade Runner and Harry Potter discs as you could. I don't blame you, but you just pissed off a lot of new adopters.

BTW I'm not one of them. I've been dual format since June, so this doesn't really affect me beyond that I hope Universal and Parmaount don't use this as the reason to curtail their own releases. Then that truly would suck
Paulidan is offline  
post #27 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:48 PM
AVS Special Member
 
HPforMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,813
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Ouch like I stated in another thread. I have both formats but this is not good news for HD DVD no matter which way you cut it. While the Paramount/Dreamworks flip was big, this is bigger because they have been the biggest HD supporters.
HPforMe is offline  
post #28 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:48 PM
Advanced Member
 
manikin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New England
Posts: 600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
All those sitting on the fence can now jump in, and those directors holding out can start letting out some of the all time classics.

Let the Assault on DVD begin

Support The Facts - Not Opinions
manikin is offline  
post #29 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:48 PM
Advanced Member
 
bairda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Louisville, KY USA
Posts: 529
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Waiting for this to be confirmed.

IF it is true, I expect toshiba to comeback with a counter punch. However, I just don't see how they could rebalance this equation unless they got another studio to swap allegiances and be exclusive for them.

Looks like the curtain may be closing on "the war".

-Alex-
bairda is offline  
post #30 of 4258 Old 01-04-2008, 12:49 PM
Advanced Member
 
ctiq21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 908
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 18
Wow. Where is my cheap dual format player? Probably will have to wait a year...
ctiq21 is offline  
Closed Thread HDTV Software Media Discussion

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off