New Panamorph Lens Coming Soon - Page 6 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #151 of 163 Old 07-03-2013, 06:20 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Gary Lightfoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 4,471
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Liked: 41
If as John says the Cinevista is astigmatism corrected, and the MKII isn't (and you can't get the corrector element any more - pm Mark/CAVX for info), then you should have a sharper image with the Cinevista, so an upgrade smile.gif

Gary

Quote:
Originally Posted by elmalloc
Who says Cameron is "right" and why do we care about him so much - lol!

I trust Gary Lightfoot more than James Cameron.
Gary Lightfoot is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #152 of 163 Old 07-03-2013, 09:56 AM
AVS Special Member
 
John Schuermann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,321
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked: 62
Thanks, Gary. Yes, the CineVista is astigmatism corrected for its recommended throw range (approximately 6 - 18 feet, with optimal sharpness between 8 - 14 feet).


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Home Theater Industry Consultant

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Check out my new movie!:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
John Schuermann is offline  
post #153 of 163 Old 07-03-2013, 10:16 AM
Senior Member
 
snowkarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 41
Took out my new CineVista last night and fired up the 8350 for a rough test (aka balancing the lens on foam blocks and projecting on the unfinished screenwall). The picture looks huge - there's definitely a fun immersion factor with scope. smile.gif

No vignetting with the full zoom I need. At a 2.5x height throw ratio, the pincushion is pretty atrocious - no surprise there - although with video content and proper masking I can see how even this level of distortion effectively disappears in a real-world viewing context. There is noticeable CA fringing at the far edges (no electronic correction on the 8350), although the middle half is laudably sharp. Fine for movies and FPS games, not so much for web browsing and test patterns.

I'm glad I decided to go with a curved screen, which will hopefully go some way towards correcting the worst of the pincushion.

I don't think the CV will satisfy demanding users, but for what it is - an entry level product for folks like me just getting started with this level of imaging and either unable or unwilling to zoom, I think it's a very nice option to have.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
 - 
One of the smallest-ever (13' x 8' x 6'8") AVS builds!


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
 
-
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
 - This time it's 2.35 CIH in a 10' x 10' alcove!

snowkarver is offline  
post #154 of 163 Old 07-03-2013, 11:29 AM
AVS Special Member
 
kgveteran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 5,709
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Liked: 38
Hmmm. I think i will be using the MKII at first.

Maybe CAVX will chime in....


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
<Multi sub Thread


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
< Garage Audio !!!
kgveteran is offline  
post #155 of 163 Old 07-21-2013, 05:22 PM
Senior Member
 
Bardia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Schuermann View Post

Thanks, Gary. Yes, the CineVista is astigmatism corrected for its recommended throw range (approximately 6 - 18 feet, with optimal sharpness between 8 - 14 feet).

What about the FVX200?
Bardia is offline  
post #156 of 163 Old 07-21-2013, 09:02 PM
AVS Special Member
 
John Schuermann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,321
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked: 62
All Panamorph lenses are astigmatism corrected.

Throw distance specs for all Panamorph lenses are here:

http://www.panamorph.com/8-support/lens-comparison


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Home Theater Industry Consultant

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Check out my new movie!:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
John Schuermann is offline  
post #157 of 163 Old 07-23-2013, 06:08 AM
Senior Member
 
Keith AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Arizona
Posts: 291
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowkarver View Post

Took out my new CineVista last night and fired up the 8350 for a rough test (aka balancing the lens on foam blocks and projecting on the unfinished screenwall). The picture looks huge - there's definitely a fun immersion factor with scope. smile.gif

No vignetting with the full zoom I need. At a 2.5x height throw ratio, the pincushion is pretty atrocious - no surprise there - although with video content and proper masking I can see how even this level of distortion effectively disappears in a real-world viewing context. There is noticeable CA fringing at the far edges (no electronic correction on the 8350), although the middle half is laudably sharp. Fine for movies and FPS games, not so much for web browsing and test patterns.

I'm glad I decided to go with a curved screen, which will hopefully go some way towards correcting the worst of the pincushion.

I don't think the CV will satisfy demanding users, but for what it is - an entry level product for folks like me just getting started with this level of imaging and either unable or unwilling to zoom, I think it's a very nice option to have.

Any chance you could post an image or two illustrating the pincushion in your environment (and perhaps one showing real-world image)? I have similar setup parameters in my environment and am considering the Cinevista.
Keith AP is offline  
post #158 of 163 Old 07-23-2013, 08:02 AM
AVS Special Member
 
John Schuermann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,321
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked: 62
Similar in terms of throw ratio? I ask because the amount of pin cushion is strictly related to throw ratio, and is pretty consistent from lens to lens (in other words, the CineVista has no more or less pincushion than any other anamorphic lens at the same throw ratio). Shorter throw ratio = more pincushion, longer throw ratio = less pincushion. Ideally you would be at at least 3x the screen height or further back.

Good luck!


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Home Theater Industry Consultant

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Check out my new movie!:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
John Schuermann is offline  
post #159 of 163 Old 07-23-2013, 08:23 AM
Senior Member
 
snowkarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith AP View Post

Any chance you could post an image or two illustrating the pincushion in your environment (and perhaps one showing real-world image)? I have similar setup parameters in my environment and am considering the Cinevista.

Sorry, I guess I should have taken a couple of quick snaps when I had it set up - but I was too busy watching stuff! Everything is boxed up as I am deep into construction. Probably won't have it all out again for at least a month.

I will say this though - John is spot on. I played around and anything under 3.0 on a flat surface I don't think most people would be happy with. I am not a very critical viewer - I'm in it for fun not technical perfection - and am very glad that I decided to spring for a curved screen.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
 - 
One of the smallest-ever (13' x 8' x 6'8") AVS builds!


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
 
-
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
 - This time it's 2.35 CIH in a 10' x 10' alcove!

snowkarver is offline  
post #160 of 163 Old 07-23-2013, 09:52 PM
Senior Member
 
Keith AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Arizona
Posts: 291
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Schuermann View Post

Similar in terms of throw ratio? I ask because the amount of pin cushion is strictly related to throw ratio, and is pretty consistent from lens to lens (in other words, the CineVista has no more or less pincushion than any other anamorphic lens at the same throw ratio). Shorter throw ratio = more pincushion, longer throw ratio = less pincushion. Ideally you would be at at least 3x the screen height or further back.

Good luck!

John, yes a similar throw ratio, 103" from a 41" height screen. Several years ago I had a large theater setup in Colorado using the UH480 and loved it. Since then I've moved and downsized - and am currently "room size challenged".

Another aspect that must be considered is that the lens of my current projector - the Benq W1070 - is recessed 1 1/8" from the front of the unit. What problems might this introduce if any?

What I was hoping to gather from snowkarver was a real-world image at his 2.5 TR to evaluate the effect of pincushion - and whether I might find it objectionable. From the sound of it, a projector's setup grid pattern might really look bad at 2.5 TR, but actual movie content might be passable for now.
Keith AP is offline  
post #161 of 163 Old 07-24-2013, 12:36 PM
AVS Special Member
 
John Schuermann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,321
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith AP View Post

John, yes a similar throw ratio, 103" from a 41" height screen. Several years ago I had a large theater setup in Colorado using the UH480 and loved it. Since then I've moved and downsized - and am currently "room size challenged".

Another aspect that must be considered is that the lens of my current projector - the Benq W1070 - is recessed 1 1/8" from the front of the unit. What problems might this introduce if any?

What I was hoping to gather from snowkarver was a real-world image at his 2.5 TR to evaluate the effect of pincushion - and whether I might find it objectionable. From the sound of it, a projector's setup grid pattern might really look bad at 2.5 TR, but actual movie content might be passable for now.

The CineVista has a large enough aperture that the recessed lens should not make a difference, but your short throw complicates things a bit. You might call Dave or Russell at Panamorph and give them the specifics. The possible issue would be vignetting, where the sides of the image could be cut off. Not likely, but worth a call to tech support.

Passable to one person may be unacceptable to another smile.gif


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Home Theater Industry Consultant

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Check out my new movie!:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
John Schuermann is offline  
post #162 of 163 Old 07-24-2013, 04:32 PM
Advanced Member
 
RLBURNSIDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 785
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Liked: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowkarver View Post

There is noticeable CA fringing at the far edges (no electronic correction on the 8350), although the middle half is laudably sharp. Fine for movies and FPS games, not so much for web browsing and test patterns.

FYI : You can correct Chromatic aberattion from a PC on your desktop as well as movies and games (using either DirectX 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / or OpenGL). How do I know this? Because I've done it. It's rather trivial to realign the colours at the edges, the hard part was making it work for games. I have currently no incentive to share my work for free, as I don't even own an A-lens currently to test it out with, and there's a bunch more tuning to be done before it's ready for prime time. Each lens is different and you really need to be able to tune the curves to achieve what ECC does on higher end projectors. My BenQ w1070 projector only cost me 850$, I just can't justify spending double that to squeeze out a slightly bigger / brighter image. (as much as I love widescreen)
RLBURNSIDE is offline  
post #163 of 163 Old 07-25-2013, 03:34 AM
AVS Special Member
 
CAVX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 8,384
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Lightfoot View Post

If as John says the Cinevista is astigmatism corrected, and the MKII isn't (and you can't get the corrector element any more - pm Mark/CAVX for info), then you should have a sharper image with the Cinevista, so an upgrade smile.gif

Gary

There was never a corrector for the MK2, only the "CAVX Corrector" for MK3 (MK3+C). MK3 was also corrected for CA.

Mark Techer

I love my Constant Image Height system!
CAVX is offline  
Reply 2.35:1 Constant Image Height Chat

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off