Convince me to go 2.35:1 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 2 Old 11-02-2012, 09:16 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
mjh222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 106
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
In my planned theater, the front wall will be approx. 16.5' wide by 8' tall. If I do a 140" wide screen, the height would be either ~5' (2.35:1) or 6.5' (1.78:1), either of which the room could accommodate. I can mask the 1.78:1 screen to achieve the same size 2.35:1 screen.

So ... I love 2:35 and most of my viewing will be in this aspect ratio, so is there any reason to buy a screen with this AR, or is the above thoughts RE: Masking correct and I should go with the 1.78:1 screen (and mask)? Remainder of front wall will likely be covered with black GOM.

Thanks,
Mike
mjh222 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 2 Old 11-03-2012, 12:10 AM
AVS Special Member
 
CAVX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 8,355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked: 32
The only way I'd do a massive 16:9 screen with masks would be if I was to a CIH + IMAX setup. Given there is only about 3 titles, not worth it IMO. 3D could benefit, but if 2D Scope is most of what you watch, then optimize the system for that.

Mark Techer

I love my Constant Image Height system!
CAVX is offline  
Reply 2.35:1 Constant Image Height Chat

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off