Some thoughts on scope 3D - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Forum Jump: 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 3 Old 11-17-2012, 12:55 PM - Thread Starter
Advanced Member
5mark's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 537
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 58 Post(s)
Liked: 32
Just as some background, I've had scope setups since 2006 and I'm sure I don't need to convince anyone here how great they are for HT, especially when the use is primarily movies. Watching my JVC RS55 from 1sw, I love the immersion and detail of 2D scope films and 16:9/1.85 becomes just the right size as well.

For 3D it is a different story. 16:9 feels like a great size, but scope 3D gradually started feeling more and more uncomfortable to watch. It is also a known fact that as you sit closer to the screen, the apparent depth of the 3D image decreases. So recently I started zooming scope 3D to just a few inches wider than my 16:9 image, maybe a more CIA relationship. It was immediately a big improvement in 3D depth and comfort of viewing (And yes, I was initially hesitant because it just felt wrong not to fill the screen with a scope image).

As it turns out, this change has totally renewed my enthusiasm for 3D. So much so that I just picked up an Epson 5010 for mostly 3D duties in a 2 projector setup. Really a fantastic upgrade over the crosstalk and flicker filled JVC 3D, and I've continued to use the smaller scope size with great success. Even the black bars have not been an issue since through the glasses they are usually very dark. And watching through the glasses kind of makes you focus more on the image and less on the surroundings/black bars.

So for my setup, the advantages of zooming scope 3D smaller are:

More comfortable to watch.

More apparent 3D depth.

The edges of the images are visible on all four sides which is important for 3D effects, especially on popouts and foreground objects. Often in a scope setup(mine included) some overscan is used to fit all ARs to the screen, to hide pincushion, etc.

The image fits inside of the glasses better.

Brightness is increased, which is always a consideration for 3D. wink.gif

Never seen this topic addressed, so I thought I'd throw it out there...
5mark is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 3 Old 03-07-2013, 02:08 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
Tom Monahan's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Butte, Montana Hometown of the late Evel Knievel
Posts: 2,722
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
Liked: 43
After experimenting with this Mark, I 100% agree with you. 3D depth and pop out are superior from furthur than 1x screen width. Having said that, at times I will still watch 3D with my scope screen filled.


My equipment: JVC RS55 for 2D, BenQ W7000 for 3D, Carada 40x117 2.925:1 AR BW Criterion screen, Navatar .8 HD conversion lens, Darbee Darblet, region free Oppo BP93, Toshiba HD-A35 HD-DVD, JVC HD-DH5U D-Theater, Mitsubishi HS-HD 20000 DVHS, Pioneer CLD-97 LD player/AC-3 mod, B&K AC3 Demodulator
Tom Monahan is offline  
post #3 of 3 Old 03-08-2013, 06:04 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
CAVX's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 8,683
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 223 Post(s)
Liked: 117
Just my $0.02 worth. It was actually my testing of the Mitsubishi HC9000 that made me sit closer at 2x the image height. I now sit there for 2D as well. All the 3D films I watched (except AVATAR which I scaled for CIH anyway) were Scope and it was my desire for a larger vertical image that made me shift from the back row to the front row. I did not find 3D depth to diminish at this closer distance.

Mark Techer

I love my Constant Image Height system!
CAVX is offline  
Sponsored Links
Reply 2.35:1 Constant Image Height Chat

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off