150" CinemaScope too big for my view - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 16 Old 12-18-2012, 09:35 PM - Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
amb1s1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 274
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I was planning to do 120 16:9, but lately I'm switching my dream to a CinemaScope screen. So I came with this conclusion that if I'm watching a 16:9 movie or show, the screen will still be 120. The question is, that I have to seating sofa that I'm planning to use. One is going to be at a 10 feet view and the last row is going to be at a 15 feet view. I can modify my first row to be at 12' feet. Is 150 CinemaScope too close for the first and second row?
amb1s1 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 16 Old 12-18-2012, 10:08 PM
Senior Member
 
tgrinch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 408
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 17
Not in my opinion biggrin.gif I have a 133" scope screen (with lens) with around the same seating distances - first row @ ~11' and second row ~15-16'. If I did it over again, I'd go bigger, probably close to 150". If you go that size, just consider if your PJ can get enough brightness for your tastes...
tgrinch is offline  
post #3 of 16 Old 12-19-2012, 05:25 AM - Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
amb1s1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 274
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I'm planning to buy the panasonic 8000u
amb1s1 is offline  
post #4 of 16 Old 12-19-2012, 07:57 AM
AVS Special Member
 
jautor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,938
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Liked: 360
I also have similar seating distances (~10' and 15.5') and a 136" scope (108" 16x9) screen.

I would NOT go any bigger, as the front row is about as big as you can get without having to move your head around. I was very concerned about the size being too big during construction. Going smaller didn't really change the "feel" from the front row, but did make a negative impact from the 2nd (which is my primary row).

So now you have both opinions. biggrin.gif

My recommendation is that if at all possible, test the screen size before deciding - use a sheet or photographer backdrop paper to see how it feels to you. After, of course, sizing the projector, etc. I did that, knowing the PJ would be able to handle the screen sizes I expected - and didn't order the screen until I had the room done with the PJ on-hand to validate the setup.

Jeff


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
 -- CIH, Panamorph, Martin Logan, SVS PB2000, Carada Masquerade, Grafik Eye, Bar table, Green Glue, JVC RS50 
Theater build photos:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

jautor is online now  
post #5 of 16 Old 12-19-2012, 09:11 AM - Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
amb1s1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 274
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I think even if I want it, I wont be able. My room size is 11' 6" and thats without the drywall. I'm thinking going with a screen between 136 to 140.
amb1s1 is offline  
post #6 of 16 Old 01-11-2013, 06:34 AM
Member
 
Shepardos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 170
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 10
is there a formula about the maximum 21:9 screen size and the seat distance?

Thanks
Shepardos
Shepardos is offline  
post #7 of 16 Old 01-14-2013, 09:36 PM
AVS Special Member
 
jautor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,938
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Liked: 360
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shepardos View Post

is there a formula about the maximum 21:9 screen size and the seat distance?

Use the normal forumulas / guidelines based on your 16:9 screen size, since you'll be using that aspect as well - and, well, by definition here, the screen height remains the same for 2.35 content...


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
 -- CIH, Panamorph, Martin Logan, SVS PB2000, Carada Masquerade, Grafik Eye, Bar table, Green Glue, JVC RS50 
Theater build photos:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

jautor is online now  
post #8 of 16 Old 01-15-2013, 05:56 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Pain Infliction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 2,706
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 156 Post(s)
Liked: 197
Quote:
Originally Posted by jautor View Post

My recommendation is that if at all possible, test the screen size before deciding - use a sheet or photographer backdrop paper to see how it feels to you. After, of course, sizing the projector, etc. I did that, knowing the PJ would be able to handle the screen sizes I expected - and didn't order the screen until I had the room done with the PJ on-hand to validate the setup.

I agree. Get the projector set up first.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Is not love not unlike the unlikely not it is unlikened to?"
- Leon Phelps
Pain Infliction is offline  
post #9 of 16 Old 01-15-2013, 11:51 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
stanger89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Marion, IA
Posts: 17,424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 133 Post(s)
Liked: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by jautor View Post

Use the normal forumulas / guidelines based on your 16:9 screen size, since you'll be using that aspect as well - and, well, by definition here, the screen height remains the same for 2.35 content...

except a lot of those specify sizes based on 16:9 screen widths, not screen heights so if you go with those you'll end up with a rather small screen.

See what an anamorphoscopic lens can do,
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
stanger89 is offline  
post #10 of 16 Old 01-16-2013, 06:29 AM
AVS Special Member
 
jautor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,938
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Liked: 360
Quote:
Originally Posted by stanger89 View Post

except a lot of those specify sizes based on 16:9 screen widths, not screen heights so if you go with those you'll end up with a rather small screen.

I'd contend that if you get the 16x9 screen size correct, you have your screen height, and therefore the correct 2.35 size... Now, whether that fits between your walls, well, another issue... biggrin.gif


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
 -- CIH, Panamorph, Martin Logan, SVS PB2000, Carada Masquerade, Grafik Eye, Bar table, Green Glue, JVC RS50 
Theater build photos:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

jautor is online now  
post #11 of 16 Old 01-16-2013, 07:31 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
stanger89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Marion, IA
Posts: 17,424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 133 Post(s)
Liked: 148
Yup, agree, it just wasn't clear that's what you meant biggrin.gif

See what an anamorphoscopic lens can do,
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
stanger89 is offline  
post #12 of 16 Old 01-17-2013, 11:29 AM
AVS Special Member
 
coolrda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 1,007
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
2X-3X screen height will take full advantage of a 1080+A lens projection system and 2.66X-4X SH will give you the comparable pixel density if using the Zoom method with its 800 lines.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

coolrda is offline  
post #13 of 16 Old 02-15-2013, 06:06 PM
Newbie
 
Detees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shepardos View Post

is there a formula about the maximum 21:9 screen size and the seat distance?

I found this


As I'm having the same problem regarding screen size and viewing distance in 2.35:1 and 16:9, my idea was to optimize the room for 2.35:1 material.
Since thats the main AR I watch and I prioritize. So I will sit in the second (middle) row.

For 16:9 I will sit in the front row, which should give me a more immersive feeling as I'm used to.

My screen is 120" 16:9 now, so I will size that a little up to 137", which give me around 170" in 2.35:1 with the lens.
Detees is offline  
post #14 of 16 Old 02-15-2013, 07:40 PM
AVS Special Member
 
CAVX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 8,384
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolrda View Post

2X-3X screen height will take full advantage of a 1080+A lens projection system and 2.66X-4X SH will give you the comparable pixel density if using the Zoom method with its 800 lines.

Agreed. If zooming, you will need to work off the image height of the zoomed 16:9 image, not the screen height. Therefore you will have to sit back a bit further than you would if using an A-Lens. Still enjoyable though.

Mark Techer

I love my Constant Image Height system!
CAVX is offline  
post #15 of 16 Old 02-20-2013, 01:08 PM
AVS Special Member
 
jautor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,938
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Liked: 360
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detees View Post

My screen is 120" 16:9 now, so I will size that a little up to 137", which give me around 170" in 2.35:1 with the lens.

That's a big screen, make sure your projector will work at the throw distance you have and be bright enough to be acceptable...

Also, what are you seating distances? Highly recommend you test the size out before committing. I'm about 10' at my front row to a 108" (in 1.85) screen, wouldn't go any bigger than that.

Jeff


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
 -- CIH, Panamorph, Martin Logan, SVS PB2000, Carada Masquerade, Grafik Eye, Bar table, Green Glue, JVC RS50 
Theater build photos:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

jautor is online now  
post #16 of 16 Old 06-07-2013, 05:55 AM
AVS Special Member
 
RobZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,546
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 17
I'm 11 ft from a 148 in 2.35:1 high power (RS20 & UH480). I love it but theres pincushioning. My 16x9 image is 120 in. Id also suggest trying before buying.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

RobZ is offline  
Reply 2.35:1 Constant Image Height Chat

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off