Official OPPO BDP-103D (Darbee Edition) Owner's Thread - Page 148 - AVS Forum

AVS Forum > Blu-ray & HD DVD > Blu-ray Players > Official OPPO BDP-103D (Darbee Edition) Owner's Thread

Blu-ray Players

Bob Pariseau's Avatar Bob Pariseau
09:00 AM Liked: 1063
post #4411 of 6325
06-13-2014 | Posts: 28,212
Joined: Jul 2004
^ "Should" is hard to answer. Just try it both ways and see which you like better.
--Bob
rdgrimes's Avatar rdgrimes
09:49 AM Liked: 292
post #4412 of 6325
06-13-2014 | Posts: 16,758
Joined: Mar 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by StanGeek View Post
Just getting my first Oppo today. Since my display is not a "true" 4K display (it's a JVC e-shift 3 projector), should I still opt for letting the Oppo do the upscaling?

I have tried using my old blu-ray player (Sony S790) do the upscaling in the past and was not too thrilled. Will the Oppo be better at that job?

Thanks.
There's only one way to answer this, which is to try both ways and use whatever looks best. Some 4K supporting displays tend to look better with 1080p input due to their own internal processing quirks. As yet, 4K support is more of a marketing tool than a pathway to superior image quality. If you're really serious, consider a pro calibration.
StanGeek's Avatar StanGeek
01:00 PM Liked: 11
post #4413 of 6325
06-13-2014 | Posts: 132
Joined: Oct 2005
Thanks! I will try the Oppo first and see how it looks.
tjcinnamon's Avatar tjcinnamon
12:08 PM Liked: 27
post #4414 of 6325
06-14-2014 | Posts: 151
Joined: Jul 2008
Is the Oppo 103D going to have that much of a difference between perhaps a $200 Samsung, Panasonic, or Sony blu-ray player or is it for true videophiles where the layperson wouldn't notice?

I'd be pairing it with a Vizio R or P series OR a panny AX900 or something else very good reviews in late 2014 early 2015.

Thanks,
JOe K.
wmcclain's Avatar wmcclain
12:20 PM Liked: 397
post #4415 of 6325
06-14-2014 | Posts: 17,923
Joined: May 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjcinnamon View Post
Is the Oppo 103D going to have that much of a difference between perhaps a $200 Samsung, Panasonic, or Sony blu-ray player or is it for true videophiles where the layperson wouldn't notice?

I'd be pairing it with a Vizio R or P series OR a panny AX900 or something else very good reviews in late 2014 early 2015.

Thanks,
JOe K.
I'll go with videophile.

-Bill
htwaits's Avatar htwaits
12:34 PM Liked: 482
post #4416 of 6325
06-14-2014 | Posts: 24,868
Joined: Sep 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjcinnamon View Post
Is the Oppo 103D going to have that much of a difference between perhaps a $200 Samsung, Panasonic, or Sony blu-ray player or is it for true videophiles where the layperson wouldn't notice?

I'd be pairing it with a Vizio R or P series OR a panny AX900 or something else very good reviews in late 2014 early 2015.

Thanks,
JOe K.
That depends on what features you're interested in. For Blu-ray discs you would be fine with last years Sony or Panasonic players at sub $100 prices.

If you have a big collections of DVD movies you would probably find that the OPPO does a better job of converting 480i to 1080p. But maybe not.
tjcinnamon's Avatar tjcinnamon
01:05 PM Liked: 27
post #4417 of 6325
06-14-2014 | Posts: 151
Joined: Jul 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by htwaits View Post
That depends on what features you're interested in. For Blu-ray discs you would be fine with last years Sony or Panasonic players at sub $100 prices.

If you have a big collections of DVD movies you would probably find that the OPPO does a better job of converting 480i to 1080p. But maybe not.
yeah, it would be Blu-Ray discs. The reason I'm curious is because in 2009 I went from a cheap Phillips DVD player to an Oppo and the difference was strikingly noticeable. I don't know if that would be the case anymore considering the quality of blu-ray discs. But that said, I never would have expected such a difference when I shelled out the extra for a quality DVD player (back in the day).

Considering I'll be rolling 4k, perhaps the upconvert for 1080p BR to 4k MIGHT be worth it. If there is an increase in color depth, that would be a selling point as well (perhaps a newer OPPO model, after all it's gonna be 2015 when I pull the trigger).

Any further advice/experience appreciated,
JOe K.
jlpowell84's Avatar jlpowell84
01:34 PM Liked: 288
post #4418 of 6325
06-14-2014 | Posts: 4,733
Joined: Dec 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjcinnamon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by htwaits View Post
That depends on what features you're interested in. For Blu-ray discs you would be fine with last years Sony or Panasonic players at sub $100 prices.

If you have a big collections of DVD movies you would probably find that the OPPO does a better job of converting 480i to 1080p. But maybe not.
yeah, it would be Blu-Ray discs. The reason I'm curious is because in 2009 I went from a cheap Phillips DVD player to an Oppo and the difference was strikingly noticeable. I don't know if that would be the case anymore considering the quality of blu-ray discs. But that said, I never would have expected such a difference when I shelled out the extra for a quality DVD player (back in the day).

Considering I'll be rolling 4k, perhaps the upconvert for 1080p BR to 4k MIGHT be worth it. If there is an increase in color depth, that would be a selling point as well (perhaps a newer OPPO model, after all it's gonna be 2015 when I pull the trigger).

Any further advice/experience appreciated,
JOe K.
Well I would say a big factor would be if you want to use the Darbee processing right? I just made the jump on a simple 50 inch Panasonic plasma and the difference is stunning! Also the quality factor of the Oppo equipment is very nice as well
tjcinnamon's Avatar tjcinnamon
01:49 PM Liked: 27
post #4419 of 6325
06-14-2014 | Posts: 151
Joined: Jul 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlpowell84 View Post

Well I would say a big factor would be if you want to use the Darbee processing right? I just made the jump on a simple 50 inch Panasonic plasma and the difference is stunning! Also the quality factor of the Oppo equipment is very nice as well
yes, If I'm shelling out $500+ for a blu ray player I'm going big with it.

Curious if playing it through MadVr as opposed to the Oppo with Darbee would yield better results (this is an HTPC with a beefy GPU). Too bad I can't get a demo of one of these
hernanu's Avatar hernanu
03:40 PM Liked: 333
post #4420 of 6325
06-14-2014 | Posts: 2,739
Joined: Apr 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjcinnamon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlpowell84 View Post

Well I would say a big factor would be if you want to use the Darbee processing right? I just made the jump on a simple 50 inch Panasonic plasma and the difference is stunning! Also the quality factor of the Oppo equipment is very nice as well
yes, If I'm shelling out $500+ for a blu ray player I'm going big with it.

Curious if playing it through MadVr as opposed to the Oppo with Darbee would yield better results (this is an HTPC with a beefy GPU). Too bad I can't get a demo of one of these
Well it's not a demo but the return policy is good - if you don't like it, you are just out return shipping.
Benje2's Avatar Benje2
04:12 PM Liked: 11
post #4421 of 6325
06-14-2014 | Posts: 74
Joined: Feb 2009
Was tweaking my OPPO 103d (AU) and got unnecessarily confused (I think).

I run into a Denon 3808a via hdmi, and generally bitstream the dsd for decoding by the denon 3808a. It has worked well on my previous 83 and 93, and seemed to be working on my 103d.

I then saw on the FAQ and on here (and read in the manual) that the oppo 103d won't output dsd over hdmi 1, so you should use hdmi 2. I didn't like this answer as it introduces extra complexity into my set-up. But then I thought - I am already using hdmi 1, and am getting dsd output (at least I think I am). How can this be?

Then I read a little further and I see that DSD and the Marvell Qdeo video processor chip are incompatible. So, I can understand why I might have an issue with an OPPO 103. But I have a 103D which does not have a Qdeo video chip - it has the Darbee Visual Presence and the Silicon Image VRS ClearView video processors. So, perhaps that is why I get to receive DSD over hdmi 1 as I thought I was receiving (and as my denon 388a was telling me.

If this is so, perhaps a clarifying comment in the unofficial FAQ would be good to explain the difference on the 103 and the 103D, and the next OPPO manual update could amend the note to SACD DSD Output (point 4 on Audio Format Setup, page 64?

Or I could just be imagining things.

Benje
Bob Pariseau's Avatar Bob Pariseau
04:46 PM Liked: 1063
post #4422 of 6325
06-14-2014 | Posts: 28,212
Joined: Jul 2004
^ Nope, you figured it out.

The 103D and 105D relax this restriction. HDMI DSD is available on both the HDMI 1 and HDMI 2 outputs of those, if connected to an AVR that can accept that.
--Bob
Benje2's Avatar Benje2
06:09 PM Liked: 11
post #4423 of 6325
06-14-2014 | Posts: 74
Joined: Feb 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Pariseau View Post
^ Nope, you figured it out.

The 103D and 105D relax this restriction. HDMI DSD is available on both the HDMI 1 and HDMI 2 outputs of those, if connected to an AVR that can accept that.
--Bob
thanks Bob, reassuring to know - I haven't lost all of my marbles! Yet.
cardoski's Avatar cardoski
01:09 AM Liked: 120
post #4424 of 6325
06-15-2014 | Posts: 981
Joined: Feb 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjcinnamon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlpowell84 View Post

Well I would say a big factor would be if you want to use the Darbee processing right? I just made the jump on a simple 50 inch Panasonic plasma and the difference is stunning! Also the quality factor of the Oppo equipment is very nice as well
yes, If I'm shelling out $500+ for a blu ray player I'm going big with it.

Curious if playing it through MadVr as opposed to the Oppo with Darbee would yield better results (this is an HTPC with a beefy GPU). Too bad I can't get a demo of one of these

MadVr looks better in my opinion, the OPPO is no better at blu-ray playback then a cheap BD player. It is nice build quality and the darbee is ok but a HTPC offers a lot of customization and tweaking.
vodil's Avatar vodil
04:19 PM Liked: 10
post #4425 of 6325
06-15-2014 | Posts: 63
Joined: Feb 2007
I would like to use my 103d as a video post processor and I was hoping that I could use ARC so that I only needed one cable from AVR to OPPO to Display.

Has anyone gotten that to work?
Bob Pariseau's Avatar Bob Pariseau
04:47 PM Liked: 1063
post #4426 of 6325
06-15-2014 | Posts: 28,212
Joined: Jul 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by vodil View Post
I would like to use my 103d as a video post processor and I was hoping that I could use ARC so that I only needed one cable from AVR to OPPO to Display.

Has anyone gotten that to work?
When you are using Audio Return Channel (i.e., digital audio coming back into the OPPO along the HDMI cable that is normally the OUTPUT to the Display) there is no video content going through the OPPO. So if your plan was to do both at the same time, the answer is that won't work.
--Bob
vodil's Avatar vodil
06:22 PM Liked: 10
post #4427 of 6325
06-15-2014 | Posts: 63
Joined: Feb 2007
[quote=Bob Pariseau;24992058]
Quote:
Originally Posted by vodil View Post
When you are using Audio Return Channel (i.e., digital audio coming back into the OPPO along the HDMI cable that is normally the OUTPUT to the Display) there is no video content going through the OPPO. So if your plan was to do both at the same time, the answer is that won't work.
--Bob
Sorry. I was unclear. I want to use the Audio Return from the OPPO to the AVR for when the OPPO is working. In other words I would like the AVR to think the OPPO is the "TV" and its getting its sounds from ARC. If it works it saves a lot of cabling and obviates HDMI loops.
Bob Pariseau's Avatar Bob Pariseau
06:34 PM Liked: 1063
post #4428 of 6325
06-15-2014 | Posts: 28,212
Joined: Jul 2004
^ Nope. The OPPO only implements ARC for audio INPUT, not OUTPUT. Just use a regular HDMI output of the OPPO to your AVR.
--Bob
gsr's Avatar gsr
06:34 PM Liked: 246
post #4429 of 6325
06-15-2014 | Posts: 7,747
Joined: Apr 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by vodil View Post
Sorry. I was unclear. I want to use the Audio Return from the OPPO to the AVR for when the OPPO is working. In other words I would like the AVR to think the OPPO is the "TV" and its getting its sounds from ARC. If it works it saves a lot of cabling and obviates HDMI loops.
ARC only works for getting audio INTO the Oppo, the Oppo won't send audio from the Oppo's HDMI inputs back to your AVR.
WhiskeyOmega's Avatar WhiskeyOmega
06:40 PM Liked: 17
post #4430 of 6325
06-15-2014 | Posts: 268
Joined: Apr 2014
So I could change the input on the tv to send the audio through the hdmi and back out to the avr on the hdmi 2 output?

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Bob Pariseau's Avatar Bob Pariseau
07:39 PM Liked: 1063
post #4431 of 6325
06-15-2014 | Posts: 28,212
Joined: Jul 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiskeyOmega View Post
So I could change the input on the tv to send the audio through the hdmi and back out to the avr on the hdmi 2 output?

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Yes, if your TV also implements Audio Return Channel (may only be on one TV input).

The idea is that when you are watching via the internal channel tuner of the TV, you can use the existing (but unused for this type of viewing) HDMI input cable into the TV to instead send that TV Chanel's audio back OUT of the TV. Normally this would go back to the AVR, but in this case it would become an audio-only Input of the OPPO. It saves having to run another cable out of the TV for that audio.
--Bob
WhiskeyOmega's Avatar WhiskeyOmega
07:50 PM Liked: 17
post #4432 of 6325
06-15-2014 | Posts: 268
Joined: Apr 2014
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Pariseau View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiskeyOmega View Post
So I could change the input on the tv to send the audio through the hdmi and back out to the avr on the hdmi 2 output?

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Yes, if your TV also implements Audio Return Channel (may only be on one TV input).

The idea is that when you are watching via the internal channel tuner of the TV, you can use the existing (but unused for this type of viewing) HDMI input cable into the TV to instead send that TV Chanel's audio back OUT of the TV. Normally this would go back to the AVR, but in this case it would become an audio-only Input of the OPPO. It saves having to run another cable out of the TV for that audio.
--Bob
Wouldn't it just be easier to have the one hdmi going from the oppo to an avr then on to the TV. Provided the avr supports 4k of course. I would however run my sky box through the oppo on the way to the avr for the darbee.


It certainly becomes a cloudy mess when lots of inputs and outputs are involved

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Bob Pariseau's Avatar Bob Pariseau
07:54 PM Liked: 1063
post #4433 of 6325
06-15-2014 | Posts: 28,212
Joined: Jul 2004
^ Of course. Like I said, Audio Return Channel is designed for use with the TV's *INTERNAL* channel tuner -- or perhaps its built in Internet apps. No SkyTV box involved.
--Bob
WhiskeyOmega's Avatar WhiskeyOmega
07:56 PM Liked: 17
post #4434 of 6325
06-15-2014 | Posts: 268
Joined: Apr 2014
Yea I'm trying to work out my system for optimal results that I'll be installing this week. It also includes a ps4 but as video processing including darbee I'm sure causes lag I think it's best to go direct from ps4 to TV

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
vodil's Avatar vodil
11:27 AM Liked: 10
post #4435 of 6325
06-16-2014 | Posts: 63
Joined: Feb 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Pariseau View Post
^ Of course. Like I said, Audio Return Channel is designed for use with the TV's *INTERNAL* channel tuner -- or perhaps it's built in Internet apps.
--Bob
Too bad. OPPO should consider adding ARC to the HDMI-in in-back so that the the wiring is greatly simplified. One HDMI cable between the OPPO-AVR; one HDMI cable between OPPO-DISPLAY. For Disks, the audio from the OPPO goes back on ARC to AVR and Video to Displays. All other video sources go through AVR and video goes through OPPO (for processing) and on to displays.
vodil's Avatar vodil
11:33 AM Liked: 10
post #4436 of 6325
06-16-2014 | Posts: 63
Joined: Feb 2007
When I get my Onkyo 3009 back from warranty work, I am giving up on Onkyos after a dozen years and 4 different models. The reliability has just been too bad.

So my question for the people who can appreciate (and of course afford) the quality of OPPO, what is the modern AVR of choice. I'd like to not have to think about replacing it for the rest of the decade.
Bob Pariseau's Avatar Bob Pariseau
11:49 AM Liked: 1063
post #4437 of 6325
06-16-2014 | Posts: 28,212
Joined: Jul 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by vodil View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Pariseau View Post
^ Of course. Like I said, Audio Return Channel is designed for use with the TV's *INTERNAL* channel tuner -- or perhaps it's built in Internet apps.
--Bob
Too bad. OPPO should consider adding ARC to the HDMI-in in-back so that the the wiring is greatly simplified. One HDMI cable between the OPPO-AVR; one HDMI cable between OPPO-DISPLAY. For Disks, the audio from the OPPO goes back on ARC to AVR and Video to Displays. All other video sources go through AVR and video goes through OPPO (for processing) and on to displays.
Nope. Audio Return Channel is too limited in the audio formats it carries. Audiophiles need not apply. It's like Optical/COAX (S/PDif) cabling. Lossy DD and DTS (up to 5.1) and stereo (only) LPCM.

It's really just another, typical half-measure from HDMI.ORG to gussy up the spec. Not particularly well thought out for any sort of general use.

It is for TV channel audio. That's it.
--Bob
Fanboyz's Avatar Fanboyz
01:37 PM Liked: 19
post #4438 of 6325
06-16-2014 | Posts: 2,444
Joined: Dec 2007
anybody ever hear their player make a momentary squeal?
I heard the sound twice in the last month, it could also be my Cable DVR or the plumbing in my house...
met_fan's Avatar met_fan
05:41 PM Liked: 20
post #4439 of 6325
06-16-2014 | Posts: 478
Joined: Jan 2007
I started watching Captain Phillips on my 103D the other night, but could not get the subtitles to show. I was watching via an mkv file (made with MakeMKV) from an NAS on my local network. The file has three PGS subtitles to choose from and I cycled through all of them trying to find the forced subs for when the pirates were speaking. None of the subtitle choices showed any subs for me. I switched over to playing the file on my Boxee Box and all three subtitle choices worked and I was able to select the option that only showed when the pirates spoke. This was the first time I had tried to watch subs with my Oppo, so the next day I tried out some other movies on my NAS to see if any worked. On some movies the subs would show, but for others I couldn't get anything to show (everything showed on the Boxee). From what I've been able to find, it seems PGS subtitles should work on the Oppo - am I wrong?
wmcclain's Avatar wmcclain
05:47 PM Liked: 397
post #4440 of 6325
06-16-2014 | Posts: 17,923
Joined: May 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by met_fan View Post
From what I've been able to find, it seems PGS subtitles should work on the Oppo - am I wrong?
I use them and have had no difficulty, but I know forced subtitles are a topic of considerable anguish in the ripping threads. I haven't studied the matter but everything seems to work for me. I haven't seen Capt Phillips.

-Bill
Tags: Oppo , Oppo Bdp 103 3d Blu Ray Player , Oppo Bdp 103d Universal 3d Blu Ray Player Darbee Edition , Oppo Brand , Oppo Digital , Oppo Digital Inc

Gear in this thread - 103d by PriceGrabber.com
Reply Blu-ray Players

Subscribe to this Thread

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3