Blu-ray showing in Dallas, March 3-5 - Page 2 - AVS Forum

AVS Forum > Blu-ray & HD DVD > Blu-ray Players > Blu-ray showing in Dallas, March 3-5

Blu-ray Players

bferr1's Avatar bferr1
09:25 PM Liked: 10
post #31 of 48
03-04-2006 | Posts: 3,388
Joined: Feb 2004
Thanks for the advice, Thebarnman, but logically I should get the Sony before I get the Pioneer. The Sony also doesn't have built-in decoders, but at least it plays CDs.

Does anyone know what the specs are for that Samsung? Of course, it'll probably use the Faroujda deinterlacer/scaler for SD DVD, and that creates macroblocking with my display.

Maybe I should find a new hobby... :rolleyes:
Ja Phule's Avatar Ja Phule
12:02 AM Liked: 10
post #32 of 48
03-05-2006 | Posts: 7,046
Joined: Aug 2004
I like how on the pdf, they talk about its use for gaming and shows a picture of a controller that looks a lot like an xbox controller.
WiFi-Spy's Avatar WiFi-Spy
12:49 AM Liked: 33
post #33 of 48
03-05-2006 | Posts: 2,311
Joined: Feb 2004
nice work SONY , umm..... Spiderman 2 OAR is 2.35:1 , not 1.78 :rolleyes:
bdavidson's Avatar bdavidson
07:06 AM Liked: 10
post #34 of 48
03-05-2006 | Posts: 366
Joined: Jun 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by dugpa
The DVD/Blu-ray comparison showed Blu-ray being a lot sharper than dvd, but honestly I don't think I've ever seen dvd look as bad as they made it in their demo.
Sounds just as lame as the Toshiba split screen demo.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dugpa
Overall the Blu-ray images looked pretty good, but there were a lot more compression artifacts than I expected to see. For having all this extra disc space it didn't look like they were taking much advantage of it, and the encoding didn't look much better than standard dvd.
Thats pretty sad. So much for using MPEG2.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dugpa
Like the Pioneer Elite player, the Sony won't have any internal decoders for the new audio formats, so you'll have to wait for new receivers that handle the formats to be able to take advantage of them. Also, the Sony Blu-ray player does not support SACD.
Are there any BD players that decode the new audio formats like the Toshiba HD-DVD players?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dugpa
I asked him about Sony's somewhat poor choice of launch titles (IMHO anyway) and he said the titles they picked were originally geared towards gamers because they had planned for the PS3 to be the first player BD released. Since it got delayed that kind of messed things up.
Great... So much for good Sony movies. Maybe this is why the video quality wasnt up to snuff. Most gamers are not really video enthusiasts.
Grubert's Avatar Grubert
07:53 AM Liked: 11
post #35 of 48
03-05-2006 | Posts: 7,892
Joined: Sep 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by WiFi-Spy
nice work SONY , umm..... Spiderman 2 OAR is 2.35:1 , not 1.78 :rolleyes:
That happened on the HD DVD demo too - some of the trailers used were presented in 2.35:1 widescreen with the appropriate letterbox bars, but some of them were modified to fill the 16:9 screen. A trailer is not necessarily representative of the AR of the actual disc.
Esox50's Avatar Esox50
10:00 AM Liked: 12
post #36 of 48
03-05-2006 | Posts: 1,473
Joined: Dec 2004
This sounds so similar to the HD-DVD demo that it is scary.

That being said, I seem to remember reading about this demo shortly after CES 2005, so it could be over a year old. I think they had this demo showing off the first versions of the Qualia 006 at some of the Sony Qualia Stores. I remember people talking about pixelation during some of the scene transitions on the Spiderman 2 scenes. In addition, people weren't too happy with the LOA transfer either, so they were wondering which source elements were used.

In the end, it's hard to judge from these demos. You don't know how it's mastered, the bit-rates, etc. I want to see both products from production models and discs.
bferr1's Avatar bferr1
10:06 AM Liked: 10
post #37 of 48
03-05-2006 | Posts: 3,388
Joined: Feb 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grubert
That happened on the HD DVD demo too - some of the trailers used were presented in 2.35:1 widescreen with the appropriate letterbox bars, but some of them were modified to fill the 16:9 screen. A trailer is not necessarily representative of the AR of the actual disc.
Grubert, dugpa did say that they showed the Spider-Man 2 trailer and some clips from the movie. It's not clear to me where the screengrabs came from. If they're from the movie, then they are indeed incorrectly formatted.
dugpa's Avatar dugpa
01:16 PM Liked: 10
post #38 of 48
03-05-2006 | Posts: 1,093
Joined: May 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by bferr1
Grubert, dugpa did say that they showed the Spider-Man 2 trailer and some clips from the movie. It's not clear to me where the screengrabs came from. If they're from the movie, then they are indeed incorrectly formatted.
The Spiderman 2 images are indeed from the clip from the actual film they showed, not the trailer. And it was in the wrong aspect ratio. But I suspect they re-formated it for the demo disc to make it fill up the screen. At least that's what I'm hoping.
DaveFi's Avatar DaveFi
01:39 PM Liked: 26
post #39 of 48
03-05-2006 | Posts: 17,180
Joined: Nov 2002
Spiderman2 was shot open matte and shown that way on HBO. I do hope Sony doesn't start releasing movies open matted/cropped because they think they're marketing them towards "gamers" with the PS3.
dialog_gvf's Avatar dialog_gvf
02:10 PM Liked: 10
post #40 of 48
03-05-2006 | Posts: 4,990
Joined: Nov 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveFi
Spiderman2 was shot open matte and shown that way on HBO. I do hope Sony doesn't start releasing movies open matted/cropped because they think they're marketing them towards "gamers" with the PS3.
Uh huh.

That's the hidden danger of the PS/3. Yes, it can push the format, but in what direction?

Gary
Paulidan's Avatar Paulidan
03:11 PM Liked: 19
post #41 of 48
03-05-2006 | Posts: 2,013
Joined: Feb 2005
Sony (and MGM) are already the worst studios for maintaining OAR- why would that philosophy change with the introduction of Bd?
Sony is also the biggest offender when it comes to multiple releases (next to Universal)- With Sony taking the opportunity at some point to distinguish one of the versions as the 'high quality' version. The Superbit stunt seemed to work well for them on DVD so i'm sure we will see a replication of that on Bd at some point in the future.
Thebarnman's Avatar Thebarnman
11:31 AM Liked: 15
post #42 of 48
03-06-2006 | Posts: 3,179
Joined: Feb 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulidan
Sony (and MGM) are already the worst studios for maintaining OAR- why would that philosophy change with the introduction of Bd?
I would hope it would change somewhat because the Bd movies can only be played on HDTV sets, and most of those have wider screen aspect ratios when compaired to most NTSC sets.
Paulidan's Avatar Paulidan
01:30 PM Liked: 19
post #43 of 48
03-06-2006 | Posts: 2,013
Joined: Feb 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thebarnman
I would hope it would change somewhat because the Bd movies can only be played on HDTV sets, and most of those have wider screen aspect ratios when compaired to most NTSC sets.
i don't think they will be cropping 2.35 films to 4:3 and then pillar boxing them, but it wouldn't surprise me at all, given their past SOP, if some of their 2.35 films were 'opened', or cropped to 16:9 (1.85) to fill that screen.
Thebarnman's Avatar Thebarnman
03:22 PM Liked: 15
post #44 of 48
03-06-2006 | Posts: 3,179
Joined: Feb 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulidan
i don't think they will be cropping 2.35 films to 4:3 and then pillar boxing them, but it wouldn't surprise me at all, given their past SOP, if some of their 2.35 films were 'opened', or cropped to 16:9 (1.85) to fill that screen.
The cropping the 2.35:1 films to full screen HDTV screen is what I was talking about. Yes, I agree with you that they would probably do that on some titles, though with the wider screen aspect ratio of HDTVs, the black bars would not be as thick on the top and bottom like it would be for 4:3 TVs and SHOULD not bother people as much about some thin black bars.

By the way, small correction, 2.35:1 movies would not be cropped to 1.85:1 to fill the HDTV screen, that is a movie ratio format, though you had it right when you stated 16X9...that's 1.77:1 not 1.85:1.
Paulidan's Avatar Paulidan
03:41 PM Liked: 19
post #45 of 48
03-06-2006 | Posts: 2,013
Joined: Feb 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thebarnman

By the way, small correction, 2.35:1 movies would not be cropped to 1.85:1 to fill the HDTV screen, that is a movie ratio format, though you had it right when you stated 16X9...that's 1.77:1 not 1.85:1.
thanks for that. poor math skills on my part
:o
nyg's Avatar nyg
06:31 PM Liked: 10
post #46 of 48
03-06-2006 | Posts: 6,687
Joined: Feb 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by efranzen
I read about this flyer going around in another thread. Any idea if there is a Seattle area date planned?
I too want to know if BD is having a demo tour? I'd love to check it out in the Milwaukee/Waukesha, Wisconsin area. I'll be heading to an HD DVD demo in Waukesha soon. Certainly the BDA can arrange a visit too.
nucleicoutfit's Avatar nucleicoutfit
06:59 PM Liked: 10
post #47 of 48
03-06-2006 | Posts: 10
Joined: Mar 2006
I'd like to see some larger comparison shots if anyone has a link.
Dan Hitchman's Avatar Dan Hitchman
12:16 AM Liked: 538
post #48 of 48
03-07-2006 | Posts: 9,249
Joined: Jul 2000
Spiderman 2 was shot (supposedly) in anamorphic Panavision (like Batman Begins) rather than Super 35. They'd be cropping the sides, not opening anything up.

I would think this the same demo that has been used for over a year, and is quite long in the tooth rather than totally indicative the Blu-Ray technology of today. The player isn't even the model that's going to be released this summer, but the old Japanese model that isn't compatible with today's Blu-Ray discs.

We shall see...

Of course, I probably will be waiting until the 2nd generation players to see if the bugs and features get ironed out, and they add HDMI 1.3 outputs.

Dan

Closed Thread Blu-ray Players

Subscribe to this Thread

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3