Official Sony Bdp-300/301 Owners Thread - Page 4 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #91 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 04:05 PM
AVS Special Member
 
ryoohki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Repentigny, Québec, Canada
Posts: 3,411
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
http://www.sigmadesigns.com/public/P...30_series.html

There a PDF on Profile 1.1 with that chip serie

http://www.sigmadesigns.com/public/P...ray8634_br.pdf

89+ Blu-ray Disc ;)
ryoohki is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #92 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 04:26 PM
AVS Special Member
 
whippersnapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
[quote=lparsons21]
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnscg View Post


Yes, the BD player does have a 'bright room' setting, but I didn't know that at first. I adjusted the TV brightness up just a bit and it looked very good.

Then I found that you could change the video setting on the player by going to the system menu while playing a BD. There you could pick a few things, one being 'bright room'.

I selected that, readjusted the TV back to where it had initially been and all was good.

Let me add that the room is bright right now, so that makes sense. I'll fiddle with it again tonight just to see how it all looks under different light conditions.

I'll be glad when my other disks show up, Crank is starting to get boring! And you can only take so much, no strike that, I can take more of Amy Smart's boob!

" I can take more of Amy Smart's boob!" Well, it's tough work, but someone's gotta do it! Enjoy the new player.
whippersnapper is offline  
post #93 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 04:29 PM
Senior Member
 
rbrb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 367
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by foxfan View Post

I can't wait to get this player, but I want to be sure of one thing first: Is it able to display an image on "pause" without having what looks like comb lines around edges? My current Sony DVD player and the original Sony Blu-Ray player I saw on demo both have this problem when I try to view the 20th Century Fox logo on pause (connected with HDMI). The Samsung player didn't have this problem.

I really hope this issue was corrected by Sony for this player.

I know what you mean. I hate having to sit there watching the Fox logo on pause with this problem also.
rbrb is offline  
post #94 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 04:34 PM
AVS Special Member
 
cpcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Vidalia, GA
Posts: 6,471
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by kjack View Post

For those of you experiencing a "dark" picture, are you using HDMI or component?

From the OM, there are settings to configure the HDMI/DVI output to YCbCr, RGB(15-235), and RGBPC (0-255). Excellent, assuming it functions correctly.

Also, the "source direct" setting for HDMI outputs "whatever is on the disc" which according to the OM will output 480i for SD and 1080p24 for HD. Very nice.
cpcat is offline  
post #95 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 04:54 PM
Member
 
SOCCERrebel5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 166
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Can somebody please verify that the new player can decode Dolby TrueHD and output it via the 5.1 analog outs? I am also curious about everyone's epinion about the sound quality and support overall. Thanks!
SOCCERrebel5 is offline  
post #96 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 05:03 PM
AVS Special Member
 
lparsons21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpcat View Post

From the OM, there are settings to configure the HDMI/DVI output to YCbCr, RGB(15-235), and RGBPC (0-255). Excellent, assuming it functions correctly.

Also, the "source direct" setting for HDMI outputs "whatever is on the disc" which according to the OM will output 480i for SD and 1080p24 for HD. Very nice.

I was just getting ready to post. I had done the quick setup, which really doesn't address the HDMI output, and it defaults to YCbCr. Setting it to RGB(15-235), which is what most current tvs expect, solved the dark issue.

Lloyd
lparsons21 is offline  
post #97 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 05:26 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Ken Ross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 23,711
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrgribbles View Post

Probably because its 1.3 lite. They would have to meet all the specs for 1.3 in order to be licensed for it and advertise it as such. I'd guess they're picking and choosing what 1.3 features to add to an earlier release. It is more interesting that they don't quote any spec. On a more benevolent take, perhaps its so new it hasn't qualified yet to the spec.

I think this is one for HDMI org. to get to the bottom of.

Crutchfield site is pretty specific, it does say it has 1.3.
Ken Ross is offline  
post #98 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 05:52 PM
Member
 
shack2009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 66
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace of Space View Post

Here's a review I found online.
http://www.hometheaterblog.com/homet...0_bl.html#more

"...which looked excellent sans a bit of macro-blocking in several of the scenes with explosions..."

Macro-blockling! How can this be?
shack2009 is offline  
post #99 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 06:04 PM
AVS Special Member
 
foxfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,013
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbrb View Post

I know what you mean. I hate having to sit there watching the Fox logo on pause with this problem also.

A little sarcasm, eh?

FYI, I was just mentioning the Fox logo as an EXAMPLE to see a problem that was visible on any still image. However, you might be surprised to see the inside jokes that you see with the HD version of that logo on pause (such as "Murdoch's" and "Chernin's" written in small print in the Hollywood background).
foxfan is offline  
post #100 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 06:05 PM
 
Slim GoodBooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,179
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by shack2009 View Post

"...which looked excellent sans a bit of macro-blocking in several of the scenes with explosions..."

Macro-blockling! How can this be?

It's a feature of compressing the crap out of video. It's always present to some degree.
Slim GoodBooty is offline  
post #101 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 06:11 PM
Member
 
shack2009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 66
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slim GoodBooty View Post

It's a feature of compressing the crap out of video. It's always present to some degree.

I thought BR had such a fast bit rate you would never see this? Are some players better than others? Or is it more about the disk? MPEG4 or something
shack2009 is offline  
post #102 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 06:14 PM
Member
 
SOCCERrebel5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 166
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I've heard that several players are having trouble loading and playing POTC. The review that was posted (via a link) also mentions it. I'm a little confused. My understanding was that Java was really only used when trying to perform functions such as PIP, not straightforward playback. Presuming this player is profile 1.0 rather than 1.1, would that mean that any BD with advanced menus and such (like POTC) will not be played quickly and smoothly even if only trying to play the main feature??
SOCCERrebel5 is offline  
post #103 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 06:15 PM
 
Slim GoodBooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,179
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by shack2009 View Post

I thought BR had such a fast bit rate you would never see this? Are some players better than others?

I've mentioned it before. Actually, BD seems to suffer fro it more than HDDVD. It isn't cable/sat type macroblocking though. It's quick and small nd most people most likely don't even notice it. As these are the kinds of scenes that are known to have it, I'm sure that serious efforts were made to put the breaks on it. Maybe the bitrates that some BDs have just can't be sucked off of a disc at the present time.
Slim GoodBooty is offline  
post #104 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 06:16 PM
 
Slim GoodBooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,179
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOCCERrebel5 View Post

I've heard that several players are having trouble loading and playing POTC. The review that was posted (via a link) also mentions it. I'm a little confused. My understanding was that Java was really only used when trying to perform functions such as PIP, not straightforward playback. Presuming this player is profile 1.0 rather than 1.1, would that mean that any BD with advanced menus and such (like POTC) will not be played quickly and smoothly even if only trying to play the main feature??

The Pirates discs are BD-J from start to finish.
Slim GoodBooty is offline  
post #105 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 06:25 PM
Member
 
SOCCERrebel5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 166
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
So basically it doesn't matter how great the player's picture quality and audio quality are. If Sony cannot do a firmwire update that makes the player profile 1.1 there will be many BD's in the future that the player will have difficulty with. That really sucks. I thought I had finally found the player that I was going to purchase. Any input on this is welcome.
SOCCERrebel5 is offline  
post #106 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 06:29 PM
 
Slim GoodBooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,179
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOCCERrebel5 View Post

So basically it doesn't matter how great the player's picture quality and audio quality are. If Sony cannot do a firmwire update that makes the player profile 1.1 there will be many BD's in the future that the player will have difficulty with. That really sucks. I thought I had finally found the player that I was going to purchase. Any input on this is welcome.

Unfortunately, I'm beginning to believe that this is the future of BD. They may never get this right on a machine that normal folks can afford. It would be better for all if Sony was t fix this now, if it can be fixed.
Slim GoodBooty is offline  
post #107 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 06:30 PM
AVS Special Member
 
ryoohki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Repentigny, Québec, Canada
Posts: 3,411
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by shack2009 View Post

"...which looked excellent sans a bit of macro-blocking in several of the scenes with explosions..."

Macro-blockling! How can this be?

SANS = French for ,without , Not, never, NADA in that case

Traduction :

Witch looked excelent without macro blocking in several of the scense with explosions...

89+ Blu-ray Disc ;)
ryoohki is offline  
post #108 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 06:32 PM
AVS Special Member
 
ryoohki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Repentigny, Québec, Canada
Posts: 3,411
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slim GoodBooty View Post

I've mentioned it before. Actually, BD seems to suffer fro it more than HDDVD. It isn't cable/sat type macroblocking though. It's quick and small nd most people most likely don't even notice it. As these are the kinds of scenes that are known to have it, I'm sure that serious efforts were made to put the breaks on it. Maybe the bitrates that some BDs have just can't be sucked off of a disc at the present time.

HD DVD have another problem, most notably in Warner BD disc, it's called Posterization and it's there on most of their release..

89+ Blu-ray Disc ;)
ryoohki is offline  
post #109 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 06:34 PM
 
Slim GoodBooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,179
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryoohki View Post

SANS = French for ,without , Not, never, NADA in that case

Traduction :

Witch looked excelent without macro blocking in several of the scense with explosions...

Not that I actually understood your post, but what I think you said makes no sense in the context of that sentence.
Slim GoodBooty is offline  
post #110 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 06:36 PM
 
Slim GoodBooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,179
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryoohki View Post

HD DVD have another problem, most notably in Warner BD disc, it's called Posterization and it's there on most of their release..

I see that and banding on lots of high bandwidth BDs as well. Either they can't get rid of it or won't. It is early in the formats, but not really early in the decoding.
Slim GoodBooty is offline  
post #111 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 06:38 PM
AVS Special Member
 
lparsons21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOCCERrebel5 View Post

So basically it doesn't matter how great the player's picture quality and audio quality are. If Sony cannot do a firmwire update that makes the player profile 1.1 there will be many BD's in the future that the player will have difficulty with. That really sucks. I thought I had finally found the player that I was going to purchase. Any input on this is welcome.

So the latest hot movie on BluRay is not so hot in terms of performance? Then why put it out in a form that current players will all have problems with?

The S300 is 2nd generation, not the 'newest technology'. I would expect that the 2nd gen products wouludn't have the same problems that the 1st gen do.

Lloyd
lparsons21 is offline  
post #112 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 06:41 PM
AVS Special Member
 
shinksma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wandering the intertubes, on the way to damnation
Posts: 2,825
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryoohki View Post

SANS = French for ,without , Not, never, NADA in that case

Traduction :

Witch looked excelent without macro blocking in several of the scense with explosions...

Though your translation is technically correct, I don't believe it is the intent of the review. English speakers tend to abuse the true meaning of foreign phrases.

I think what they were trying to say was "which looked excellent except for a little macro blocking in several of the scenes with explosions..."

IMHO, YMMV,

shinksma

My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect those of my captors.
shinksma is offline  
post #113 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 06:45 PM
Member
 
SOCCERrebel5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 166
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by lparsons21 View Post

So the latest hot movie on BluRay is not so hot in terms of performance? Then why put it out in a form that current players will all have problems with?

The S300 is 2nd generation, not the 'newest technology'. I would expect that the 2nd gen products wouludn't have the same problems that the 1st gen do.

I'm not sure I understand exactly what you mean, so please take no offense if I assume incorrectly...

While I completely agree that any BD, especially the really popular titles like POTC, should perform superbly on any BD player and that a 2nd generation player like the S300 should handle it all flawlessly, that does not change the fact that many people have reportly trouble loading titles like POTC. The samsung 1200, and now the s300 as well. Both of these may be upgradable to fix this problem, I don't know.
SOCCERrebel5 is offline  
post #114 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 06:52 PM
AVS Special Member
 
lparsons21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOCCERrebel5 View Post

I'm not sure I understand exactly what you mean, so please take no offense if I assume incorrectly...

While I completely agree that any BD, especially the really popular titles like POTC, should perform superbly on any BD player and that a 2nd generation player like the S300 should handle it all flawlessly, that does not change the fact that many people have reportly trouble loading titles like POTC. The samsung 1200, and now the s300 as well. Both of these may be upgradable to fix this problem, I don't know.

We are saying the same thing. All BD titles should run great on ALL BD players, especially 2nd Generation players. There is literally no valid excuse for this to be a non-issue. Is it because the specification isn't finalized? Is it because all that BD-J really doesn't work well? Is it because the mfgs and the studios don't communicate well?

Movies produced today should be supported by players mfg'd today PERIOD. This shouldn't have to be said, it is what makes sense.

/rant on
Unfortunately, these kinds of problems are all over CE these days. From BD players with BD-J problems, to HDDVD players having problems with some disks after frequent use, to AVR equipment described one way but really not doing what their own manuals say, heck even what their own tech support says.

Meanwhile, they are all lined up to take our money.
/rant off

Lloyd
lparsons21 is offline  
post #115 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 06:53 PM
AVS Special Member
 
shinksma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wandering the intertubes, on the way to damnation
Posts: 2,825
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 15
My suspicion about why heavy Java-oriented titles like POTC are problematic is that standalone players simply do not have the horsepower to process the Java code. Java can really bog down a non-optimized platform, and my bet is that the PS3 is optimized for it (perhaps due to the gaming architecture) but the other players are just overwhelmed by the not-quite streamlined Java code.

This is strongly IMHO, in fact it is highly speculative, since I have no inside info on what is really happening inside the units, so YMMV,

shinksma

My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect those of my captors.
shinksma is offline  
post #116 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 06:54 PM
Member
 
SOCCERrebel5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 166
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
People have stated that the S300 supports all of the advanced audio (TrueHD, DD+, and DTS-HD) via PCM. Can somebody who owns the player please check to see if these are also supported through the 5.1 analog outs and how good the sound quality is? I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks!
SOCCERrebel5 is offline  
post #117 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 06:57 PM
AVS Special Member
 
whippersnapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by lparsons21 View Post

So the latest hot movie on BluRay is not so hot in terms of performance? Then why put it out in a form that current players will all have problems with?

The S300 is 2nd generation, not the 'newest technology'. I would expect that the 2nd gen products wouludn't have the same problems that the 1st gen do.

I came to this thread (and will be back in the future) to get feedback from S300 owners. I know it's very early so you're in the vanguard of owners. So I appreciate your continued input. I also notice that there appear to be a lot of folks who have come here just to "blow smoke". Hopefully I'll be able to differentiate between the real "owners" and the smoke blowers. From what I've been able to piece together, I think you make a good move getting this player.
whippersnapper is offline  
post #118 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 07:02 PM
 
Slim GoodBooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,179
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by whippersnapper View Post

I came to this thread (and will be back in the future) to get feedback from S300 owners. I know it's very early so you're in the vanguard of owners. So I appreciate your continued input. I also notice that there appear to be a lot of folks who have come here just to "blow smoke". Hopefully I'll be able to differentiate between the real "owners" and the smoke blowers. From what I've been able to piece together, I think you make a good move getting this player.

I'm not unhappy to have one, but I am concerned about the POTC thing.
Slim GoodBooty is offline  
post #119 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 07:07 PM
AVS Special Member
 
lparsons21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinksma View Post

My suspicion about why heavy Java-oriented titles like POTC are problematic is that standalone players simply do not have the horsepower to process the Java code. Java can really bog down a non-optimized platform, and my bet is that the PS3 is optimized for it (perhaps due to the gaming architecture) but the other players are just overwhelmed by the not-quite streamlined Java code.

This is strongly IMHO, in fact it is highly speculative, since I have no inside info on what is really happening inside the units, so YMMV,

shinksma

From interpreting the different reports, I think you are spot on. But it doesn't matter why, it matters that it is! If we as consumers of these products expect it to change we have to be very vociferous to the mfgs and studios about their products performance.

I'm already doing that with another mfg and with an online video rental service. We are just about at the point where I'm gonna keep my money!

Lloyd
lparsons21 is offline  
post #120 of 4494 Old 06-14-2007, 07:10 PM
AVS Special Member
 
lparsons21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slim GoodBooty View Post

I'm not unhappy to have one, but I am concerned about the POTC thing.

I'm with you!

Tonight just happens to be the night I'm feeling frustrated. I want HiDef DVDs to succeed, whichever wins the war. It won't happen if the technology doesn't get more stable. While J6P might not read here, he does read or listen elsewhere. How impressed do you think he's gonna be when POTC or other demo doesn't work very well?

I'll tell you how. The plastic will stay in his wallet.

Lloyd
lparsons21 is offline  
Reply Blu-ray Players

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off