Steve's cheap build - Page 3 - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Forum Jump: 
 21Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #61 of 87 Old 10-31-2016, 09:45 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
steve1106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Northern, Va
Posts: 1,795
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 662 Post(s)
Liked: 389
This is my third Halloween on the forum. Once again the Atoms FearFx DVDs were a hit using two projectors, two shower curtains and two windows. I mixed it up this year and had the Phantasms roam around both windows while the Ghostly Apparitions stayed in their window. We made up 147 bags and once again the wife bought enough treats for three hundred kids. Once the 147 were exhausted at one bag per kid we just started putting in four or five pieces a bag to keep up with the crowds. I attached a picture again of the window and to be fair, what you see in the picture is a pale reflection of what you see in person.

One workday into retirement. On Friday, I was stripped of everything belonging to my agency and escorted off the property. Odd feeling and I kept waiting for the strip search..."Where did you get that pen?" Now if I can just live to 100 so they have to pay for my retirement for another 46 years.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01346a.jpg
Views:	246
Size:	137.3 KB
ID:	1746697   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01343a.jpg
Views:	119
Size:	269.6 KB
ID:	1746705   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01347a.jpg
Views:	119
Size:	148.5 KB
ID:	1747209  

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/15-gen...eap-build.html
Epson HC3700/HC2000; Screen - 151.5" 16:9/TV or 143.5" 2.35:1/HT at a seating distance of 13/14 feet; Yamaha RXV675 for 7.4; Speakers - Infinity Primus; Subs - 3 Polk PSW10s, 1 BIC F12; Headphones - 4 JVC wireless; Sony 3D Blu-ray player/six pairs 3D glasses.

Last edited by steve1106; 11-01-2016 at 07:33 AM.
steve1106 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #62 of 87 Old 11-01-2016, 08:37 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
NickTheGreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 2,693
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 434 Post(s)
Liked: 307
I like the Halloween stuff. I may have to do that projector method sometime in the future.

Sorry to hear about your "retirement." That just doesn't seem right
NickTheGreat is offline  
post #63 of 87 Old 11-01-2016, 01:21 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
steve1106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Northern, Va
Posts: 1,795
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 662 Post(s)
Liked: 389
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickTheGreat View Post
I like the Halloween stuff. I may have to do that projector method sometime in the future.

Sorry to hear about your "retirement." That just doesn't seem right
On the projectors it is the easiest way to go. Pull up blinds and use painters tape to hold two frosted shower curtains up. We shut down at 8:15 and I had everything broken down and up by 8:40. On the DVDs, the older Atmos FearFx is ...well old looking, so the newer stuff is the way to go.

On retirement, now we all get the same retirement walk off the property at the end of the day for security reasons. I think the X-files said it best "Trust no one."
NickTheGreat likes this.

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/15-gen...eap-build.html
Epson HC3700/HC2000; Screen - 151.5" 16:9/TV or 143.5" 2.35:1/HT at a seating distance of 13/14 feet; Yamaha RXV675 for 7.4; Speakers - Infinity Primus; Subs - 3 Polk PSW10s, 1 BIC F12; Headphones - 4 JVC wireless; Sony 3D Blu-ray player/six pairs 3D glasses.
steve1106 is offline  
 
post #64 of 87 Old 11-23-2016, 02:39 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
steve1106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Northern, Va
Posts: 1,795
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 662 Post(s)
Liked: 389
With the kids home for the holiday, we went ahead and put up the holiday decorations. The holiday projector and AtmosCheerFX fake window set the tone over the 70" TV while we decorate the tree. (The usual family room light is on, but it always looks much darker in the photos.)
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01369a.jpg
Views:	83
Size:	169.0 KB
ID:	1786545   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01370a.jpg
Views:	211
Size:	204.4 KB
ID:	1786553  

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/15-gen...eap-build.html
Epson HC3700/HC2000; Screen - 151.5" 16:9/TV or 143.5" 2.35:1/HT at a seating distance of 13/14 feet; Yamaha RXV675 for 7.4; Speakers - Infinity Primus; Subs - 3 Polk PSW10s, 1 BIC F12; Headphones - 4 JVC wireless; Sony 3D Blu-ray player/six pairs 3D glasses.
steve1106 is offline  
post #65 of 87 Old 11-30-2016, 04:49 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 1
multi functional!
steve1106 likes this.
Beach Leary is offline  
post #66 of 87 Old 12-02-2016, 12:00 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
steve1106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Northern, Va
Posts: 1,795
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 662 Post(s)
Liked: 389
I posted this in the CIH section which is probably not the right place, but.... here is another benefit of a simple 16:9 setup:

With TVs becoming larger and 4K cheaper, I wonder if we will see more use of the entire 16:9 format on Blu-ray releases for the home market. For example, we watched the new Ghostbusters last night and we all enjoyed it. The special effects almost had a 3D feel to them and to be honest we couldn't put our finger on it until the end credits. It was then we realized parts of the IMAX/3D had been added in 2D. The transition was seamless to us (TV does it all the time now), but it made the movie feel....more...larger than life. I should have hated the movie, but it was actually worth watching for the special effects.

Could this be the trend now that consumers are springing for 60 to 85" TVs? I can't see it adding much to the cost if they have IMAX/3D presentation during the release.




http://www.avsforum.com/forum/15-gen...eap-build.html
Epson HC3700/HC2000; Screen - 151.5" 16:9/TV or 143.5" 2.35:1/HT at a seating distance of 13/14 feet; Yamaha RXV675 for 7.4; Speakers - Infinity Primus; Subs - 3 Polk PSW10s, 1 BIC F12; Headphones - 4 JVC wireless; Sony 3D Blu-ray player/six pairs 3D glasses.

Last edited by steve1106; 12-02-2016 at 01:18 PM.
steve1106 is offline  
post #67 of 87 Old 02-22-2017, 05:29 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
steve1106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Northern, Va
Posts: 1,795
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 662 Post(s)
Liked: 389
Darn this hobby!

For years I have wanted to retire to a house on a lake with good fishing/land, no mortgage and a reasonable distance away from neighbors...now that it is more or less time to find that retirement home, I find myself wanting a house that will accommodate a 190ish" 16:9 screen wall more than anything. (my dream 187" screen size)


The search begins: build vs buy, land vs lake vs budget???? Time frame....anytime from this summer to next year. Area....tri-state Alabama/Georgia/Tennessee.

Or we could live "In a van down by the river" and do outdoor movies.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01669a.jpg
Views:	425
Size:	165.1 KB
ID:	1985537  

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/15-gen...eap-build.html
Epson HC3700/HC2000; Screen - 151.5" 16:9/TV or 143.5" 2.35:1/HT at a seating distance of 13/14 feet; Yamaha RXV675 for 7.4; Speakers - Infinity Primus; Subs - 3 Polk PSW10s, 1 BIC F12; Headphones - 4 JVC wireless; Sony 3D Blu-ray player/six pairs 3D glasses.
steve1106 is offline  
post #68 of 87 Old 03-01-2017, 12:46 PM
Member
 
uhcoogsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 12
I know what you mean about the retirement house as I have always wanted to live either out where I have land around me and a beautiful view or house by the beach or on some body of water. Now that I finally have put together a media room that is not part of the living room I am finding it hard to move. To live on the water I would have to have a smaller house that would not have a dedicated media room due to higher housing costs. The good part is that I have 3 years to look and decide.
steve1106 likes this.
uhcoogsfan is offline  
post #69 of 87 Old 03-01-2017, 04:40 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
steve1106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Northern, Va
Posts: 1,795
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 662 Post(s)
Liked: 389
Quote:
Originally Posted by uhcoogsfan View Post
I know what you mean about the retirement house as I have always wanted to live either out where I have land around me and a beautiful view or house by the beach or on some body of water. Now that I finally have put together a media room that is not part of the living room I am finding it hard to move. To live on the water I would have to have a smaller house that would not have a dedicated media room due to higher housing costs. The good part is that I have 3 years to look and decide.
According to my buddy who grew up and was a cop in Houston, you can have both your current house and a very affordable house on the beach (Galveston) if you live in Houston. He has been trying to sell me on Texas every since he moved back in 09 from Shreveport where we were "stationed". I went Northeast and he went four hours West (Dallas) at the same time. He bought a fantastic house on a large lot with a large pool and I got .15 of an acre/house on a lot where I could almost open a window and spit in my neighbor's window. The sad part is that I spent almost $200k more for less.

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/15-gen...eap-build.html
Epson HC3700/HC2000; Screen - 151.5" 16:9/TV or 143.5" 2.35:1/HT at a seating distance of 13/14 feet; Yamaha RXV675 for 7.4; Speakers - Infinity Primus; Subs - 3 Polk PSW10s, 1 BIC F12; Headphones - 4 JVC wireless; Sony 3D Blu-ray player/six pairs 3D glasses.
steve1106 is offline  
post #70 of 87 Old 03-03-2017, 11:03 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve1106 View Post
Darn this hobby!

For years I have wanted to retire to a house on a lake with good fishing/land, no mortgage and a reasonable distance away from neighbors...now that it is more or less time to find that retirement home, I find myself wanting a house that will accommodate a 190ish" 16:9 screen wall more than anything. (my dream 187" screen size)

Or we could live "In a van down by the river" and do outdoor movies.
I'm still about 30 years from retirement and I'm already thinking about this...doh! Good luck!
chbrandt is offline  
post #71 of 87 Old 07-07-2017, 10:24 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
steve1106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Northern, Va
Posts: 1,795
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 662 Post(s)
Liked: 389
Just another viewpoint on the whole scope vs flat screen (not that there is anything wrong with either screen):

So today I saw another member planning out his room and he is going with a scope setup of possibly 11 feet in width. While I can understand the scope screen attraction/argument of "it looks cooler" or scope shouldn't be smaller that flat (16:9) or if you move the chairs up you will get the same flat experience but more immersion in scope, I just see it a different way. I want the largest possible setup for my 132" of width...it is all I have and nothing will change that. In my case having the largest possible 16:9 gives me exactly the same scope experience. If the black bars bothered me, I could make two masking strips. At a seating distance of 13 feet the Avengers just looks better bigger and if I'm stuck watching a 16:9 movie I really don't want to invest in on HBO or another premium channel, it still feels like a movie.

I would be stuck watching the Avengers in the smaller box or playing an old school game smaller or missing out on the occasional changing aspect movie or short changing the Olympics or even an old 4:3 war movie. Now if I had an extra couple of feet or even a foot of extra width to work with, I would make a different argument...oh, and a projector that would allow me to easily switch back and forth, but I don't. I've tried it as seen below and it just feels small.


To me it is like having an 80 inch TV and deciding you only want to use 75.78" for everything to keep scope larger than regular TV.

http://displaywars.com/80-inch-16x9-vs-75,78-inch-235x1

If you disagree or think I'm crazy, I understand but it is all about what works for me and mine..."one size does not fit all".
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01789a.jpg
Views:	407
Size:	161.9 KB
ID:	2222649   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01849a.jpg
Views:	1206
Size:	148.4 KB
ID:	2222657   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01395a.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	129.5 KB
ID:	2222689   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01095a.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	150.3 KB
ID:	2222697   Click image for larger version

Name:	scope1.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	97.0 KB
ID:	2222769  

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01844a.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	110.9 KB
ID:	2222793  

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/15-gen...eap-build.html
Epson HC3700/HC2000; Screen - 151.5" 16:9/TV or 143.5" 2.35:1/HT at a seating distance of 13/14 feet; Yamaha RXV675 for 7.4; Speakers - Infinity Primus; Subs - 3 Polk PSW10s, 1 BIC F12; Headphones - 4 JVC wireless; Sony 3D Blu-ray player/six pairs 3D glasses.

Last edited by steve1106; 07-07-2017 at 10:46 AM.
steve1106 is offline  
post #72 of 87 Old 07-08-2017, 02:14 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
steve1106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Northern, Va
Posts: 1,795
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 662 Post(s)
Liked: 389
As I've stated before, I am a fan of being able to have the lights on and still have a usable room while having the 1800 lumen projector on eco with a lamp that has 3300 hours on it.

As you can see it is fairly light,


and I still get this,


drop to a lamp in the back and on the side,


and it is even better but still light enough to read/eat/etc when seated.


My summer retirement hobby is starting to take a bite into HT time. Even though for every one of these,


I catch one of these. (I only catch and release since growing up on a lake I got tired of eating fish three or four times a week.)
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01874a.jpg
Views:	376
Size:	238.8 KB
ID:	2225353   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01901a.jpg
Views:	533
Size:	81.7 KB
ID:	2225361   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01878a.jpg
Views:	302
Size:	212.7 KB
ID:	2225369   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01896a.jpg
Views:	302
Size:	62.7 KB
ID:	2225377   Click image for larger version

Name:	junecat2.jpg
Views:	305
Size:	261.1 KB
ID:	2225385  

Click image for larger version

Name:	turtle2.jpg
Views:	300
Size:	222.0 KB
ID:	2225393  

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/15-gen...eap-build.html
Epson HC3700/HC2000; Screen - 151.5" 16:9/TV or 143.5" 2.35:1/HT at a seating distance of 13/14 feet; Yamaha RXV675 for 7.4; Speakers - Infinity Primus; Subs - 3 Polk PSW10s, 1 BIC F12; Headphones - 4 JVC wireless; Sony 3D Blu-ray player/six pairs 3D glasses.

Last edited by steve1106; 07-08-2017 at 02:18 PM.
steve1106 is offline  
post #73 of 87 Old 07-12-2017, 10:10 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
fierce_gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,454
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1772 Post(s)
Liked: 1689
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve1106 View Post
Just another viewpoint on the whole scope vs flat screen (not that there is anything wrong with either screen):

So today I saw another member planning out his room and he is going with a scope setup of possibly 11 feet in width. While I can understand the scope screen attraction/argument of "it looks cooler" or scope shouldn't be smaller that flat (16:9) or if you move the chairs up you will get the same flat experience but more immersion in scope, I just see it a different way. I want the largest possible setup for my 132" of width...it is all I have and nothing will change that. In my case having the largest possible 16:9 gives me exactly the same scope experience. If the black bars bothered me, I could make two masking strips. At a seating distance of 13 feet the Avengers just looks better bigger and if I'm stuck watching a 16:9 movie I really don't want to invest in on HBO or another premium channel, it still feels like a movie.

I would be stuck watching the Avengers in the smaller box or playing an old school game smaller or missing out on the occasional changing aspect movie or short changing the Olympics or even an old 4:3 war movie. Now if I had an extra couple of feet or even a foot of extra width to work with, I would make a different argument...oh, and a projector that would allow me to easily switch back and forth, but I don't. I've tried it as seen below and it just feels small.
[/url]

If you disagree or think I'm crazy, I understand but it is all about what works for me and mine..."one size does not fit all".

i definitely PREFER scope with CIH, but i totally agree that it comes down to the room. my current room is about 12feet wide with 8foot ceilings. my 16:9 screen is basically wall to wall, so my scope movies are as big as they can get. i do sometimes feel that the height of the 16:9 stuff is overwhelming, but that's entirely personal. the facts are, my movies are not any smaller because of my screen choice, but if my room was wider, without being any taller, then i'd definitely go with a scope screen so i could get larger 2.35:1 movies, while still getting the same size 16:9 movies. if your room is wide, go scope, if you room is narrow, 16:9
steve1106 likes this.

Displays: Samsung PN64F8500/JVC X35
AVR: Pioneer VSX-1130K, 7.1/5.1.2 audio
Sources: HTPC(Enby), PS3, XBOX360, Wii
Control: Harmony One
fierce_gt is online now  
post #74 of 87 Old 07-13-2017, 06:22 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
steve1106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Northern, Va
Posts: 1,795
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 662 Post(s)
Liked: 389
Quote:
Originally Posted by fierce_gt View Post
i definitely PREFER scope with CIH, but i totally agree that it comes down to the room. my current room is about 12feet wide with 8foot ceilings. my 16:9 screen is basically wall to wall, so my scope movies are as big as they can get. i do sometimes feel that the height of the 16:9 stuff is overwhelming, but that's entirely personal. the facts are, my movies are not any smaller because of my screen choice, but if my room was wider, without being any taller, then i'd definitely go with a scope screen so i could get larger 2.35:1 movies, while still getting the same size 16:9 movies. if your room is wide, go scope, if you room is narrow, 16:9
I completely agree. Pick what works for your room and you, but another consideration should be your viewing habits. We are heavy TV watchers. With my wife joining me in retirement this month, that will only go up. or maybe since I'll be stuck watching more of her stuff. I can hear it now "Can I watch Days of Our Lives in the basement... everyday?"

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/15-gen...eap-build.html
Epson HC3700/HC2000; Screen - 151.5" 16:9/TV or 143.5" 2.35:1/HT at a seating distance of 13/14 feet; Yamaha RXV675 for 7.4; Speakers - Infinity Primus; Subs - 3 Polk PSW10s, 1 BIC F12; Headphones - 4 JVC wireless; Sony 3D Blu-ray player/six pairs 3D glasses.
steve1106 is offline  
post #75 of 87 Old 07-14-2017, 02:09 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
fierce_gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,454
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1772 Post(s)
Liked: 1689
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve1106 View Post
I completely agree. Pick what works for your room and you, but another consideration should be your viewing habits. We are heavy TV watchers. With my wife joining me in retirement this month, that will only go up. or maybe since I'll be stuck watching more of her stuff. I can hear it now "Can I watch Days of Our Lives in the basement... everyday?"
true.

not sure if you've experienced this or not, but i actually found 16:9 stuff 'overwhelming' when it's the same width as my preferred 2.35:1 screen size.

i started with a 120" 16:9 screen, most of my content was 16:9(video games, tv, half the movies) and when i decided i needed a better screen than the one bundled in with my projector, i opted to go to a smaller 106" 16:9 screen. it was great for 16:9 content, but i started to feel like scope movies were too small. I actually rehung my old screen and pulled it down partway for scope movies(simulating a 2.35:1 screen). what i discovered was that the height of a scope movie on the 120" screen was nearly the same height as 16:9 on a 106" screen. i found it very interesting, that even if i had free range to go as wide or as tall as i wanted, that it seemed like my comfort level was dictated more by the height of the image than by the width.

with my current room, i'm still trying to find the perfect solution. my screen is as wide as i can go, in a 16:9 format. i feel like i would probably like a wider screen for 2.35:1(but i don't have any more room and don't want to move closer), but it's sometimes a little too tall for 16:9 content. i don't mind movies on it, kind gives that imax feel, but watching sports/tv i tend to zoom out a bit go just a touch smaller. I think i'm going to figure out a masking system once i get a little further along in the room build

i do really like the idea of a CIH screen in a wide room, but it seems like this mixed AR movies that flip between 2.35:1 and IMAX formats from scene to scene may not go away. it's pretty frustrating to have to watch a movie like that on a scope screen. so as long as projectors are 16:9 native, a 16:9 screen with masking might make the most sense. so many issues...

Displays: Samsung PN64F8500/JVC X35
AVR: Pioneer VSX-1130K, 7.1/5.1.2 audio
Sources: HTPC(Enby), PS3, XBOX360, Wii
Control: Harmony One
fierce_gt is online now  
post #76 of 87 Old 07-17-2017, 02:28 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
VideoGrabber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 2,645
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 214 Post(s)
Liked: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by fierce_gt View Post
i actually found 16:9 stuff 'overwhelming' when it's the same width as my preferred 2.35:1 screen size.
Since you have an X35, can't you just resize things down a bit (using a memory slot), to deal with that?
VideoGrabber is offline  
post #77 of 87 Old 07-17-2017, 04:49 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
steve1106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Northern, Va
Posts: 1,795
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 662 Post(s)
Liked: 389
Quote:
Originally Posted by fierce_gt View Post
not sure if you've experienced this or not, but i actually found 16:9 stuff 'overwhelming' when it's the same width as my preferred 2.35:1 screen size.
We don't, but if we did we could always pull back another three feet or so, and then move up for scope. In a simple (cheap) room it is as easy as plugging the mic in and doing auto setup on the sound...but if I had more width and height at some point I would have to limit the flat and expand the scope. Maybe not a true CIH because we watch so much 16:9 and old 4:3, so we want to keep them as large as comfortable.

Now to figure out where we want to live, so I can get a real HT.

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/15-gen...eap-build.html
Epson HC3700/HC2000; Screen - 151.5" 16:9/TV or 143.5" 2.35:1/HT at a seating distance of 13/14 feet; Yamaha RXV675 for 7.4; Speakers - Infinity Primus; Subs - 3 Polk PSW10s, 1 BIC F12; Headphones - 4 JVC wireless; Sony 3D Blu-ray player/six pairs 3D glasses.
steve1106 is offline  
post #78 of 87 Old 07-18-2017, 12:03 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 1
Nice Build Steve!
steve1106 likes this.
Computer Supplies is offline  
post #79 of 87 Old 07-20-2017, 06:54 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked: 1
The bic f12 is on sale on Amazon right meow. I ended up going with the Dayton Audio 12" for $150.00. You can't beat it for the price!
travism is offline  
post #80 of 87 Old 07-20-2017, 12:25 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
steve1106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Northern, Va
Posts: 1,795
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 662 Post(s)
Liked: 389
Quote:
Originally Posted by travism View Post
The bic f12 is on sale on Amazon right meow. I ended up going with the Dayton Audio 12" for $150.00. You can't beat it for the price!
That is a great price, but I just got another small Polk PSW10 a couple of days ago for $79 and still haven't opened the box, but I only got it to bump to replace a sub in other room's 5.2, so I'll have to wait for a while. I'm leaning toward the Dayton 15" for 7.4 with the two larger subs behind the chairs.

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/15-gen...eap-build.html
Epson HC3700/HC2000; Screen - 151.5" 16:9/TV or 143.5" 2.35:1/HT at a seating distance of 13/14 feet; Yamaha RXV675 for 7.4; Speakers - Infinity Primus; Subs - 3 Polk PSW10s, 1 BIC F12; Headphones - 4 JVC wireless; Sony 3D Blu-ray player/six pairs 3D glasses.
steve1106 is offline  
post #81 of 87 Old 07-21-2017, 05:26 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
fierce_gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,454
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1772 Post(s)
Liked: 1689
Quote:
Originally Posted by VideoGrabber View Post
Since you have an X35, can't you just resize things down a bit (using a memory slot), to deal with that?
i did when i had a wider/shorter room. now i have a taller/narrow room, so i can't really go as wide as i want with the scope anyway.

to make a long story short, i have my seats set up based on speaker placement, and the speakers are all in-wall/in-ceiling so i'm not about to move them around. at that seating distance, the height of 16:9 stuff projected nearly the full width of my screen wall, is acceptable to me(not overwhelming). so i don't have any need to go CIH with my current room.

Displays: Samsung PN64F8500/JVC X35
AVR: Pioneer VSX-1130K, 7.1/5.1.2 audio
Sources: HTPC(Enby), PS3, XBOX360, Wii
Control: Harmony One
fierce_gt is online now  
post #82 of 87 Old 07-24-2017, 08:53 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
steve1106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Northern, Va
Posts: 1,795
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 662 Post(s)
Liked: 389
Quote:
Originally Posted by fierce_gt View Post
i did when i had a wider/shorter room. now i have a taller/narrow room, so i can't really go as wide as i want with the scope anyway.

to make a long story short, i have my seats set up based on speaker placement, and the speakers are all in-wall/in-ceiling so i'm not about to move them around. at that seating distance, the height of 16:9 stuff projected nearly the full width of my screen wall, is acceptable to me(not overwhelming). so i don't have any need to go CIH with my current room.
It is like you said earlier between the changing aspect ratio movies... IMAX scenes being added to movies, going pure CIH is going to require a sacrifice. Throw in the movies released in 2:1 (Jurassic World) and 1:85 (Avengers and now Justice League) and CIH isn't an easy choice.

To watch in a straight scope presentation or scope plus IMAX scene is the question. At my house, Avengers: Civil War in scope (143.5") or in scope plus/digital IMAX (151.5")? In my simple room, it is no contest. I'll take the scope plus...but I wish they would just offer the whole movie that way. It just makes the rest of the movie feel less when it switches back to scope.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	antman1.jpg
Views:	140
Size:	163.9 KB
ID:	2257841   Click image for larger version

Name:	antman1a.jpg
Views:	140
Size:	176.8 KB
ID:	2257849  

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/15-gen...eap-build.html
Epson HC3700/HC2000; Screen - 151.5" 16:9/TV or 143.5" 2.35:1/HT at a seating distance of 13/14 feet; Yamaha RXV675 for 7.4; Speakers - Infinity Primus; Subs - 3 Polk PSW10s, 1 BIC F12; Headphones - 4 JVC wireless; Sony 3D Blu-ray player/six pairs 3D glasses.

Last edited by steve1106; 07-24-2017 at 09:02 PM.
steve1106 is offline  
post #83 of 87 Old 07-24-2017, 09:39 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
fierce_gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,454
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1772 Post(s)
Liked: 1689
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve1106 View Post
It is like you said earlier between the changing aspect ratio movies... IMAX scenes being added to movies, going pure CIH is going to require a sacrifice. Throw in the movies released in 2:1 (Jurassic World) and 1:85 (Avengers and now Justice League) and CIH isn't an easy choice.

To watch in a straight scope presentation or scope plus IMAX scene is the question. At my house, Avengers: Civil War in scope (143.5") or in scope plus/digital IMAX (151.5")? In my simple room, it is no contest. I'll take the scope plus...but I wish they would just offer the whole movie that way. It just makes the rest of the movie feel less when it switches back to scope.
i'm REALLY not a fan of mixed AR's. i know i'm supposed to support whatever the director wants, but i can't help but feel they are being cheap by not filming the whole movie in imax format, and then selling it as an 'artistic decision'. i also don't understand the difference between 'imax' and '16:9' when they both end up being digital in the same resolution anyway...

a few years ago, i would have easily claimed CIH is the best option for me. but as you mentioned, the mixed AR movies make it a tough decision. miss out on the imax scenes(or even worse, have them spill onto your ceiling/wall) or watch the other 80% of the movie in a smaller height

since my current screen is nearly wall to wall and floor to ceiling, i plan to make some masking panels to allow me to make a 2.35:1 screen if i feel like doing CIH, but still allow me to remove the panels for the odd movie that has those mixed in imax scenes

Displays: Samsung PN64F8500/JVC X35
AVR: Pioneer VSX-1130K, 7.1/5.1.2 audio
Sources: HTPC(Enby), PS3, XBOX360, Wii
Control: Harmony One
fierce_gt is online now  
post #84 of 87 Old 07-25-2017, 04:22 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
steve1106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Northern, Va
Posts: 1,795
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 662 Post(s)
Liked: 389
Quote:
Originally Posted by fierce_gt View Post
i also don't understand the difference between 'imax' and '16:9' when they both end up being digital in the same resolution anyway...
To me the difference is you will never see the Avengers in scope. It was shot in 1:85:1, while a movie like Beauty and the beast is in 1.9:1 IMAX with careful consideration for the scope presentation that most will see it in. It really is just scope plus and you lose nothing if you watch it in either format other than it fill up the 16:9 screen better. I like IMAX at home, but the whole movie should be presented one way either in scope or IMAX. If it was shot in 16:9 you would end up with the final thumb.

Since I'm doing scope with black bars, IMAX really fills out the screen while giving me the same information I would get in the scope presentation with a little extra filler on the top and bottom. I'd be willing to pay a little more for an IMAX blu-ray and not have to bother with the bars on the top and bottom.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	beauty-and-the-beast-imax-ratio scope.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	176.7 KB
ID:	2257977   Click image for larger version

Name:	beauty-and-the-beast-imax-ratio.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	210.2 KB
ID:	2257985   Click image for larger version

Name:	beauty-and-the-beast-imax-ratio flat.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	147.7 KB
ID:	2257993  

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/15-gen...eap-build.html
Epson HC3700/HC2000; Screen - 151.5" 16:9/TV or 143.5" 2.35:1/HT at a seating distance of 13/14 feet; Yamaha RXV675 for 7.4; Speakers - Infinity Primus; Subs - 3 Polk PSW10s, 1 BIC F12; Headphones - 4 JVC wireless; Sony 3D Blu-ray player/six pairs 3D glasses.
steve1106 is offline  
post #85 of 87 Old 07-26-2017, 09:58 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
fierce_gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,454
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1772 Post(s)
Liked: 1689
those pictures are interesting, but don't make a whole lot of sense to me.

i get the difference between scope and imax. they are totally different 'shapes' and something has to be cut off. what i'm saying is that there really shouldn't be THAT much cut off from a 1.9:1 ratio to make it fit a 1.85 or 16:9 ratio. in the pics you sent, to go to 16:9 they first trimmed it down to 2.35:1, then they chopped the sides off to make it 16:9. maybe there's some other technical or philosophical reason behind it, but if they went straight from IMAX to 16:9, very little would need to get trimmed, and that is my point.

i think it's BS marketing to claim IMAX is vastly different than the standard 1.85:1. in the past, on film, there was a difference. the IMAX was technically higher resolution, using larger film, but in the digital world, I don't see how a IMAX screen is any different than sitting closer to a 1.85:1 screen. and when presented at home, there is CERTAINLY no advantage to IMAX format over 16:9, unless they needlessly trim from BOTH the vertical and horizontal directions.

i don't understand why 16:9 is 'small' and imax is 'big' when they could contain almost exactly the same image
steve1106 likes this.

Displays: Samsung PN64F8500/JVC X35
AVR: Pioneer VSX-1130K, 7.1/5.1.2 audio
Sources: HTPC(Enby), PS3, XBOX360, Wii
Control: Harmony One
fierce_gt is online now  
post #86 of 87 Old 09-07-2017, 05:38 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
steve1106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Northern, Va
Posts: 1,795
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 662 Post(s)
Liked: 389
Finally broke down and got a better projector today. The Epson HC3700 is far superior to the HC2000 it replaced....backs up.... until the lamp dims and tones down the HC3700's brightness.


Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC02069a.jpg (190.0 KB, 434 views)
File Type: jpg DSC02072a.jpg (163.2 KB, 1267 views)

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/15-gen...eap-build.html
Epson HC3700/HC2000; Screen - 151.5" 16:9/TV or 143.5" 2.35:1/HT at a seating distance of 13/14 feet; Yamaha RXV675 for 7.4; Speakers - Infinity Primus; Subs - 3 Polk PSW10s, 1 BIC F12; Headphones - 4 JVC wireless; Sony 3D Blu-ray player/six pairs 3D glasses.
steve1106 is offline  
post #87 of 87 Old 09-21-2017, 12:51 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
 
steve1106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Northern, Va
Posts: 1,795
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 662 Post(s)
Liked: 389
So I bought a new van unexpectedly this week and upgraded the projector a few weeks ago, and guess what my wife complains about when it...she arrived via Amazon today? Wig, girl and costume were around a hundred, so not too bad.




Also, last week I picked up a replacement chair for a HT chair that broke. I didn't want anything expensive since we still plan on moving once we pick a state to live in, so I went with a $172 (total with shipping) chair from Amazon. While it works for me, it isn't the the best chair for full time use but it would be a good occasional use chair for a second row. I do miss the cup holders.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC02095a.jpg (326.6 KB, 68 views)
File Type: jpg DSC02090a.jpg (211.0 KB, 68 views)

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/15-gen...eap-build.html
Epson HC3700/HC2000; Screen - 151.5" 16:9/TV or 143.5" 2.35:1/HT at a seating distance of 13/14 feet; Yamaha RXV675 for 7.4; Speakers - Infinity Primus; Subs - 3 Polk PSW10s, 1 BIC F12; Headphones - 4 JVC wireless; Sony 3D Blu-ray player/six pairs 3D glasses.
steve1106 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply General Home Theater & Media/Game Rooms

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off