"The Dark Knight" PQ issues. - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 10:22 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Club Gold
 
Alan Gouger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Florida
Posts: 18,726
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
I just watched my copy. Regarding PQ why is it they have to mess with the block busters. I was disappointed to see someone applied good ole EE. The ringing is not to bad but its enough to leave the movie with what I call edginess at times during long distance shots it clearly rears its head. Sad. I had to make sure all sharpness setting were flat for this one but it did not help clean it up.
I screened this at 8 feet wide. I doubt anyone with a smaller display or flat panel will notice as this transfer will come off extra on these sets.
Other then this complaint I found the transfer/sound/movie enjoyable.

All follow ups please mention your display width.

Thx.
Alan Gouger is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 10:26 AM
AVS Special Member
 
JeffY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: England
Posts: 3,667
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
The EE was probably down scaling of the IMAX content How was the variable aspect ratio?
JeffY is offline  
post #3 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 10:28 AM
 
Thunderbolt8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 643
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
bring on some screens
Thunderbolt8 is offline  
post #4 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 10:28 AM
AVS Special Member
 
shadowrage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,780
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Did they add EE to already super sharp IMAX shots?

Alan how did you feel about the aspect ratio shifts on a big screen? And what are the audio bitrates like? I'm hoping that this is Warner's 2nd 24bit track.

Ridiculous codec tier sig gone. Still AVC/24bit lossless fanboy.

Studio quality tier
Most Major studios>Small Studios>dogs>cats>Warner(the guys that do new movies)
shadowrage is offline  
post #5 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 10:36 AM
Senior Member
 
ToEhrIsHuman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NorCal
Posts: 426
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffY View Post

The EE was probably down scaling of the IMAX content How was the variable aspect ratio?

Actually, my guess is it would be just the reverse. WB probably used the IMAX master for the BD transfer, and I noticed ringing on the IMAX presentation on many of the non-IMAX format scenes. They apparently added EE so that the non-IMAX shots would appear clearer when blown up to IMAX proportions (it didn't work). I found it distracting in the theater, and hopefully it won't be too distracting on my 5-foot DLP.
ToEhrIsHuman is offline  
post #6 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 10:45 AM
AVS Special Member
 
rveras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Haverhill, MA
Posts: 1,745
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowrage View Post

Did they add EE to already super sharp IMAX shots?

Alan how did you feel about the aspect ratio shifts on a big screen? And what are the audio bitrates like? I'm hoping that this is Warner's 2nd 24bit track.

I saw what it look to me like EE (halos?) when I went to see the movie at IMAX (I'm no 100% but I don't believe it was on any of the IMAX shots). Someone at High-Def Digest mention that this is caused by the 35mm to IMAX upscaling process that needs to be done to present a 35mm print on that big of a screen.
rveras is offline  
post #7 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 10:50 AM
AVS Special Member
 
rveras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Haverhill, MA
Posts: 1,745
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToEhrIsHuman View Post

Actually, my guess is it would be just the reverse. WB probably used the IMAX master for the BD transfer, and I noticed ringing on the IMAX presentation on many of the non-IMAX format scenes. They apparently added EE so that the non-IMAX shots would appear clearer when blown up to IMAX proportions (it didn't work). I found it distracting in the theater, and hopefully it won't be too distracting on my 5-foot DLP.

Glad I was not the only one to notice that. I remember thinking "those scientist at AVS Forum are a bunch of liars. No EE on film, yea right!!!"

I was glad to learn that there was a reason for it but it was definately distracting.
rveras is offline  
post #8 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 10:51 AM
 
FoxyMulder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,860
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I just got an email tonight saying my copy has shipped so i'll expect it early next week or even by the weekend if i'm lucky....When it arrives i'll be viewing on a 106inch screen.

EE on such a new release is troublesome...I remember Robert Harris earlier in the year saying that by January 2009 he expected DNR to be gone on all new major releases...I can only hope EE doesn't start creeping in on new releases as to those of us with large projection systems it is a major headache.

I'll report back on this thread when i view it...Hoping the EE is minor and not throughout the film as that will be most annoying.

If this is something to do with the IMAX edition then they should have used a different print as EE is just plain old unacceptable in 2008 on HD media.

For me Batman Begins looked detailed and had no EE....I sure hope this isn't going to disappoint...Smaller your screen the less EE is noticeable or bothersome so many might not even notice it or might come onto the boards saying it's sharper than Batman begins not realising it's the EE making it seem sharper ( but EE is all an illusion and it's not really sharper )
FoxyMulder is offline  
post #9 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 10:53 AM
AVS Special Member
 
42041's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 3,289
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 54
I don't mind a bit of EE, as long as it doesn't look as mediocre in terms of detail as Batman Begins.
42041 is offline  
post #10 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 11:20 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Club Gold
 
Alan Gouger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Florida
Posts: 18,726
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
The aspect ratio change really threw me. I run a 235:1 screen and started out watching this in 185 then bingo. I plan to watch this again and not yet sure how I prefer to handle this. I do however hope this does not become common, I dont like it.
Alan Gouger is offline  
post #11 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 11:30 AM
AVS Special Member
 
shadowrage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,780
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Gouger View Post

The aspect ratio change really threw me. I run a 235:1 screen and started out watching this in 185 then bingo. I plan to watch this again and not yet sure how I prefer to handle this. I do however hope this does not become common, I dont like it.

Only Kubrick is allowed to do this.

They could have easily branched in reformatted IMAX shots, and let people to choose between the normal scope and switching IMAX version.

I have my fingers crossed they'll do that for the Ultimate Edition next year.

Ridiculous codec tier sig gone. Still AVC/24bit lossless fanboy.

Studio quality tier
Most Major studios>Small Studios>dogs>cats>Warner(the guys that do new movies)
shadowrage is offline  
post #12 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 11:33 AM
 
FoxyMulder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,860
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Gouger View Post

The aspect ratio change really threw me. I run a 235:1 screen and started out watching this in 185 then bingo. I plan to watch this again and not yet sure how I prefer to handle this. I do however hope this does not become common, I dont like it.

They have an aspect change during the movie ? Now that could be distracting.

I assume thats for the IMAX shot scenes...Just wondering but does the EE disappear when it changes to the 1.85:1 IMAX shot scenes ?
FoxyMulder is offline  
post #13 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 11:55 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Club Gold
 
Alan Gouger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Florida
Posts: 18,726
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoxyMulder View Post

They have an aspect change during the movie ? Now that could be distracting.

I assume thats for the IMAX shot scenes...Just wondering but does the EE disappear when it changes to the 1.85:1 IMAX shot scenes ?

The EE is there from the get go in 16x9 which I assume would be the Imax footage. It is possible I noticed it more when 235:1 kicked in I will have to look closer next viewing.
The ringing is not anywhere as bad as Ive seen it but its there. I mentioned I doubt anyone will a smaller display will notice this and it may work in their favor but this ringing keeps me from placing this in the reference category ( but close ) Id score it an 8 out of 10. Im curious how the reviewers will rate this or if they will even pick up on it.
Alan Gouger is offline  
post #14 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 11:55 AM
AVS Special Member
 
rveras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Haverhill, MA
Posts: 1,745
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Hey guys keep in mind that the aspect ratio change is what the director wanted so seeing this movie any other way is not appropriate. You wouldn't watch a 2.35 movie zoom in, will you?
rveras is offline  
post #15 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 11:59 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Club Gold
 
Alan Gouger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Florida
Posts: 18,726
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
How was this projected in the theaters? I wonder if many cut corners and masked to one ratio or if some went through the trouble to automate the ratio change.
For those who had the opportunity how did you see the theatrical screening?
Alan Gouger is offline  
post #16 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 12:04 PM
AVS Special Member
 
rveras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Haverhill, MA
Posts: 1,745
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Gouger View Post

How was this projected in the theaters? I wonder if many cut corners and masked to one ratio or if some when through the trouble to automate the ratio change.

At IMAX it was presented with the aspect ratio change. At regular theaters it was presented with a 2.40 aspect ratio with the IMAX scene masked top and bottom.

How the Dark Night Went IMAX
http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/07/14/...ght-went-imax/
rveras is offline  
post #17 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 12:05 PM
Advanced Member
 
paul nyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 672
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Gouger View Post

The aspect ratio change really threw me. I run a 235:1 screen and started out watching this in 185 then bingo. I plan to watch this again and not yet sure how I prefer to handle this. I do however hope this does not become common, I dont like it.



1.78 AR for the IMAX filmed sequences
2.35 (2.40) AR for the 35mm filmed sequences

5/5 PQ (via BD30 - 60" Elite 1080p ISF)
5/5 AQ (Integra w/ KEF x 5 w/ 15" Supercube)
paul nyc is offline  
post #18 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 12:10 PM
AVS Special Member
 
John Ballentine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles, Ca.
Posts: 5,084
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Alan,
Geeeze I'm confused.
So You watched the whole film in 16x9 on your scope screen? What would happen if you watched this w/ anamorphic lens on your scope screen? Would heads be be cut off when it switched to IMAX footage? Or?
John Ballentine is offline  
post #19 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 12:37 PM
Toe
AVS Addicted Member
 
Toe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,986
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Liked: 414
How is the sound?? I can deal with a bit of EE (but I wish I did not have to), but hope the sound is reference!

JVC 3D: Been there, done that, bought a DLP
Toe is online now  
post #20 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 12:38 PM
AVS Special Member
 
patrick99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,912
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul nyc View Post

1.78 AR for the IMAX filmed sequences
2.35 (2.40) AR for the 35mm filmed sequences

5/5 PQ (via BD30 - 60" Elite 1080p ISF)
5/5 AQ (Integra w/ KEF x 5 w/ 15" Supercube)

Any comments on the presence of EE?
patrick99 is offline  
post #21 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 12:42 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Club Gold
 
Alan Gouger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Florida
Posts: 18,726
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Ballentine View Post

Alan,
Geeeze I'm confused.
So You watched the whole film in 16x9 on your scope screen? What would happen if you watched this w/ anamorphic lens on your scope screen? Would heads be be cut off when it switched to IMAX footage? Or?

I can hit a button to switch between the two ratios but there is still lag time between that switch where anyone over for the movie would yell at me and say WTF are you doing
Alan Gouger is offline  
post #22 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 12:45 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
R Harkness's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,958
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Liked: 301
I don't like the whole switching ARs either. Seeing it in an IMAX theater, ok...but for home viewing it's more a PIA.
R Harkness is online now  
post #23 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 01:14 PM
Advanced Member
 
paul nyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 672
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrick99 View Post

Any comments on the presence of EE?

None on a 60" plasma. Can't comment on any larger screen size.
paul nyc is offline  
post #24 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 01:37 PM
AVS Special Member
 
patrick99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,912
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul nyc View Post

None on a 60" plasma. Can't comment on any larger screen size.

Thanks. Mind if I ask about viewing distance?
patrick99 is offline  
post #25 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 02:07 PM
AVS Special Member
 
sharkcohen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by R Harkness View Post

I don't like the whole switching ARs either. Seeing it in an IMAX theater, ok...but for home viewing it's more a PIA.

I'm not happy about it. It may be what Nolan wanted, but that doesn't mean he's not smoking crack.

Back off man, I'm a scientist.
sharkcohen is offline  
post #26 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 02:08 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Club Gold
 
Alan Gouger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Florida
Posts: 18,726
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
I just screened "Wanted" which I also received today and that transfer is everything TDK could and should have been not that TDK is that far behind, it is close.

TDK was the bigger block buster of the two and its sad someone had to lay on the EE knob based on their personal artistic opinion for the day thinking Ah I think this looks better
Alan Gouger is offline  
post #27 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 02:12 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Club Gold
 
Alan Gouger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Florida
Posts: 18,726
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
By the way I started this thread knowing another thread was in progress but that threads topic is centered around the movies story.
Alan Gouger is offline  
post #28 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 02:27 PM
Advanced Member
 
paul nyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 672
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrick99 View Post

Thanks. Mind if I ask about viewing distance?

9-10 feet
paul nyc is offline  
post #29 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 02:30 PM
AVS Special Member
 
patrick99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,912
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul nyc View Post

9-10 feet

Thanks again. I watch from about one screen width, and it might be more noticeable at that distance.
patrick99 is offline  
post #30 of 1074 Old 11-20-2008, 02:32 PM
Advanced Member
 
tauheel05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 592
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Alan,

Post some screen captures.

Thanks.
tauheel05 is offline  
Closed Thread Blu-ray Software

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off