The Truman Show Blu-ray vs HDTV Comparison - Page 4 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #91 of 112 Old 01-19-2009, 12:36 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Ruined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,528
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 15
I found a copy of the original OOP US DVD in a local FYE for $5 new. I bought it, I'd rather watch an upscale than the EE'd/DNR'd/geometrically distorted Blu-ray. Oh well...

Vote with your wallet. Don't buy Cinavia-infected Blu-ray Discs! Why pay a premium for pseudo-lossless audio damaged by an intrusive watermark in the audible spectrum?
Ruined is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #92 of 112 Old 01-26-2009, 02:02 PM
 
FoxyMulder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,860
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Does anyone have Ghost ?

It's also Paramount and released late December and i'm wary of picking it up without first knowing if this issue that is on The Truman Show also affects it. My thinking being that maybe quality control missed something on the latest catalogue releases from this studio as Event Horizon seems to have the same issue.

So does anyone have the movie Ghost and can give an opinion on whether this horizontal squeeze issue affects it ?
FoxyMulder is offline  
post #93 of 112 Old 01-26-2009, 07:06 PM
Senior Member
 
vazel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 449
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Ah dammit why did I have to see this thread. I was eagerly waiting to buy this movie in a big BD buy. I know I would not have noticed this problem if I hadn't seen this thread but now I can't get the movie without this buzzing at my mind.
vazel is offline  
post #94 of 112 Old 01-26-2009, 07:23 PM
Member
 
sayitisntsony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oregon Coast
Posts: 72
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by vazel View Post

Ah dammit why did I have to see this thread. I was eagerly waiting to buy this movie in a big BD buy. I know I would not have noticed this problem if I hadn't seen this thread but now I can't get the movie without this buzzing at my mind.

I had already ordered Truman when I found this thread and I dreaded watching it while looking for everything that's been talked about here. Thankfully, I watched the movie all the way through and enjoyed it very much, forgetting to think about DNR, EE, oval moons, etc. I have never owned the film in any format and I am not unhappy I bought it. If there is a good anamorphic version on DVD double dipping up from that may be a waste.

All that said it's still a shame that BR versions are being so heavily altered.

I need more zither!
sayitisntsony is offline  
post #95 of 112 Old 01-26-2009, 07:32 PM
AVS Special Member
 
SirDrexl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 4,133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by vazel View Post

Ah dammit why did I have to see this thread. I was eagerly waiting to buy this movie in a big BD buy. I know I would not have noticed this problem if I hadn't seen this thread but now I can't get the movie without this buzzing at my mind.

I don't know that it would have mattered. I think the EE and DNR are more of a problem with this title than the stretching, and this is coming from someone who HATES stretching (such as to fill a 16x9 TV). When I first saw the screenshots, I didn't even notice the stretching, but I sure saw the EE/DNR.
SirDrexl is offline  
post #96 of 112 Old 01-27-2009, 04:58 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Pecker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,181
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked: 17
I've shown the stills round a few people.

When I show the 'stretched' stills, no one has noticed.

When I show the comparisons, hardly anyone noticed (and the person who did notice didn't think it was really noticeable unless you were looking for it).

When I pointed out that one was the right shape and the other had been made either too fat or too thin, very few could say which was which (whether the BD was stretched or the other copy made thin).

Before anyone jumps on my back, I believe every BD should be perfect, without any DNR or EE, and certainly in OAR with the correct proportions.

I just think we need to keep the level of the problem in a little perspective.

Steve W
Pecker is offline  
post #97 of 112 Old 01-27-2009, 02:35 PM
AVS Special Member
 
cakefoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,825
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked: 32
A lot of casual HDTV owners don't mind stretching SD to fill their 16:9 screen. Many of them prefer distorting the picture because they can't stand black bars/want the biggest picture possible. Knowing this doesn't change my feelings.

My Videos

A movie with good 3D does not necessarily equal a good 3D movie!

cakefoo is offline  
post #98 of 112 Old 01-27-2009, 08:37 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
eric.exe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,341
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 14
More:





eric.exe is offline  
post #99 of 112 Old 01-28-2009, 12:05 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Kram Sacul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5,257
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Maybe this can be considered the very first anamorphically enhanced HD title. We just need a 1.66:1 button on our remotes to get it into the correct AR.
Kram Sacul is offline  
post #100 of 112 Old 01-28-2009, 07:09 AM
Senior Member
 
DraZtiK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 277
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 15
I am impressed with eric.exe and the way the first post was presented in this thread. I can go to the first post and see thumbs of the screens and their all there. Open in new tab on the thumbs and can stare and compare. I find it it truly annoying to scan 20 first posts in a single thread just to view a single screenshot at full rez while its stretching off my screen to who knows where. thank you eric.exe, excellent job.

As far as the film, I am saddened as I enjoyed this movie alot and was looking forward to it, but still can not get over the way it turned out.
DraZtiK is offline  
post #101 of 112 Old 01-28-2009, 12:26 PM
AVS Special Member
 
cakefoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,825
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked: 32
I wish more screenshot threads had an organized first post like this one.


A couple things I'd do to improve the user-friendliness even further:

1. Instead of just saying that post #1 has been updated, include the thumbnails in the latest post also, so that people can effortlessly quote reply the new shots, and so latecomers can know exactly what shots had been added.


2. In the OP, along with the new shots, include a link to the post where they were added so latecomers can know where those particular shots were first being discussed.


Example of what the first post in the thread would look like:


My Videos

A movie with good 3D does not necessarily equal a good 3D movie!

cakefoo is offline  
post #102 of 112 Old 01-28-2009, 04:34 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
eric.exe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,341
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 14
updated with cakefoo's suggestions
eric.exe is offline  
post #103 of 112 Old 01-28-2009, 04:46 PM
AVS Special Member
 
cakefoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,825
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked: 32


I pre-visioned it!

My Videos

A movie with good 3D does not necessarily equal a good 3D movie!

cakefoo is offline  
post #104 of 112 Old 01-28-2009, 08:34 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Deviation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Coon Rapids, MN
Posts: 2,780
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by eric.exe View Post

updated with cakefoo's suggestions

I've gotta say... it looks really nice. I like the format - thanks for the effort!
Deviation is offline  
post #105 of 112 Old 06-09-2009, 11:21 AM
Member
 
Tompa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 183
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 11
The vertical stretch is probably intentional to simulate that the camera ads 10 pounds...
Tompa is offline  
post #106 of 112 Old 07-18-2009, 01:29 AM
Senior Member
 
vazel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 449
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Does anyone know why a new release of the BD is coming out? Is this going to fix the stretching? And if so will there be an exchange program? http://www.amazon.com/Truman-Show-Bl...7905711&sr=1-2
vazel is offline  
post #107 of 112 Old 07-18-2009, 05:51 AM
AVS Special Member
 
paku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,618
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I believe Paramount is re-releasing a number of titles with lower SRP and Movie Cash. Most likely they will be the exact same discs.
paku is offline  
post #108 of 112 Old 07-30-2009, 08:27 AM
Member
 
solidgator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Louisville Ky
Posts: 117
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Has anyone bought the new version of this or any of the other re-released Paramount titles? Did they fix it? I know its extremely unlikely, but I'm still hopeful. BTW, its on sale at Bestbuy.
solidgator is offline  
post #109 of 112 Old 07-30-2009, 04:51 PM
AVS Special Member
 
raoul_duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 32
There's nothing 'new' about them.
raoul_duke is offline  
post #110 of 112 Old 07-31-2009, 11:07 PM
AVS Special Member
 
skibum5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 3,569
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by raoul_duke View Post

There's nothing 'new' about them.

so they wont release a fixed version??

was waiting for this for a long time guess i will be stuck with the DVD....

i still dont undestand how any major studio could release something was such insanely major errors, blows the mind....
skibum5000 is offline  
post #111 of 112 Old 07-31-2009, 11:46 PM
AVS Special Member
 
kucharsk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Louisville, CO
Posts: 3,927
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by skibum5000 View Post

i still dont undestand how any major studio could release something was such insanely major errors, blows the mind....

Because for the most part the majority of customers don't care.

It's simple math - do more people care (lost sales) than the cost of remastering the title?

If so, they do it.

If not, it's not worth it at they may as well leave the title on the market.
kucharsk is offline  
post #112 of 112 Old 08-13-2009, 07:04 PM
AVS Special Member
 
TrevorS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,232
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Hey, I fell in love with this film on letterbox LD (a very nice quality release), guess that's where I'm staying ! (Was very interested in the BD .)
TrevorS is offline  
Reply Blu-ray Software

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off