Street Fighter US vs Street Fighter Aus - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 19 Old 03-19-2009, 06:47 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
kennerado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 80
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Hey guys,

Not that anyone cares about this movie, but even though I have the US version of SF that I imported, I noticed recently that its out over here as well. So I picked it up, it looks like a different encode.

Its a Sony release, there are no Universal logos on the cover at all.

Here are the specs:

Region free (marked ABC)
AVC encode
English, French and Spanish TrueHD 5.1
Aspect is 2.40:1 (which I think is wrong, 2:35:1 is the correct one)
Special features are the audio comentary, SF IV trailer, deleted scenes and the making of.

Also there is a Street Fighter tribute gallery, whatever that is.

I just got it so I have not really checked it out yet, doing a BD-Info scan now.
kennerado is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 19 Old 03-19-2009, 09:07 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Faceless Rebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,390
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked: 10
There is only one version of JCVD's turn as Guile that I'm aware of. The Sony international and Universal domestic releases are probably identical in terms of the film at least.
Faceless Rebel is offline  
post #3 of 19 Old 03-19-2009, 10:54 PM
Senior Member
 
BenjaminG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 259
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I have the Australian version and don't recall the outtakes reel which is present on the U.S. release.

Also the U.S. release features DTS HD MA vs the Dolby TrueHD on the Aus release.
BenjaminG is offline  
post #4 of 19 Old 03-19-2009, 11:01 PM
357
Advanced Member
 
357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 691
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
How is the US BD? I have an Amazon giftcard and may buy...
357 is offline  
post #5 of 19 Old 03-20-2009, 07:16 AM
 
N1LSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 401
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
what exactly makes you think it's a different encoding? [IMG]http://************************************/img/2464/i09b0128lrvx/smile.gif[/IMG]
N1LSS is offline  
post #6 of 19 Old 03-20-2009, 01:52 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
kennerado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 80
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
AVC vs VC-1 (US)

From the stats the Aus one also has higher bitrate.
kennerado is offline  
post #7 of 19 Old 04-17-2009, 04:56 PM
Newbie
 
interaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
interaser is offline  
post #8 of 19 Old 04-18-2009, 01:17 AM
Advanced Member
 
Nissen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 515
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by interaser View Post

_http://comparescreenshots.slicx.com/comparison/3824

AVC vs VC-1


From those screenshots, the US VC-1 is clearly superior.
Nissen is offline  
post #9 of 19 Old 04-18-2009, 07:26 AM
Advanced Member
 
kdssrugby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 680
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Not necessarily. The US disc is sharper for sure, but it suffers from fairly obvious EE and to my eyes it looks harsher so on that count I prefer the Aus version. Still I will admit it is softer and not a huge upgrade from the DVD.
kdssrugby is offline  
post #10 of 19 Old 04-18-2009, 07:32 AM
AVS Special Member
 
paku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,618
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nissen View Post

From those screenshots, the US VC-1 is clearly superior.

Crap colours + oversharpened + worse framing = clearly superior?

There may be a very slight increase in detail on the US transfer, but most of it is due to the sharpening. I'd take the AUS one any day.
paku is offline  
post #11 of 19 Old 04-18-2009, 08:02 AM
AVS Special Member
 
MSmith83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,551
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked: 50
Yes, it looks like the people who worked on the Universal version were trying to get more detail out of a source low in detail. However, the results could likely be achieved with the basic sharpening found on virtually all consumer display systems.

In my opinion, the people at Sony have once again demonstrated that they know what they're doing while some other studios do not.
MSmith83 is offline  
post #12 of 19 Old 04-18-2009, 12:29 PM
Advanced Member
 
Nissen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 515
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by paku View Post

Crap colours + oversharpened + worse framing = clearly superior?

There may be a very slight increase in detail on the US transfer, but most of it is due to the sharpening. I'd take the AUS one any day.

I humbly apologize.
What I meant to say was that the VC-1 has more natural colour, is more detailed and brighter than the AVC. You may keep the AUS one any day.
Nissen is offline  
post #13 of 19 Old 04-18-2009, 12:41 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Ruined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,528
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 15
I also believe the VC-1 transfer looks far superior IMO. The AVC one has the reds blown out, looks horrendously artificial.

Vote with your wallet. Don't buy Cinavia-infected Blu-ray Discs! Why pay a premium for pseudo-lossless audio damaged by an intrusive watermark in the audible spectrum?
Ruined is offline  
post #14 of 19 Old 04-18-2009, 02:53 PM
AVS Special Member
 
JeffY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: England
Posts: 3,667
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
They both look crap, but I'd choose the US one because of the more natural colour.
JeffY is offline  
post #15 of 19 Old 04-18-2009, 05:49 PM
Senior Member
 
Xerowarp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 331
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
I purchased the VC-1 versian that was printed on a Friday and it has far more accurate color temp and saturation than the AVC copy that was printed on a Monday. I would stay away from those monday prints.
Xerowarp is offline  
post #16 of 19 Old 04-20-2009, 09:41 PM
Senior Member
 
fuzz!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 305
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffY View Post

They both look crap, but I'd choose the US one because of the more natural colour.

They both look crap, they are both crap movies.. why oh why are these sort of movies released on BluRay?
fuzz! is offline  
post #17 of 19 Old 04-20-2009, 11:32 PM
Advanced Member
 
CRT Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hanover, PA
Posts: 887
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Tie in with the even worse Chun-Li movie.
CRT Dude is offline  
post #18 of 19 Old 04-23-2009, 06:26 AM
Senior Member
 
Beastus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 209
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by fuzz! View Post

They both look crap, they are both crap movies.. why oh why are these sort of movies released on BluRay?

Because people want them. I'm glad they do release movies like these, and just not the so-called "superior" movies. Granted, Street Fighter is not exactly great. But personally I'm more excited about getting Steven Seagal movies on Blu-ray than eg Star Wars. We all got different taste, and that's why studios need to release all kinds of movies if they want the format to succeed.

A little off-topic, I know. But every day I read comments about how the studios spend money on "crap" when all these "great" titles are still unreleased.
Beastus is online now  
post #19 of 19 Old 04-23-2009, 03:41 PM
Senior Member
 
fuzz!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 305
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beastus View Post

A little off-topic, I know. But every day I read comments about how the studios spend money on "crap" when all these "great" titles are still unreleased.

Granted we all have different tastes.. But let's say we had two videos.. one with Jessica Alba in the buff.. and another of granny scat porn.. Imagine how their IMDB ratings would look, and imagine which is going to sell more.

We may have different tastes, but some tastes are a lot more common (like a taste for Jessica Alba)

So from a business perspective, wouldn't you expect the studios to be releasing the more common tastes first? I'm sure something like "Titanic" would sell like hotcakes.

Yes, I just compared Street Fighter to granny scat porn :P

Hehe.. I'm a big B-Grade fan too, I bought The Marine on BD and would probably buy titles like Frankenfish, Earthstorm (who knew a Baldwin could get so fat!?!) and so forth..

So sure, I'm biased... but I still wish crap like "The Love Guru" wasn't on the new release shelf when I'm waiting for LOTR.
fuzz! is offline  
Reply Blu-ray Software

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off