It's A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World - Page 4 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #91 of 125 Old 07-20-2011, 04:45 PM
AVS Special Member
 
rlsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 5,618
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by 42041 View Post

Well, all those were shot on 65mm or 8-perf 35mm negatives... not sure about Niagara.

For many reasons, the period of the late 50's through early 60's promoted a clean look.

-- as mentioned, the films you note were shot on 65mm film or Technirama (8 perf 35mm).
-- films were generally much better lit, which meant that there would be less grain and better color. Scenes that would look dark and lifeless today often looked very bright and colorful. [Take a look at the night scenes in The Ten Commandments for example.]
-- the "artistiic" use of grain, desaturated color, etc., was either not done or heavily criticized when it was.
-- epic films and roadshow presentations paid a lot of attention to costumes, sets, and splendid looking photography.
-- process shots were used when necessary but people preferred actually building things and using large crowds of real people. Look at The Fall of the Roman Empire compared to Gladiator (the same story!) for example. Empire actually built enormous sets, Gladiator used CGI that looks very crefty by comparison.

Everyone was aware that they were competing with TV and they had to make films look bigger, cleaner, and brighter to compete.


Beginning in the late 60's, a more "cinema-verite" style was used: grain, shakey cameras, poor color, poor lighting were often considered more artistic. This trend has to some extent continued to this day.
Phantom Stranger likes this.
rlsmith is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #92 of 125 Old 07-23-2011, 08:17 AM
AVS Special Member
 
RobertR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: California
Posts: 6,165
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 179 Post(s)
Liked: 409
I watched this last night, and I was generally very pleased with the image. Clean and sharp, bright vivid colors, very nice. I did detect halos in a few scenes, but overall, not a problem.
RobertR is online now  
post #93 of 125 Old 07-23-2011, 10:08 AM
Advanced Member
 
Herve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 953
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Is this movie available at any Walmart in Canada?
Herve is offline  
post #94 of 125 Old 07-24-2011, 06:50 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Mr.G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,509
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 103 Post(s)
Liked: 118
I watched my copy last night, amazing colors. Or I am so used to today's color drained and dark style in movies that something shot almost 50 years ago looks stunning by comparison. The aspect ratio made me glad I had a 120" screen, the carefully composed shots that had multiple characters spread across the screen were a joy to behold. After all of these years watching badly cropped versions of this movie on TV and elsewhere I had forgotten just how much picture information was missing from the image I first saw on a Cinerama screen. If you're a fan its an easy recommendation - buy!

All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Movies

Mr.G is offline  
post #95 of 125 Old 07-24-2011, 11:25 AM
Member
 
zarg7883's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Van Nuys CA
Posts: 182
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.G View Post

The aspect ratio made me glad I had a 120" screen, the carefully composed shots that had multiple characters spread across the screen were a joy to behold. After all of these years watching badly cropped versions of this movie on TV and elsewhere I had forgotten just how much picture information was missing from the image I first saw on a Cinerama screen.

Definitely true. A good example is the scene where Hackett, Rooney, and Backus are just taking off in the Beech 18. Backus' character starts asking for a drink, but the best part is that off the sides you can see that he's still in the initial takeoff climb! Cropped versions always lose that nuance.
zarg7883 is offline  
post #96 of 125 Old 07-31-2011, 02:05 PM
Advanced Member
 
SaxCatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Dry Dry Desert, AZ
Posts: 518
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.G View Post
The aspect ratio made me glad I had a 120" screen, the carefully composed shots that had multiple characters spread across the screen were a joy to behold.
LoL! Exactly my thoughts... "man, this is REALLY wide. Oh well, at least I'm watching it on a ten-footer!" I also have to give my enthusiastic support for this top-notch transfer. Its not without flaws, but finally having a quality release of this film at a VERY reasonable price is worth promoting.
SaxCatz is offline  
post #97 of 125 Old 08-03-2011, 01:29 PM
Advanced Member
 
hconwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Willow Grove, PA
Posts: 865
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyDP View Post

I got it today and just got thru watching it. Its a great transfer with nice color, detail and no image processing in sight. At 2.76:1, you see some pretty major letterboxing even on a 16x9 TV and this is the 154 general release version. But given how little it costs there's no way anyone remotely interesting in this title can pass it up. Walmart is selling it for $10 and you get a $5 Vudu credit so the film essentially ends up costing you five bucks. A great deal all around.

Just picked this up. Haven't opened it. The packing says the AR is 2.55. But people here have talked about it being 2.76. What is it?

Hank Brown

"Being at the right place at the right time is purely a function of being at the right place a lot."

JPEG's of my Home Theater.
hconwell is offline  
post #98 of 125 Old 08-03-2011, 04:36 PM
AVS Special Member
 
RobertR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: California
Posts: 6,165
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 179 Post(s)
Liked: 409
Looks like 2.76 to me.
RobertR is online now  
post #99 of 125 Old 08-03-2011, 05:24 PM
Advanced Member
 
hconwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Willow Grove, PA
Posts: 865
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Thanks

Hank Brown

"Being at the right place at the right time is purely a function of being at the right place a lot."

JPEG's of my Home Theater.
hconwell is offline  
post #100 of 125 Old 08-07-2011, 01:27 PM
Member
 
CinemaScope Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Encinitas CA
Posts: 56
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Will we ever see a 2.76 release of "The Hallelujah Trail" any time soon?

Also any word on other Cinerama Blu-Ray releases?
CinemaScope Man is offline  
post #101 of 125 Old 07-16-2012, 03:02 AM
Senior Member
 
amoergosum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
amoergosum is offline  
post #102 of 125 Old 07-16-2012, 09:04 AM
Advanced Member
 
nathanddrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 918
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked: 74
Phenominal improvement over DVD... but do I see halos or is it just chromatic aberration?
nathanddrews is offline  
post #103 of 125 Old 07-16-2012, 09:36 AM
 
haineshisway's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 581
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanddrews View Post

Phenominal improvement over DVD... but do I see halos or is it just chromatic aberration?

I don't know, are you watching the Blu-ray or looking at ridiculous screen caps. It's a great transfer and there are NO HALOES anywhere.
haineshisway is offline  
post #104 of 125 Old 07-16-2012, 10:02 AM
Advanced Member
 
Dex Robinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Winnipeg, MB Canada
Posts: 778
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanddrews View Post

Phenominal improvement over DVD... but do I see halos or is it just chromatic aberration?

Yeah. You're seeing halos.

But they are within the realm of acceptability.

Pretty much all transfers have them to one degree or another. Just like in digital still photography, a degree of sharpening is considered necessary to compensate for softness introduced by the mechanics of digtal imagining. MAD...WORLD is pretty good in this respect but doesn't quite keep the halos below the level of perception. We can still see them. But compared to most transfers, these ones aren't worth being too concerned about.

Oh yes...I own the disc. (both DVD and BD).
Dex Robinson is offline  
post #105 of 125 Old 07-16-2012, 10:47 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Oliver Klohs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Posts: 2,534
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanddrews View Post

Phenominal improvement over DVD... but do I see halos or is it just chromatic aberration?

Sharpening is a bit too much for my taste. Better to watch this with all sharpening circuits set to off. It is looking really good though and much better than the other releases of movies shot in Ultra Panavision 70 (Mutiny on the Bounty, Battle of the Bulge, The Greatest Story Ever Told, Fall of the Roman Empire) that range from mediocre at best to hideous.
Oliver Klohs is offline  
post #106 of 125 Old 07-16-2012, 06:41 PM
AVS Special Member
 
wuther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,437
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 117 Post(s)
Liked: 33
Bought this for $10 bucks but have not looked at it yet because I saw it recently on HDTV, I told myself not to watch but could not resist. I suspect that like in the caps it will be a bit processed looking although much better then the HDTV version.
wuther is offline  
post #107 of 125 Old 09-01-2012, 10:31 AM
Newbie
 
Daniel Bissell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
OMG that capture looks great. I cued up my DVD on the PC and then on the big screen via the PS3 to that exact scene and the difference is VERY noticeable. The only problem I have is that on my DVD, which is 2.55:1, there is the black bars at the top and bottom. And as your screen capture shows, there is an extra 3 feet of that office that I have never seen. The 2.77:1 BRD is going to look really nice, but also smaller on my 55".
Daniel Bissell is offline  
post #108 of 125 Old 07-12-2013, 09:04 AM
Member
 
CinemaScope Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Encinitas CA
Posts: 56
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by CinemaScope Man View Post

Will we ever see a 2.76 release of "The Hallelujah Trail" any time soon?


Also any word on other Cinerama Blu-Ray releases?

Any word on a Blu-Ray of the above?
CinemaScope Man is offline  
post #109 of 125 Old 07-12-2013, 01:30 PM
RUR
Innocent Bystander
 
RUR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: California Republic
Posts: 2,353
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Liked: 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by CinemaScope Man View Post

Any word on a Blu-Ray of the above?
Not for Hallelujah Trail, though plenty of folks are clamoring for it.
RUR is offline  
post #110 of 125 Old 07-12-2013, 04:23 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
NetworkTV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 15,616
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 168 Post(s)
Liked: 447
Quote:
Originally Posted by zarg7883 View Post


Definitely true. A good example is the scene where Hackett, Rooney, and Backus are just taking off in the Beech 18. Backus' character starts asking for a drink, but the best part is that off the sides you can see that he's still in the initial takeoff climb! Cropped versions always lose that nuance.
Another point where the wide aspect really pays off is in the "kick the bucket" scene. The characters are all lined up on the side of the cliff and it's like a one shot who's who of comedy.

Nothing annoys me more than filmmakers who choose an aspect ratio, then fail to use it to good visual effect - often leaving blank holes or simply frame the movie as if they assume the sides will be cut off for TV - so why bother putting anything important outside of the center 4x3...

That's not an issue for It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad world. The Sound of Music is another one that requires that wide aspect, especially when the kids get lined up in one shot. Even a film like Stand by Me does a great job at framing to tell us things that don't need to be said. Of course, then there's Citizen Kane which did wonders with the opposite extreme, an academy aspect ratio where close-ups, dollies or crane moves take over where vistas aren't possible.

It's always refreshing to see great composition. It feels like someone actually cared. Now days, the attitude is usually "we'll fix it in post"...
NetworkTV is online now  
post #111 of 125 Old 10-16-2013, 04:57 PM
AVS Special Member
 
LexInVA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,960
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked: 42
New Blu-Ray coming in January from Criterion Collection. New 4K restoration from the general release version of the film - 159 minutes - and an HD restoration of a reconstructed extended cut of the film - 197 minutes - that was supervised by Robert Harris. 5.1 DTS-HD-MA on both cuts and gobs of extras too.
LexInVA is offline  
post #112 of 125 Old 10-16-2013, 05:11 PM
Senior Member
 
Jamie E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 454
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexInVA View Post

New Blu-Ray coming in January from Criterion Collection. New 4K restoration from the general release version of the film - 159 minutes - and an HD restoration of a reconstructed extended cut of the film - 197 minutes - that was supervised by Robert Harris. 5.1 DTS-HD-MA on both cuts and gobs of extras too.

Wow, finally!

http://www.criterion.com/films/28579-it-s-a-mad-mad-mad-mad-world

Movies look their best when they look like movies. More Patton-esque remasters!

Jamie E is offline  
post #113 of 125 Old 10-17-2013, 05:23 AM
RUR
Innocent Bystander
 
RUR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: California Republic
Posts: 2,353
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Liked: 73
Finally is right. I thought the waiting-for-announcement drama would never end.wink.gif

Price be damned, I couldn't order it fast enough.
RUR is offline  
post #114 of 125 Old 10-22-2013, 04:30 AM
AVS Special Member
 
kucharsk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Louisville, CO
Posts: 3,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Liked: 29
Ordered!
kucharsk is offline  
post #115 of 125 Old 10-22-2013, 06:49 AM
Advanced Member
 
nathanddrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 918
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked: 74
Awesome, awesome, awesome, awesome!
chirpie likes this.
nathanddrews is offline  
post #116 of 125 Old 10-24-2013, 07:38 AM
AVS Special Member
 
replayrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NY- The tax State
Posts: 4,136
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 170 Post(s)
Liked: 178
Mad Mad World is bar none the best movie to watch before the ball drops on new years eve night!
You start watching right after dinner around 9pm and before you know it- it's midnight. Although with the new extended version we're going to have to start watching during dessert! biggrin.gif

"If we ain't outta here in ten minutes, we won't need no rocket to fly through space."
replayrob is offline  
post #117 of 125 Old 10-29-2013, 12:55 PM
Member
 
avjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 51
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 13
This is truly epic. I still have the roadshow? brochure my mom bought me when we were leaving the theater.

Sid Caesar trying to shush the fireworks is as funny as funny can get.
avjohn is offline  
post #118 of 125 Old 01-16-2014, 05:39 PM
AVS Special Member
 
wuther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,437
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 117 Post(s)
Liked: 33
Here is a first look of the Criterion version with a comparison vs the MGM:

http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film3/blu-ray_reviews56/its_a_mad_mad_mad_mad_world_blu-ray.htm

Clearly both are from the same master with the Extended Criterion in the images crisper then the MGM which also show the source EE more slightly more obvious (did he just write that?). The reviewer claims there is a color grading difference but I cannot see that in the caps. I am sure some will have wild conspiracy theories.
wuther is offline  
post #119 of 125 Old 01-16-2014, 05:48 PM
AVS Special Member
 
42041's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 3,289
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 54
Sharpness discrepancy is due to DVDBeaver's bad caps.
42041 is offline  
post #120 of 125 Old 01-17-2014, 12:26 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Phantom Stranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Between the known and the unknown...
Posts: 3,161
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Liked: 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlsmith View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by 42041 View Post

Well, all those were shot on 65mm or 8-perf 35mm negatives... not sure about Niagara.


For many reasons, the period of the late 50's through early 60's promoted a clean look.


-- as mentioned, the films you note were shot on 65mm film or Technirama (8 perf 35mm).

-- films were generally much better lit, which meant that there would be less grain and better color. Scenes that would look dark and lifeless today often looked very bright and colorful. [Take a look at the night scenes in The Ten Commandments for example.]

-- the "artistiic" use of grain, desaturated color, etc., was either not done or heavily criticized when it was.

-- epic films and roadshow presentations paid a lot of attention to costumes, sets, and splendid looking photography.

-- process shots were used when necessary but people preferred actually building things and using large crowds of real people. Look at The Fall of the Roman Empire compared to Gladiator (the same story!) for example. Empire actually built enormous sets, Gladiator used CGI that looks very crefty by comparison.


Everyone was aware that they were competing with TV and they had to make films look bigger, cleaner, and brighter to compete.



Beginning in the late 60's, a more "cinema-verite" style was used: grain, shakey cameras, poor color, poor lighting were often considered more artistic. This trend has to some extent continued to this day.
Those are very good points, especially when it comes to films shot on Hollywood studio sets. I was watching the Pillow Talk (1959) BD and the cinematography is never really pushed past a stage production, so its sharpness and overall picture quality is quite pleasing for a Cinemascope movie. Universal slathered the transfer with too much edge enhancement, but that is another story.
Phantom Stranger is offline  
Reply Blu-ray Software

Tags
Its A Mad Mad Mad Mad World Blu Ray
Gear in this thread - Its by PriceGrabber.com

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off