Drive - Page 3 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #61 of 310 Old 01-09-2012, 08:06 PM
Member
 
mldardy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 103
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by dvdmike007 View Post

Point was each to their own, but no one expects to come into the drive thread to hear it slagged off, in fact mods are against it.
Also since when did awards equal quality? I don't like it, but I don't feel the need to tell everyone.

I would say more times than not awards equal quality than not equaling quality. It means that people who saw the film think highly enough of it's performances to say it deserved an award. I love how people always dismiss awards. If a film is lucky enough to have two performances from it's actors to get recognized it has to have some kind of quality about it.
mldardy is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #62 of 310 Old 01-09-2012, 11:07 PM - Thread Starter
 
dvdmike007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 8,687
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by mldardy View Post


I would say more times than not awards equal quality than not equaling quality. It means that people who saw the film think highly enough of it's performances to say it deserved an award. I love how people always dismiss awards. If a film is lucky enough to have two performances from it's actors to get recognized it has to have some kind of quality about it.

So if this wins more awards you would have to admit it's a good movie....
dvdmike007 is offline  
post #63 of 310 Old 01-10-2012, 12:54 PM
Member
 
mldardy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 103
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by dvdmike007 View Post

So if this wins more awards you would have to admit it's a good movie....

I already think it's a good movie.
mldardy is offline  
post #64 of 310 Old 01-10-2012, 01:39 PM - Thread Starter
 
dvdmike007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 8,687
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by mldardy View Post


I already think it's a good movie.

sorry my bad
dvdmike007 is offline  
post #65 of 310 Old 01-10-2012, 02:12 PM
Member
 
stwrt22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
This is released on rental in the UK via Blockbuster Video next Monday 16 Jan so UK posters should be able to let us know what the transfer is like.
stwrt22 is offline  
post #66 of 310 Old 01-10-2012, 02:31 PM - Thread Starter
 
dvdmike007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 8,687
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by stwrt22 View Post

This is released on rental in the UK via Blockbuster Video next Monday 16 Jan so UK posters should be able to let us know what the transfer is like.

Have you read the thread?? I got it Monday and have posted pics
dvdmike007 is offline  
post #67 of 310 Old 01-11-2012, 12:49 AM
Member
 
stwrt22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by dvdmike007 View Post

Have you read the thread?? I got it Monday and have posted pics

Sorry for for my laziness, I only read the last couple of posts. Many thanks for posting and making my post meaningless
stwrt22 is offline  
post #68 of 310 Old 01-11-2012, 10:11 AM - Thread Starter
 
dvdmike007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 8,687
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by stwrt22 View Post


Sorry for for my laziness, I only read the last couple of posts. Many thanks for posting and making my post meaningless

Sorry I was tired and cranky and it took twenty mins to crack the disc so I was pissed off in general.
I run a blockbuster as of this month, so can get a few early impressions on discs.
dvdmike007 is offline  
post #69 of 310 Old 01-14-2012, 12:01 PM
Advanced Member
 
David_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: delete me
Posts: 983
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 26
I'm glad you liked it. But I didn't.

Yes, not everyone likes every film you do Mike, and I gave my reasons why I thought it was bad so that those that might decide to blind buy this would know why.

Sorry if you don't like to hear from other's that don't hold your opinion, but I suppose if you had titled this thread "Drive is coming out! I love it! Tell me why You love it too!" I might have been a bit off base.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dvdmike007 View Post

Point was each to their own, but no one expects to come into the drive thread to hear it slagged off, in fact mods are against it.
Also since when did awards equal quality? I don't like it, but I don't feel the need to tell everyone.


buytme
David_B is offline  
post #70 of 310 Old 01-14-2012, 12:14 PM - Thread Starter
 
dvdmike007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 8,687
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by David_B View Post

I'm glad you liked it. But I didn't.

Yes, not everyone likes every film you do Mike, and I gave my reasons why I thought it was bad so that those that might decide to blind buy this would know why.

Sorry if you don't like to hear from other's that don't hold your opinion, but I suppose if you had titled this thread "Drive is coming out! I love it! Tell me why You love it too!" I might have been a bit off base.

I am pretty sure posts have been deleted for exactly what you put, this is not movie discussions it's bluray quality.
But I am glad you felt the need to pop in and tell everyone.
dvdmike007 is offline  
post #71 of 310 Old 01-14-2012, 05:51 PM
Member
 
TylerAfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Code:
DISC INFO:

Disc Title: * * DRIVE
Disc Size: * * *48,124,947,076 bytes
Protection: * * AACS
BD-Java: * * * *Yes
BDInfo: * * * * 0.5.6

PLAYLIST REPORT:

Name: * * * * * * * * * 00800.MPLS
Length: * * * * * * * * 1:40:24 (h:m:s)
Size: * * * * * * * * * 30,369,091,584 bytes
Total Bitrate: * * * * *40.33 Mbps

VIDEO:

Codec * * * * * * * * * Bitrate * * * * * * Description * * 
----- * * * * * * * * * ------- * * * * * * ----------- * * 
MPEG-4 AVC Video * * * *34999 kbps * * * * *1080p / 23.976 fps / 16:9 / High Profile 4.1

AUDIO:

Codec * * * * * * * * * * * * * Language * * * *Bitrate * * * * Description * * 
----- * * * * * * * * * * * * * -------- * * * *------- * * * * ----------- * * 
DTS-HD Master Audio * * * * * * English * * * * 3297 kbps * * * 5.1 / 48 kHz / 3297 kbps / 24-bit (DTS Core: 5.1 / 48 kHz / 1509 kbps / 24-bit)

SUBTITLES:

Codec * * * * * * * * * * * * * Language * * * *Bitrate * * * * Description * * 
----- * * * * * * * * * * * * * -------- * * * *------- * * * * ----------- * * 
Presentation Graphics * * * * * English * * * * 19.263 kbps * * * * * * * * * * 
Presentation Graphics * * * * * English * * * * 18.100 kbps * * * * * * * * * * 
Presentation Graphics * * * * * Spanish * * * * 15.655 kbps * *
There are supposed to be a bunch of different editions, containing extras or barebone.. The one I got looks very nice PQ wise
TylerAfx is offline  
post #72 of 310 Old 01-15-2012, 04:05 AM - Thread Starter
 
dvdmike007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 8,687
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by TylerAfx View Post

DISC INFO:

Disc Title: * * DRIVE
Disc Size: * * *48,124,947,076 bytes
Protection: * * AACS
BD-Java: * * * *Yes
BDInfo: * * * * 0.5.6

PLAYLIST REPORT:

Name: * * * * * * * * * 00800.MPLS
Length: * * * * * * * * 1:40:24 (h:m:s)
Size: * * * * * * * * * 30,369,091,584 bytes
Total Bitrate: * * * * *40.33 Mbps

VIDEO:

Codec * * * * * * * * * Bitrate * * * * * * Description * *
----- * * * * * * * * * ------- * * * * * * ----------- * *
MPEG-4 AVC Video * * * *34999 kbps * * * * *1080p / 23.976 fps / 16:9 / High Profile 4.1

AUDIO:

Codec * * * * * * * * * * * * * Language * * * *Bitrate * * * * Description * *
----- * * * * * * * * * * * * * -------- * * * *------- * * * * ----------- * *
DTS-HD Master Audio * * * * * * English * * * * 3297 kbps * * * 5.1 / 48 kHz / 3297 kbps / 24-bit (DTS Core: 5.1 / 48 kHz / 1509 kbps / 24-bit)

SUBTITLES:

Codec * * * * * * * * * * * * * Language * * * *Bitrate * * * * Description * *
----- * * * * * * * * * * * * * -------- * * * *------- * * * * ----------- * *
Presentation Graphics * * * * * English * * * * 19.263 kbps * * * * * * * * * *
Presentation Graphics * * * * * English * * * * 18.100 kbps * * * * * * * * * *
Presentation Graphics * * * * * Spanish * * * * 15.655 kbps * *


There are supposed to be a bunch of different editions, containing extras or barebone.. The one I got looks very nice PQ wise

The first releases are the same worldwide for extras, I have already posted pix from the UK disc.
dvdmike007 is offline  
post #73 of 310 Old 01-15-2012, 08:19 AM
Member
 
TylerAfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
well, I dont know but according to your bdinfo this is a different disc, I will check and see if I can make comparison shots to yours..
TylerAfx is offline  
post #74 of 310 Old 01-15-2012, 08:29 AM - Thread Starter
 
dvdmike007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 8,687
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by TylerAfx View Post

well, I dont know but according to your bdinfo this is a different disc, I will check and see if I can make comparison shots to yours..

Was it the UK disc? I have already ordered 90% of the worlds drive releases
dvdmike007 is offline  
post #75 of 310 Old 01-15-2012, 08:35 AM
AVS Special Member
 
zoey67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: cloud9
Posts: 2,634
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by David_B View Post

Sorry if you don't like to hear from other's that don't hold your opinion, but I suppose if you had titled this thread "Drive is coming out! I love it! Tell me why You love it too!" I might have been a bit off base.

x 3
zoey67 is offline  
post #76 of 310 Old 01-15-2012, 08:52 AM
Member
 
TylerAfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by dvdmike007 View Post

Was it the UK disc? I have already ordered 90% of the worlds drive releases


no, US.

Whatever Disc you got your screens taken from is "obviously" not as good PQ wise.

check the comparing screens from the us disc:









I'd say, better colour timing, finer grain preservation and even one pixel line more on top, so even might be a different transfer..

I know theres another BD announced with bonus features etc.. will wait for that one, yet I doubt it will have a better PQ than the US I already have.

cheers

Tyler
TylerAfx is offline  
post #77 of 310 Old 01-15-2012, 09:08 AM - Thread Starter
 
dvdmike007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 8,687
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 50
Like I said in the thread, the US Sony disc would be better.
Also there is no grain to preserve, digital cinema does not have grain


Quote:
Originally Posted by zoey67 View Post

x 3

Then your issue is with the mods who have deleted posts for just that not with me, if there is no consistency with what they delete then that's a problem indeed.
I just never have felt so self important enough to make sure everyone know I dislike a move in a thread devoted to the BD release.

From the Scarface thread:


Quote:
Originally Posted by rboster View Post

If you are in this thread to debate the merits of the film, please do not bother to post. We offer a movie forum for that type of discussion. It's one thing for the topic of the film to come up organically, but to post just to discuss the film and nothing of the transfer, audio, video, extras etc....than that's off topic for this particular forum.

Thanks
Ron

So maybe calm down a little people...
dvdmike007 is offline  
post #78 of 310 Old 01-15-2012, 10:49 AM
Member
 
TylerAfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Erhm, digital filming doesn't mean you have no grain, seriously you are mixing up something there.. CG generated movies, like pixar doesn't necessarily have grain. But surely filming with the Alexa for example, captures grain. Especially in lowlight scenes.

Just look at the the screens, there is grain in every image.

Nevertheless, the US disc seems to preserve the grain/noise/ structure, etc better than your version the screens are taken from

Cheers

tyler
TylerAfx is offline  
post #79 of 310 Old 01-15-2012, 11:00 AM - Thread Starter
 
dvdmike007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 8,687
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by TylerAfx View Post

Erhm, digital filming doesn't mean you have no grain, seriously you are mixing up something there.. CG generated movies, like pixar doesn't necessarily have grain. But surely filming with the Alexa for example, captures grain. Especially in lowlight scenes.

Just look at the the screens, there is grain in every image.

Nevertheless, the US disc seems to preserve the grain/noise/ structure, etc better than your version the screens are taken from

Cheers

tyler

It's not grain, it's digital noise.
I am also not sure what fight you are trying to win? I said when I posted the pix that the Sony disc would look better, as the UK encode is on the small side.
dvdmike007 is offline  
post #80 of 310 Old 01-15-2012, 11:57 AM
Member
 
TylerAfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by dvdmike007 View Post

It's not grain, it's digital noise

Ha, I knew this was going to happen well, enough nitpicking for me.

Just wanted to compare the releases and am sure people
can decide which version to get much better now..

UK :0 US :1
TylerAfx is offline  
post #81 of 310 Old 01-15-2012, 12:08 PM - Thread Starter
 
dvdmike007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 8,687
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by TylerAfx View Post


Ha, I knew this was going to happen well, enough nitpicking for me.

Just wanted to compare the releases and am sure people
can decide which version to get much better now..

UK :0 US :1

Again you think I am defending the UK disc....
3 times I have said the Sony is better.
Are you just choosing not to read now?

If you know digital noise is not grain then why say it?
All you are doing is confusing the issue, I have bought 5 versions at least and was planning a real comparison.
Saying a digital movie transfer does not resolve grain is helping no one.
dvdmike007 is offline  
post #82 of 310 Old 01-16-2012, 03:04 PM
AVS Special Member
 
KBMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Grass Valley, CA
Posts: 2,820
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked: 29
what is this movie, "Drive"? I guess I'll have to search the web....

Terrence
"Hey Vasquez, have you ever been mistaken for a man?...."No, have you?" -ALIENS

KBMAN is offline  
post #83 of 310 Old 01-16-2012, 03:12 PM - Thread Starter
 
dvdmike007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 8,687
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by KBMAN View Post

what is this movie, "Drive"? I guess I'll have to search the web....

It's Shane with cars set in the universe of thief
dvdmike007 is offline  
post #84 of 310 Old 01-17-2012, 01:43 AM
AVS Special Member
 
d3code's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,681
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
!! Safe your money !!!

i watched the movie last night and all i can say that is it almost as horrible as suckerpunch. the only difference is that suckerpunch has no story at all. and drive has an ultra boring and predictable one.

there is one scene that i thought my bluray player stopped working. the movie is only like 1 hour and 30 mins long. and there is a scene of 1 minute that focus only on the face of ryan gosling. what the heck is the directory trying to explain here?

the story predictable. movie ultaboring. it is like watching paint dry. except the first 5 minutes and last 10 minutes there is nothing to enjoy here.

my guess is directory tried to make it like robert de niros taxi driver. - failed
my guess is director tried to make it like mallick - failed.

i see this movie like you make a painting and use only color red. every normal human being knows everybody can make this. however you have those artist people who will rave on that the color red is used on all kinds of ways. that the artist tries to create this or that. no he does not. it is just red. everybody can make a painting or wall in the color red. and that is what drive is about.

every normal human being will know drive is terrible and everybody can make a movie like drive. just ask ryan gosling can you sit in a car and just well make some moves with your face and record it. then you have already 90% recorded of the movie.

i really dig movies like spider,imsommnia, usual suspects etc. but this movie aint nothing like that. it tries to be art like. but fails misserable.

if you want to watch a good movie with ryan gosling watch idle of march. movie aint ultra exciting. but has a good story and good acting. but Drive. if you really want to part from your money. then rather spend it on charity.

hopefully i can still post this because before we know is we are struck by SOPA law and i have to sit 10 years in jail
d3code is offline  
post #85 of 310 Old 01-17-2012, 02:05 AM
Senior Member
 
Alkaline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by d3code View Post

!! Safe your money !!!

i watched the movie last night and all i can say that is it almost as horrible as suckerpunch. the only difference is that suckerpunch has no story at all. and drive has an ultra boring and predictable one.

there is one scene that i thought my bluray player stopped working. the movie is only like 1 hour and 30 mins long. and there is a scene of 1 minute that focus only on the face of ryan gosling. what the heck is the directory trying to explain here?

the story predictable. movie ultaboring. it is like watching paint dry. except the first 5 minutes and last 10 minutes there is nothing to enjoy here.

my guess is directory tried to make it like robert de niros taxi driver. - failed
my guess is director tried to make it like mallick - failed.

i see this movie like you make a painting and use only color red. every normal human being knows everybody can make this. however you have those artist people who will rave on that the color red is used on all kinds of ways. that the artist tries to create this or that. no he does not. it is just red. everybody can make a painting or wall in the color red. and that is what drive is about.

every normal human being will know drive is terrible and everybody can make a movie like drive. just ask ryan gosling can you sit in a car and just well make some moves with your face and record it. then you have already 90% recorded of the movie.

i really dig movies like spider,imsommnia, usual suspects etc. but this movie aint nothing like that. it tries to be art like. but fails misserable.

if you want to watch a good movie with ryan gosling watch idle of march. movie aint ultra exciting. but has a good story and good acting. but Drive. if you really want to part from your money. then rather spend it on charity.

hopefully i can still post this because before we know is we are struck by SOPA law and i have to sit 10 years in jail

I'm baffled enough by "almost as bad as Sucker Punch" and "attempts to emulate Malick", but I'll only ask you to provide an explanation for your claim of "tries to be art-like". I find this so be an irritatingly overused critique people tend to aim at films they happen to find boring and/or unengaging.
Alkaline is offline  
post #86 of 310 Old 01-17-2012, 05:36 AM
Senior Member
 
rezpekt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 267
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Not sure if he/she is serious or just trolling....
rezpekt is offline  
post #87 of 310 Old 01-17-2012, 07:07 AM
Advanced Member
 
markmathers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 749
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
No kiddin. Credibility was lost with the broke logic and incomplete sentences in my opinion. Not to mention "Idle of March" I believe he meant "Ides of March" Not to nitpick, I can respect people's different opinions regarding movies but if your gonna go in SO hard on a movie like this, it would help to formulate your opinion in a way that sounds a bit more intelligent.
markmathers is offline  
post #88 of 310 Old 01-17-2012, 08:44 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Josh Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Planet Boston, source of the spice, Melange.
Posts: 19,854
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Liked: 280
Quote:
Originally Posted by markmathers View Post

No kiddin. Credibility was lost with the broke logic and incomplete sentences in my opinion. Not to mention "Idle of March" I believe he meant "Ides of March" Not to nitpick, I can respect people's different opinions regarding movies but if your gonna go in SO hard on a movie like this, it would help to formulate your opinion in a way that sounds a bit more intelligent.

English may not be his first language. Unless I'm mistaken, this forum has rules against berating someone for his grammar or spelling.

Frankly, I agree with all of his criticisms of the movie. It's a lot of pretentious faux-existential posturing with nothing at all going on beneath the surface.

Josh Z
Writer/Editor, High-Def Digest (Blog updated daily!)
Curator, Laserdisc Forever

My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect those of my employers.

Josh Z is offline  
post #89 of 310 Old 01-17-2012, 01:39 PM
AVS Special Member
 
d3code's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,681
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
English is indeed not my first language.

i can formulate it much more. but then i would go into spoiler territority.

that said if you watch the trailer you think this movie is awesome. however the real movie aint nothing like that.

look at the box office it has been terrible for drive. why do you think that is when watching the official trailer? because in the trailer you think it is an awesome heist -action movie with a great story. it aint nothing like that. you will get trapped bigtime! like me who paid 25 euro at an import shop. the trailer is incredible misleading.

check for example this review below of drive. also someone who said the movie was misleading. i am realy not the only one out there. be warned!

http://blog.moviefone.com/2011/09/19...ed-soundtrack/

it explains perfectly in reveiw without spoilers why we are tricked.

again be advised the trailer is nothing like you think the movie is!
d3code is offline  
post #90 of 310 Old 01-17-2012, 01:46 PM
Senior Member
 
rezpekt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 267
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Firstly, box office and the quality of the film are not related.

Secondly, Drive did very well in the box office. Budget was $15 millions, USA box office $35 millions + another $35 milions foreign box office = $70 millions.

Thirdly, I don't care what your native language is. Sentences start with a capital letter in every Latin alphabet language.
rezpekt is offline  
Reply Blu-ray Software

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off