Chinatown - Page 4 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #91 of 119 Old 03-23-2012, 08:27 PM
Senior Member
 
R o d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 231
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by oink View Post

Certainly the DVDbeaver shot is not as detailed....no question.

It's also not as red.
R o d is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #92 of 119 Old 03-25-2012, 03:00 PM - Thread Starter
 
dvdmike007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 8,687
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 50
http://caps-a-holic.com/hd_vergleich...ess=#vergleich
dvdmike007 is offline  
post #93 of 119 Old 03-25-2012, 08:47 PM
Member
 
filmoreXXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 29
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by haineshisway View Post

Paramount has done stellar work on three films: White Christmas, Breakfast at Tiffany's, and The Ten Commandments. Those three are as good as any Blu-rays ever released. The work on them was done by a man named Ron Smith, who clearly knew what he was doing. He is no longer at Paramount - they thought they could do without his services - they cannot. That is why we got the older transfer of To Catch a Thief used for the last DVD - as good as it is, if they did a transfer from the VistaVision negative it would be as good as The Ten Commandments. That is why Chinatown is off the master used for the last DVD release - it looks good, but could look MUCH better. When Ron was there, there was so much hope for great classic film transfers. Now - not so much.

lets bring back Ron !!
filmoreXXX is offline  
post #94 of 119 Old 03-25-2012, 09:26 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
oink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Shuloch
Posts: 26,553
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Liked: 814
Quote:

In cap#9 the EE is gone from the staircase rail (and that's good).

Is this the same master as the DVD?
It kinda looks like it...

A.P.S. deserve our protection....join the cause today!
oink is offline  
post #95 of 119 Old 03-30-2012, 11:18 AM
Advanced Member
 
paul nyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 672
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
From the review at HD DIGEST:

I'm usually not a big fan of Dolby TrueHD tracks, which I feel tend to lack the clarity and nuance of their DTS-HD counterparts, but the TrueHD 5.1 soundtrack for 'Chinatown' just might change my mind.

Um, really?
paul nyc is offline  
post #96 of 119 Old 03-30-2012, 11:55 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Thebarnman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 3,161
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 13
At least things are starting to look up for this Blu-ray release.

Still, a new transfer for Blu-ray would have been better.

Movies must be OAR, sports and movies must also have 5.1 audio, No EE or NO SALE!
Thebarnman is offline  
post #97 of 119 Old 03-30-2012, 12:44 PM
AVS Special Member
 
spectator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,036
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul nyc View Post

From the review at HD DIGEST:

I'm usually not a big fan of Dolby TrueHD tracks, which I feel tend to lack the clarity and nuance of their DTS-HD counterparts, but the TrueHD 5.1 soundtrack for 'Chinatown' just might change my mind.

Yikes! This, again?

Excepting production errors, lossless is lossless is lossless.

I don't feel special...
spectator is offline  
post #98 of 119 Old 03-30-2012, 01:34 PM
Advanced Member
 
paul nyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 672
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by spectator View Post

Yikes! This, again?

Excepting production errors, lossless is lossless is lossless.

Though I do enjoy reading reviews online from various sites, quotes like the one above always have me doing a facepalm. One of the few reviewers that I actually trust is Gary Reber at Widescreen Review. He's been doing this since the laserdisc days and is fantastic. Just my two cents...
paul nyc is offline  
post #99 of 119 Old 03-30-2012, 01:47 PM
AVS Special Member
 
spectator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,036
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul nyc View Post

Though I do enjoy reading reviews online from various sites, quotes like the one above always have me doing a facepalm. One of the few reviewers that I actually trust is Gary Reber at Widescreen Review. He's been doing this since the laserdisc days and is fantastic. Just my two cents...

I'm an old WR reader, from issue #2.

I don't feel special...
spectator is offline  
post #100 of 119 Old 03-30-2012, 02:00 PM
AVS Special Member
 
PeterTHX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,857
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul nyc View Post

Though I do enjoy reading reviews online from various sites, quotes like the one above always have me doing a facepalm. One of the few reviewers that I actually trust is Gary Reber at Widescreen Review. He's been doing this since the laserdisc days and is fantastic. Just my two cents...

I read WSR until it turned into the DTS Newsletter and the reviews turned into mere capsules that told you nothing.

It was right around the time DVD started hitting it big and Reber was complaining about it being a format for the masses and proposed a LD sized format.

My opinions do not reflect the policies of my company
PeterTHX is offline  
post #101 of 119 Old 03-30-2012, 02:22 PM
Advanced Member
 
paul nyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 672
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterTHX View Post

I read WSR until it turned into the DTS Newsletter and the reviews turned into mere capsules that told you nothing.

It was right around the time DVD started hitting it big and Reber was complaining about it being a format for the masses and proposed a LD sized format.

Yeah, the reviews have gotten smaller, but he still knows his stuff...
paul nyc is offline  
post #102 of 119 Old 03-30-2012, 07:11 PM
AVS Special Member
 
wuther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,266
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul nyc View Post

From the review at HD DIGEST:

I'm usually not a big fan of Dolby TrueHD tracks, which I feel tend to lack the clarity and nuance of their DTS-HD counterparts, but the TrueHD 5.1 soundtrack for 'Chinatown' just might change my mind.

Um, really?

I have not been able to tell the AQ difference between DTS, Dolby and Uncompressed PCM HD audio myself, I am no audiophile however.
wuther is offline  
post #103 of 119 Old 04-03-2012, 01:56 PM
AVS Special Member
 
BIG ED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: California Wine Country
Posts: 3,290
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Well?!?!

"I wonder if any of the releases had slipcovers though."
"Are these comfirmed to have slipcovers?"
"They look nice in those slips."
"This slipcover looks too good to pass up."
BIG ED is offline  
post #104 of 119 Old 04-03-2012, 07:47 PM
Advanced Member
 
Penman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 626
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
I received mine today, and I'm happy to check on a scene and report back. Any scene in particular?
Penman is offline  
post #105 of 119 Old 04-04-2012, 12:52 PM
AVS Special Member
 
BIG ED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: California Wine Country
Posts: 3,290
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penman View Post

I received mine today, and I'm happy to check on a scene and report back. Any scene in particular?

Congrats!
How bout: Best & Worse?!?!

"I wonder if any of the releases had slipcovers though."
"Are these comfirmed to have slipcovers?"
"They look nice in those slips."
"This slipcover looks too good to pass up."
BIG ED is offline  
post #106 of 119 Old 04-05-2012, 10:55 AM
Advanced Member
 
Penman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 626
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
I looked at the credits and the dam hearing sequence (where the livestock are brought in as protest), and I thought both looked very good.

Some posted screenshots showed Gittes' skin tones that looked too red (to my eyes), but they (and the rest of the colors) looked fine on my set-up (RS-1, 122" screen).

I was pleased overall by what I saw in those two sequences.
Penman is offline  
post #107 of 119 Old 04-06-2012, 07:30 PM
AVS Special Member
 
BIG ED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: California Wine Country
Posts: 3,290
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
^^^
Thanks for the input; can't believe I haven't pickED this up yet...

"I wonder if any of the releases had slipcovers though."
"Are these comfirmed to have slipcovers?"
"They look nice in those slips."
"This slipcover looks too good to pass up."
BIG ED is offline  
post #108 of 119 Old 04-07-2012, 09:53 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Milt99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Of California
Posts: 5,093
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked: 66
Picked this up at Fry's for $12.99.

 

It ain't ignorance causes so much trouble; it's folks knowing so much that ain't so

Milt99 is offline  
post #109 of 119 Old 04-07-2012, 05:23 PM
AVS Special Member
 
MickB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Danbury, CT
Posts: 1,164
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I thought most of the movie looked like upscaled dvd.
MickB is offline  
post #110 of 119 Old 04-07-2012, 07:08 PM
AVS Special Member
 
BIG ED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: California Wine Country
Posts: 3,290
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by MickB View Post

I thought most of the movie looked like upscaled dvd.

How so?!?!

"I wonder if any of the releases had slipcovers though."
"Are these comfirmed to have slipcovers?"
"They look nice in those slips."
"This slipcover looks too good to pass up."
BIG ED is offline  
post #111 of 119 Old 04-08-2012, 01:50 AM
 
haineshisway's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 581
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by MickB View Post

I thought most of the movie looked like upscaled dvd.

Um, no. It's the same transfer that was used for the last DVD, but it looks MUCH better than the DVD. However, if Paramount had kept Ron Smith and he'd done a fresh transfer, it would look astonishing now - it doesn't. It's adequate and perfectly okay, as befits a five or six year old transfer. But Paramount, like other studios, are very aware of how many units this will sell and I guess they finally decided that Ron wasn't worth the money and that it's just easier to release an older transfer.
haineshisway is offline  
post #112 of 119 Old 04-08-2012, 04:52 AM
Member
 
filmoreXXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 29
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
out of curiosity , how much would it cost paramount to re-scan the negatives for a proper blu ray?
filmoreXXX is offline  
post #113 of 119 Old 04-08-2012, 08:26 AM
Advanced Member
 
Penman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 626
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by haineshisway View Post

Um, no. It's the same transfer that was used for the last DVD, but it looks MUCH better than the DVD. However, if Paramount had kept Ron Smith and he'd done a fresh transfer, it would look astonishing now - it doesn't. It's adequate and perfectly okay, as befits a five or six year old transfer. But Paramount, like other studios, are very aware of how many units this will sell and I guess they finally decided that Ron wasn't worth the money and that it's just easier to release an older transfer.

I guess my question is why the quality of a Blu-ray release should depend on the gifts and skills of a single person. Even if a studio is smart enough to hang on to their uniquely talented employee, accidents happen all the time. So why are all the best transfer eggs put in a single employee's basket*?

*Happy Easter!
Penman is offline  
post #114 of 119 Old 04-08-2012, 10:51 AM
 
haineshisway's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 581
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penman View Post

I guess my question is why the quality of a Blu-ray release should depend on the gifts and skills of a single person. Even if a studio is smart enough to hang on to their uniquely talented employee, accidents happen all the time. So why are all the best transfer eggs put in a single employee's basket*?

*Happy Easter!

It's only a question of people knowing what they're doing and having the resources to do it properly. Some do, some don't. Grover Crisp does. Ron did. Now someone makes the decision, "Oh, we've got an HD transfer from five or six years ago, let's just put that out, after all how much better can it look? Well, a fresh scan would look much better because the technology is better - it wouldn't cost all that much, but if someone did it or just left it to a lab and they didn't know what they were doing, well, it could even be worse. The Searchers is a perfect example - at the time a gorgeous transfer off the VistaVision negative - beautifully sharp - but you had someone who had no idea about the color and he screwed it up. He could have easily pulled their IB Tech reference print to use as a guide, but - he didn't. That, apparently, was too much bother. So, we have a way too yellow The Searchers that looks nothing like it should other than being pleasingly detailed and sharp. And that's why you need a Ron Smith or Grover Crisp - because they CARE, they do the research and the result is The Ten Commandments, White Christmas, and Breakfast at Tiffany's from Paramount, three transfers that perfectly replicate what those films should look like, and just about any transfer coming out of Sony.
haineshisway is offline  
post #115 of 119 Old 04-08-2012, 10:51 AM
Member
 
Robert Harris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 141
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by filmoreXXX View Post

out of curiosity , how much would it cost paramount to re-scan the negatives for a proper blu ray?

The question is not the cost of scanning, which would run around 60k, but rather the cost of the entire process toward the creation of a new HD master.

That number would be around 120k.

A trifle they take from a great box they have. And an easy decision to make.

RAH
Robert Harris is offline  
post #116 of 119 Old 04-08-2012, 11:00 AM
Advanced Member
 
Penman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 626
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by haineshisway View Post

It's only a question of people knowing what they're doing and having the resources to do it properly. Some do, some don't. Grover Crisp does. Ron did. Now someone makes the decision, "Oh, we've got an HD transfer from five or six years ago, let's just put that out, after all how much better can it look? Well, a fresh scan would look much better because the technology is better - it wouldn't cost all that much, but if someone did it or just left it to a lab and they didn't know what they were doing, well, it could even be worse. The Searchers is a perfect example - at the time a gorgeous transfer off the VistaVision negative - beautifully sharp - but you had someone who had no idea about the color and he screwed it up. He could have easily pulled their IB Tech reference print to use as a guide, but - he didn't. That, apparently, was too much bother. So, we have a way too yellow The Searchers that looks nothing like it should other than being pleasingly detailed and sharp. And that's why you need a Ron Smith or Grover Crisp - because they CARE, they do the research and the result is The Ten Commandments, White Christmas, and Breakfast at Tiffany's from Paramount, three transfers that perfectly replicate what those films should look like, and just about any transfer coming out of Sony.

Thanks for the thorough explanation.

I feel like we're almost better off with obviously craptastic work like Gladiator or Out of Africa, where the work is so conspicuously sub-par that consumer pushback can result in getting a better disc. In contrast, with a B-level job (The Searchers, Chinatown, et al.), there isn't enough of a consumer outcry to justify the expense of re-doing it. So this is probably the best Chinatown will look for a long, long time, I guess.
Penman is offline  
post #117 of 119 Old 04-08-2012, 06:05 PM
AVS Special Member
 
BIG ED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: California Wine Country
Posts: 3,290
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Any digital mastering artifacts on this release?

"I wonder if any of the releases had slipcovers though."
"Are these comfirmed to have slipcovers?"
"They look nice in those slips."
"This slipcover looks too good to pass up."
BIG ED is offline  
post #118 of 119 Old 04-08-2012, 07:28 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Milt99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Of California
Posts: 5,093
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked: 66
It would be nice to think that if Roman Polanski wasn't what he is, that he would be living in the U.S. and would be able to take interest in his films.
Analogous to the music industry, if the artist( in the case of film, the director) doesn't get involved, the level of care is a toss up.

I for one, would love to see The Fearless Vampire Killers in HD(Criterion?)
as well as other of his films done justice.

I bought Chinatown regardless.
I had to.

 

It ain't ignorance causes so much trouble; it's folks knowing so much that ain't so

Milt99 is offline  
post #119 of 119 Old 04-11-2012, 02:18 PM - Thread Starter
 
dvdmike007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 8,687
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 50
How is the Fincher/Towne commentary
dvdmike007 is offline  
Reply Blu-ray Software

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off