Blue Underground vs Arrow - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 20 Old 11-26-2012, 05:44 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
wuther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,255
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked: 24
This once again confirms my belief that Arrow brightened transfers a lot and is continuing to do so:
http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film/dvdcompare3/zombie.htm

And if someone thinks this is beaver's doing, BU:
http://images3.static-bluray.com/reviews/5035_17_1080p.jpg
Arrow:
http://images3.static-bluray.com/reviews/7148_19_1080p.jpg
wuther is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 20 Old 11-26-2012, 09:38 PM
Senior Member
 
Alkaline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 10
The Arrow release is a completely different scan/restoration (A first between BU/Arrow, I believe). Such differences are to be expected. From the shots I've seen, the Arrow looks to be an improvement.
Alkaline is offline  
post #3 of 20 Old 11-27-2012, 05:51 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
rboster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 17,542
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked: 55
Is your thread about the differences as a whole between the two companies' releases of that particular title?

"Retired" AVS Moderator
rboster is online now  
post #4 of 20 Old 11-27-2012, 06:57 AM
Advanced Member
 
Dex Robinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Winnipeg, MB Canada
Posts: 777
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by wuther View Post

This once again confirms my belief that Arrow brightened transfers a lot and is continuing to do so...

A few days ago, I rewatched the Arrow Blu-ray of PHENOMENA. I remember thinking that it was a decent picture but it seemed unusually bright...almost too "cheerful" looking for a horror film.
Dex Robinson is offline  
post #5 of 20 Old 11-27-2012, 10:54 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Matt_Stevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 13,818
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 48
Arrow is abysmal. They have released one laughably bad transfer after another. Many of the Argento films scanned at that Italian facility were scanned on a unit that was out of calibration. Noise was introduced into each transfer. Just look at TENEBRAE. The French release is so infinitely superior in every way, it's clear the Arrow release is so bad it should be recalled.

Vimeo is the home of the Super8 Shooter...
http://vimeo.com/super8shooter
Matt_Stevens is offline  
post #6 of 20 Old 11-27-2012, 02:07 PM
Senior Member
 
Alkaline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt_Stevens View Post

Arrow is abysmal. They have released one laughably bad transfer after another. Many of the Argento films scanned at that Italian facility were scanned on a unit that was out of calibration. Noise was introduced into each transfer. Just look at TENEBRAE. The French release is so infinitely superior in every way, it's clear the Arrow release is so bad it should be recalled.

The Funhouse? Maniac Cop? A Bay of Blood? Exterminator? Vamp? Demons? Forbidden Zone? Red Scorpion? Spirits of the Dead? Obsession? Rififi? The Tin Drum? Bicycle Thieves? Cinema Paradiso? Ashes and Diamonds? Miracle in Milan? Ohh, just abysmal! rolleyes.gif
Alkaline is offline  
post #7 of 20 Old 11-27-2012, 02:19 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Phantom Stranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Between the known and the unknown...
Posts: 3,023
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alkaline View Post

The Arrow release is a completely different scan/restoration (A first between BU/Arrow, I believe). Such differences are to be expected. From the shots I've seen, the Arrow looks to be an improvement.
The Arrow transfer appears to capture much more of the actual detail and resolution inherent to the film elements, with a superior application of compression to boot. The level of contrast on the BU's transfer is probably closer to the intended look, but Arrow's transfer would be almost perfect if they had slightly toned down the brightness. Arrow has released a number of garbage BDs in the past in terms of video quality, but this is not one of them. I'm not sure the marginal uptick in filmic quality is worth it for current owners of the BU Blu-ray.
Phantom Stranger is offline  
post #8 of 20 Old 11-27-2012, 02:23 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Matt_Stevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 13,818
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alkaline View Post

The Funhouse? Maniac Cop? A Bay of Blood? Exterminator? Vamp? Demons? Forbidden Zone? Red Scorpion? Spirits of the Dead? Obsession? Rififi? The Tin Drum? Bicycle Thieves? Cinema Paradiso? Ashes and Diamonds? Miracle in Milan? Ohh, just abysmal! rolleyes.gif
Did I or did I not refer to the Argento films? Those releases are a sham.

Vimeo is the home of the Super8 Shooter...
http://vimeo.com/super8shooter
Matt_Stevens is offline  
post #9 of 20 Old 11-27-2012, 03:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Alkaline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt_Stevens View Post

Did I or did I not refer to the Argento films? Those releases are a sham.

You said "Arrow is abysmal", which is a pretty blanket statement. Some of their early releases had pretty significant issues - I agree on those you mentioned - but they've largely changed their ways. I'd say the good to excellent easily outweighs the bad at this point. From what I've seen so far, their Zombi looks to be another winner.
Alkaline is offline  
post #10 of 20 Old 11-27-2012, 03:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Alkaline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phantom Stranger View Post

The Arrow transfer appears to capture much more of the actual detail and resolution inherent to the film elements, with a superior application of compression to boot. The level of contrast on the BU's transfer is probably closer to the intended look, but Arrow's transfer would be almost perfect if they had slightly toned down the brightness. Arrow has released a number of garbage BDs in the past in terms of video quality, but this is not one of them. I'm not sure the marginal uptick in filmic quality is worth it for current owners of the BU Blu-ray.

Agreed. Detail aside, I do find the BU contrast/color more appealing in a few shots I've seen. Still, I never got around to the BU release and this will likely be the one that gets my money everything considered.
Alkaline is offline  
post #11 of 20 Old 11-27-2012, 06:06 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
wuther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,255
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked: 24
Of course this is not the first time Arrow has done this:
http://caps-a-holic.com/hd_vergleiche/index.php?vergleich=city_of_the_living_dead

Sometimes Arrow is out brightened by another distributor, as appears to be the case with Miramax's on Cinema Paradiso.
I think there was a Universal title Arrow managed to put out that was probably better, does not say much for Universal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alkaline View Post

The Arrow release is a completely different scan/restoration (A first between BU/Arrow, I believe). Such differences are to be expected. From the shots I've seen, the Arrow looks to be an improvement.

Got something tangible to base that claim on? Nothing in the images indicates one is a 'new' scan. I am pretty damn sure BU & Arrow are licensing from the same source on the many BD titles both released.
wuther is offline  
post #12 of 20 Old 11-27-2012, 06:47 PM
AVS Special Member
 
42041's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 3,289
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by wuther View Post

Got something tangible to base that claim on? Nothing in the images indicates one is a 'new' scan. I am pretty damn sure BU & Arrow are licensing from the same source on the many BD titles both released.
The BU version is loaded with DNR/remnants of scanner noise and the Arrow transfer isn't?
42041 is offline  
post #13 of 20 Old 11-27-2012, 06:59 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
wuther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,255
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by 42041 View Post

The BU version is loaded with DNR/remnants of scanner noise and the Arrow transfer isn't?

lol, 'scanner noise' meaning film grain. Yes, the Arrow transfer in most images have less film grain most of it probably washed away by the brightening. I grant you most of those adverse to film grain will probably like the 'cleaner' Arrow version better.
wuther is offline  
post #14 of 20 Old 11-27-2012, 07:01 PM
Senior Member
 
Alkaline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by wuther View Post

Of course this is not the first time Arrow has done this:
http://caps-a-holic.com/hd_vergleiche/index.php?vergleich=city_of_the_living_dead
Sometimes Arrow is out brightened by another distributor, as appears to be the case with Miramax's on Cinema Paradiso.
I think there was a Universal title Arrow managed to put out that was probably better, does not say much for Universal.
Got something tangible to base that claim on? Nothing in the images indicates one is a 'new' scan. I am pretty damn sure BU & Arrow are licensing from the same source on the many BD titles both released.

Um. I'm basing that on the fact Arrow have explicitly stated this release comes from an all new scan conducted in London (harness the power of the internets!), along with, as 42041 said, that it appears (or should) to come from a completely different scan to anyone with eyeballs. Also, did you miss the part where I stated this to be a first TMK? I'm well-aware Arrow/BU have utilized the same masters in the past. This isn't those.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wuther View Post

lol, 'scanner noise' meaning film grain. Yes, the Arrow transfer in most images have less film grain most of it probably washed away by the brightening. I grant you most of those adverse to film grain will probably like the 'cleaner' Arrow version better.

Nah. Scanner noise, meaning, scanner noise. It's pretty common knowledge BU DNR'd their release, most likely to combat that noise in response to the blowback from their prior releases with the same issue. It would be uncharacteristic of BU to blast natural, wholesome grain with DNR, so one can reasonably assume that to be the reason. The Arrow exhibits more grain in virtually every comparison grab I've seen thus far. New scan, with proper grain in lieu of noise, makes sense.
Alkaline is offline  
post #15 of 20 Old 11-27-2012, 07:02 PM
AVS Special Member
 
42041's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 3,289
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by wuther View Post

lol, 'scanner noise' meaning film grain. Yes, the Arrow transfer in most images have less film grain most of it probably washed away by the brightening.
No, scanner noise meaning scanner noise. If you think that garbage on the BU discs of Italian films is grain... well, it's nice to get a reminder why someone's on your ignore list.
42041 is offline  
post #16 of 20 Old 11-27-2012, 07:08 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
wuther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,255
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alkaline View Post

Um. I'm basing that on the fact Arrow have explicitly stated this release comes from an all new scan

That's it?? lol, Means no more to me then when Universal often claims a HD-DVD master is a new made for BD scan or when a distributor claims a director several years dead approved the BD. Yes I agree, if you dislike film grain you will like Arrow BDs.
wuther is offline  
post #17 of 20 Old 11-27-2012, 07:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Alkaline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by wuther View Post

That's it?? lol, Means no more to me then when Universal often claims a HD-DVD master is a new made for BD scan or when a distributor claims a director several years dead approved the BD. Yes I agree, if you dislike film grain you will like Arrow BDs.

Well that and the thing about them looking sufficiently different so as to render the a claim of a new scan completely credible. Those two factors working together in tandem. Re: grain...easy, Johnny Presumptive. I love the stuff. Ya know, grain. Not abhorrent digital noise introduced by aging/subpar equipment at the telecine stage.
Alkaline is offline  
post #18 of 20 Old 11-27-2012, 07:58 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Matt_Stevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 13,818
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alkaline View Post

You said "Arrow is abysmal", which is a pretty blanket statement. Some of their early releases had pretty significant issues - I agree on those you mentioned - but they've largely changed their ways. I'd say the good to excellent easily outweighs the bad at this point. From what I've seen so far, their Zombi looks to be another winner.
I gave up on them. They were so awful, so pathetic, it wasn't worth my time to continue to spend (waste) money on them. And some of the releases you mention are not so hot to my eyes.

Should they be releasing great BD's now, awesome. good for them. But nearly ever release of theirs I have come across has been abysmal.

Anyway, Phenomena is a really mixed bag. No release is perfect. They are all messed up in numerous ways. Blu-Ray, DVD and Laserdisc.

Vimeo is the home of the Super8 Shooter...
http://vimeo.com/super8shooter
Matt_Stevens is offline  
post #19 of 20 Old 11-27-2012, 09:03 PM
Senior Member
 
Dan Average's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 491
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
For the record, here's what the Arrow release says about the transfer:
Quote:
Zombie Flesh Eaters has been exclusively by Arrow [sic] for this release, with all work personally overseen by Restoration Supervisor James White at Deluxe Soho, London.

The film was sourced from the original Techniscope 2-perf 35mm negative made available by Variety Communications, Italy. The picture was scanned at 2K resolution and fully graded on a Nicoda Film Master at Deluxe Soho, London. Restoration work was completed in 1080psf HD resolution using a combination of software tools and techniques. Thousands of instances of dirt, scratches and debris were carefully removed frame by frame. Damaged or missing frames were repaired, and density and stability issues were significantly improved. Throughout the process, care was taken to ensure that the film's original details and grain structure remained unaffected by digital processing. Although every effort has been made to present Zombie Flesh Eaters at the highest quality possible, some minor picture issues remain, in keeping with the condition of the original materials.

Both the original English and Italian mono soundtracks were restored, with audio issues such as bumps, clicks or dropouts removed or repaired. Audio sync to picture remains noticeably loose at times, in keeping with the nature of the film's production.

Lastly, working from the original 2-perf negative has allowed for access to the entire exposed image area of the film, so we have chosen to retain as much of the original frame are possible for this restoration.

Restoration supervisor: James White.
Audio mastering: Gary Sanders/Deluxe 142.
Dan Average is offline  
post #20 of 20 Old 11-28-2012, 11:05 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Matt_Stevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 13,818
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 48
The shame is that so many films did not receive such treatment, or they do and then it is all for nothing because some dunderhead decides to slather DNR and EE onto the master and bake them in.
Quote:
Zombie Flesh Eaters has been exclusively by Arrow [sic] for this release, with all work personally overseen by Restoration Supervisor James White at Deluxe Soho, London.

The film was sourced from the original Techniscope 2-perf 35mm negative made available by Variety Communications, Italy. The picture was scanned at 2K resolution and fully graded on a Nicoda Film Master at Deluxe Soho, London. Restoration work was completed in 1080psf HD resolution using a combination of software tools and techniques. Thousands of instances of dirt, scratches and debris were carefully removed frame by frame. Damaged or missing frames were repaired, and density and stability issues were significantly improved. Throughout the process, care was taken to ensure that the film's original details and grain structure remained unaffected by digital processing. Although every effort has been made to present Zombie Flesh Eaters at the highest quality possible, some minor picture issues remain, in keeping with the condition of the original materials.

Both the original English and Italian mono soundtracks were restored, with audio issues such as bumps, clicks or dropouts removed or repaired. Audio sync to picture remains noticeably loose at times, in keeping with the nature of the film's production.

Lastly, working from the original 2-perf negative has allowed for access to the entire exposed image area of the film, so we have chosen to retain as much of the original frame are possible for this restoration.

Vimeo is the home of the Super8 Shooter...
http://vimeo.com/super8shooter
Matt_Stevens is offline  
Reply Blu-ray Software

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off