Shane - Stunning - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 50 Old 08-15-2013, 10:50 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
Milt99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Of California
Posts: 5,106
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked: 69
Another stunning Technicolor restoration ala Niagara but slightly better, imo, but I'm not a nitpicker.
Highest recommendation. FWIW.

 

It ain't ignorance causes so much trouble; it's folks knowing so much that ain't so

Milt99 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 50 Old 08-15-2013, 11:08 AM
RUR
Innocent Bystander
 
RUR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: California Republic
Posts: 2,253
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Liked: 58

Yup, I watched it last night and it's very, very nice - stunning, in some scenes.  First time in Academy I do believe.

RUR is offline  
post #3 of 50 Old 08-16-2013, 09:13 AM
AVS Special Member
 
fookoo_2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,738
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Liked: 51
Sam Peckinpaw: The Greatest Story Of the West Ever Filmed.

The remastered version of Shane is simply dazzling and is a showcase by director George Stevens in the art of story telling. This movie is not for those who crave action or special effects of either the visual and/or audio types (such as Transformers). It is a must have for any cinema-phile who realizes that we are in the golden age of cinema and Shane is clearly one of its high points from 1953. And e-gads it is not wide screen, but in an aspect ratio of 1.37:1.
fookoo_2010 is offline  
post #4 of 50 Old 08-16-2013, 05:37 PM
AVS Special Member
 
wuther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,307
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Liked: 26
I could be wrong but it seems there are more Paramount catalog tiles coming out on BD since WB took over the distribution.
wuther is offline  
post #5 of 50 Old 08-16-2013, 06:37 PM
Advanced Member
 
inspector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Menifee, CA , USA
Posts: 941
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by fookoo_2010 View Post

Sam Peckinpaw: The Greatest Story Of the West Ever Filmed.

The remastered version of Shane is simply dazzling and is a showcase by director George Stevens in the art of story telling. This movie is not for those who crave action or special effects of either the visual and/or audio types (such as Transformers). It is a must have for any cinema-phile who realizes that we are in the golden age of cinema and Shane is clearly one of its high points from 1953. And e-gads it is not wide screen, but in an aspect ratio of 1.37:1.

If you go to HTF.com, you'll read why 1.37:1 is the correct aspect ratio!

...finally retired and spending time in my HT!!!

 

My equipment consists of:

 

Epson 9500 UB Projector; 110" JKP Affinity Screen; Panasonic BD30 Player, Toshiba HDA1 Player; Definitive Speakers (Center, Towers, Rear); Onkyo 608 A/V Receiver; Nevo Q50 Remote; TW HD Cable Box. 

inspector is offline  
post #6 of 50 Old 08-17-2013, 08:42 AM
AVS Special Member
 
wuther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,307
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Liked: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milt99 View Post

Another stunning Technicolor restoration ala Niagara but slightly better, imo, but I'm not a nitpicker.
Highest recommendation. FWIW.

Niagara is Fox however while Shane is Paramount.
wuther is offline  
post #7 of 50 Old 08-17-2013, 10:48 AM
AVS Special Member
 
JazzGuyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oro Valley AZ
Posts: 2,667
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by wuther View Post

Niagara is Fox however while Shane is Paramount.
And the release is actually the work of Warner. Warner is now doing Paramount's new releases just like Fox does MGM (post 1986) and UA movies.

JazzGuyy is offline  
post #8 of 50 Old 08-17-2013, 12:44 PM
AVS Special Member
 
wuther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,307
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Liked: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzGuyy View Post

And the release is actually the work of Warner. Warner is now doing Paramount's new releases just like Fox does MGM (post 1986) and UA movies.

Do you have some source that WB is doing the mastering for the Paramount titles? Fox does not necessarily do the mastering for MGM titles. Both are distribution arrangements rather then taking over everything.
wuther is offline  
post #9 of 50 Old 08-17-2013, 01:40 PM
AVS Special Member
 
JazzGuyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oro Valley AZ
Posts: 2,667
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked: 78
I seem to remember George Feltenstein saying something about this on a podcast or posting. I am pretty sure that WB has not only taken over distribution but also mastering for Paramount. I can't find the specific citing at the moment though.
wuther likes this.

JazzGuyy is offline  
post #10 of 50 Old 08-17-2013, 01:56 PM
AVS Special Member
 
JazzGuyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oro Valley AZ
Posts: 2,667
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked: 78
If Warner didn't do this disk mastering, it is probable that Technicolor did it via their contract with Paramount. Fiinding out who mastered a disk can be a difficult task.

JazzGuyy is offline  
post #11 of 50 Old 08-17-2013, 03:49 PM
AVS Special Member
 
wuther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,307
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Liked: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzGuyy View Post

I seem to remember George Feltenstein saying something about this on a podcast or posting. I am pretty sure that WB has not only taken over distribution but also mastering for Paramount. I can't find the specific citing at the moment though.

If that's true then who did the mastering on Betty Boob? There are claims Paramount did it rather then WB or Olive.
wuther is offline  
post #12 of 50 Old 08-17-2013, 04:23 PM
AVS Special Member
 
JazzGuyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oro Valley AZ
Posts: 2,667
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked: 78
I have no idea about Betty Boop. There is some information about contracts out on the net that indicates that mastering for Paramount as of 2009 and afterward was done by Technicolor but it is close to impossible (for me anyway) to find which disk used which mastering house. The reason I think Shane may have been done by Warner is that the original 1:37 aspect ratio is on this release and Warner has been better than most studios about getting aspect ratios right in classic material. Warner may not actually do mastering in-house either. The same info I saw re Paramount and Technicolor indicates that Technicolor has done mastering for Warner. There is the additional question as to where the original film elements used in the mastering came from. I would assume Paramount material comes from Paramount but these days who knows.

JazzGuyy is offline  
post #13 of 50 Old 08-17-2013, 05:01 PM
AVS Special Member
 
wuther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,307
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Liked: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzGuyy View Post

I have no idea about Betty Boop. There is some information about contracts out on the net that indicates that mastering for Paramount as of 2009 and afterward was done by Technicolor but it is close to impossible (for me anyway) to find which disk used which mastering house. The reason I think Shane may have been done by Warner is that the original 1:37 aspect ratio is on this release and Warner has been better than most studios about getting aspect ratios right in classic material. Warner may not actually do mastering in-house either. The same info I saw re Paramount and Technicolor indicates that Technicolor has done mastering for Warner. There is the additional question as to where the original film elements used in the mastering came from. I would assume Paramount material comes from Paramount but these days who knows.

Not sure what years you mean by classic but WB often puts out 1:85.1 OAR films as full screen instead unlike say Sony.
wuther is offline  
post #14 of 50 Old 08-18-2013, 07:04 AM
AVS Special Member
 
JazzGuyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oro Valley AZ
Posts: 2,667
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by wuther View Post

Not sure what years you mean by classic but WB often puts out 1:85.1 OAR films as full screen instead unlike say Sony.

Classic to me is anything prior to 1970 or so. What 1.85:1 OAR films has Warner put out as full screen recently? I don't really count anything from the early days of DVD since everyone was releasing full screen pan-and-scan versions of widescreen movies. The only thing I object to from Warner these days is that they have released some 1.85:1 films in the Warner Archive series as 1.78:1. My guess is that Warner Archive uses mostly (all?) masters prepared for the TCM cable channel and that it is someone in that organization who is controlling this. I don't really like the TCM operation because they continue to windowbox widescreen movies on TCM-HD for "compatibility" with the non-HD channel. But that is a whole other issue.

JazzGuyy is offline  
post #15 of 50 Old 08-18-2013, 07:55 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Shaded Dogfood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Terminus and the Lake of Light
Posts: 4,830
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked: 34
I don't really like the TCM operation because they continue to windowbox widescreen movies on TCM-HD for "compatibility" with the non-HD channel. But that is a whole other issue.

??

CW Hinkle
Shaded Dogfood is offline  
post #16 of 50 Old 08-18-2013, 08:38 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Josh Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Planet Boston, source of the spice, Melange.
Posts: 20,007
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 230 Post(s)
Liked: 334
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzGuyy View Post

The reason I think Shane may have been done by Warner is that the original 1:37 aspect ratio is on this release and Warner has been better than most studios about getting aspect ratios right in classic material.

The aspect ratio on this disc has nothing to do with the distribution by Warner or Paramount. The disc was originally announced to be a 1.66:1 transfer reframed shot-by-shot under the supervision of George Stevens, Jr. However, after uproar by fans, who pointed out to him the importance of preserving the 1.37:1 framing that his father actually composed the film for, Stevens relented and asked the studio to remaster it in Academy Ratio.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzGuyy View Post

What 1.85:1 OAR films has Warner put out as full screen recently?

Both Warner and Paramount open the mattes on all 1.85:1 movies to 1.78:1 as a matter of policy. Recent Warner Blu-rays like this include Flashdance, Action Jackson, National Lampoon's Vacation and Vegas Vacation, An Officer and a Gentleman, and The Great Gatsby (1974).

Josh Z
Writer/Editor, High-Def Digest (Blog updated daily!)
Curator, Laserdisc Forever

My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect those of my employers.

Josh Z is online now  
post #17 of 50 Old 08-18-2013, 03:46 PM
AVS Special Member
 
fookoo_2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,738
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Liked: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by inspector View Post

If you go to HTF.com, you'll read why 1.37:1 is the correct aspect ratio!

You misunderstood my comment. Today, it is expected, by most, to have a wide screen aspect ratio. It wasn't all that long ago that some buyers wanted to see stuff full screen, without any black bars.
fookoo_2010 is offline  
post #18 of 50 Old 08-19-2013, 05:54 AM
AVS Special Member
 
JazzGuyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oro Valley AZ
Posts: 2,667
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh Z View Post

The aspect ratio on this disc has nothing to do with the distribution by Warner or Paramount. The disc was originally announced to be a 1.66:1 transfer reframed shot-by-shot under the supervision of George Stevens, Jr. However, after uproar by fans, who pointed out to him the importance of preserving the 1.37:1 framing that his father actually composed the film for, Stevens relented and asked the studio to remaster it in Academy Ratio.
Both Warner and Paramount open the mattes on all 1.85:1 movies to 1.78:1 as a matter of policy. Recent Warner Blu-rays like this include Flashdance, Action Jackson, National Lampoon's Vacation and Vegas Vacation, An Officer and a Gentleman, and The Great Gatsby (1974).
By "full screen" I thought you meant 1.85:1 at 1.33:1 and not showing 1.85:1 material at 1:78. I object to that too and indicated that I didn't like that Warner was doing that.

JazzGuyy is offline  
post #19 of 50 Old 08-19-2013, 05:57 AM
AVS Special Member
 
JazzGuyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oro Valley AZ
Posts: 2,667
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by fookoo_2010 View Post

You misunderstood my comment. Today, it is expected, by most, to have a wide screen aspect ratio. It wasn't all that long ago that some buyers wanted to see stuff full screen, without any black bars.
I don't think you should have a widescreen aspect ratio if that isn't how the movie was intended to be seen. I watch lots of classic movies and I wouldn't want to see them cropped to be widescreen. Cropping is every bit as bad as pan and scan in my estimation.

JazzGuyy is offline  
post #20 of 50 Old 08-19-2013, 11:02 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Josh Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Planet Boston, source of the spice, Melange.
Posts: 20,007
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 230 Post(s)
Liked: 334
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzGuyy View Post

By "full screen" I thought you meant 1.85:1 at 1.33:1 and not showing 1.85:1 material at 1:78. I object to that too and indicated that I didn't like that Warner was doing that.

The difference between 1.85:1 and 1.78:1 is a few scan lines and doesn't affect the compositional intent of the photography. The difference is well within the expected tolerances for theatrical projection variances. No director has ever complained about his 1.85:1 movie being opened up to 1.78:1. There are much more important battles to fight.

Josh Z
Writer/Editor, High-Def Digest (Blog updated daily!)
Curator, Laserdisc Forever

My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect those of my employers.

Josh Z is online now  
post #21 of 50 Old 08-19-2013, 07:25 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Jedi2016's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,430
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzGuyy View Post

I don't think you should have a widescreen aspect ratio if that isn't how the movie was intended to be seen. I watch lots of classic movies and I wouldn't want to see them cropped to be widescreen. Cropping is every bit as bad as pan and scan in my estimation.
I think most people here would agree with you. The problem is the masses of stupid people for whom the presence of black bars (either vertical or horizontal) is simply beyond all comprehension. It's not just that they don't want them there, but they actually don't understand why they're there in the first place.

As annoying as it would be, I wouldn't really be against the idea of putting a "this film has been formatted" message in front of any movie that doesn't fill up a 16:9 display (although I also agree that 1.85 is pretty much unnoticeable). And not just "the black bars at the top and bottom are normal", because that only states that they're supposed to be there, but doesn't explain why.

"This film is presented in its original 1.33:1 aspect ratio, as originally filmed and projected. The black bars on the left and right are normal and preserve the filmmakers' original presentation." or something along those lines.

I absolutely applaud releases that stick to the original intent, even if it might piss off a bunch of ignorant &^*()&s.

Welcome to Rivendell, Mister Anderson.
Jedi2016 is offline  
post #22 of 50 Old 08-20-2013, 05:34 PM
Senior Member
 
Chazcdc54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Coatesville, PA (Suburban Philadelphia)
Posts: 217
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I will admit the picture looked great, though I for one feel the day for night sequences simply too dark.

Small side note: did anyone catch the same freaking error on the packaging that Warner's pulled back on the 2000 DVD edition? Check the back and you will see most of a full figure shot of Alan Ladd taken not from Shane but The Carpetbaggers from 1964. Will someone wake up that idiot in Marketing and Promotion! mad.gif
Chazcdc54 is offline  
post #23 of 50 Old 08-20-2013, 05:52 PM
AVS Special Member
 
fookoo_2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,738
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Liked: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chazcdc54 View Post

I will admit the picture looked great, though I for one feel the day for night sequences simply too dark.

Maybe you need a brighter display, like a plasma. It looks fine on my plasma, a Panasonic 65VT50.
fookoo_2010 is offline  
post #24 of 50 Old 08-24-2013, 01:22 PM
AVS Special Member
 
subavision212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,440
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by fookoo_2010 View Post

Maybe you need a brighter display, like a plasma. It looks fine on my plasma, a Panasonic 65VT50.
Yea, I agree this is a gorgeous transfer. I've never saw Shane look this great. Watched on ISF calibrated Panasonic 65PZ850U in my dedicated HT.

subavision212 is offline  
post #25 of 50 Old 08-29-2013, 08:40 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
Milt99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Of California
Posts: 5,106
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked: 69
Leave it to AVS to turn a thread about a classic movie and awesome transfer into a studio\aspect ratio re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-hash.

 

It ain't ignorance causes so much trouble; it's folks knowing so much that ain't so

Milt99 is offline  
post #26 of 50 Old 08-29-2013, 08:49 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Toknowshita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,191
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked: 42
Thanks Max Headroom. Plus I always thought HD DVD was a format for classic film fans. Why isn't this being released on HD DVD? wink.gif

Toknowshita is offline  
post #27 of 50 Old 08-29-2013, 04:26 PM
AVS Special Member
 
JazzGuyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oro Valley AZ
Posts: 2,667
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked: 78
HD DVD ceased to exist several years ago.

JazzGuyy is offline  
post #28 of 50 Old 08-29-2013, 09:02 PM
AVS Special Member
 
tenthplanet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North of Mexico, South of Oregon, Not as far east as Vegas
Posts: 1,326
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 53 Post(s)
Liked: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by RUR View Post

Yup, I watched it last night and it's very, very nice - stunning, in some scenes.  First time in Academy I do believe.
Surprise Netflix has this on Blu-ray, will have a look at it.

"Bring out yer dead!".."Wait I'm not dead yet!"..(Sound Austrian here) "WRONG !!" (You know what happens next..)
tenthplanet is online now  
post #29 of 50 Old 09-03-2013, 12:09 PM
Member
 
P Ross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 77
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Rented SHANE from Netflix. Good blu ray. Dated film.
P Ross is offline  
post #30 of 50 Old 09-03-2013, 07:40 PM
AVS Special Member
 
fookoo_2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,738
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Liked: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by P Ross View Post

Rented SHANE from Netflix. Good blu ray. Dated film.

What do you mean by dated film?
fookoo_2010 is offline  
Reply Blu-ray Software

Tags
Shane 1953 Blu Ray
Gear in this thread - Shane by PriceGrabber.com

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off